All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@oracle.com>
To: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
	x86@kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org,
	m.szyprowski@samsung.com, jgross@suse.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
	sstabellini@kernel.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
	konrad.wilk@oracle.com, mst@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com,
	joe.jin@oracle.com
Subject: [PATCH RFC v1 0/7] swiotlb: extra 64-bit buffer for dev->dma_io_tlb_mem
Date: Wed,  8 Jun 2022 17:55:46 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220609005553.30954-1-dongli.zhang@oracle.com> (raw)

Hello,

I used to send out a patchset on 64-bit buffer and people thought it was
the same as Restricted DMA. However, the 64-bit buffer is still not supported.

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210203233709.19819-1-dongli.zhang@oracle.com/

This RFC is to introduce the extra swiotlb buffer with SWIOTLB_ANY flag,
to support 64-bit swiotlb.

The core ideas are:

1. Create an extra io_tlb_mem with SWIOTLB_ANY flags.

2. The dev->dma_io_tlb_mem is set to either default or the extra io_tlb_mem,
   depending on dma mask.


Would you please help suggest for below questions in the RFC?

- Is it fine to create the extra io_tlb_mem?

- Which one is better: to create a separate variable for the extra
  io_tlb_mem, or make it an array of two io_tlb_mem?

- Should I set dev->dma_io_tlb_mem in each driver (e.g., virtio driver as
  in this patchset)based on the value of
  min_not_zero(*dev->dma_mask, dev->bus_dma_limit), or at higher level
  (e.g., post pci driver)?


This patchset is to demonstrate that the idea works. Since this is just a
RFC, I have only tested virtio-blk on qemu-7.0 by enforcing swiotlb. It is
not tested on AMD SEV environment.

qemu-system-x86_64 -cpu host -name debug-threads=on \
-smp 8 -m 16G -machine q35,accel=kvm -vnc :5 -hda boot.img \
-kernel mainline-linux/arch/x86_64/boot/bzImage \
-append "root=/dev/sda1 init=/sbin/init text console=ttyS0 loglevel=7 swiotlb=327680,3145728,force" \
-device virtio-blk-pci,id=vblk0,num-queues=8,drive=drive0,disable-legacy=on,iommu_platform=true \
-drive file=test.raw,if=none,id=drive0,cache=none \
-net nic -net user,hostfwd=tcp::5025-:22 -serial stdio


The kernel command line "swiotlb=327680,3145728,force" is to allocate 6GB for
the extra swiotlb.

[    2.826676] PCI-DMA: Using software bounce buffering for IO (SWIOTLB)
[    2.826693] software IO TLB: default mapped [mem 0x0000000037000000-0x000000005f000000] (640MB)
[    2.826697] software IO TLB: high mapped [mem 0x00000002edc80000-0x000000046dc80000] (6144MB)

The highmem swiotlb is being used by virtio-blk.

$ cat /sys/kernel/debug/swiotlb/swiotlb-hi/io_tlb_nslabs 
3145728
$ cat /sys/kernel/debug/swiotlb/swiotlb-hi/io_tlb_used 
8960


Dongli Zhang (7):
  swiotlb: introduce the highmem swiotlb buffer
  swiotlb: change the signature of remap function
  swiotlb-xen: support highmem for xen specific code
  swiotlb: to implement io_tlb_high_mem
  swiotlb: add interface to set dev->dma_io_tlb_mem
  virtio: use io_tlb_high_mem if it is active
  swiotlb: fix the slot_addr() overflow

arch/powerpc/kernel/dma-swiotlb.c      |   8 +-
arch/x86/include/asm/xen/swiotlb-xen.h |   2 +-
arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c              |   5 +-
drivers/virtio/virtio.c                |   8 ++
drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c              |  16 +++-
include/linux/swiotlb.h                |  14 ++-
kernel/dma/swiotlb.c                   | 136 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
7 files changed, 145 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)

Thank you very much for feedback and suggestion!

Dongli Zhang



WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@oracle.com>
To: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
	x86@kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: jgross@suse.com, sstabellini@kernel.org, mst@redhat.com,
	konrad.wilk@oracle.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au, jasowang@redhat.com,
	dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, joe.jin@oracle.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org,
	mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: [PATCH RFC v1 0/7] swiotlb: extra 64-bit buffer for dev->dma_io_tlb_mem
Date: Wed,  8 Jun 2022 17:55:46 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220609005553.30954-1-dongli.zhang@oracle.com> (raw)

Hello,

I used to send out a patchset on 64-bit buffer and people thought it was
the same as Restricted DMA. However, the 64-bit buffer is still not supported.

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210203233709.19819-1-dongli.zhang@oracle.com/

This RFC is to introduce the extra swiotlb buffer with SWIOTLB_ANY flag,
to support 64-bit swiotlb.

The core ideas are:

1. Create an extra io_tlb_mem with SWIOTLB_ANY flags.

2. The dev->dma_io_tlb_mem is set to either default or the extra io_tlb_mem,
   depending on dma mask.


Would you please help suggest for below questions in the RFC?

- Is it fine to create the extra io_tlb_mem?

- Which one is better: to create a separate variable for the extra
  io_tlb_mem, or make it an array of two io_tlb_mem?

- Should I set dev->dma_io_tlb_mem in each driver (e.g., virtio driver as
  in this patchset)based on the value of
  min_not_zero(*dev->dma_mask, dev->bus_dma_limit), or at higher level
  (e.g., post pci driver)?


This patchset is to demonstrate that the idea works. Since this is just a
RFC, I have only tested virtio-blk on qemu-7.0 by enforcing swiotlb. It is
not tested on AMD SEV environment.

qemu-system-x86_64 -cpu host -name debug-threads=on \
-smp 8 -m 16G -machine q35,accel=kvm -vnc :5 -hda boot.img \
-kernel mainline-linux/arch/x86_64/boot/bzImage \
-append "root=/dev/sda1 init=/sbin/init text console=ttyS0 loglevel=7 swiotlb=327680,3145728,force" \
-device virtio-blk-pci,id=vblk0,num-queues=8,drive=drive0,disable-legacy=on,iommu_platform=true \
-drive file=test.raw,if=none,id=drive0,cache=none \
-net nic -net user,hostfwd=tcp::5025-:22 -serial stdio


The kernel command line "swiotlb=327680,3145728,force" is to allocate 6GB for
the extra swiotlb.

[    2.826676] PCI-DMA: Using software bounce buffering for IO (SWIOTLB)
[    2.826693] software IO TLB: default mapped [mem 0x0000000037000000-0x000000005f000000] (640MB)
[    2.826697] software IO TLB: high mapped [mem 0x00000002edc80000-0x000000046dc80000] (6144MB)

The highmem swiotlb is being used by virtio-blk.

$ cat /sys/kernel/debug/swiotlb/swiotlb-hi/io_tlb_nslabs 
3145728
$ cat /sys/kernel/debug/swiotlb/swiotlb-hi/io_tlb_used 
8960


Dongli Zhang (7):
  swiotlb: introduce the highmem swiotlb buffer
  swiotlb: change the signature of remap function
  swiotlb-xen: support highmem for xen specific code
  swiotlb: to implement io_tlb_high_mem
  swiotlb: add interface to set dev->dma_io_tlb_mem
  virtio: use io_tlb_high_mem if it is active
  swiotlb: fix the slot_addr() overflow

arch/powerpc/kernel/dma-swiotlb.c      |   8 +-
arch/x86/include/asm/xen/swiotlb-xen.h |   2 +-
arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c              |   5 +-
drivers/virtio/virtio.c                |   8 ++
drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c              |  16 +++-
include/linux/swiotlb.h                |  14 ++-
kernel/dma/swiotlb.c                   | 136 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
7 files changed, 145 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)

Thank you very much for feedback and suggestion!

Dongli Zhang


_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@oracle.com>
To: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
	x86@kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: jgross@suse.com, sstabellini@kernel.org, mst@redhat.com,
	konrad.wilk@oracle.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
	dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, joe.jin@oracle.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org,
	mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, tglx@linutronix.de,
	m.szyprowski@samsung.com
Subject: [PATCH RFC v1 0/7] swiotlb: extra 64-bit buffer for dev->dma_io_tlb_mem
Date: Wed,  8 Jun 2022 17:55:46 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220609005553.30954-1-dongli.zhang@oracle.com> (raw)

Hello,

I used to send out a patchset on 64-bit buffer and people thought it was
the same as Restricted DMA. However, the 64-bit buffer is still not supported.

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210203233709.19819-1-dongli.zhang@oracle.com/

This RFC is to introduce the extra swiotlb buffer with SWIOTLB_ANY flag,
to support 64-bit swiotlb.

The core ideas are:

1. Create an extra io_tlb_mem with SWIOTLB_ANY flags.

2. The dev->dma_io_tlb_mem is set to either default or the extra io_tlb_mem,
   depending on dma mask.


Would you please help suggest for below questions in the RFC?

- Is it fine to create the extra io_tlb_mem?

- Which one is better: to create a separate variable for the extra
  io_tlb_mem, or make it an array of two io_tlb_mem?

- Should I set dev->dma_io_tlb_mem in each driver (e.g., virtio driver as
  in this patchset)based on the value of
  min_not_zero(*dev->dma_mask, dev->bus_dma_limit), or at higher level
  (e.g., post pci driver)?


This patchset is to demonstrate that the idea works. Since this is just a
RFC, I have only tested virtio-blk on qemu-7.0 by enforcing swiotlb. It is
not tested on AMD SEV environment.

qemu-system-x86_64 -cpu host -name debug-threads=on \
-smp 8 -m 16G -machine q35,accel=kvm -vnc :5 -hda boot.img \
-kernel mainline-linux/arch/x86_64/boot/bzImage \
-append "root=/dev/sda1 init=/sbin/init text console=ttyS0 loglevel=7 swiotlb=327680,3145728,force" \
-device virtio-blk-pci,id=vblk0,num-queues=8,drive=drive0,disable-legacy=on,iommu_platform=true \
-drive file=test.raw,if=none,id=drive0,cache=none \
-net nic -net user,hostfwd=tcp::5025-:22 -serial stdio


The kernel command line "swiotlb=327680,3145728,force" is to allocate 6GB for
the extra swiotlb.

[    2.826676] PCI-DMA: Using software bounce buffering for IO (SWIOTLB)
[    2.826693] software IO TLB: default mapped [mem 0x0000000037000000-0x000000005f000000] (640MB)
[    2.826697] software IO TLB: high mapped [mem 0x00000002edc80000-0x000000046dc80000] (6144MB)

The highmem swiotlb is being used by virtio-blk.

$ cat /sys/kernel/debug/swiotlb/swiotlb-hi/io_tlb_nslabs 
3145728
$ cat /sys/kernel/debug/swiotlb/swiotlb-hi/io_tlb_used 
8960


Dongli Zhang (7):
  swiotlb: introduce the highmem swiotlb buffer
  swiotlb: change the signature of remap function
  swiotlb-xen: support highmem for xen specific code
  swiotlb: to implement io_tlb_high_mem
  swiotlb: add interface to set dev->dma_io_tlb_mem
  virtio: use io_tlb_high_mem if it is active
  swiotlb: fix the slot_addr() overflow

arch/powerpc/kernel/dma-swiotlb.c      |   8 +-
arch/x86/include/asm/xen/swiotlb-xen.h |   2 +-
arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c              |   5 +-
drivers/virtio/virtio.c                |   8 ++
drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c              |  16 +++-
include/linux/swiotlb.h                |  14 ++-
kernel/dma/swiotlb.c                   | 136 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
7 files changed, 145 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)

Thank you very much for feedback and suggestion!

Dongli Zhang


_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@oracle.com>
To: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
	x86@kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: jgross@suse.com, sstabellini@kernel.org, mst@redhat.com,
	konrad.wilk@oracle.com, jasowang@redhat.com,
	dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, joe.jin@oracle.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org,
	mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, tglx@linutronix.de,
	m.szyprowski@samsung.com
Subject: [PATCH RFC v1 0/7] swiotlb: extra 64-bit buffer for dev->dma_io_tlb_mem
Date: Wed,  8 Jun 2022 17:55:46 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220609005553.30954-1-dongli.zhang@oracle.com> (raw)

Hello,

I used to send out a patchset on 64-bit buffer and people thought it was
the same as Restricted DMA. However, the 64-bit buffer is still not supported.

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210203233709.19819-1-dongli.zhang@oracle.com/

This RFC is to introduce the extra swiotlb buffer with SWIOTLB_ANY flag,
to support 64-bit swiotlb.

The core ideas are:

1. Create an extra io_tlb_mem with SWIOTLB_ANY flags.

2. The dev->dma_io_tlb_mem is set to either default or the extra io_tlb_mem,
   depending on dma mask.


Would you please help suggest for below questions in the RFC?

- Is it fine to create the extra io_tlb_mem?

- Which one is better: to create a separate variable for the extra
  io_tlb_mem, or make it an array of two io_tlb_mem?

- Should I set dev->dma_io_tlb_mem in each driver (e.g., virtio driver as
  in this patchset)based on the value of
  min_not_zero(*dev->dma_mask, dev->bus_dma_limit), or at higher level
  (e.g., post pci driver)?


This patchset is to demonstrate that the idea works. Since this is just a
RFC, I have only tested virtio-blk on qemu-7.0 by enforcing swiotlb. It is
not tested on AMD SEV environment.

qemu-system-x86_64 -cpu host -name debug-threads=on \
-smp 8 -m 16G -machine q35,accel=kvm -vnc :5 -hda boot.img \
-kernel mainline-linux/arch/x86_64/boot/bzImage \
-append "root=/dev/sda1 init=/sbin/init text console=ttyS0 loglevel=7 swiotlb=327680,3145728,force" \
-device virtio-blk-pci,id=vblk0,num-queues=8,drive=drive0,disable-legacy=on,iommu_platform=true \
-drive file=test.raw,if=none,id=drive0,cache=none \
-net nic -net user,hostfwd=tcp::5025-:22 -serial stdio


The kernel command line "swiotlb=327680,3145728,force" is to allocate 6GB for
the extra swiotlb.

[    2.826676] PCI-DMA: Using software bounce buffering for IO (SWIOTLB)
[    2.826693] software IO TLB: default mapped [mem 0x0000000037000000-0x000000005f000000] (640MB)
[    2.826697] software IO TLB: high mapped [mem 0x00000002edc80000-0x000000046dc80000] (6144MB)

The highmem swiotlb is being used by virtio-blk.

$ cat /sys/kernel/debug/swiotlb/swiotlb-hi/io_tlb_nslabs 
3145728
$ cat /sys/kernel/debug/swiotlb/swiotlb-hi/io_tlb_used 
8960


Dongli Zhang (7):
  swiotlb: introduce the highmem swiotlb buffer
  swiotlb: change the signature of remap function
  swiotlb-xen: support highmem for xen specific code
  swiotlb: to implement io_tlb_high_mem
  swiotlb: add interface to set dev->dma_io_tlb_mem
  virtio: use io_tlb_high_mem if it is active
  swiotlb: fix the slot_addr() overflow

arch/powerpc/kernel/dma-swiotlb.c      |   8 +-
arch/x86/include/asm/xen/swiotlb-xen.h |   2 +-
arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c              |   5 +-
drivers/virtio/virtio.c                |   8 ++
drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c              |  16 +++-
include/linux/swiotlb.h                |  14 ++-
kernel/dma/swiotlb.c                   | 136 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
7 files changed, 145 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)

Thank you very much for feedback and suggestion!

Dongli Zhang



             reply	other threads:[~2022-06-09  1:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-09  0:55 Dongli Zhang [this message]
2022-06-09  0:55 ` [PATCH RFC v1 0/7] swiotlb: extra 64-bit buffer for dev->dma_io_tlb_mem Dongli Zhang
2022-06-09  0:55 ` Dongli Zhang
2022-06-09  0:55 ` Dongli Zhang
2022-06-09  0:55 ` [PATCH RFC v1 1/7] swiotlb: introduce the highmem swiotlb buffer Dongli Zhang
2022-06-09  0:55   ` Dongli Zhang
2022-06-09  0:55   ` Dongli Zhang
2022-06-09  0:55   ` Dongli Zhang
2022-06-09  5:04   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-09  5:04     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-09  5:04     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-09  5:04     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-09  0:55 ` [PATCH RFC v1 2/7] swiotlb: change the signature of remap function Dongli Zhang
2022-06-09  0:55   ` Dongli Zhang
2022-06-09  0:55   ` Dongli Zhang
2022-06-09  0:55   ` Dongli Zhang
2022-06-09  0:55 ` [PATCH RFC v1 3/7] swiotlb-xen: support highmem for xen specific code Dongli Zhang
2022-06-09  0:55   ` Dongli Zhang
2022-06-09  0:55   ` Dongli Zhang
2022-06-09  0:55   ` Dongli Zhang
2022-06-09  5:08   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-09  5:08     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-09  5:08     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-09  5:08     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-09  0:55 ` [PATCH RFC v1 4/7] swiotlb: to implement io_tlb_high_mem Dongli Zhang
2022-06-09  0:55   ` Dongli Zhang
2022-06-09  0:55   ` Dongli Zhang
2022-06-09  0:55   ` Dongli Zhang
2022-06-09  5:05   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-09  5:05     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-09  5:05     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-09  5:05     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-10 21:56     ` Dongli Zhang
2022-06-10 21:56       ` Dongli Zhang
2022-06-10 21:56       ` Dongli Zhang
2022-06-10 21:56       ` Dongli Zhang
2022-06-13  6:04       ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-13  6:04         ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-13  6:04         ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-13  6:04         ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-09  0:55 ` [PATCH RFC v1 5/7] swiotlb: add interface to set dev->dma_io_tlb_mem Dongli Zhang
2022-06-09  0:55   ` Dongli Zhang
2022-06-09  0:55   ` Dongli Zhang
2022-06-09  0:55   ` Dongli Zhang
2022-06-09  5:06   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-09  5:06     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-09  5:06     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-09  5:06     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-09  0:55 ` [PATCH RFC v1 6/7] virtio: use io_tlb_high_mem if it is active Dongli Zhang
2022-06-09  0:55   ` Dongli Zhang
2022-06-09  0:55   ` Dongli Zhang
2022-06-09  0:55   ` Dongli Zhang
2022-06-09  5:07   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-09  5:07     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-09  5:07     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-09  5:07     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-09  0:55 ` [PATCH RFC v1 7/7] swiotlb: fix the slot_addr() overflow Dongli Zhang
2022-06-09  0:55   ` Dongli Zhang
2022-06-09  0:55   ` Dongli Zhang
2022-06-09  0:55   ` Dongli Zhang
2022-06-09  5:07   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-09  5:07     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-09  5:07     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-09  5:07     ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220609005553.30954-1-dongli.zhang@oracle.com \
    --to=dongli.zhang@oracle.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=joe.jin@oracle.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.