[PATCH] drm/i915/gvt: fix double-free bug in split_2MB_gtt_entry

* [PATCH] drm/i915/gvt: fix double-free bug in split_2MB_gtt_entry
@ 2022-09-18 19:24 ` Zheng Wang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 93+ messages in thread
From: Zheng Wang @ 2022-09-18 19:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gregkh
  Cc: alex000young, security, tvrtko.ursulin, airlied, intel-gfx,
	hackerzheng666, dri-devel, linux-kernel

 From afe79848cb74cc8e45ab426d13fa2394c87e0422 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: xmzyshypnc <1002992920@qq.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2022 23:48:23 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915/gvt: fix double-free bug in split_2MB_gtt_entry

There is a double-free security bug in split_2MB_gtt_entry.

Here is a calling chain :
ppgtt_populate_spt->ppgtt_populate_shadow_entry->split_2MB_gtt_entry.

If intel_gvt_dma_map_guest_page failed, it will call
ppgtt_invalidate_spt, which will finally call ppgtt_free_spt and
kfree(spt). But the caller does not notice that, and it will call
ppgtt_free_spt again in error path.

Fix this by only freeing spt in ppgtt_invalidate_spt in good case.

Signed-off-by: xmzyshypnc <1002992920@qq.com>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gtt.c | 16 +++++++++-------
  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gtt.c
index ce0eb03709c3..550519f0acca 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gtt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gtt.c
@@ -959,7 +959,7 @@ static inline int ppgtt_put_spt(struct 
intel_vgpu_ppgtt_spt *spt)
      return atomic_dec_return(&spt->refcount);
  }

-static int ppgtt_invalidate_spt(struct intel_vgpu_ppgtt_spt *spt);
+static int ppgtt_invalidate_spt(struct intel_vgpu_ppgtt_spt *spt, int 
is_error);

  static int ppgtt_invalidate_spt_by_shadow_entry(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu,
          struct intel_gvt_gtt_entry *e)
@@ -995,7 +995,7 @@ static int 
ppgtt_invalidate_spt_by_shadow_entry(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu,
                  ops->get_pfn(e));
          return -ENXIO;
      }
-    return ppgtt_invalidate_spt(s);
+    return ppgtt_invalidate_spt(s, 0);
  }

  static inline void ppgtt_invalidate_pte(struct intel_vgpu_ppgtt_spt *spt,
@@ -1016,7 +1016,7 @@ static inline void ppgtt_invalidate_pte(struct 
intel_vgpu_ppgtt_spt *spt,
      intel_gvt_dma_unmap_guest_page(vgpu, pfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
  }

-static int ppgtt_invalidate_spt(struct intel_vgpu_ppgtt_spt *spt)
+static int ppgtt_invalidate_spt(struct intel_vgpu_ppgtt_spt *spt, int 
is_error)
  {
      struct intel_vgpu *vgpu = spt->vgpu;
      struct intel_gvt_gtt_entry e;
@@ -1059,9 +1059,11 @@ static int ppgtt_invalidate_spt(struct 
intel_vgpu_ppgtt_spt *spt)
          }
      }

-    trace_spt_change(spt->vgpu->id, "release", spt,
+    if (!is_error) {
+        trace_spt_change(spt->vgpu->id, "release", spt,
               spt->guest_page.gfn, spt->shadow_page.type);
-    ppgtt_free_spt(spt);
+        ppgtt_free_spt(spt);
+    }
      return 0;
  fail:
      gvt_vgpu_err("fail: shadow page %p shadow entry 0x%llx type %d\n",
@@ -1215,7 +1217,7 @@ static int split_2MB_gtt_entry(struct intel_vgpu 
*vgpu,
          ret = intel_gvt_dma_map_guest_page(vgpu, start_gfn + sub_index,
                             PAGE_SIZE, &dma_addr);
          if (ret) {
-            ppgtt_invalidate_spt(spt);
+            ppgtt_invalidate_spt(spt, 1);
              return ret;
          }
          sub_se.val64 = se->val64;
@@ -1393,7 +1395,7 @@ static int ppgtt_handle_guest_entry_removal(struct 
intel_vgpu_ppgtt_spt *spt,
              ret = -ENXIO;
              goto fail;
          }
-        ret = ppgtt_invalidate_spt(s);
+        ret = ppgtt_invalidate_spt(s, 0);
          if (ret)
              goto fail;
      } else {
-- 
2.25.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 93+ messages in thread