All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yipeng Zou <zouyipeng@huawei.com>
To: <tglx@linutronix.de>, <maz@kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: <hewenliang4@huawei.com>, <zouyipeng@huawei.com>,
	<chris.zjh@huawei.com>, <liaochang1@huawei.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH] irqchip/gic-v3: wait irq done to set affinity
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2023 16:21:36 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230106082136.68501-1-zouyipeng@huawei.com> (raw)

Recently we have some problem about gic set affinity in our test.

This patch just aim to make some discuss about this problem.

For now, the implementation of gic set affinity going to take effects
immediately, and without check if any irq are being processed.

So, This leads to some problem, think about this scenario:

1. First, we have an irq was generated by an device.

2. In the processing of this irq(after handle event, before clear
IRQD_IRQ_INPROGRESS flag), we modify the route and the gic takes effect
immediately,at the same time the new one was generated again.

3. The new irq will be processing in other cpu which different form the
old one.

4. The new irq going to be discarded because of the flag IRQD_IRQ_INPROGRESS
has been set.

I notice that if we set IRQF_ONESHOT when register the irq, this problem
will gone.

But I'm also thinking about change the gic_set_affinity function, to wait
current irq done on all cpus before gic_write_irouter.
I'm not sure if that's appropriate.

Is the best workaround to use IRQF_ONESHOT to prevent reentrancy?

Please let me know, if have any other suggestions on this issue.

Signed-off-by: Yipeng Zou <zouyipeng@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
index 997104d4338e..e9b9f15f07f8 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
@@ -1348,6 +1348,8 @@ static int gic_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, const struct cpumask *mask_val,
 	reg = gic_dist_base(d) + offset + (index * 8);
 	val = gic_mpidr_to_affinity(cpu_logical_map(cpu));
 
+	// wait irq done on all cpus
+
 	gic_write_irouter(val, reg);
 
 	/*
-- 
2.17.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Yipeng Zou <zouyipeng@huawei.com>
To: <tglx@linutronix.de>, <maz@kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: <hewenliang4@huawei.com>, <zouyipeng@huawei.com>,
	<chris.zjh@huawei.com>, <liaochang1@huawei.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH] irqchip/gic-v3: wait irq done to set affinity
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2023 16:21:36 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230106082136.68501-1-zouyipeng@huawei.com> (raw)

Recently we have some problem about gic set affinity in our test.

This patch just aim to make some discuss about this problem.

For now, the implementation of gic set affinity going to take effects
immediately, and without check if any irq are being processed.

So, This leads to some problem, think about this scenario:

1. First, we have an irq was generated by an device.

2. In the processing of this irq(after handle event, before clear
IRQD_IRQ_INPROGRESS flag), we modify the route and the gic takes effect
immediately,at the same time the new one was generated again.

3. The new irq will be processing in other cpu which different form the
old one.

4. The new irq going to be discarded because of the flag IRQD_IRQ_INPROGRESS
has been set.

I notice that if we set IRQF_ONESHOT when register the irq, this problem
will gone.

But I'm also thinking about change the gic_set_affinity function, to wait
current irq done on all cpus before gic_write_irouter.
I'm not sure if that's appropriate.

Is the best workaround to use IRQF_ONESHOT to prevent reentrancy?

Please let me know, if have any other suggestions on this issue.

Signed-off-by: Yipeng Zou <zouyipeng@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
index 997104d4338e..e9b9f15f07f8 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
@@ -1348,6 +1348,8 @@ static int gic_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, const struct cpumask *mask_val,
 	reg = gic_dist_base(d) + offset + (index * 8);
 	val = gic_mpidr_to_affinity(cpu_logical_map(cpu));
 
+	// wait irq done on all cpus
+
 	gic_write_irouter(val, reg);
 
 	/*
-- 
2.17.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

             reply	other threads:[~2023-01-06  8:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-06  8:21 Yipeng Zou [this message]
2023-01-06  8:21 ` [RFC PATCH] irqchip/gic-v3: wait irq done to set affinity Yipeng Zou
2023-01-06 11:55 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-06 11:55   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-09 12:26   ` Yipeng Zou
2023-01-09 12:26     ` Yipeng Zou
2023-01-17  9:38     ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-01-17  9:38       ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230106082136.68501-1-zouyipeng@huawei.com \
    --to=zouyipeng@huawei.com \
    --cc=chris.zjh@huawei.com \
    --cc=hewenliang4@huawei.com \
    --cc=liaochang1@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.