Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Add "mclk" support for maxim,max9867

From: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@linux.dev>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Ladislav Michl <ladis@linux-mips.org>,
	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
	Benjamin Bara <benjamin.bara@skidata.com>,
	Benjamin Bara <bbara93@gmail.com>,
	alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Add "mclk" support for maxim,max9867
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 07:59:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230328055916.GA11037@g0hl1n.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <167810953075.75807.14829875612499629879.b4-ty@kernel.org>

Hi Mark, Hi Krzysztof,

sorry for coming back to you on this series, but I have a question on
the "workflow"...

On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 01:32:10PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Mar 2023 11:04:00 +0100, richard.leitner@linux.dev wrote:
> > This series adds support for the clocks properties in the
> > maxim,max9867 bindings. Furthermore the binding definitions are
> > converted from txt to yaml.
> > 
> > The clock property is needed to define the mclk for one of our
> > boards which uses the the i.MX8MP SAI MCLK as clock for the
> > maxim,max9867.
> > 
> > [...]
> 
> Applied to
> 
>    https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> [1/3] ASoC: dt-bindings: maxim,max9867: convert txt bindings to yaml
>       commit: 6668f70abeea30f4674b2fdbc4232d5c3611b272
> [2/3] ASoC: dt-bindings: maxim,max9867: add clocks property
>       commit: d63e55b3e8ec90da69107f32038f3059d7317cc5
> [3/3] ASoC: maxim,max9867: add "mclk" support
>       commit: 448b06ba107d925d59d02781acdd2e4ad12dda0b
> 
> All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
> tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
> the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
> problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
> 
> You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
> and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
> send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
> 
> If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
> should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
> patches will not be replaced.

As Krzysztof requested some changes on the clocks property dt-bindings
patch (#2) commit message... How should I handle this?

The changes requested on the patch content (dts example) should be sent
as incremental patch to the original series, I guess?

see https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/45d306d3-8efb-12ac-0a83-f01ca2982b0a@linaro.org/

> 
> Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
> to this mail.
> 
> Thanks,
> Mark
> 

Thanks & regards;rl