Re: [PATCH v4 21/21] dt-bindings: devfreq: event: convert Rockchip DFI binding to yaml

From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
	MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>,
	Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@wolfvision.net>,
	kernel@pengutronix.de, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 21/21] dt-bindings: devfreq: event: convert Rockchip DFI binding to yaml
Date: Tue, 9 May 2023 12:02:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230509100239.GG29365@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <326c57b3-90b3-8d92-be10-34d03463d8d2@kernel.org>

On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 11:40:26AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 09/05/2023 11:37, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > On Fri, May 05, 2023 at 06:31:35PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> On 05/05/2023 18:29, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >>> On 05/05/2023 13:38, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> >>>> Convert the Rockchip DFI binding to yaml. While at it add the newly
> >>>> supported rk3568-dfi to the binding.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
> >>>
> >>> Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary people
> >>> and lists to CC.  It might happen, that command when run on an older
> >>> kernel, gives you outdated entries.  Therefore please be sure you base
> >>> your patches on recent Linux kernel.
> >>>
> >>> You missed at least DT list (maybe more), so this won't be tested.
> >>> Please resend and include all necessary entries.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Actually you already got such comments and nothing improved here. You
> >> just resend same patch with same bugs.
> >>
> >> This is a waste of our time. Ignoring output of maintainers means there
> >> is no testing and the patch does not appear in the inboxes.
> >>
> >> I don't understand why you insist on ignoring that output.
> > 
> > I skipped the device tree list because there was no change in the dts or
> > binding part compared to the previous version.
> 
> Please always CC DT list and all maintainers. Just because something did
> not change here, does not mean that nothing changed elsewhere, e.g. in
> dependant schemas.

Ok.

> 
> What's more, the binding should have changed because I asked to fix
> several things.

You commented on v1 of this series and the things you mentioned were
fixed in v2 and v3. It's v4 where I lost them.

Sascha

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip