All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
To: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, palmer@dabbelt.com,
	paul.walmsley@sifive.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	christoph.muellner@vrull.eu, David.Laight@aculab.com,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@vrull.eu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] riscv: don't include kernel.h into alternative.h
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 16:01:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230524-1ae0ba16b93b71a150320a6d@orel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230521114715.955823-2-heiko.stuebner@vrull.eu>

On Sun, May 21, 2023 at 01:47:14PM +0200, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@vrull.eu>
> 
> This include is not currently needed for alternatives and creates
> possible issues when we want to add alternatives to deeper kernel
> infrastructure.
> 
> The issue in question came from trying to introduce Zawrs alternatives,
> which resulted in a somewhat circular dependency like:
> 
> In file included from ../include/linux/bitops.h:34,
>                  from ../include/linux/kernel.h:22,
>                  from ../arch/riscv/include/asm/alternative.h:16,
>                  from ../arch/riscv/include/asm/errata_list.h:8,
>                  from ../arch/riscv/include/asm/barrier.h:15,
>                  from ../include/linux/list.h:11,
>                  from ../include/linux/preempt.h:11,
>                  from ../include/linux/spinlock.h:56,
>                  from ../include/linux/mmzone.h:8,
>                  from ../include/linux/gfp.h:7,
>                  from ../include/linux/mm.h:7,
>                  from ../arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c:10:
> ../include/asm-generic/bitops/generic-non-atomic.h: In function ‘generic_test_bit_acquire’:
> ../include/asm-generic/bitops/generic-non-atomic.h:140:23: error: implicit declaration of function ‘smp_load_acquire’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   140 |         return 1UL & (smp_load_acquire(p) >> (nr & (BITS_PER_LONG-1)));
>       |                       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@vrull.eu>
> ---
>  arch/riscv/include/asm/alternative.h | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/alternative.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/alternative.h
> index 6a41537826a7..05885de6048c 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/alternative.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/alternative.h
> @@ -13,7 +13,6 @@
>  #ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ALTERNATIVE
>  
>  #include <linux/init.h>
> -#include <linux/kernel.h>
>  #include <linux/types.h>
>  #include <linux/stddef.h>
>  #include <asm/hwcap.h>
> -- 
> 2.39.0
>

Removing this include doesn't break compilation because the only callers
of PATCH_ID_CPUFEATURE_ID() and PATCH_ID_CPUFEATURE_VALUE(), which are
defined with lower/upper_16_bits(), are in arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c,
which includes at least one thing which eventually includes linux/kernel.h
(the first path I found was linux/module.h -> linux/moduleparam.h ->
linux/kernel.h). Ideally we wouldn't rely on that luck. We can open
code the PATCH_ID_* macros to drop the lower/upper_16_bits() dependencies
or move the macros elsewhere, maybe, for now, just to
arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c

Thanks,
drew

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
To: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, palmer@dabbelt.com,
	 paul.walmsley@sifive.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	christoph.muellner@vrull.eu,  David.Laight@aculab.com,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@vrull.eu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] riscv: don't include kernel.h into alternative.h
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 16:01:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230524-1ae0ba16b93b71a150320a6d@orel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230521114715.955823-2-heiko.stuebner@vrull.eu>

On Sun, May 21, 2023 at 01:47:14PM +0200, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@vrull.eu>
> 
> This include is not currently needed for alternatives and creates
> possible issues when we want to add alternatives to deeper kernel
> infrastructure.
> 
> The issue in question came from trying to introduce Zawrs alternatives,
> which resulted in a somewhat circular dependency like:
> 
> In file included from ../include/linux/bitops.h:34,
>                  from ../include/linux/kernel.h:22,
>                  from ../arch/riscv/include/asm/alternative.h:16,
>                  from ../arch/riscv/include/asm/errata_list.h:8,
>                  from ../arch/riscv/include/asm/barrier.h:15,
>                  from ../include/linux/list.h:11,
>                  from ../include/linux/preempt.h:11,
>                  from ../include/linux/spinlock.h:56,
>                  from ../include/linux/mmzone.h:8,
>                  from ../include/linux/gfp.h:7,
>                  from ../include/linux/mm.h:7,
>                  from ../arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c:10:
> ../include/asm-generic/bitops/generic-non-atomic.h: In function ‘generic_test_bit_acquire’:
> ../include/asm-generic/bitops/generic-non-atomic.h:140:23: error: implicit declaration of function ‘smp_load_acquire’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   140 |         return 1UL & (smp_load_acquire(p) >> (nr & (BITS_PER_LONG-1)));
>       |                       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@vrull.eu>
> ---
>  arch/riscv/include/asm/alternative.h | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/alternative.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/alternative.h
> index 6a41537826a7..05885de6048c 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/alternative.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/alternative.h
> @@ -13,7 +13,6 @@
>  #ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ALTERNATIVE
>  
>  #include <linux/init.h>
> -#include <linux/kernel.h>
>  #include <linux/types.h>
>  #include <linux/stddef.h>
>  #include <asm/hwcap.h>
> -- 
> 2.39.0
>

Removing this include doesn't break compilation because the only callers
of PATCH_ID_CPUFEATURE_ID() and PATCH_ID_CPUFEATURE_VALUE(), which are
defined with lower/upper_16_bits(), are in arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c,
which includes at least one thing which eventually includes linux/kernel.h
(the first path I found was linux/module.h -> linux/moduleparam.h ->
linux/kernel.h). Ideally we wouldn't rely on that luck. We can open
code the PATCH_ID_* macros to drop the lower/upper_16_bits() dependencies
or move the macros elsewhere, maybe, for now, just to
arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c

Thanks,
drew

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-24 14:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-21 11:47 [PATCH v3 0/2] Add Zawrs support and use it for spinlocks Heiko Stuebner
2023-05-21 11:47 ` Heiko Stuebner
2023-05-21 11:47 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] riscv: don't include kernel.h into alternative.h Heiko Stuebner
2023-05-21 11:47   ` Heiko Stuebner
2023-05-24 14:01   ` Andrew Jones [this message]
2023-05-24 14:01     ` Andrew Jones
2023-05-21 11:47 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] riscv: Add Zawrs support for spinlocks Heiko Stuebner
2023-05-21 11:47   ` Heiko Stuebner
2023-05-22 17:43   ` Conor Dooley
2023-05-22 17:43     ` Conor Dooley
2023-05-24 17:05   ` Andrew Jones
2023-05-24 17:05     ` Andrew Jones
2023-05-24 23:00     ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-05-24 23:00       ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-05-30 18:45       ` Andrea Parri
2023-05-30 18:45         ` Andrea Parri
2023-10-19 14:21 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] Add Zawrs support and use it " Andrea Parri
2023-10-19 14:21   ` Andrea Parri
2023-10-19 16:22   ` Christoph Müllner
2023-10-19 16:22     ` Christoph Müllner
2023-10-20 10:19     ` Andrea Parri
2023-10-20 10:19       ` Andrea Parri
2024-01-08 11:35       ` Andrew Jones
2024-01-08 11:35         ` Andrew Jones
2024-01-08 13:38         ` Andrea Parri
2024-01-08 13:38           ` Andrea Parri
2024-01-08 14:00         ` Christoph Müllner
2024-01-08 14:00           ` Christoph Müllner
2024-01-08 14:10           ` Andrew Jones
2024-01-08 14:10             ` Andrew Jones
2024-03-05 23:31             ` Charlie Jenkins
2024-03-05 23:31               ` Charlie Jenkins

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230524-1ae0ba16b93b71a150320a6d@orel \
    --to=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
    --cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
    --cc=christoph.muellner@vrull.eu \
    --cc=heiko.stuebner@vrull.eu \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.