Re: Re: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Add Zawrs support and use it for spinlocks

[Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>]

On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 03:00:29PM +0100, Christoph Müllner wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 12:35 PM Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 12:19:38PM +0200, Andrea Parri wrote:
> > > (Removing Heiko's @vrull address from Cc:, since it seemed to bounce, keeping
> > >  his @sntech address.)
> > >
> > > > I had a quick look at your changes, and they look good to me.
> > >
> > > Great.  Thank you for looking them over.
> > >
> > > > Did you agree with Palmer about testing requirements?
> > > > I.e., do we need to run this on hardware that implements Zawrs in a
> > > > non-trivial way?
> > >
> > > I didn't quite discuss such specific requirements or hardware implementations,
> > > but I agree that's a valid concern.  Not that I currently have access to such
> > > hardware; any further inputs/data will be appreciated.
> > >
> > > > I can try to raise the priority on this here, but can't promise anything.
> > > > For me it is also ok if you take over this patchset.
> > >
> > > Thanks.  Either way works for me.  No urgency from my side.  I'd say - let us
> > > leave this up to the community/other reviewers.  (IIUC, Palmer was recovering
> > > from a certain flu and might need more time than usual to get back here.)
> > >
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I'm also interested in seeing this series resurrected and making progress
> > again. I'd be happy to help out in any way. It's not clear to me if it has
> > a current owner. If not, then I could start shepherding the patches with
> > their authorships intact.
> 
> Sounds good to me!
> Thanks for working on this!

Thanks for the quick replies! I'll try pull something together in the very
near future.

drew

> 
> >
> > I may be able to do some testing on an FPGA too.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > drew