All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhangjin Wu <falcon@tinylab.org>
To: arnd@arndb.de
Cc: falcon@tinylab.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	palmer@dabbelt.com, paul.walmsley@sifive.com, thomas@t-8ch.de,
	w@1wt.eu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] tools/nolibc: riscv: Add full rv32 support
Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 19:00:01 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230526110001.150368-1-falcon@tinylab.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bf3e07c1-75f5-425b-9124-f3f2b230e63a@app.fastmail.com>

Hi, Arnd

> On Wed, May 24, 2023, at 19:59, Zhangjin Wu wrote:
> > diff --git a/tools/include/nolibc/sys.h b/tools/include/nolibc/sys.h
> > index c0335a84f880..00c7197dcd50 100644
> > --- a/tools/include/nolibc/sys.h
> > +++ b/tools/include/nolibc/sys.h
> > @@ -1041,8 +1041,13 @@ int sys_select(int nfds, fd_set *rfds, fd_set 
> > *wfds, fd_set *efds, struct timeva
> >  		struct timeval *t;
> >  	} arg = { .n = nfds, .r = rfds, .w = wfds, .e = efds, .t = timeout };
> >  	return my_syscall1(__NR_select, &arg);
> > -#elif defined(__ARCH_WANT_SYS_PSELECT6) && defined(__NR_pselect6)
> > +#elif defined(__ARCH_WANT_SYS_PSELECT6) && (defined(__NR_pselect6) || 
> > defined(__NR_pselect6_time64))
> > +#ifdef __NR_pselect6
> >  	struct timespec t;
> > +#else
> > +	struct timespec64 t;
> > +#define __NR_pselect6 __NR_pselect6_time64
> > +#endif
> 
> Overriding the __NR_pselect6 constant seems wrong here, this can
> easily lead to more bugs, as pselect6 and pselect6_time64 are
> not compatible because of the different arguments, so anything
> using the constant after including sys.h will be broken.
>

Yes, thanks, Thomas also pointed out this issue in another reply of this
message thread, it has been fixed locally with his suggestion, it looks
like this:

    #ifdef __NR_pselect6
    	struct timespec t;
    	const long nr_pselect = __NR_pselect6;
    #else
    	struct timespec64 t;
    	const long nr_pselect = __NR_pselect6_time64;
    #endif
    
    	if (timeout) {
    		t.tv_sec  = timeout->tv_sec;
    		t.tv_nsec = timeout->tv_usec * 1000;
    	}
    	return my_syscall6(nr_pselect, nfds, rfds, wfds, efds, timeout ? &t : NULL, NULL);

I have applied this method for ppoll_time64 and clock_gettime64 too,
this method can save several duplicated lines for us, I have prepared v2
patches locally for them. 

> I would just use __kernel_timespec64 unconditionally and then
> use __NR_pselect6_time64 on all 32-bit architectures here,
> but use __NR_pselect6 on 32-bit architectures.
>

The 2nd 32-bit you mean is 64-bit?

This is related to the timespec64/time64_t definitions as you commented
in another reply. I will learn how to use the one from
<linux/time_types.h>, it may require to clean up the existing files in
tools/include/nolibc/ at first.

> I think we can also kill off the oldselect and newselect 
> cases, using pselect6/pselect6_time64 unconditionally here,
> and no longer care about building against pre-5.1 kernel
> headers, at least for the copy of nolibc that ships with the
> kernel.

As Willy commented in another reply, users may want to copy the recent
one and use them with an old kernel, even if want to drop them, a
standalone patch may be preferable.

Thanks very much,
Zhangjin

> 
>      Arnd

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Zhangjin Wu <falcon@tinylab.org>
To: arnd@arndb.de
Cc: falcon@tinylab.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	palmer@dabbelt.com, paul.walmsley@sifive.com, thomas@t-8ch.de,
	w@1wt.eu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] tools/nolibc: riscv: Add full rv32 support
Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 19:00:01 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230526110001.150368-1-falcon@tinylab.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bf3e07c1-75f5-425b-9124-f3f2b230e63a@app.fastmail.com>

Hi, Arnd

> On Wed, May 24, 2023, at 19:59, Zhangjin Wu wrote:
> > diff --git a/tools/include/nolibc/sys.h b/tools/include/nolibc/sys.h
> > index c0335a84f880..00c7197dcd50 100644
> > --- a/tools/include/nolibc/sys.h
> > +++ b/tools/include/nolibc/sys.h
> > @@ -1041,8 +1041,13 @@ int sys_select(int nfds, fd_set *rfds, fd_set 
> > *wfds, fd_set *efds, struct timeva
> >  		struct timeval *t;
> >  	} arg = { .n = nfds, .r = rfds, .w = wfds, .e = efds, .t = timeout };
> >  	return my_syscall1(__NR_select, &arg);
> > -#elif defined(__ARCH_WANT_SYS_PSELECT6) && defined(__NR_pselect6)
> > +#elif defined(__ARCH_WANT_SYS_PSELECT6) && (defined(__NR_pselect6) || 
> > defined(__NR_pselect6_time64))
> > +#ifdef __NR_pselect6
> >  	struct timespec t;
> > +#else
> > +	struct timespec64 t;
> > +#define __NR_pselect6 __NR_pselect6_time64
> > +#endif
> 
> Overriding the __NR_pselect6 constant seems wrong here, this can
> easily lead to more bugs, as pselect6 and pselect6_time64 are
> not compatible because of the different arguments, so anything
> using the constant after including sys.h will be broken.
>

Yes, thanks, Thomas also pointed out this issue in another reply of this
message thread, it has been fixed locally with his suggestion, it looks
like this:

    #ifdef __NR_pselect6
    	struct timespec t;
    	const long nr_pselect = __NR_pselect6;
    #else
    	struct timespec64 t;
    	const long nr_pselect = __NR_pselect6_time64;
    #endif
    
    	if (timeout) {
    		t.tv_sec  = timeout->tv_sec;
    		t.tv_nsec = timeout->tv_usec * 1000;
    	}
    	return my_syscall6(nr_pselect, nfds, rfds, wfds, efds, timeout ? &t : NULL, NULL);

I have applied this method for ppoll_time64 and clock_gettime64 too,
this method can save several duplicated lines for us, I have prepared v2
patches locally for them. 

> I would just use __kernel_timespec64 unconditionally and then
> use __NR_pselect6_time64 on all 32-bit architectures here,
> but use __NR_pselect6 on 32-bit architectures.
>

The 2nd 32-bit you mean is 64-bit?

This is related to the timespec64/time64_t definitions as you commented
in another reply. I will learn how to use the one from
<linux/time_types.h>, it may require to clean up the existing files in
tools/include/nolibc/ at first.

> I think we can also kill off the oldselect and newselect 
> cases, using pselect6/pselect6_time64 unconditionally here,
> and no longer care about building against pre-5.1 kernel
> headers, at least for the copy of nolibc that ships with the
> kernel.

As Willy commented in another reply, users may want to copy the recent
one and use them with an old kernel, even if want to drop them, a
standalone patch may be preferable.

Thanks very much,
Zhangjin

> 
>      Arnd

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-26 11:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 119+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-24 17:33 [PATCH 00/13] tools/nolibc: riscv: Add full rv32 support Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-24 17:33 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-24 17:41 ` [PATCH 01/13] Revert "tools/nolibc: riscv: Support __NR_llseek for rv32" Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-24 17:41   ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-24 17:44 ` [PATCH 02/13] Revert "selftests/nolibc: Fix up compile error " Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-24 17:44   ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-24 17:46 ` [PATCH 03/13] selftests/nolibc: print name instead of number for EOVERFLOW Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-24 18:28   ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-24 17:46   ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-24 20:23   ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-05-24 20:23     ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-05-24 17:48 ` [PATCH 04/13] selftests/nolibc: syscall_args: use __NR_statx for rv32 Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-24 17:48   ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-24 19:49   ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-05-24 19:49     ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-05-25  7:20     ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-25  7:20       ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-26  9:21   ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-05-26  9:21     ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-05-26 10:06     ` Willy Tarreau
2023-05-26 10:06       ` Willy Tarreau
2023-05-27  0:58     ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-27  0:58       ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-24 17:50 ` [PATCH 05/13] selftests/nolibc: riscv: customize makefile " Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-24 17:50   ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-26  6:57   ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-05-26  6:57     ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-05-26  9:20     ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-26  9:20       ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-24 17:52 ` [PATCH 06/13] selftests/nolibc: allow specify a bios for qemu Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-24 17:52   ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-26  7:00   ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-05-26  7:00     ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-05-26 10:25     ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-26 10:25       ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-26 10:36       ` Conor Dooley
2023-05-26 10:36         ` Conor Dooley
2023-05-26 13:38         ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-26 13:38           ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-26 15:08           ` Conor Dooley
2023-05-26 15:08             ` Conor Dooley
2023-05-28  7:52     ` Willy Tarreau
2023-05-28  7:52       ` Willy Tarreau
2023-05-24 17:54 ` [PATCH 07/13] selftests/nolibc: remove the duplicated gettimeofday_bad2 Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-24 17:54   ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-24 17:55 ` [PATCH 08/13] tools/nolibc: sys_lseek: riscv: use __NR_llseek for rv32 Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-24 17:55   ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-24 17:57 ` [PATCH 09/13] tools/nolibc: sys_poll: riscv: use __NR_ppoll_time64 " Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-24 17:57   ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-26  7:15   ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-05-26  7:15     ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-05-26  9:34     ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-05-26  9:34       ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-05-28  8:25       ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-28  8:25         ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-28  8:48         ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-05-28  8:48           ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-05-28 10:29         ` Willy Tarreau
2023-05-28 10:29           ` Willy Tarreau
2023-05-28 10:55           ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-05-28 10:55             ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-05-28 11:03             ` Willy Tarreau
2023-05-28 11:03               ` Willy Tarreau
2023-05-24 17:58 ` [PATCH 10/13] tools/nolibc: ppoll/ppoll_time64: add a missing argument Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-24 17:58   ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-24 17:59 ` [PATCH 11/13] tools/nolibc: sys_select: riscv: use __NR_pselect6_time64 for rv32 Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-24 17:59   ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-24 20:22   ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-05-24 20:22     ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-05-25  7:10     ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-25  7:10       ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-25  7:22       ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-05-25  7:22         ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-05-26  1:50         ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-26  1:50           ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-26  9:19   ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-05-26  9:19     ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-05-26 11:00     ` Zhangjin Wu [this message]
2023-05-26 11:00       ` [PATCH 00/13] tools/nolibc: riscv: Add full rv32 support Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-26 11:13       ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-05-26 11:13         ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-05-24 18:02 ` [PATCH 12/13] tools/nolibc: sys_wait4: riscv: use __NR_waitid for rv32 Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-24 18:02   ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-24 18:03 ` [PATCH 13/13] tools/nolibc: sys_gettimeofday: riscv: use __NR_clock_gettime64 " Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-24 18:03   ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-26  7:38   ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-05-26  7:38     ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-05-27  1:26     ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-27  1:26       ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-27  3:39       ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-27  3:39         ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-27  5:12       ` Willy Tarreau
2023-05-27  5:12         ` Willy Tarreau
2023-05-24 18:24 ` [PATCH 00/13] tools/nolibc: riscv: Add full rv32 support Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-24 18:24   ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-28  7:59 ` Willy Tarreau
2023-05-28  7:59   ` Willy Tarreau
2023-05-28  8:42   ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-05-28  8:42     ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-05-28  9:41     ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-05-28  9:41       ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-05-28 10:17       ` Willy Tarreau
2023-05-28 10:17         ` Willy Tarreau
2023-05-28 10:39   ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-28 10:39     ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-28 11:33     ` Willy Tarreau
2023-05-28 11:33       ` Willy Tarreau
2023-05-28 12:52       ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-28 12:52         ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-28 13:45     ` Thomas Weißschuh 
2023-05-28 13:45       ` Thomas Weißschuh 
2023-05-28 18:39       ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-28 18:39         ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-29  8:45         ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-05-29  8:45           ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-05-29 11:31           ` Willy Tarreau
2023-05-29 11:31             ` Willy Tarreau
2023-05-30 10:06             ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-30 10:06               ` Zhangjin Wu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230526110001.150368-1-falcon@tinylab.org \
    --to=falcon@tinylab.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=thomas@t-8ch.de \
    --cc=w@1wt.eu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.