From: Zhangjin Wu <falcon@tinylab.org> To: w@1wt.eu Cc: falcon@tinylab.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, thomas@t-8ch.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] tools/nolibc: riscv: Add full rv32 support Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 18:06:29 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20230530100629.383892-1-falcon@tinylab.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20230529113143.GB2762@1wt.eu> [-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --] [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8, Size: 3131 bytes --] Hi, Thomas, Willy > Hi Thomas, > > On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 10:45:40AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > > <lots of implementation> > > > > > usage: > > > > > > $ gcc -o nolibc-test tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c > > > $ ./nolibc-test > > > ... > > > 35 gettimeofday_tz = 0 [OK] > > > 36 gettimeofday_tv_tz = 0 [OK] > > > 37 gettimeofday_bad1 = -1 [FAIL] (continued by sigaction/siglongjmp/sigsetjmp) > > > 38 gettimeofday_bad2 = -1 [FAIL] (continued by sigaction/siglongjmp/sigsetjmp) > > > 39 getpagesize = 0 [OK] > > > 40 ioctl_tiocinq = 0 [OK] > > > 41 ioctl_tiocinq = 0 [OK] > > > ... > > > > > > It did work as expected, but for nolibc, we still need to add sigaction/siglongjump/sigsetjmp support. > > > > > > Will send a patch based on Willy's latest branch, perhaps this may help us to > > > verify the future sigaction/siglongjump/sigsetjmp for nolibc. > > > > > > ref: https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/i/7.1?topic=ssw_ibm_i_71/apis/sigsetj.html > > > https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.1.0?topic=functions-siglongjmp-restore-stack-environment-signal-mask > > > > This seems very complicated for fairly limited gain to be honest. > > I agree as well. I'm not denying the fact that one day we may want to > support signal, longjmp and friends but I'm not convinced we want to > go through that just to make a few uncertain tests succeed. > I agree too, I'm just interested in whether it is able to restore the whole test after a user-space invalid memory access ;-) > > If we really want to keep the current testcase we could also ensure that > > the pointer does not fall into the first page, as the first page is not > > mapped under Linux: > > > > 0 <= addr < PAGE_SIZE > > > > Or instead of PAGE_SIZE just hardcode 4096, as that should be the > > minimum size and and does not require a lookup. > > I would not even do that. It brings nothing to the application layer and > inflates the code. I'd rather just get rid of the EFAULT test cases that > rely on an unreliable syscall (i.e. one that may either be a real syscall > or an emulated one). The value brought by these tests is extremely low > and they were implemented only because they were easy to do. If they're > causing pain, let's just drop them. Thanks, one of the sent v2 patches has dropped both of them. yesterday, based on the demo code pasted in this email thread, I went further to implement a cleaner user-space 'efault' handler, with this handler, it is able to continue next test, and without this handler, just skip the test, so, it can be used to add future test cases for sigaction/sigsetjmp/siglongjmp. besides, a multiple 'run' support is added too, will share the new code as a new standalone patchset later but I'm not expecting it is mergeable. Thanks, Zhangjin > > Willy
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Zhangjin Wu <falcon@tinylab.org> To: w@1wt.eu Cc: falcon@tinylab.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, thomas@t-8ch.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] tools/nolibc: riscv: Add full rv32 support Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 18:06:29 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20230530100629.383892-1-falcon@tinylab.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20230529113143.GB2762@1wt.eu> [-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --] [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8, Size: 3132 bytes --] Hi, Thomas, Willy > Hi Thomas, > > On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 10:45:40AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > > <lots of implementation> > > > > > usage: > > > > > > $ gcc -o nolibc-test tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c > > > $ ./nolibc-test > > > ... > > > 35 gettimeofday_tz = 0 [OK] > > > 36 gettimeofday_tv_tz = 0 [OK] > > > 37 gettimeofday_bad1 = -1 [FAIL] (continued by sigaction/siglongjmp/sigsetjmp) > > > 38 gettimeofday_bad2 = -1 [FAIL] (continued by sigaction/siglongjmp/sigsetjmp) > > > 39 getpagesize = 0 [OK] > > > 40 ioctl_tiocinq = 0 [OK] > > > 41 ioctl_tiocinq = 0 [OK] > > > ... > > > > > > It did work as expected, but for nolibc, we still need to add sigaction/siglongjump/sigsetjmp support. > > > > > > Will send a patch based on Willy's latest branch, perhaps this may help us to > > > verify the future sigaction/siglongjump/sigsetjmp for nolibc. > > > > > > ref: https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/i/7.1?topic=ssw_ibm_i_71/apis/sigsetj.html > > > https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.1.0?topic=functions-siglongjmp-restore-stack-environment-signal-mask > > > > This seems very complicated for fairly limited gain to be honest. > > I agree as well. I'm not denying the fact that one day we may want to > support signal, longjmp and friends but I'm not convinced we want to > go through that just to make a few uncertain tests succeed. > I agree too, I'm just interested in whether it is able to restore the whole test after a user-space invalid memory access ;-) > > If we really want to keep the current testcase we could also ensure that > > the pointer does not fall into the first page, as the first page is not > > mapped under Linux: > > > > 0 <= addr < PAGE_SIZE > > > > Or instead of PAGE_SIZE just hardcode 4096, as that should be the > > minimum size and and does not require a lookup. > > I would not even do that. It brings nothing to the application layer and > inflates the code. I'd rather just get rid of the EFAULT test cases that > rely on an unreliable syscall (i.e. one that may either be a real syscall > or an emulated one). The value brought by these tests is extremely low > and they were implemented only because they were easy to do. If they're > causing pain, let's just drop them. Thanks, one of the sent v2 patches has dropped both of them. yesterday, based on the demo code pasted in this email thread, I went further to implement a cleaner user-space 'efault' handler, with this handler, it is able to continue next test, and without this handler, just skip the test, so, it can be used to add future test cases for sigaction/sigsetjmp/siglongjmp. besides, a multiple 'run' support is added too, will share the new code as a new standalone patchset later but I'm not expecting it is mergeable. Thanks, Zhangjin > > Willy [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 161 bytes --] _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-30 10:07 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 119+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2023-05-24 17:33 [PATCH 00/13] tools/nolibc: riscv: Add full rv32 support Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-24 17:33 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-24 17:41 ` [PATCH 01/13] Revert "tools/nolibc: riscv: Support __NR_llseek for rv32" Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-24 17:41 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-24 17:44 ` [PATCH 02/13] Revert "selftests/nolibc: Fix up compile error " Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-24 17:44 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-24 17:46 ` [PATCH 03/13] selftests/nolibc: print name instead of number for EOVERFLOW Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-24 18:28 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-24 17:46 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-24 20:23 ` Thomas Weißschuh 2023-05-24 20:23 ` Thomas Weißschuh 2023-05-24 17:48 ` [PATCH 04/13] selftests/nolibc: syscall_args: use __NR_statx for rv32 Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-24 17:48 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-24 19:49 ` Thomas Weißschuh 2023-05-24 19:49 ` Thomas Weißschuh 2023-05-25 7:20 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-25 7:20 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-26 9:21 ` Arnd Bergmann 2023-05-26 9:21 ` Arnd Bergmann 2023-05-26 10:06 ` Willy Tarreau 2023-05-26 10:06 ` Willy Tarreau 2023-05-27 0:58 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-27 0:58 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-24 17:50 ` [PATCH 05/13] selftests/nolibc: riscv: customize makefile " Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-24 17:50 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-26 6:57 ` Thomas Weißschuh 2023-05-26 6:57 ` Thomas Weißschuh 2023-05-26 9:20 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-26 9:20 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-24 17:52 ` [PATCH 06/13] selftests/nolibc: allow specify a bios for qemu Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-24 17:52 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-26 7:00 ` Thomas Weißschuh 2023-05-26 7:00 ` Thomas Weißschuh 2023-05-26 10:25 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-26 10:25 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-26 10:36 ` Conor Dooley 2023-05-26 10:36 ` Conor Dooley 2023-05-26 13:38 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-26 13:38 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-26 15:08 ` Conor Dooley 2023-05-26 15:08 ` Conor Dooley 2023-05-28 7:52 ` Willy Tarreau 2023-05-28 7:52 ` Willy Tarreau 2023-05-24 17:54 ` [PATCH 07/13] selftests/nolibc: remove the duplicated gettimeofday_bad2 Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-24 17:54 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-24 17:55 ` [PATCH 08/13] tools/nolibc: sys_lseek: riscv: use __NR_llseek for rv32 Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-24 17:55 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-24 17:57 ` [PATCH 09/13] tools/nolibc: sys_poll: riscv: use __NR_ppoll_time64 " Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-24 17:57 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-26 7:15 ` Thomas Weißschuh 2023-05-26 7:15 ` Thomas Weißschuh 2023-05-26 9:34 ` Arnd Bergmann 2023-05-26 9:34 ` Arnd Bergmann 2023-05-28 8:25 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-28 8:25 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-28 8:48 ` Arnd Bergmann 2023-05-28 8:48 ` Arnd Bergmann 2023-05-28 10:29 ` Willy Tarreau 2023-05-28 10:29 ` Willy Tarreau 2023-05-28 10:55 ` Arnd Bergmann 2023-05-28 10:55 ` Arnd Bergmann 2023-05-28 11:03 ` Willy Tarreau 2023-05-28 11:03 ` Willy Tarreau 2023-05-24 17:58 ` [PATCH 10/13] tools/nolibc: ppoll/ppoll_time64: add a missing argument Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-24 17:58 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-24 17:59 ` [PATCH 11/13] tools/nolibc: sys_select: riscv: use __NR_pselect6_time64 for rv32 Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-24 17:59 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-24 20:22 ` Thomas Weißschuh 2023-05-24 20:22 ` Thomas Weißschuh 2023-05-25 7:10 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-25 7:10 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-25 7:22 ` Thomas Weißschuh 2023-05-25 7:22 ` Thomas Weißschuh 2023-05-26 1:50 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-26 1:50 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-26 9:19 ` Arnd Bergmann 2023-05-26 9:19 ` Arnd Bergmann 2023-05-26 11:00 ` [PATCH 00/13] tools/nolibc: riscv: Add full rv32 support Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-26 11:00 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-26 11:13 ` Arnd Bergmann 2023-05-26 11:13 ` Arnd Bergmann 2023-05-24 18:02 ` [PATCH 12/13] tools/nolibc: sys_wait4: riscv: use __NR_waitid for rv32 Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-24 18:02 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-24 18:03 ` [PATCH 13/13] tools/nolibc: sys_gettimeofday: riscv: use __NR_clock_gettime64 " Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-24 18:03 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-26 7:38 ` Thomas Weißschuh 2023-05-26 7:38 ` Thomas Weißschuh 2023-05-27 1:26 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-27 1:26 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-27 3:39 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-27 3:39 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-27 5:12 ` Willy Tarreau 2023-05-27 5:12 ` Willy Tarreau 2023-05-24 18:24 ` [PATCH 00/13] tools/nolibc: riscv: Add full rv32 support Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-24 18:24 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-28 7:59 ` Willy Tarreau 2023-05-28 7:59 ` Willy Tarreau 2023-05-28 8:42 ` Thomas Weißschuh 2023-05-28 8:42 ` Thomas Weißschuh 2023-05-28 9:41 ` Thomas Weißschuh 2023-05-28 9:41 ` Thomas Weißschuh 2023-05-28 10:17 ` Willy Tarreau 2023-05-28 10:17 ` Willy Tarreau 2023-05-28 10:39 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-28 10:39 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-28 11:33 ` Willy Tarreau 2023-05-28 11:33 ` Willy Tarreau 2023-05-28 12:52 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-28 12:52 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-28 13:45 ` Thomas Weißschuh 2023-05-28 13:45 ` Thomas Weißschuh 2023-05-28 18:39 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-28 18:39 ` Zhangjin Wu 2023-05-29 8:45 ` Thomas Weißschuh 2023-05-29 8:45 ` Thomas Weißschuh 2023-05-29 11:31 ` Willy Tarreau 2023-05-29 11:31 ` Willy Tarreau 2023-05-30 10:06 ` Zhangjin Wu [this message] 2023-05-30 10:06 ` Zhangjin Wu
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20230530100629.383892-1-falcon@tinylab.org \ --to=falcon@tinylab.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=thomas@t-8ch.de \ --cc=w@1wt.eu \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.