All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>
Cc: virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org, cohuck@redhat.com,
	david.edmondson@oracle.com, virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org,
	sburla@marvell.com, jasowang@redhat.com, yishaih@nvidia.com,
	maorg@nvidia.com, shahafs@nvidia.com
Subject: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v11 0/3] admin: Access legacy registers using admin commands
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2023 18:36:31 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230706183617-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230706212722.97973-1-parav@nvidia.com>

On Fri, Jul 07, 2023 at 12:27:19AM +0300, Parav Pandit wrote:
> This short series introduces legacy registers access commands for the owner
> group member access the legacy registers of the member VFs.
> This short series introduces legacy region access commands by the group owner
> device for its member devices.
> Currently it is applicable to the PCI PF and VF devices. If in future any
> SIOV devices to support legacy registers, they can be easily supported using
> same commands by using the group member identifiers of the future SIOV devices.
> 
> More details as overview, motivation, use case are further described
> below.

corneli want to apply 1,2 as editorial?

> Patch summary:
> --------------
> patch-1 split rows of admin opcode tables by a line
> patch-2 fix section numbering
> patch-3 add legacy region access commands
> 
> It uses the newly introduced administration command facility with 4 new
> commands and a new optional command to query the legacy notification region.
> 
> Usecase:
> --------
> 1. A hypervisor/system needs to provide transitional
>    virtio devices to the guest VM at scale of thousands,
>    typically, one to eight devices per VM.
> 
> 2. A hypervisor/system needs to provide such devices using a
>    vendor agnostic driver in the hypervisor system.
> 
> 3. A hypervisor system prefers to have single stack regardless of
>    virtio device type (net/blk) and be future compatible with a
>    single vfio stack using SR-IOV or other scalable device
>    virtualization technology to map PCI devices to the guest VM.
>    (as transitional or otherwise)
> 
> Motivation/Background:
> ----------------------
> The existing virtio transitional PCI device is missing support for
> PCI SR-IOV based devices. Currently it does not work beyond
> PCI PF, or as software emulated device in reality. Currently it
> has below cited system level limitations:
> 
> [a] PCIe spec citation:
> VFs do not support I/O Space and thus VF BARs shall not indicate I/O Space.
> 
> [b] cpu arch citiation:
> Intel 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software Developer’s Manual:
> The processor’s I/O address space is separate and distinct from
> the physical-memory address space. The I/O address space consists
> of 64K individually addressable 8-bit I/O ports, numbered 0 through FFFFH.
> 
> [c] PCIe spec citation:
> If a bridge implements an I/O address range,...I/O address range will be
> aligned to a 4 KB boundary.
> 
> Overview:
> ---------
> Above usecase requirements is solved by PCI PF group owner accessing
> its group member PCI VFs legacy registers using an admin virtqueue of
> the group owner PCI PF.
> 
> Two new admin virtqueue commands are added which read/write PCI VF
> registers.
> 
> Software usage example:
> -----------------------
> One way to use and map to the guest VM is by using vfio driver
> framework in Linux kernel.
> 
>                 +----------------------+
>                 |pci_dev_id = 0x100X   |
> +---------------|pci_rev_id = 0x0      |-----+
> |vfio device    |BAR0 = I/O region     |     |
> |               |Other attributes      |     |
> |               +----------------------+     |
> |                                            |
> +   +--------------+     +-----------------+ |
> |   |I/O BAR to AQ |     | Other vfio      | |
> |   |rd/wr mapper  |     | functionalities | |
> |   +--------------+     +-----------------+ |
> |                                            |
> +------+-------------------------+-----------+
>        |                         |
>    Legacy region            Driver notification
>     access                       |
>        |                         |
>   +----+------------+       +----+------------+
>   | +-----+         |       | PCI VF device A |
>   | | AQ  |-------------+---->+-------------+ |
>   | +-----+         |   |   | | legacy regs | |
>   | PCI PF device   |   |   | +-------------+ |
>   +-----------------+   |   +-----------------+
>                         |
>                         |   +----+------------+
>                         |   | PCI VF device N |
>                         +---->+-------------+ |
>                             | | legacy regs | |
>                             | +-------------+ |
>                             +-----------------+
> 
> 2. Virtio pci driver to bind to the listed device id and
>    use it in the host.
> 
> 3. Use it in a light weight hypervisor to run bare-metal OS.
> 
> Please review.
> 
> Alternatives considered:
> ========================
> 1. Exposing BAR0 as MMIO BAR that follows legacy registers template
> Pros:
> a. Kind of works with legacy drivers as some of them have used API
>    which is agnostic to MMIO vs IOBAR.
> b. Does not require hypervisor intervantion
> Cons:
> a. Device reset is extremely hard to implement in device at scale as
>    driver does not wait for device reset completion
> b. Device register width related problems persist that hypervisor if
>    wishes, it cannot be fixed.
> 
> 2. Accessing VF registers by tunneling it through new legacy PCI capability
> Pros:
> a. Self contained, but cannot work with future PCI SIOV devices
> Cons:
> a. Equally slow as AQ access
> b. Still requires new capability for notification access
> c. Requires hardware to build low level registers access which is not worth
>    for long term future
> 
> 3. Accessing VF notification region using new PF BAR
> Cons:
> a. Requires hardware to build new PCI steering logic per PF to forward
>    notification from the PF to VF, requires double the amount of logic
>    compared to today
> b. Requires very large additional PF BAR whose size must be max_Vfs * BAR size.
> 
> 4. Trapping CVQ, configuration region, LEGACY_HDR
> Cons:
> a. This does not fullfil the very basic requirement to not trap the
>    1.x objects (configuration registers, vqs)
> b. Requires feature negotiations mediation in hypervisor software
> c. Requires constant device type specific knowledge in hypervisor driver
>    (Does not scale for 30+ device types)
> 
> 4. F_LEACY_HDR, F_WRITE_MAC
> Cons:
> a. Requires device support to have read/write mac address which is
>    hard to implement on every member device.
> b. such functionality is duplicate of existing cvq per device.
> c. config space is only for the initialization specific purpose.
> d. Requires mediation of 1.x objects, which is not good design.
> e. Solves only for the net device.
> Pros:
> a. May work for nested env
> 
> conclusion for picking AQ approach:
> ==================================
> 1. Overall AQ based access is simpler to implement with combination of
>    best from software and device so that legacy registers do not get baked
>    in the device hardware
> 2. AQ allows hypervisor software to intercept legacy registers and make
>    corrections if needed
> 3. Provides trade-off between performance, device complexity vs spec,
>    while still maintaining passthrough mode for the VFs with minimal
>    hypervisor intercepts only for legacy registers access
> 4. AQ mechanism is designed for accessing other member devices registers
>    as noted in AQ submission, it utilizes the existing infrastructure over
>    other alternatives.
> 5. Uses existing driver notification region similar to legacy notification
>    saves hardware resources
> 
> Fixes: https://github.com/oasis-tcs/virtio-spec/issues/167
> Signed-off-by: Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>
> 
> ---
> changelog:
> v10->v11:
> - replaced tab with white spaces in read structure
> - included pci fields along side other generic fields to avoid
>   indirection
> - merged pci conformance section
> - avoid using definite in starting introduction
> - replace 'all of the' with 'any of the'
> - changed drivers notification normative to indicate use of
>   NOTIFY_INFO command
> - renamed NOTIFY_QUERY to NOTIFY_INFO name
> - merged 4th patch with 3rd
> - added normative line for notify_info command
> - reworded notification region command description to be more verbose
> - merged flags and owner field to indicate end of list
> v9->v10:
> - added white space at end of line
> - addressed below comments from Cornelia
> - fixed errors related to article
> - hardwire to hardwires
> - replaced various to all
> - added hardwire to zero
> - fixed requirements for administration virtqueue section
> - added missing articles
> - reworded description for notification query command
> - grammar fixes
> - addressed below comments from Michael
> - added description for member group id setting
> - reworded device and driver conformance statements
> - opcode table description updated
> - fixed label for device read command
> - length alignment restriction text added
> - data length described for read write commands
> - notification description added and refined
> - reworded text around command specific result and data field usage
> v8->v9:
> - add missing articles in notify query command
> - replaced 'this notification' with 'such a notification'
> - addressed below comments from Michael
> - dropped 'Region' from the commands
> - added 7 reserved pad bytes in config write commands
> - rewrote from 'use following structure' to 'field' has the following
>   struct..
> - dropped mentioning to follow struct virtio_admin_cmd.
> - added note about command limited to only sriov group type for now
> - rewrote the description little differently
> v7->v8:
> - remove empty line at the end of file
> - removed white space at the end
> - addressed comments from Michael add link to pci
> - renamed region to region_data
> - made region_data width to be 16 bytes to cover for 8 bytes offset
> - moved generic notification region related normative from pci to
>   generic section
> - addressed comments from Michael
> - made bar offset 64-bit
> - prefix legacy specific structure with _legacy
> - moved generic normative from pci to generic section
> - added link to virtio pci capabilities when referring to bar 0
> - remove 'should' from generic description
> v6->v7:
> - addressed several comments from Michael
> - use AQ command to query legacy notify region, dropped pci capability
>   modifications
> - moved most part of the text to the generic admin command section
> - replace administrative to administration
> - replace admin vq citation to admin commands
> - added normatives for device and driver side
> - made BAR0 to be not used at all when supporting legacy interface
> - added normative around BAR0 and SR-IOV extended capability
> - grammar corrections
> v5->v6:
> - fixed previous missed abbreviation of LCC and LD
> - added text for the PCI capability for the group member device
> v4->v5:
> - split pci transport and generic command section to new patch
> - removed multiple references to the VF
> - written the description of the command as generic with member
>   and group device terminology
> - reflected many section names to remove VF
> - split from pci transport specific patch
> - split conformance to transport and generic sections
> - written the description of the command as generic with member
>   and group device terminology
> - reflected many section names to remove VF
> - rename fields from register to region
> - avoided abbreviation for legacy, device and config
> v3->v4:
> - moved noted to the conformance section details in next patch
> - removed queue notify address query AQ command on Michael's suggestion,
>   though it is fine. Instead replaced with extending virtio_pci_notify_cap
>   to indicate that legacy queue notifications can be done on the
>   notification location
> - fixed spelling errors
> - replaced administrative virtqueue to administration virtqueue
> - moved legacy interface normative references to legacy conformance
>   section
> v2->v3:
> - added new patch to split raws of admin vq opcode table
> - adddressed Jason and Michael's comment to split single register
>   access command to common config and device specific commands.
> - dropped the suggetion to introduce enable/disable command as
>   admin command cap bit already covers it.
> - added other alternative design considered and discussed in detail in v0, v1 and v2
> v1->v2:
> - addressed comments from Michael
> - added theory of operation
> - grammar corrections
> - removed group fields description from individual commands as
>   it is already present in generic section
> - added endianness normative for legacy device registers region
> - renamed the file to drop vf and add legacy prefix
> - added overview in commit log
> - renamed subsection to reflect command
> v0->v1:
> - addressed comments, suggesetions and ideas from Michael Tsirkin and Jason Wang
> - far more simpler design than MMR access
> - removed complexities of MMR device ids
> - removed complexities of MMR registers and extended capabilities
> - dropped adding new extended capabilities because if if they are
>   added, a pci device still needs to have existing capabilities
>   in the legacy configuration space and hypervisor driver do not
>   need to access them
> 
> Parav Pandit (3):
>   admin: Split opcode table rows with a line
>   admin: Fix section numbering
>   admin: Add group member legacy register access commands
> 
>  admin-cmds-legacy-interface.tex | 302 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  admin.tex                       |  24 ++-
>  conformance.tex                 |   2 +
>  3 files changed, 323 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 admin-cmds-legacy-interface.tex
> 
> -- 
> 2.26.2


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>
Cc: virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org, cohuck@redhat.com,
	david.edmondson@oracle.com, virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org,
	sburla@marvell.com, jasowang@redhat.com, yishaih@nvidia.com,
	maorg@nvidia.com, shahafs@nvidia.com
Subject: [virtio-comment] Re: [PATCH v11 0/3] admin: Access legacy registers using admin commands
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2023 18:36:31 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230706183617-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230706212722.97973-1-parav@nvidia.com>

On Fri, Jul 07, 2023 at 12:27:19AM +0300, Parav Pandit wrote:
> This short series introduces legacy registers access commands for the owner
> group member access the legacy registers of the member VFs.
> This short series introduces legacy region access commands by the group owner
> device for its member devices.
> Currently it is applicable to the PCI PF and VF devices. If in future any
> SIOV devices to support legacy registers, they can be easily supported using
> same commands by using the group member identifiers of the future SIOV devices.
> 
> More details as overview, motivation, use case are further described
> below.

corneli want to apply 1,2 as editorial?

> Patch summary:
> --------------
> patch-1 split rows of admin opcode tables by a line
> patch-2 fix section numbering
> patch-3 add legacy region access commands
> 
> It uses the newly introduced administration command facility with 4 new
> commands and a new optional command to query the legacy notification region.
> 
> Usecase:
> --------
> 1. A hypervisor/system needs to provide transitional
>    virtio devices to the guest VM at scale of thousands,
>    typically, one to eight devices per VM.
> 
> 2. A hypervisor/system needs to provide such devices using a
>    vendor agnostic driver in the hypervisor system.
> 
> 3. A hypervisor system prefers to have single stack regardless of
>    virtio device type (net/blk) and be future compatible with a
>    single vfio stack using SR-IOV or other scalable device
>    virtualization technology to map PCI devices to the guest VM.
>    (as transitional or otherwise)
> 
> Motivation/Background:
> ----------------------
> The existing virtio transitional PCI device is missing support for
> PCI SR-IOV based devices. Currently it does not work beyond
> PCI PF, or as software emulated device in reality. Currently it
> has below cited system level limitations:
> 
> [a] PCIe spec citation:
> VFs do not support I/O Space and thus VF BARs shall not indicate I/O Space.
> 
> [b] cpu arch citiation:
> Intel 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software Developer’s Manual:
> The processor’s I/O address space is separate and distinct from
> the physical-memory address space. The I/O address space consists
> of 64K individually addressable 8-bit I/O ports, numbered 0 through FFFFH.
> 
> [c] PCIe spec citation:
> If a bridge implements an I/O address range,...I/O address range will be
> aligned to a 4 KB boundary.
> 
> Overview:
> ---------
> Above usecase requirements is solved by PCI PF group owner accessing
> its group member PCI VFs legacy registers using an admin virtqueue of
> the group owner PCI PF.
> 
> Two new admin virtqueue commands are added which read/write PCI VF
> registers.
> 
> Software usage example:
> -----------------------
> One way to use and map to the guest VM is by using vfio driver
> framework in Linux kernel.
> 
>                 +----------------------+
>                 |pci_dev_id = 0x100X   |
> +---------------|pci_rev_id = 0x0      |-----+
> |vfio device    |BAR0 = I/O region     |     |
> |               |Other attributes      |     |
> |               +----------------------+     |
> |                                            |
> +   +--------------+     +-----------------+ |
> |   |I/O BAR to AQ |     | Other vfio      | |
> |   |rd/wr mapper  |     | functionalities | |
> |   +--------------+     +-----------------+ |
> |                                            |
> +------+-------------------------+-----------+
>        |                         |
>    Legacy region            Driver notification
>     access                       |
>        |                         |
>   +----+------------+       +----+------------+
>   | +-----+         |       | PCI VF device A |
>   | | AQ  |-------------+---->+-------------+ |
>   | +-----+         |   |   | | legacy regs | |
>   | PCI PF device   |   |   | +-------------+ |
>   +-----------------+   |   +-----------------+
>                         |
>                         |   +----+------------+
>                         |   | PCI VF device N |
>                         +---->+-------------+ |
>                             | | legacy regs | |
>                             | +-------------+ |
>                             +-----------------+
> 
> 2. Virtio pci driver to bind to the listed device id and
>    use it in the host.
> 
> 3. Use it in a light weight hypervisor to run bare-metal OS.
> 
> Please review.
> 
> Alternatives considered:
> ========================
> 1. Exposing BAR0 as MMIO BAR that follows legacy registers template
> Pros:
> a. Kind of works with legacy drivers as some of them have used API
>    which is agnostic to MMIO vs IOBAR.
> b. Does not require hypervisor intervantion
> Cons:
> a. Device reset is extremely hard to implement in device at scale as
>    driver does not wait for device reset completion
> b. Device register width related problems persist that hypervisor if
>    wishes, it cannot be fixed.
> 
> 2. Accessing VF registers by tunneling it through new legacy PCI capability
> Pros:
> a. Self contained, but cannot work with future PCI SIOV devices
> Cons:
> a. Equally slow as AQ access
> b. Still requires new capability for notification access
> c. Requires hardware to build low level registers access which is not worth
>    for long term future
> 
> 3. Accessing VF notification region using new PF BAR
> Cons:
> a. Requires hardware to build new PCI steering logic per PF to forward
>    notification from the PF to VF, requires double the amount of logic
>    compared to today
> b. Requires very large additional PF BAR whose size must be max_Vfs * BAR size.
> 
> 4. Trapping CVQ, configuration region, LEGACY_HDR
> Cons:
> a. This does not fullfil the very basic requirement to not trap the
>    1.x objects (configuration registers, vqs)
> b. Requires feature negotiations mediation in hypervisor software
> c. Requires constant device type specific knowledge in hypervisor driver
>    (Does not scale for 30+ device types)
> 
> 4. F_LEACY_HDR, F_WRITE_MAC
> Cons:
> a. Requires device support to have read/write mac address which is
>    hard to implement on every member device.
> b. such functionality is duplicate of existing cvq per device.
> c. config space is only for the initialization specific purpose.
> d. Requires mediation of 1.x objects, which is not good design.
> e. Solves only for the net device.
> Pros:
> a. May work for nested env
> 
> conclusion for picking AQ approach:
> ==================================
> 1. Overall AQ based access is simpler to implement with combination of
>    best from software and device so that legacy registers do not get baked
>    in the device hardware
> 2. AQ allows hypervisor software to intercept legacy registers and make
>    corrections if needed
> 3. Provides trade-off between performance, device complexity vs spec,
>    while still maintaining passthrough mode for the VFs with minimal
>    hypervisor intercepts only for legacy registers access
> 4. AQ mechanism is designed for accessing other member devices registers
>    as noted in AQ submission, it utilizes the existing infrastructure over
>    other alternatives.
> 5. Uses existing driver notification region similar to legacy notification
>    saves hardware resources
> 
> Fixes: https://github.com/oasis-tcs/virtio-spec/issues/167
> Signed-off-by: Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>
> 
> ---
> changelog:
> v10->v11:
> - replaced tab with white spaces in read structure
> - included pci fields along side other generic fields to avoid
>   indirection
> - merged pci conformance section
> - avoid using definite in starting introduction
> - replace 'all of the' with 'any of the'
> - changed drivers notification normative to indicate use of
>   NOTIFY_INFO command
> - renamed NOTIFY_QUERY to NOTIFY_INFO name
> - merged 4th patch with 3rd
> - added normative line for notify_info command
> - reworded notification region command description to be more verbose
> - merged flags and owner field to indicate end of list
> v9->v10:
> - added white space at end of line
> - addressed below comments from Cornelia
> - fixed errors related to article
> - hardwire to hardwires
> - replaced various to all
> - added hardwire to zero
> - fixed requirements for administration virtqueue section
> - added missing articles
> - reworded description for notification query command
> - grammar fixes
> - addressed below comments from Michael
> - added description for member group id setting
> - reworded device and driver conformance statements
> - opcode table description updated
> - fixed label for device read command
> - length alignment restriction text added
> - data length described for read write commands
> - notification description added and refined
> - reworded text around command specific result and data field usage
> v8->v9:
> - add missing articles in notify query command
> - replaced 'this notification' with 'such a notification'
> - addressed below comments from Michael
> - dropped 'Region' from the commands
> - added 7 reserved pad bytes in config write commands
> - rewrote from 'use following structure' to 'field' has the following
>   struct..
> - dropped mentioning to follow struct virtio_admin_cmd.
> - added note about command limited to only sriov group type for now
> - rewrote the description little differently
> v7->v8:
> - remove empty line at the end of file
> - removed white space at the end
> - addressed comments from Michael add link to pci
> - renamed region to region_data
> - made region_data width to be 16 bytes to cover for 8 bytes offset
> - moved generic notification region related normative from pci to
>   generic section
> - addressed comments from Michael
> - made bar offset 64-bit
> - prefix legacy specific structure with _legacy
> - moved generic normative from pci to generic section
> - added link to virtio pci capabilities when referring to bar 0
> - remove 'should' from generic description
> v6->v7:
> - addressed several comments from Michael
> - use AQ command to query legacy notify region, dropped pci capability
>   modifications
> - moved most part of the text to the generic admin command section
> - replace administrative to administration
> - replace admin vq citation to admin commands
> - added normatives for device and driver side
> - made BAR0 to be not used at all when supporting legacy interface
> - added normative around BAR0 and SR-IOV extended capability
> - grammar corrections
> v5->v6:
> - fixed previous missed abbreviation of LCC and LD
> - added text for the PCI capability for the group member device
> v4->v5:
> - split pci transport and generic command section to new patch
> - removed multiple references to the VF
> - written the description of the command as generic with member
>   and group device terminology
> - reflected many section names to remove VF
> - split from pci transport specific patch
> - split conformance to transport and generic sections
> - written the description of the command as generic with member
>   and group device terminology
> - reflected many section names to remove VF
> - rename fields from register to region
> - avoided abbreviation for legacy, device and config
> v3->v4:
> - moved noted to the conformance section details in next patch
> - removed queue notify address query AQ command on Michael's suggestion,
>   though it is fine. Instead replaced with extending virtio_pci_notify_cap
>   to indicate that legacy queue notifications can be done on the
>   notification location
> - fixed spelling errors
> - replaced administrative virtqueue to administration virtqueue
> - moved legacy interface normative references to legacy conformance
>   section
> v2->v3:
> - added new patch to split raws of admin vq opcode table
> - adddressed Jason and Michael's comment to split single register
>   access command to common config and device specific commands.
> - dropped the suggetion to introduce enable/disable command as
>   admin command cap bit already covers it.
> - added other alternative design considered and discussed in detail in v0, v1 and v2
> v1->v2:
> - addressed comments from Michael
> - added theory of operation
> - grammar corrections
> - removed group fields description from individual commands as
>   it is already present in generic section
> - added endianness normative for legacy device registers region
> - renamed the file to drop vf and add legacy prefix
> - added overview in commit log
> - renamed subsection to reflect command
> v0->v1:
> - addressed comments, suggesetions and ideas from Michael Tsirkin and Jason Wang
> - far more simpler design than MMR access
> - removed complexities of MMR device ids
> - removed complexities of MMR registers and extended capabilities
> - dropped adding new extended capabilities because if if they are
>   added, a pci device still needs to have existing capabilities
>   in the legacy configuration space and hypervisor driver do not
>   need to access them
> 
> Parav Pandit (3):
>   admin: Split opcode table rows with a line
>   admin: Fix section numbering
>   admin: Add group member legacy register access commands
> 
>  admin-cmds-legacy-interface.tex | 302 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  admin.tex                       |  24 ++-
>  conformance.tex                 |   2 +
>  3 files changed, 323 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 admin-cmds-legacy-interface.tex
> 
> -- 
> 2.26.2


This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to the
OASIS Virtual I/O Device (VIRTIO) TC.

In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms and
to minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required
before posting.

Subscribe: virtio-comment-subscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
Unsubscribe: virtio-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
List help: virtio-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org
List archive: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/
Feedback License: https://www.oasis-open.org/who/ipr/feedback_license.pdf
List Guidelines: https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/mailing-lists
Committee: https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/virtio/
Join OASIS: https://www.oasis-open.org/join/


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-07-06 22:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-06 21:27 [virtio-dev] [PATCH v11 0/3] admin: Access legacy registers using admin commands Parav Pandit
2023-07-06 21:27 ` [virtio-comment] " Parav Pandit
2023-07-06 21:27 ` [virtio-dev] [PATCH v11 1/3] admin: Split opcode table rows with a line Parav Pandit
2023-07-06 21:27   ` [virtio-comment] " Parav Pandit
2023-07-06 21:27 ` [virtio-dev] [PATCH v11 2/3] admin: Fix section numbering Parav Pandit
2023-07-06 21:27   ` [virtio-comment] " Parav Pandit
2023-07-06 21:27 ` [virtio-dev] [PATCH v11 3/3] admin: Add group member legacy register access commands Parav Pandit
2023-07-06 21:27   ` [virtio-comment] " Parav Pandit
2023-07-06 22:36   ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-07-06 22:36     ` [virtio-comment] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-07-07  3:54     ` [virtio-dev] " Parav Pandit
2023-07-07  3:54       ` [virtio-comment] " Parav Pandit
2023-07-07  8:29       ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-07-07  8:29         ` [virtio-comment] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-07-06 22:36 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2023-07-06 22:36   ` [virtio-comment] Re: [PATCH v11 0/3] admin: Access legacy registers using admin commands Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-07-07 11:37   ` [virtio-dev] " Cornelia Huck
2023-07-07 11:37     ` [virtio-comment] " Cornelia Huck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230706183617-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=david.edmondson@oracle.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=maorg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=parav@nvidia.com \
    --cc=sburla@marvell.com \
    --cc=shahafs@nvidia.com \
    --cc=virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org \
    --cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
    --cc=yishaih@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.