All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v15 00/13] Add support for MT8195 SCP 2nd core
@ 2023-07-21  2:41 ` Tinghan Shen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Tinghan Shen @ 2023-07-21  2:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bjorn Andersson, Mathieu Poirier, Rob Herring,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Matthias Brugger,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno, Tinghan Shen
  Cc: linux-remoteproc, devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-mediatek, Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group

The mediatek remoteproc driver currently only allows bringing up a 
single core SCP, e.g. MT8183. It also only bringing up the 1st 
core in SoCs with a dual-core SCP, e.g. MT8195. This series support 
to bring-up the 2nd core of the dual-core SCP.

v15 -> v14:
1. Use the common SCP registers in struct mtk_scp_of_cluster instead of
   copy it to struct mtk_scp at patchset 5 
2. Use platform_set_drvdata instead of platform_device_add_data at patchset 5 
3. Rename l2tcm_lock to cluster_lock at patchset 8
4. Check l2tcm_refcnt value before decreasing at patchset 8
5. Revise the commit message at patchset 11

v13 -> v14:
1. add review tag to patchset 1,6
2. exchange the order of sram power on and reset assert in
mt8195_scp_c1_before_load at patchset 2
3. Use ERR_CAST in patchset 5
4. Re-write patchset 7 to remove dependency between core 0 and core 1 
5. Add patch set 10 to report watchdot timeout to all cores

v12 -> v13:
1. replace subdevice with new mediatek scp operations in patchset 7 
2. add review tag to patchset 3
3. modify mediatek,scp phandle name of video-codec@18000000 at patchset 11

v11 -> v12:
1. add scp_add_single/multi_core() to patchset 6
2. remove unused comment in patchset 6
3. rename list name from mtk_scp_cluster to mtk_scp_list
4. rewrite the multi-core probe flow 
5. disable rproc->autoboot and boot rproc by request_firmware_nowait at patchset 7 
6. remove patchset 7 review tag  

v10 -> v11:
1. rewrite patchset 5 to probe single-core SCP with the cluster list
2. Also in patchset 5, move the pointer of mtk_scp object from the
   platform data property to the driver data property 
3. move the appearance of mtk_scp cluster property to patcheset 7

v9 -> v10:
1. move the global mtk_scp list into the platform device driver data structure
2. remove an unnecessary if() condition

v8 -> v9:
1. initialize l1tcm_size/l1tcm_phys at patchset 05/11 
2. rewrite patchset 06/11 to unify the flow and remove hacks

v7 -> v8:
1. update the node name of mt8192 asurada SCP rpmsg subnode
2. squash register definitions into driver patches
3. initialize local variables on the declaration at patch v8 06/11 

v6 -> v7:
1. merge the mtk_scp_cluster struct into the mtk_scp structure
   at the "Probe multi-core SCP" patch

v5 -> v6:
1. move the mtk_scp_of_regs structure from mtk_common.h to mtk_scp.c
2. rename the SCP core 0 label from 'scp' to 'scp_c0'

v4 -> v5:
1. move resource release actions to the platform driver remove operation 
2. fix dual-core watchdog handling

v3 -> v4:
1. change the representation of dual-core SCP in dts file and update SCP yaml
2. rewrite SCP driver to reflect the change of dts node
3. drop 'remove redundant call of rproc_boot for SCP' in v3 for further investigation

v2 -> v3:
1. change the representation of dual-core SCP in dts file and update SCP yaml
2. rewrite SCP driver to reflect the change of dts node
3. add SCP core 1 node to mt8195.dtsi
4. remove redundant call of rproc_boot for SCP
5. refine IPI error message

v1 -> v2:
1. update dt-binding property description
2. remove kconfig for scp dual driver
3. merge mtk_scp_dual.c and mtk_scp_subdev.c to mtk_scp.c


Tinghan Shen (13):
  dt-bindings: remoteproc: mediatek: Improve the rpmsg subnode
    definition
  arm64: dts: mediatek: Update the node name of SCP rpmsg subnode
  dt-bindings: remoteproc: mediatek: Support MT8195 dual-core SCP
  remoteproc: mediatek: Add MT8195 SCP core 1 operations
  remoteproc: mediatek: Extract SCP common registers
  remoteproc: mediatek: Probe SCP cluster on single-core SCP
  remoteproc: mediatek: Probe SCP cluster on multi-core SCP
  remoteproc: mediatek: Remove dependency of MT8195 SCP L2TCM power
    control on dual-core SCP
  remoteproc: mediatek: Setup MT8195 SCP core 1 SRAM offset
  remoteproc: mediatek: Handle MT8195 SCP core 1 watchdog timeout
  remoteproc: mediatek: Report watchdog crash to all cores
  remoteproc: mediatek: Refine ipi handler error message
  arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8195: Add SCP 2nd core

 .../bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml          | 176 +++++-
 .../arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-kukui.dtsi |   2 +-
 .../boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192-asurada.dtsi     |   2 +-
 .../boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195-cherry.dtsi      |   6 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi      |  34 +-
 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h               |  39 +-
 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c                  | 534 ++++++++++++++----
 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp_ipi.c              |   4 +-
 8 files changed, 651 insertions(+), 146 deletions(-)

-- 
2.18.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v15 00/13] Add support for MT8195 SCP 2nd core
@ 2023-07-21  2:41 ` Tinghan Shen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Tinghan Shen @ 2023-07-21  2:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bjorn Andersson, Mathieu Poirier, Rob Herring,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Matthias Brugger,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno, Tinghan Shen
  Cc: linux-remoteproc, devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-mediatek, Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group

The mediatek remoteproc driver currently only allows bringing up a 
single core SCP, e.g. MT8183. It also only bringing up the 1st 
core in SoCs with a dual-core SCP, e.g. MT8195. This series support 
to bring-up the 2nd core of the dual-core SCP.

v15 -> v14:
1. Use the common SCP registers in struct mtk_scp_of_cluster instead of
   copy it to struct mtk_scp at patchset 5 
2. Use platform_set_drvdata instead of platform_device_add_data at patchset 5 
3. Rename l2tcm_lock to cluster_lock at patchset 8
4. Check l2tcm_refcnt value before decreasing at patchset 8
5. Revise the commit message at patchset 11

v13 -> v14:
1. add review tag to patchset 1,6
2. exchange the order of sram power on and reset assert in
mt8195_scp_c1_before_load at patchset 2
3. Use ERR_CAST in patchset 5
4. Re-write patchset 7 to remove dependency between core 0 and core 1 
5. Add patch set 10 to report watchdot timeout to all cores

v12 -> v13:
1. replace subdevice with new mediatek scp operations in patchset 7 
2. add review tag to patchset 3
3. modify mediatek,scp phandle name of video-codec@18000000 at patchset 11

v11 -> v12:
1. add scp_add_single/multi_core() to patchset 6
2. remove unused comment in patchset 6
3. rename list name from mtk_scp_cluster to mtk_scp_list
4. rewrite the multi-core probe flow 
5. disable rproc->autoboot and boot rproc by request_firmware_nowait at patchset 7 
6. remove patchset 7 review tag  

v10 -> v11:
1. rewrite patchset 5 to probe single-core SCP with the cluster list
2. Also in patchset 5, move the pointer of mtk_scp object from the
   platform data property to the driver data property 
3. move the appearance of mtk_scp cluster property to patcheset 7

v9 -> v10:
1. move the global mtk_scp list into the platform device driver data structure
2. remove an unnecessary if() condition

v8 -> v9:
1. initialize l1tcm_size/l1tcm_phys at patchset 05/11 
2. rewrite patchset 06/11 to unify the flow and remove hacks

v7 -> v8:
1. update the node name of mt8192 asurada SCP rpmsg subnode
2. squash register definitions into driver patches
3. initialize local variables on the declaration at patch v8 06/11 

v6 -> v7:
1. merge the mtk_scp_cluster struct into the mtk_scp structure
   at the "Probe multi-core SCP" patch

v5 -> v6:
1. move the mtk_scp_of_regs structure from mtk_common.h to mtk_scp.c
2. rename the SCP core 0 label from 'scp' to 'scp_c0'

v4 -> v5:
1. move resource release actions to the platform driver remove operation 
2. fix dual-core watchdog handling

v3 -> v4:
1. change the representation of dual-core SCP in dts file and update SCP yaml
2. rewrite SCP driver to reflect the change of dts node
3. drop 'remove redundant call of rproc_boot for SCP' in v3 for further investigation

v2 -> v3:
1. change the representation of dual-core SCP in dts file and update SCP yaml
2. rewrite SCP driver to reflect the change of dts node
3. add SCP core 1 node to mt8195.dtsi
4. remove redundant call of rproc_boot for SCP
5. refine IPI error message

v1 -> v2:
1. update dt-binding property description
2. remove kconfig for scp dual driver
3. merge mtk_scp_dual.c and mtk_scp_subdev.c to mtk_scp.c


Tinghan Shen (13):
  dt-bindings: remoteproc: mediatek: Improve the rpmsg subnode
    definition
  arm64: dts: mediatek: Update the node name of SCP rpmsg subnode
  dt-bindings: remoteproc: mediatek: Support MT8195 dual-core SCP
  remoteproc: mediatek: Add MT8195 SCP core 1 operations
  remoteproc: mediatek: Extract SCP common registers
  remoteproc: mediatek: Probe SCP cluster on single-core SCP
  remoteproc: mediatek: Probe SCP cluster on multi-core SCP
  remoteproc: mediatek: Remove dependency of MT8195 SCP L2TCM power
    control on dual-core SCP
  remoteproc: mediatek: Setup MT8195 SCP core 1 SRAM offset
  remoteproc: mediatek: Handle MT8195 SCP core 1 watchdog timeout
  remoteproc: mediatek: Report watchdog crash to all cores
  remoteproc: mediatek: Refine ipi handler error message
  arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8195: Add SCP 2nd core

 .../bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml          | 176 +++++-
 .../arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-kukui.dtsi |   2 +-
 .../boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192-asurada.dtsi     |   2 +-
 .../boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195-cherry.dtsi      |   6 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi      |  34 +-
 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h               |  39 +-
 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c                  | 534 ++++++++++++++----
 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp_ipi.c              |   4 +-
 8 files changed, 651 insertions(+), 146 deletions(-)

-- 
2.18.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v15 01/13] dt-bindings: remoteproc: mediatek: Improve the rpmsg subnode definition
  2023-07-21  2:41 ` Tinghan Shen
@ 2023-07-21  2:41   ` Tinghan Shen
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Tinghan Shen @ 2023-07-21  2:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bjorn Andersson, Mathieu Poirier, Rob Herring,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Matthias Brugger,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno, Tinghan Shen
  Cc: linux-remoteproc, devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-mediatek, Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group

Improve the definition of the rpmsg subnode by assigning a distinct node name
and adding the definition source of node properties.

Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
---
 .../bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml          | 31 +++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml
index 895415772d1d..271081df0e46 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml
@@ -58,6 +58,18 @@ properties:
   memory-region:
     maxItems: 1
 
+  cros-ec-rpmsg:
+    $ref: /schemas/mfd/google,cros-ec.yaml
+    description:
+      This subnode represents the rpmsg device. The properties
+      of this node are defined by the individual bindings for
+      the rpmsg devices.
+
+    required:
+      - mediatek,rpmsg-name
+
+    unevaluatedProperties: false
+
 required:
   - compatible
   - reg
@@ -89,21 +101,7 @@ allOf:
         reg-names:
           maxItems: 2
 
-additionalProperties:
-  type: object
-  description:
-    Subnodes of the SCP represent rpmsg devices. The names of the devices
-    are not important. The properties of these nodes are defined by the
-    individual bindings for the rpmsg devices.
-  properties:
-    mediatek,rpmsg-name:
-      $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/string-array
-      description:
-        Contains the name for the rpmsg device. Used to match
-        the subnode to rpmsg device announced by SCP.
-
-  required:
-    - mediatek,rpmsg-name
+additionalProperties: false
 
 examples:
   - |
@@ -118,7 +116,8 @@ examples:
         clocks = <&infracfg CLK_INFRA_SCPSYS>;
         clock-names = "main";
 
-        cros_ec {
+        cros-ec-rpmsg {
+            compatible = "google,cros-ec-rpmsg";
             mediatek,rpmsg-name = "cros-ec-rpmsg";
         };
     };
-- 
2.18.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v15 01/13] dt-bindings: remoteproc: mediatek: Improve the rpmsg subnode definition
@ 2023-07-21  2:41   ` Tinghan Shen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Tinghan Shen @ 2023-07-21  2:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bjorn Andersson, Mathieu Poirier, Rob Herring,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Matthias Brugger,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno, Tinghan Shen
  Cc: linux-remoteproc, devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-mediatek, Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group

Improve the definition of the rpmsg subnode by assigning a distinct node name
and adding the definition source of node properties.

Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
---
 .../bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml          | 31 +++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml
index 895415772d1d..271081df0e46 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml
@@ -58,6 +58,18 @@ properties:
   memory-region:
     maxItems: 1
 
+  cros-ec-rpmsg:
+    $ref: /schemas/mfd/google,cros-ec.yaml
+    description:
+      This subnode represents the rpmsg device. The properties
+      of this node are defined by the individual bindings for
+      the rpmsg devices.
+
+    required:
+      - mediatek,rpmsg-name
+
+    unevaluatedProperties: false
+
 required:
   - compatible
   - reg
@@ -89,21 +101,7 @@ allOf:
         reg-names:
           maxItems: 2
 
-additionalProperties:
-  type: object
-  description:
-    Subnodes of the SCP represent rpmsg devices. The names of the devices
-    are not important. The properties of these nodes are defined by the
-    individual bindings for the rpmsg devices.
-  properties:
-    mediatek,rpmsg-name:
-      $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/string-array
-      description:
-        Contains the name for the rpmsg device. Used to match
-        the subnode to rpmsg device announced by SCP.
-
-  required:
-    - mediatek,rpmsg-name
+additionalProperties: false
 
 examples:
   - |
@@ -118,7 +116,8 @@ examples:
         clocks = <&infracfg CLK_INFRA_SCPSYS>;
         clock-names = "main";
 
-        cros_ec {
+        cros-ec-rpmsg {
+            compatible = "google,cros-ec-rpmsg";
             mediatek,rpmsg-name = "cros-ec-rpmsg";
         };
     };
-- 
2.18.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v15 02/13] arm64: dts: mediatek: Update the node name of SCP rpmsg subnode
  2023-07-21  2:41 ` Tinghan Shen
@ 2023-07-21  2:41   ` Tinghan Shen
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Tinghan Shen @ 2023-07-21  2:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bjorn Andersson, Mathieu Poirier, Rob Herring,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Matthias Brugger,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno, Tinghan Shen
  Cc: linux-remoteproc, devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-mediatek, Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group

Align the node name with the definition in SCP bindings.

Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Acked-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-kukui.dtsi   | 2 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192-asurada.dtsi | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-kukui.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-kukui.dtsi
index 6ce16a265e05..34076ba28fd0 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-kukui.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-kukui.dtsi
@@ -831,7 +831,7 @@
 	pinctrl-names = "default";
 	pinctrl-0 = <&scp_pins>;
 
-	cros_ec {
+	cros-ec-rpmsg {
 		compatible = "google,cros-ec-rpmsg";
 		mediatek,rpmsg-name = "cros-ec-rpmsg";
 	};
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192-asurada.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192-asurada.dtsi
index 0e8b34117090..1bbc994bc109 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192-asurada.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192-asurada.dtsi
@@ -1284,7 +1284,7 @@
 	pinctrl-names = "default";
 	pinctrl-0 = <&scp_pins>;
 
-	cros-ec {
+	cros-ec-rpmsg {
 		compatible = "google,cros-ec-rpmsg";
 		mediatek,rpmsg-name = "cros-ec-rpmsg";
 	};
-- 
2.18.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v15 02/13] arm64: dts: mediatek: Update the node name of SCP rpmsg subnode
@ 2023-07-21  2:41   ` Tinghan Shen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Tinghan Shen @ 2023-07-21  2:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bjorn Andersson, Mathieu Poirier, Rob Herring,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Matthias Brugger,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno, Tinghan Shen
  Cc: linux-remoteproc, devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-mediatek, Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group

Align the node name with the definition in SCP bindings.

Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Acked-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-kukui.dtsi   | 2 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192-asurada.dtsi | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-kukui.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-kukui.dtsi
index 6ce16a265e05..34076ba28fd0 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-kukui.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-kukui.dtsi
@@ -831,7 +831,7 @@
 	pinctrl-names = "default";
 	pinctrl-0 = <&scp_pins>;
 
-	cros_ec {
+	cros-ec-rpmsg {
 		compatible = "google,cros-ec-rpmsg";
 		mediatek,rpmsg-name = "cros-ec-rpmsg";
 	};
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192-asurada.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192-asurada.dtsi
index 0e8b34117090..1bbc994bc109 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192-asurada.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192-asurada.dtsi
@@ -1284,7 +1284,7 @@
 	pinctrl-names = "default";
 	pinctrl-0 = <&scp_pins>;
 
-	cros-ec {
+	cros-ec-rpmsg {
 		compatible = "google,cros-ec-rpmsg";
 		mediatek,rpmsg-name = "cros-ec-rpmsg";
 	};
-- 
2.18.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v15 03/13] dt-bindings: remoteproc: mediatek: Support MT8195 dual-core SCP
  2023-07-21  2:41 ` Tinghan Shen
@ 2023-07-21  2:41   ` Tinghan Shen
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Tinghan Shen @ 2023-07-21  2:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bjorn Andersson, Mathieu Poirier, Rob Herring,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Matthias Brugger,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno, Tinghan Shen
  Cc: linux-remoteproc, devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-mediatek, Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group

Extend the SCP binding to describe the MT8195 dual-core SCP.

Under different applications, the MT8195 SCP can be used as single-core
or dual-core. This change keeps the single-core definitions and
adds new definitions for the dual-core use case.

Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
---
 .../bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml          | 145 +++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 141 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml
index 271081df0e46..09102dda4942 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ properties:
       - mediatek,mt8188-scp
       - mediatek,mt8192-scp
       - mediatek,mt8195-scp
+      - mediatek,mt8195-scp-dual
 
   reg:
     description:
@@ -31,10 +32,7 @@ properties:
 
   reg-names:
     minItems: 2
-    items:
-      - const: sram
-      - const: cfg
-      - const: l1tcm
+    maxItems: 3
 
   clocks:
     description:
@@ -70,6 +68,81 @@ properties:
 
     unevaluatedProperties: false
 
+  '#address-cells':
+    const: 1
+
+  '#size-cells':
+    const: 1
+
+  ranges:
+    description:
+      Standard ranges definition providing address translations for
+      local SCP SRAM address spaces to bus addresses.
+
+patternProperties:
+  "^scp@[a-f0-9]+$":
+    type: object
+    description:
+      The MediaTek SCP integrated to SoC might be a multi-core version.
+      The other cores are represented as child nodes of the boot core.
+      There are some integration differences for the IP like the usage of
+      address translator for translating SoC bus addresses into address space
+      for the processor.
+
+      Each SCP core has own cache memory. The SRAM and L1TCM are shared by
+      cores. The power of cache, SRAM and L1TCM power should be enabled
+      before booting SCP cores. The size of cache, SRAM, and L1TCM are varied
+      on differnt SoCs.
+
+      The SCP cores do not use an MMU, but has a set of registers to
+      control the translations between 32-bit CPU addresses into system bus
+      addresses. Cache and memory access settings are provided through a
+      Memory Protection Unit (MPU), programmable only from the SCP.
+
+    properties:
+      compatible:
+        enum:
+          - mediatek,scp-core
+
+      reg:
+        description: The base address and size of SRAM.
+        maxItems: 1
+
+      reg-names:
+        const: sram
+
+      interrupts:
+        maxItems: 1
+
+      firmware-name:
+        $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/string
+        description:
+          If present, name (or relative path) of the file within the
+          firmware search path containing the firmware image used when
+          initializing sub cores of multi-core SCP.
+
+      memory-region:
+        maxItems: 1
+
+      cros-ec-rpmsg:
+        $ref: /schemas/mfd/google,cros-ec.yaml
+        description:
+          This subnode represents the rpmsg device. The properties
+          of this node are defined by the individual bindings for
+          the rpmsg devices.
+
+        required:
+          - mediatek,rpmsg-name
+
+        unevaluatedProperties: false
+
+    required:
+      - compatible
+      - reg
+      - reg-names
+
+    additionalProperties: false
+
 required:
   - compatible
   - reg
@@ -99,7 +172,37 @@ allOf:
         reg:
           maxItems: 2
         reg-names:
+          items:
+            - const: sram
+            - const: cfg
+  - if:
+      properties:
+        compatible:
+          enum:
+            - mediatek,mt8192-scp
+            - mediatek,mt8195-scp
+    then:
+      properties:
+        reg:
+          maxItems: 3
+        reg-names:
+          items:
+            - const: sram
+            - const: cfg
+            - const: l1tcm
+  - if:
+      properties:
+        compatible:
+          enum:
+            - mediatek,mt8195-scp-dual
+    then:
+      properties:
+        reg:
           maxItems: 2
+        reg-names:
+          items:
+            - const: cfg
+            - const: l1tcm
 
 additionalProperties: false
 
@@ -121,3 +224,37 @@ examples:
             mediatek,rpmsg-name = "cros-ec-rpmsg";
         };
     };
+
+  - |
+    scp@10500000 {
+        compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-scp-dual";
+        reg = <0x10720000 0xe0000>,
+              <0x10700000 0x8000>;
+        reg-names = "cfg", "l1tcm";
+
+        #address-cells = <1>;
+        #size-cells = <1>;
+        ranges = <0 0x10500000 0x100000>;
+
+        scp@0 {
+            compatible = "mediatek,scp-core";
+            reg = <0x0 0xa0000>;
+            reg-names = "sram";
+
+            cros-ec-rpmsg {
+                compatible = "google,cros-ec-rpmsg";
+                mediatek,rpmsg-name = "cros-ec-rpmsg";
+            };
+        };
+
+        scp@a0000 {
+            compatible = "mediatek,scp-core";
+            reg = <0xa0000 0x20000>;
+            reg-names = "sram";
+
+            cros-ec-rpmsg {
+                compatible = "google,cros-ec-rpmsg";
+                mediatek,rpmsg-name = "cros-ec-rpmsg";
+            };
+        };
+    };
-- 
2.18.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v15 03/13] dt-bindings: remoteproc: mediatek: Support MT8195 dual-core SCP
@ 2023-07-21  2:41   ` Tinghan Shen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Tinghan Shen @ 2023-07-21  2:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bjorn Andersson, Mathieu Poirier, Rob Herring,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Matthias Brugger,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno, Tinghan Shen
  Cc: linux-remoteproc, devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-mediatek, Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group

Extend the SCP binding to describe the MT8195 dual-core SCP.

Under different applications, the MT8195 SCP can be used as single-core
or dual-core. This change keeps the single-core definitions and
adds new definitions for the dual-core use case.

Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
---
 .../bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml          | 145 +++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 141 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml
index 271081df0e46..09102dda4942 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ properties:
       - mediatek,mt8188-scp
       - mediatek,mt8192-scp
       - mediatek,mt8195-scp
+      - mediatek,mt8195-scp-dual
 
   reg:
     description:
@@ -31,10 +32,7 @@ properties:
 
   reg-names:
     minItems: 2
-    items:
-      - const: sram
-      - const: cfg
-      - const: l1tcm
+    maxItems: 3
 
   clocks:
     description:
@@ -70,6 +68,81 @@ properties:
 
     unevaluatedProperties: false
 
+  '#address-cells':
+    const: 1
+
+  '#size-cells':
+    const: 1
+
+  ranges:
+    description:
+      Standard ranges definition providing address translations for
+      local SCP SRAM address spaces to bus addresses.
+
+patternProperties:
+  "^scp@[a-f0-9]+$":
+    type: object
+    description:
+      The MediaTek SCP integrated to SoC might be a multi-core version.
+      The other cores are represented as child nodes of the boot core.
+      There are some integration differences for the IP like the usage of
+      address translator for translating SoC bus addresses into address space
+      for the processor.
+
+      Each SCP core has own cache memory. The SRAM and L1TCM are shared by
+      cores. The power of cache, SRAM and L1TCM power should be enabled
+      before booting SCP cores. The size of cache, SRAM, and L1TCM are varied
+      on differnt SoCs.
+
+      The SCP cores do not use an MMU, but has a set of registers to
+      control the translations between 32-bit CPU addresses into system bus
+      addresses. Cache and memory access settings are provided through a
+      Memory Protection Unit (MPU), programmable only from the SCP.
+
+    properties:
+      compatible:
+        enum:
+          - mediatek,scp-core
+
+      reg:
+        description: The base address and size of SRAM.
+        maxItems: 1
+
+      reg-names:
+        const: sram
+
+      interrupts:
+        maxItems: 1
+
+      firmware-name:
+        $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/string
+        description:
+          If present, name (or relative path) of the file within the
+          firmware search path containing the firmware image used when
+          initializing sub cores of multi-core SCP.
+
+      memory-region:
+        maxItems: 1
+
+      cros-ec-rpmsg:
+        $ref: /schemas/mfd/google,cros-ec.yaml
+        description:
+          This subnode represents the rpmsg device. The properties
+          of this node are defined by the individual bindings for
+          the rpmsg devices.
+
+        required:
+          - mediatek,rpmsg-name
+
+        unevaluatedProperties: false
+
+    required:
+      - compatible
+      - reg
+      - reg-names
+
+    additionalProperties: false
+
 required:
   - compatible
   - reg
@@ -99,7 +172,37 @@ allOf:
         reg:
           maxItems: 2
         reg-names:
+          items:
+            - const: sram
+            - const: cfg
+  - if:
+      properties:
+        compatible:
+          enum:
+            - mediatek,mt8192-scp
+            - mediatek,mt8195-scp
+    then:
+      properties:
+        reg:
+          maxItems: 3
+        reg-names:
+          items:
+            - const: sram
+            - const: cfg
+            - const: l1tcm
+  - if:
+      properties:
+        compatible:
+          enum:
+            - mediatek,mt8195-scp-dual
+    then:
+      properties:
+        reg:
           maxItems: 2
+        reg-names:
+          items:
+            - const: cfg
+            - const: l1tcm
 
 additionalProperties: false
 
@@ -121,3 +224,37 @@ examples:
             mediatek,rpmsg-name = "cros-ec-rpmsg";
         };
     };
+
+  - |
+    scp@10500000 {
+        compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-scp-dual";
+        reg = <0x10720000 0xe0000>,
+              <0x10700000 0x8000>;
+        reg-names = "cfg", "l1tcm";
+
+        #address-cells = <1>;
+        #size-cells = <1>;
+        ranges = <0 0x10500000 0x100000>;
+
+        scp@0 {
+            compatible = "mediatek,scp-core";
+            reg = <0x0 0xa0000>;
+            reg-names = "sram";
+
+            cros-ec-rpmsg {
+                compatible = "google,cros-ec-rpmsg";
+                mediatek,rpmsg-name = "cros-ec-rpmsg";
+            };
+        };
+
+        scp@a0000 {
+            compatible = "mediatek,scp-core";
+            reg = <0xa0000 0x20000>;
+            reg-names = "sram";
+
+            cros-ec-rpmsg {
+                compatible = "google,cros-ec-rpmsg";
+                mediatek,rpmsg-name = "cros-ec-rpmsg";
+            };
+        };
+    };
-- 
2.18.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v15 04/13] remoteproc: mediatek: Add MT8195 SCP core 1 operations
  2023-07-21  2:41 ` Tinghan Shen
@ 2023-07-21  2:41   ` Tinghan Shen
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Tinghan Shen @ 2023-07-21  2:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bjorn Andersson, Mathieu Poirier, Rob Herring,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Matthias Brugger,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno, Tinghan Shen
  Cc: linux-remoteproc, devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-mediatek, Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group

The SCP rproc driver has a set of chip dependent callbacks for
boot sequence and IRQ handling. Implement these callbacks for MT8195
SCP core 1.

Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h |  9 ++++++
 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c    | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 64 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
index ea6fa1100a00..c0905aec3b4b 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
@@ -47,6 +47,7 @@
 #define MT8192_SCP2SPM_IPC_CLR		0x4094
 #define MT8192_GIPC_IN_SET		0x4098
 #define MT8192_HOST_IPC_INT_BIT		BIT(0)
+#define MT8195_CORE1_HOST_IPC_INT_BIT	BIT(4)
 
 #define MT8192_CORE0_SW_RSTN_CLR	0x10000
 #define MT8192_CORE0_SW_RSTN_SET	0x10004
@@ -56,6 +57,14 @@
 
 #define MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_RSI_BITS		GENMASK(7, 4)
 
+#define MT8195_CPU1_SRAM_PD			0x1084
+#define MT8195_SSHUB2APMCU_IPC_SET		0x4088
+#define MT8195_SSHUB2APMCU_IPC_CLR		0x408C
+#define MT8195_CORE1_SW_RSTN_CLR		0x20000
+#define MT8195_CORE1_SW_RSTN_SET		0x20004
+#define MT8195_CORE1_MEM_ATT_PREDEF		0x20008
+#define MT8195_CORE1_WDT_CFG			0x20034
+
 #define SCP_FW_VER_LEN			32
 #define SCP_SHARE_BUFFER_SIZE		288
 
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
index dcc94ee2458d..48e759c2d486 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
@@ -176,6 +176,16 @@ static void mt8192_scp_reset_deassert(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 	writel(1, scp->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_SW_RSTN_CLR);
 }
 
+static void mt8195_scp_c1_reset_assert(struct mtk_scp *scp)
+{
+	writel(1, scp->reg_base + MT8195_CORE1_SW_RSTN_SET);
+}
+
+static void mt8195_scp_c1_reset_deassert(struct mtk_scp *scp)
+{
+	writel(1, scp->reg_base + MT8195_CORE1_SW_RSTN_CLR);
+}
+
 static void mt8183_scp_irq_handler(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 {
 	u32 scp_to_host;
@@ -212,6 +222,18 @@ static void mt8192_scp_irq_handler(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 	}
 }
 
+static void mt8195_scp_c1_irq_handler(struct mtk_scp *scp)
+{
+	u32 scp_to_host;
+
+	scp_to_host = readl(scp->reg_base + MT8195_SSHUB2APMCU_IPC_SET);
+
+	if (scp_to_host & MT8192_SCP_IPC_INT_BIT)
+		scp_ipi_handler(scp);
+
+	writel(scp_to_host, scp->reg_base + MT8195_SSHUB2APMCU_IPC_CLR);
+}
+
 static irqreturn_t scp_irq_handler(int irq, void *priv)
 {
 	struct mtk_scp *scp = priv;
@@ -453,6 +475,18 @@ static int mt8195_scp_before_load(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int mt8195_scp_c1_before_load(struct mtk_scp *scp)
+{
+	scp->data->scp_reset_assert(scp);
+
+	scp_sram_power_on(scp->reg_base + MT8195_CPU1_SRAM_PD, 0);
+
+	/* enable MPU for all memory regions */
+	writel(0xff, scp->reg_base + MT8195_CORE1_MEM_ATT_PREDEF);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int scp_load(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
 {
 	struct mtk_scp *scp = rproc->priv;
@@ -625,6 +659,15 @@ static void mt8195_scp_stop(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 	writel(0, scp->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_WDT_CFG);
 }
 
+static void mt8195_scp_c1_stop(struct mtk_scp *scp)
+{
+	/* Power off CPU SRAM */
+	scp_sram_power_off(scp->reg_base + MT8195_CPU1_SRAM_PD, 0);
+
+	/* Disable SCP watchdog */
+	writel(0, scp->reg_base + MT8195_CORE1_WDT_CFG);
+}
+
 static int scp_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
 {
 	struct mtk_scp *scp = rproc->priv;
@@ -989,6 +1032,18 @@ static const struct mtk_scp_of_data mt8195_of_data = {
 	.host_to_scp_int_bit = MT8192_HOST_IPC_INT_BIT,
 };
 
+static const struct mtk_scp_of_data mt8195_of_data_c1 = {
+	.scp_clk_get = mt8195_scp_clk_get,
+	.scp_before_load = mt8195_scp_c1_before_load,
+	.scp_irq_handler = mt8195_scp_c1_irq_handler,
+	.scp_reset_assert = mt8195_scp_c1_reset_assert,
+	.scp_reset_deassert = mt8195_scp_c1_reset_deassert,
+	.scp_stop = mt8195_scp_c1_stop,
+	.scp_da_to_va = mt8192_scp_da_to_va,
+	.host_to_scp_reg = MT8192_GIPC_IN_SET,
+	.host_to_scp_int_bit = MT8195_CORE1_HOST_IPC_INT_BIT,
+};
+
 static const struct of_device_id mtk_scp_of_match[] = {
 	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8183-scp", .data = &mt8183_of_data },
 	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8186-scp", .data = &mt8186_of_data },
-- 
2.18.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v15 04/13] remoteproc: mediatek: Add MT8195 SCP core 1 operations
@ 2023-07-21  2:41   ` Tinghan Shen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Tinghan Shen @ 2023-07-21  2:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bjorn Andersson, Mathieu Poirier, Rob Herring,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Matthias Brugger,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno, Tinghan Shen
  Cc: linux-remoteproc, devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-mediatek, Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group

The SCP rproc driver has a set of chip dependent callbacks for
boot sequence and IRQ handling. Implement these callbacks for MT8195
SCP core 1.

Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h |  9 ++++++
 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c    | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 64 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
index ea6fa1100a00..c0905aec3b4b 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
@@ -47,6 +47,7 @@
 #define MT8192_SCP2SPM_IPC_CLR		0x4094
 #define MT8192_GIPC_IN_SET		0x4098
 #define MT8192_HOST_IPC_INT_BIT		BIT(0)
+#define MT8195_CORE1_HOST_IPC_INT_BIT	BIT(4)
 
 #define MT8192_CORE0_SW_RSTN_CLR	0x10000
 #define MT8192_CORE0_SW_RSTN_SET	0x10004
@@ -56,6 +57,14 @@
 
 #define MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_RSI_BITS		GENMASK(7, 4)
 
+#define MT8195_CPU1_SRAM_PD			0x1084
+#define MT8195_SSHUB2APMCU_IPC_SET		0x4088
+#define MT8195_SSHUB2APMCU_IPC_CLR		0x408C
+#define MT8195_CORE1_SW_RSTN_CLR		0x20000
+#define MT8195_CORE1_SW_RSTN_SET		0x20004
+#define MT8195_CORE1_MEM_ATT_PREDEF		0x20008
+#define MT8195_CORE1_WDT_CFG			0x20034
+
 #define SCP_FW_VER_LEN			32
 #define SCP_SHARE_BUFFER_SIZE		288
 
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
index dcc94ee2458d..48e759c2d486 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
@@ -176,6 +176,16 @@ static void mt8192_scp_reset_deassert(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 	writel(1, scp->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_SW_RSTN_CLR);
 }
 
+static void mt8195_scp_c1_reset_assert(struct mtk_scp *scp)
+{
+	writel(1, scp->reg_base + MT8195_CORE1_SW_RSTN_SET);
+}
+
+static void mt8195_scp_c1_reset_deassert(struct mtk_scp *scp)
+{
+	writel(1, scp->reg_base + MT8195_CORE1_SW_RSTN_CLR);
+}
+
 static void mt8183_scp_irq_handler(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 {
 	u32 scp_to_host;
@@ -212,6 +222,18 @@ static void mt8192_scp_irq_handler(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 	}
 }
 
+static void mt8195_scp_c1_irq_handler(struct mtk_scp *scp)
+{
+	u32 scp_to_host;
+
+	scp_to_host = readl(scp->reg_base + MT8195_SSHUB2APMCU_IPC_SET);
+
+	if (scp_to_host & MT8192_SCP_IPC_INT_BIT)
+		scp_ipi_handler(scp);
+
+	writel(scp_to_host, scp->reg_base + MT8195_SSHUB2APMCU_IPC_CLR);
+}
+
 static irqreturn_t scp_irq_handler(int irq, void *priv)
 {
 	struct mtk_scp *scp = priv;
@@ -453,6 +475,18 @@ static int mt8195_scp_before_load(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int mt8195_scp_c1_before_load(struct mtk_scp *scp)
+{
+	scp->data->scp_reset_assert(scp);
+
+	scp_sram_power_on(scp->reg_base + MT8195_CPU1_SRAM_PD, 0);
+
+	/* enable MPU for all memory regions */
+	writel(0xff, scp->reg_base + MT8195_CORE1_MEM_ATT_PREDEF);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int scp_load(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
 {
 	struct mtk_scp *scp = rproc->priv;
@@ -625,6 +659,15 @@ static void mt8195_scp_stop(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 	writel(0, scp->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_WDT_CFG);
 }
 
+static void mt8195_scp_c1_stop(struct mtk_scp *scp)
+{
+	/* Power off CPU SRAM */
+	scp_sram_power_off(scp->reg_base + MT8195_CPU1_SRAM_PD, 0);
+
+	/* Disable SCP watchdog */
+	writel(0, scp->reg_base + MT8195_CORE1_WDT_CFG);
+}
+
 static int scp_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
 {
 	struct mtk_scp *scp = rproc->priv;
@@ -989,6 +1032,18 @@ static const struct mtk_scp_of_data mt8195_of_data = {
 	.host_to_scp_int_bit = MT8192_HOST_IPC_INT_BIT,
 };
 
+static const struct mtk_scp_of_data mt8195_of_data_c1 = {
+	.scp_clk_get = mt8195_scp_clk_get,
+	.scp_before_load = mt8195_scp_c1_before_load,
+	.scp_irq_handler = mt8195_scp_c1_irq_handler,
+	.scp_reset_assert = mt8195_scp_c1_reset_assert,
+	.scp_reset_deassert = mt8195_scp_c1_reset_deassert,
+	.scp_stop = mt8195_scp_c1_stop,
+	.scp_da_to_va = mt8192_scp_da_to_va,
+	.host_to_scp_reg = MT8192_GIPC_IN_SET,
+	.host_to_scp_int_bit = MT8195_CORE1_HOST_IPC_INT_BIT,
+};
+
 static const struct of_device_id mtk_scp_of_match[] = {
 	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8183-scp", .data = &mt8183_of_data },
 	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8186-scp", .data = &mt8186_of_data },
-- 
2.18.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v15 05/13] remoteproc: mediatek: Extract SCP common registers
  2023-07-21  2:41 ` Tinghan Shen
@ 2023-07-21  2:41   ` Tinghan Shen
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Tinghan Shen @ 2023-07-21  2:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bjorn Andersson, Mathieu Poirier, Rob Herring,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Matthias Brugger,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno, Tinghan Shen
  Cc: linux-remoteproc, devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-mediatek, Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group

This is the 1st preliminary steps for probing multi-core SCP.
The registers of config and l1tcm are common on single-core SCP
and multi-core SCP. Extract these registers out to reduce duplicated
fields in mtk_scp when probing multi-core SCP.

Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h  |  13 +-
 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c     | 201 +++++++++++++++++--------------
 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp_ipi.c |   4 +-
 3 files changed, 122 insertions(+), 96 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
index c0905aec3b4b..b04d71277c1f 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
@@ -100,17 +100,20 @@ struct mtk_scp_of_data {
 	size_t ipi_buf_offset;
 };
 
+struct mtk_scp_of_cluster {
+	void __iomem *reg_base;
+	void __iomem *l1tcm_base;
+	size_t l1tcm_size;
+	phys_addr_t l1tcm_phys;
+};
+
 struct mtk_scp {
 	struct device *dev;
 	struct rproc *rproc;
 	struct clk *clk;
-	void __iomem *reg_base;
 	void __iomem *sram_base;
 	size_t sram_size;
 	phys_addr_t sram_phys;
-	void __iomem *l1tcm_base;
-	size_t l1tcm_size;
-	phys_addr_t l1tcm_phys;
 
 	const struct mtk_scp_of_data *data;
 
@@ -128,6 +131,8 @@ struct mtk_scp {
 	size_t dram_size;
 
 	struct rproc_subdev *rpmsg_subdev;
+
+	struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *cluster;
 };
 
 /**
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
index 48e759c2d486..9486f5020946 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
@@ -152,45 +152,45 @@ static void mt8183_scp_reset_assert(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 {
 	u32 val;
 
-	val = readl(scp->reg_base + MT8183_SW_RSTN);
+	val = readl(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SW_RSTN);
 	val &= ~MT8183_SW_RSTN_BIT;
-	writel(val, scp->reg_base + MT8183_SW_RSTN);
+	writel(val, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SW_RSTN);
 }
 
 static void mt8183_scp_reset_deassert(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 {
 	u32 val;
 
-	val = readl(scp->reg_base + MT8183_SW_RSTN);
+	val = readl(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SW_RSTN);
 	val |= MT8183_SW_RSTN_BIT;
-	writel(val, scp->reg_base + MT8183_SW_RSTN);
+	writel(val, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SW_RSTN);
 }
 
 static void mt8192_scp_reset_assert(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 {
-	writel(1, scp->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_SW_RSTN_SET);
+	writel(1, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_SW_RSTN_SET);
 }
 
 static void mt8192_scp_reset_deassert(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 {
-	writel(1, scp->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_SW_RSTN_CLR);
+	writel(1, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_SW_RSTN_CLR);
 }
 
 static void mt8195_scp_c1_reset_assert(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 {
-	writel(1, scp->reg_base + MT8195_CORE1_SW_RSTN_SET);
+	writel(1, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8195_CORE1_SW_RSTN_SET);
 }
 
 static void mt8195_scp_c1_reset_deassert(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 {
-	writel(1, scp->reg_base + MT8195_CORE1_SW_RSTN_CLR);
+	writel(1, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8195_CORE1_SW_RSTN_CLR);
 }
 
 static void mt8183_scp_irq_handler(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 {
 	u32 scp_to_host;
 
-	scp_to_host = readl(scp->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_TO_HOST);
+	scp_to_host = readl(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_TO_HOST);
 	if (scp_to_host & MT8183_SCP_IPC_INT_BIT)
 		scp_ipi_handler(scp);
 	else
@@ -198,14 +198,14 @@ static void mt8183_scp_irq_handler(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 
 	/* SCP won't send another interrupt until we set SCP_TO_HOST to 0. */
 	writel(MT8183_SCP_IPC_INT_BIT | MT8183_SCP_WDT_INT_BIT,
-	       scp->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_TO_HOST);
+	       scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_TO_HOST);
 }
 
 static void mt8192_scp_irq_handler(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 {
 	u32 scp_to_host;
 
-	scp_to_host = readl(scp->reg_base + MT8192_SCP2APMCU_IPC_SET);
+	scp_to_host = readl(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_SCP2APMCU_IPC_SET);
 
 	if (scp_to_host & MT8192_SCP_IPC_INT_BIT) {
 		scp_ipi_handler(scp);
@@ -215,10 +215,10 @@ static void mt8192_scp_irq_handler(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 		 * MT8192_SCP2APMCU_IPC.
 		 */
 		writel(MT8192_SCP_IPC_INT_BIT,
-		       scp->reg_base + MT8192_SCP2APMCU_IPC_CLR);
+		       scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_SCP2APMCU_IPC_CLR);
 	} else {
 		scp_wdt_handler(scp, scp_to_host);
-		writel(1, scp->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_WDT_IRQ);
+		writel(1, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_WDT_IRQ);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -226,12 +226,12 @@ static void mt8195_scp_c1_irq_handler(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 {
 	u32 scp_to_host;
 
-	scp_to_host = readl(scp->reg_base + MT8195_SSHUB2APMCU_IPC_SET);
+	scp_to_host = readl(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8195_SSHUB2APMCU_IPC_SET);
 
 	if (scp_to_host & MT8192_SCP_IPC_INT_BIT)
 		scp_ipi_handler(scp);
 
-	writel(scp_to_host, scp->reg_base + MT8195_SSHUB2APMCU_IPC_CLR);
+	writel(scp_to_host, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8195_SSHUB2APMCU_IPC_CLR);
 }
 
 static irqreturn_t scp_irq_handler(int irq, void *priv)
@@ -363,26 +363,26 @@ static int mt8195_scp_clk_get(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 static int mt8183_scp_before_load(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 {
 	/* Clear SCP to host interrupt */
-	writel(MT8183_SCP_IPC_INT_BIT, scp->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_TO_HOST);
+	writel(MT8183_SCP_IPC_INT_BIT, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_TO_HOST);
 
 	/* Reset clocks before loading FW */
-	writel(0x0, scp->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_CLK_SW_SEL);
-	writel(0x0, scp->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_CLK_DIV_SEL);
+	writel(0x0, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_CLK_SW_SEL);
+	writel(0x0, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_CLK_DIV_SEL);
 
 	/* Initialize TCM before loading FW. */
-	writel(0x0, scp->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_L1_SRAM_PD);
-	writel(0x0, scp->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_TCM_TAIL_SRAM_PD);
+	writel(0x0, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_L1_SRAM_PD);
+	writel(0x0, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_TCM_TAIL_SRAM_PD);
 
 	/* Turn on the power of SCP's SRAM before using it. */
-	writel(0x0, scp->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_SRAM_PDN);
+	writel(0x0, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_SRAM_PDN);
 
 	/*
 	 * Set I-cache and D-cache size before loading SCP FW.
 	 * SCP SRAM logical address may change when cache size setting differs.
 	 */
 	writel(MT8183_SCP_CACHE_CON_WAYEN | MT8183_SCP_CACHESIZE_8KB,
-	       scp->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_CACHE_CON);
-	writel(MT8183_SCP_CACHESIZE_8KB, scp->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_DCACHE_CON);
+	       scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_CACHE_CON);
+	writel(MT8183_SCP_CACHESIZE_8KB, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_DCACHE_CON);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -408,28 +408,28 @@ static void scp_sram_power_off(void __iomem *addr, u32 reserved_mask)
 static int mt8186_scp_before_load(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 {
 	/* Clear SCP to host interrupt */
-	writel(MT8183_SCP_IPC_INT_BIT, scp->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_TO_HOST);
+	writel(MT8183_SCP_IPC_INT_BIT, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_TO_HOST);
 
 	/* Reset clocks before loading FW */
-	writel(0x0, scp->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_CLK_SW_SEL);
-	writel(0x0, scp->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_CLK_DIV_SEL);
+	writel(0x0, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_CLK_SW_SEL);
+	writel(0x0, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_CLK_DIV_SEL);
 
 	/* Turn on the power of SCP's SRAM before using it. Enable 1 block per time*/
-	scp_sram_power_on(scp->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_SRAM_PDN, 0);
+	scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_SRAM_PDN, 0);
 
 	/* Initialize TCM before loading FW. */
-	writel(0x0, scp->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_L1_SRAM_PD);
-	writel(0x0, scp->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_TCM_TAIL_SRAM_PD);
-	writel(0x0, scp->reg_base + MT8186_SCP_L1_SRAM_PD_P1);
-	writel(0x0, scp->reg_base + MT8186_SCP_L1_SRAM_PD_p2);
+	writel(0x0, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_L1_SRAM_PD);
+	writel(0x0, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_TCM_TAIL_SRAM_PD);
+	writel(0x0, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8186_SCP_L1_SRAM_PD_P1);
+	writel(0x0, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8186_SCP_L1_SRAM_PD_p2);
 
 	/*
 	 * Set I-cache and D-cache size before loading SCP FW.
 	 * SCP SRAM logical address may change when cache size setting differs.
 	 */
 	writel(MT8183_SCP_CACHE_CON_WAYEN | MT8183_SCP_CACHESIZE_8KB,
-	       scp->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_CACHE_CON);
-	writel(MT8183_SCP_CACHESIZE_8KB, scp->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_DCACHE_CON);
+	       scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_CACHE_CON);
+	writel(MT8183_SCP_CACHESIZE_8KB, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_DCACHE_CON);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -437,19 +437,19 @@ static int mt8186_scp_before_load(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 static int mt8192_scp_before_load(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 {
 	/* clear SPM interrupt, SCP2SPM_IPC_CLR */
-	writel(0xff, scp->reg_base + MT8192_SCP2SPM_IPC_CLR);
+	writel(0xff, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_SCP2SPM_IPC_CLR);
 
-	writel(1, scp->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_SW_RSTN_SET);
+	writel(1, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_SW_RSTN_SET);
 
 	/* enable SRAM clock */
-	scp_sram_power_on(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_0, 0);
-	scp_sram_power_on(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_1, 0);
-	scp_sram_power_on(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_2, 0);
-	scp_sram_power_on(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN, 0);
-	scp_sram_power_on(scp->reg_base + MT8192_CPU0_SRAM_PD, 0);
+	scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_0, 0);
+	scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_1, 0);
+	scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_2, 0);
+	scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN, 0);
+	scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_CPU0_SRAM_PD, 0);
 
 	/* enable MPU for all memory regions */
-	writel(0xff, scp->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_MEM_ATT_PREDEF);
+	writel(0xff, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_MEM_ATT_PREDEF);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -457,20 +457,20 @@ static int mt8192_scp_before_load(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 static int mt8195_scp_before_load(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 {
 	/* clear SPM interrupt, SCP2SPM_IPC_CLR */
-	writel(0xff, scp->reg_base + MT8192_SCP2SPM_IPC_CLR);
+	writel(0xff, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_SCP2SPM_IPC_CLR);
 
-	writel(1, scp->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_SW_RSTN_SET);
+	writel(1, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_SW_RSTN_SET);
 
 	/* enable SRAM clock */
-	scp_sram_power_on(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_0, 0);
-	scp_sram_power_on(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_1, 0);
-	scp_sram_power_on(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_2, 0);
-	scp_sram_power_on(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN,
+	scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_0, 0);
+	scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_1, 0);
+	scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_2, 0);
+	scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN,
 			  MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_RSI_BITS);
-	scp_sram_power_on(scp->reg_base + MT8192_CPU0_SRAM_PD, 0);
+	scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_CPU0_SRAM_PD, 0);
 
 	/* enable MPU for all memory regions */
-	writel(0xff, scp->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_MEM_ATT_PREDEF);
+	writel(0xff, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_MEM_ATT_PREDEF);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -479,10 +479,10 @@ static int mt8195_scp_c1_before_load(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 {
 	scp->data->scp_reset_assert(scp);
 
-	scp_sram_power_on(scp->reg_base + MT8195_CPU1_SRAM_PD, 0);
+	scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8195_CPU1_SRAM_PD, 0);
 
 	/* enable MPU for all memory regions */
-	writel(0xff, scp->reg_base + MT8195_CORE1_MEM_ATT_PREDEF);
+	writel(0xff, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8195_CORE1_MEM_ATT_PREDEF);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -601,11 +601,11 @@ static void *mt8192_scp_da_to_va(struct mtk_scp *scp, u64 da, size_t len)
 	}
 
 	/* optional memory region */
-	if (scp->l1tcm_size &&
-	    da >= scp->l1tcm_phys &&
-	    (da + len) <= scp->l1tcm_phys + scp->l1tcm_size) {
-		offset = da - scp->l1tcm_phys;
-		return (void __force *)scp->l1tcm_base + offset;
+	if (scp->cluster->l1tcm_size &&
+	    da >= scp->cluster->l1tcm_phys &&
+	    (da + len) <= scp->cluster->l1tcm_phys + scp->cluster->l1tcm_size) {
+		offset = da - scp->cluster->l1tcm_phys;
+		return (void __force *)scp->cluster->l1tcm_base + offset;
 	}
 
 	/* optional memory region */
@@ -629,43 +629,43 @@ static void *scp_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, size_t len, bool *is_iome
 static void mt8183_scp_stop(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 {
 	/* Disable SCP watchdog */
-	writel(0, scp->reg_base + MT8183_WDT_CFG);
+	writel(0, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_WDT_CFG);
 }
 
 static void mt8192_scp_stop(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 {
 	/* Disable SRAM clock */
-	scp_sram_power_off(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_0, 0);
-	scp_sram_power_off(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_1, 0);
-	scp_sram_power_off(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_2, 0);
-	scp_sram_power_off(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN, 0);
-	scp_sram_power_off(scp->reg_base + MT8192_CPU0_SRAM_PD, 0);
+	scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_0, 0);
+	scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_1, 0);
+	scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_2, 0);
+	scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN, 0);
+	scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_CPU0_SRAM_PD, 0);
 
 	/* Disable SCP watchdog */
-	writel(0, scp->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_WDT_CFG);
+	writel(0, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_WDT_CFG);
 }
 
 static void mt8195_scp_stop(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 {
 	/* Disable SRAM clock */
-	scp_sram_power_off(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_0, 0);
-	scp_sram_power_off(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_1, 0);
-	scp_sram_power_off(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_2, 0);
-	scp_sram_power_off(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN,
+	scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_0, 0);
+	scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_1, 0);
+	scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_2, 0);
+	scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN,
 			   MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_RSI_BITS);
-	scp_sram_power_off(scp->reg_base + MT8192_CPU0_SRAM_PD, 0);
+	scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_CPU0_SRAM_PD, 0);
 
 	/* Disable SCP watchdog */
-	writel(0, scp->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_WDT_CFG);
+	writel(0, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_WDT_CFG);
 }
 
 static void mt8195_scp_c1_stop(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 {
 	/* Power off CPU SRAM */
-	scp_sram_power_off(scp->reg_base + MT8195_CPU1_SRAM_PD, 0);
+	scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8195_CPU1_SRAM_PD, 0);
 
 	/* Disable SCP watchdog */
-	writel(0, scp->reg_base + MT8195_CORE1_WDT_CFG);
+	writel(0, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8195_CORE1_WDT_CFG);
 }
 
 static int scp_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
@@ -854,7 +854,8 @@ static void scp_remove_rpmsg_subdev(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 	}
 }
 
-static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+static int scp_cluster_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
+			    struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster)
 {
 	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
 	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
@@ -876,6 +877,7 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	scp->rproc = rproc;
 	scp->dev = dev;
 	scp->data = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
+	scp->cluster = scp_cluster;
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, scp);
 
 	res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "sram");
@@ -887,24 +889,6 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	scp->sram_size = resource_size(res);
 	scp->sram_phys = res->start;
 
-	/* l1tcm is an optional memory region */
-	res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "l1tcm");
-	scp->l1tcm_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
-	if (IS_ERR(scp->l1tcm_base)) {
-		ret = PTR_ERR(scp->l1tcm_base);
-		if (ret != -EINVAL) {
-			return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to map l1tcm memory\n");
-		}
-	} else {
-		scp->l1tcm_size = resource_size(res);
-		scp->l1tcm_phys = res->start;
-	}
-
-	scp->reg_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "cfg");
-	if (IS_ERR(scp->reg_base))
-		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(scp->reg_base),
-				     "Failed to parse and map cfg memory\n");
-
 	ret = scp->data->scp_clk_get(scp);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
@@ -956,6 +940,43 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	return ret;
 }
 
+static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+	struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster;
+	struct resource *res;
+	int ret;
+
+	scp_cluster = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*scp_cluster), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!scp_cluster)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	scp_cluster->reg_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "cfg");
+	if (IS_ERR(scp_cluster->reg_base))
+		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(scp_cluster->reg_base),
+				     "Failed to parse and map cfg memory\n");
+
+	/* l1tcm is an optional memory region */
+	res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "l1tcm");
+	scp_cluster->l1tcm_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
+	if (IS_ERR(scp_cluster->l1tcm_base)) {
+		ret = PTR_ERR(scp_cluster->l1tcm_base);
+		if (ret != -EINVAL)
+			return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to map l1tcm memory\n");
+
+		scp_cluster->l1tcm_base = NULL;
+	} else {
+		scp_cluster->l1tcm_size = resource_size(res);
+		scp_cluster->l1tcm_phys = res->start;
+	}
+
+	ret = scp_cluster_init(pdev, scp_cluster);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static void scp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct mtk_scp *scp = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp_ipi.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp_ipi.c
index 9c7c17b9d181..cd0b60106ec2 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp_ipi.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp_ipi.c
@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ int scp_ipi_send(struct mtk_scp *scp, u32 id, void *buf, unsigned int len,
 	mutex_lock(&scp->send_lock);
 
 	 /* Wait until SCP receives the last command */
-	ret = readl_poll_timeout_atomic(scp->reg_base + scp->data->host_to_scp_reg,
+	ret = readl_poll_timeout_atomic(scp->cluster->reg_base + scp->data->host_to_scp_reg,
 					val, !val, 0, SCP_TIMEOUT_US);
 	if (ret) {
 		dev_err(scp->dev, "%s: IPI timeout!\n", __func__);
@@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ int scp_ipi_send(struct mtk_scp *scp, u32 id, void *buf, unsigned int len,
 	scp->ipi_id_ack[id] = false;
 	/* send the command to SCP */
 	writel(scp->data->host_to_scp_int_bit,
-	       scp->reg_base + scp->data->host_to_scp_reg);
+	       scp->cluster->reg_base + scp->data->host_to_scp_reg);
 
 	if (wait) {
 		/* wait for SCP's ACK */
-- 
2.18.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v15 05/13] remoteproc: mediatek: Extract SCP common registers
@ 2023-07-21  2:41   ` Tinghan Shen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Tinghan Shen @ 2023-07-21  2:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bjorn Andersson, Mathieu Poirier, Rob Herring,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Matthias Brugger,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno, Tinghan Shen
  Cc: linux-remoteproc, devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-mediatek, Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group

This is the 1st preliminary steps for probing multi-core SCP.
The registers of config and l1tcm are common on single-core SCP
and multi-core SCP. Extract these registers out to reduce duplicated
fields in mtk_scp when probing multi-core SCP.

Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h  |  13 +-
 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c     | 201 +++++++++++++++++--------------
 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp_ipi.c |   4 +-
 3 files changed, 122 insertions(+), 96 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
index c0905aec3b4b..b04d71277c1f 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
@@ -100,17 +100,20 @@ struct mtk_scp_of_data {
 	size_t ipi_buf_offset;
 };
 
+struct mtk_scp_of_cluster {
+	void __iomem *reg_base;
+	void __iomem *l1tcm_base;
+	size_t l1tcm_size;
+	phys_addr_t l1tcm_phys;
+};
+
 struct mtk_scp {
 	struct device *dev;
 	struct rproc *rproc;
 	struct clk *clk;
-	void __iomem *reg_base;
 	void __iomem *sram_base;
 	size_t sram_size;
 	phys_addr_t sram_phys;
-	void __iomem *l1tcm_base;
-	size_t l1tcm_size;
-	phys_addr_t l1tcm_phys;
 
 	const struct mtk_scp_of_data *data;
 
@@ -128,6 +131,8 @@ struct mtk_scp {
 	size_t dram_size;
 
 	struct rproc_subdev *rpmsg_subdev;
+
+	struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *cluster;
 };
 
 /**
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
index 48e759c2d486..9486f5020946 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
@@ -152,45 +152,45 @@ static void mt8183_scp_reset_assert(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 {
 	u32 val;
 
-	val = readl(scp->reg_base + MT8183_SW_RSTN);
+	val = readl(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SW_RSTN);
 	val &= ~MT8183_SW_RSTN_BIT;
-	writel(val, scp->reg_base + MT8183_SW_RSTN);
+	writel(val, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SW_RSTN);
 }
 
 static void mt8183_scp_reset_deassert(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 {
 	u32 val;
 
-	val = readl(scp->reg_base + MT8183_SW_RSTN);
+	val = readl(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SW_RSTN);
 	val |= MT8183_SW_RSTN_BIT;
-	writel(val, scp->reg_base + MT8183_SW_RSTN);
+	writel(val, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SW_RSTN);
 }
 
 static void mt8192_scp_reset_assert(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 {
-	writel(1, scp->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_SW_RSTN_SET);
+	writel(1, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_SW_RSTN_SET);
 }
 
 static void mt8192_scp_reset_deassert(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 {
-	writel(1, scp->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_SW_RSTN_CLR);
+	writel(1, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_SW_RSTN_CLR);
 }
 
 static void mt8195_scp_c1_reset_assert(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 {
-	writel(1, scp->reg_base + MT8195_CORE1_SW_RSTN_SET);
+	writel(1, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8195_CORE1_SW_RSTN_SET);
 }
 
 static void mt8195_scp_c1_reset_deassert(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 {
-	writel(1, scp->reg_base + MT8195_CORE1_SW_RSTN_CLR);
+	writel(1, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8195_CORE1_SW_RSTN_CLR);
 }
 
 static void mt8183_scp_irq_handler(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 {
 	u32 scp_to_host;
 
-	scp_to_host = readl(scp->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_TO_HOST);
+	scp_to_host = readl(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_TO_HOST);
 	if (scp_to_host & MT8183_SCP_IPC_INT_BIT)
 		scp_ipi_handler(scp);
 	else
@@ -198,14 +198,14 @@ static void mt8183_scp_irq_handler(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 
 	/* SCP won't send another interrupt until we set SCP_TO_HOST to 0. */
 	writel(MT8183_SCP_IPC_INT_BIT | MT8183_SCP_WDT_INT_BIT,
-	       scp->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_TO_HOST);
+	       scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_TO_HOST);
 }
 
 static void mt8192_scp_irq_handler(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 {
 	u32 scp_to_host;
 
-	scp_to_host = readl(scp->reg_base + MT8192_SCP2APMCU_IPC_SET);
+	scp_to_host = readl(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_SCP2APMCU_IPC_SET);
 
 	if (scp_to_host & MT8192_SCP_IPC_INT_BIT) {
 		scp_ipi_handler(scp);
@@ -215,10 +215,10 @@ static void mt8192_scp_irq_handler(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 		 * MT8192_SCP2APMCU_IPC.
 		 */
 		writel(MT8192_SCP_IPC_INT_BIT,
-		       scp->reg_base + MT8192_SCP2APMCU_IPC_CLR);
+		       scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_SCP2APMCU_IPC_CLR);
 	} else {
 		scp_wdt_handler(scp, scp_to_host);
-		writel(1, scp->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_WDT_IRQ);
+		writel(1, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_WDT_IRQ);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -226,12 +226,12 @@ static void mt8195_scp_c1_irq_handler(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 {
 	u32 scp_to_host;
 
-	scp_to_host = readl(scp->reg_base + MT8195_SSHUB2APMCU_IPC_SET);
+	scp_to_host = readl(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8195_SSHUB2APMCU_IPC_SET);
 
 	if (scp_to_host & MT8192_SCP_IPC_INT_BIT)
 		scp_ipi_handler(scp);
 
-	writel(scp_to_host, scp->reg_base + MT8195_SSHUB2APMCU_IPC_CLR);
+	writel(scp_to_host, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8195_SSHUB2APMCU_IPC_CLR);
 }
 
 static irqreturn_t scp_irq_handler(int irq, void *priv)
@@ -363,26 +363,26 @@ static int mt8195_scp_clk_get(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 static int mt8183_scp_before_load(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 {
 	/* Clear SCP to host interrupt */
-	writel(MT8183_SCP_IPC_INT_BIT, scp->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_TO_HOST);
+	writel(MT8183_SCP_IPC_INT_BIT, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_TO_HOST);
 
 	/* Reset clocks before loading FW */
-	writel(0x0, scp->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_CLK_SW_SEL);
-	writel(0x0, scp->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_CLK_DIV_SEL);
+	writel(0x0, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_CLK_SW_SEL);
+	writel(0x0, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_CLK_DIV_SEL);
 
 	/* Initialize TCM before loading FW. */
-	writel(0x0, scp->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_L1_SRAM_PD);
-	writel(0x0, scp->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_TCM_TAIL_SRAM_PD);
+	writel(0x0, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_L1_SRAM_PD);
+	writel(0x0, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_TCM_TAIL_SRAM_PD);
 
 	/* Turn on the power of SCP's SRAM before using it. */
-	writel(0x0, scp->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_SRAM_PDN);
+	writel(0x0, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_SRAM_PDN);
 
 	/*
 	 * Set I-cache and D-cache size before loading SCP FW.
 	 * SCP SRAM logical address may change when cache size setting differs.
 	 */
 	writel(MT8183_SCP_CACHE_CON_WAYEN | MT8183_SCP_CACHESIZE_8KB,
-	       scp->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_CACHE_CON);
-	writel(MT8183_SCP_CACHESIZE_8KB, scp->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_DCACHE_CON);
+	       scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_CACHE_CON);
+	writel(MT8183_SCP_CACHESIZE_8KB, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_DCACHE_CON);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -408,28 +408,28 @@ static void scp_sram_power_off(void __iomem *addr, u32 reserved_mask)
 static int mt8186_scp_before_load(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 {
 	/* Clear SCP to host interrupt */
-	writel(MT8183_SCP_IPC_INT_BIT, scp->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_TO_HOST);
+	writel(MT8183_SCP_IPC_INT_BIT, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_TO_HOST);
 
 	/* Reset clocks before loading FW */
-	writel(0x0, scp->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_CLK_SW_SEL);
-	writel(0x0, scp->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_CLK_DIV_SEL);
+	writel(0x0, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_CLK_SW_SEL);
+	writel(0x0, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_CLK_DIV_SEL);
 
 	/* Turn on the power of SCP's SRAM before using it. Enable 1 block per time*/
-	scp_sram_power_on(scp->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_SRAM_PDN, 0);
+	scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_SRAM_PDN, 0);
 
 	/* Initialize TCM before loading FW. */
-	writel(0x0, scp->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_L1_SRAM_PD);
-	writel(0x0, scp->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_TCM_TAIL_SRAM_PD);
-	writel(0x0, scp->reg_base + MT8186_SCP_L1_SRAM_PD_P1);
-	writel(0x0, scp->reg_base + MT8186_SCP_L1_SRAM_PD_p2);
+	writel(0x0, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_L1_SRAM_PD);
+	writel(0x0, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_TCM_TAIL_SRAM_PD);
+	writel(0x0, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8186_SCP_L1_SRAM_PD_P1);
+	writel(0x0, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8186_SCP_L1_SRAM_PD_p2);
 
 	/*
 	 * Set I-cache and D-cache size before loading SCP FW.
 	 * SCP SRAM logical address may change when cache size setting differs.
 	 */
 	writel(MT8183_SCP_CACHE_CON_WAYEN | MT8183_SCP_CACHESIZE_8KB,
-	       scp->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_CACHE_CON);
-	writel(MT8183_SCP_CACHESIZE_8KB, scp->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_DCACHE_CON);
+	       scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_CACHE_CON);
+	writel(MT8183_SCP_CACHESIZE_8KB, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_DCACHE_CON);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -437,19 +437,19 @@ static int mt8186_scp_before_load(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 static int mt8192_scp_before_load(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 {
 	/* clear SPM interrupt, SCP2SPM_IPC_CLR */
-	writel(0xff, scp->reg_base + MT8192_SCP2SPM_IPC_CLR);
+	writel(0xff, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_SCP2SPM_IPC_CLR);
 
-	writel(1, scp->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_SW_RSTN_SET);
+	writel(1, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_SW_RSTN_SET);
 
 	/* enable SRAM clock */
-	scp_sram_power_on(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_0, 0);
-	scp_sram_power_on(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_1, 0);
-	scp_sram_power_on(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_2, 0);
-	scp_sram_power_on(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN, 0);
-	scp_sram_power_on(scp->reg_base + MT8192_CPU0_SRAM_PD, 0);
+	scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_0, 0);
+	scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_1, 0);
+	scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_2, 0);
+	scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN, 0);
+	scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_CPU0_SRAM_PD, 0);
 
 	/* enable MPU for all memory regions */
-	writel(0xff, scp->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_MEM_ATT_PREDEF);
+	writel(0xff, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_MEM_ATT_PREDEF);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -457,20 +457,20 @@ static int mt8192_scp_before_load(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 static int mt8195_scp_before_load(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 {
 	/* clear SPM interrupt, SCP2SPM_IPC_CLR */
-	writel(0xff, scp->reg_base + MT8192_SCP2SPM_IPC_CLR);
+	writel(0xff, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_SCP2SPM_IPC_CLR);
 
-	writel(1, scp->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_SW_RSTN_SET);
+	writel(1, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_SW_RSTN_SET);
 
 	/* enable SRAM clock */
-	scp_sram_power_on(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_0, 0);
-	scp_sram_power_on(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_1, 0);
-	scp_sram_power_on(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_2, 0);
-	scp_sram_power_on(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN,
+	scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_0, 0);
+	scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_1, 0);
+	scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_2, 0);
+	scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN,
 			  MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_RSI_BITS);
-	scp_sram_power_on(scp->reg_base + MT8192_CPU0_SRAM_PD, 0);
+	scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_CPU0_SRAM_PD, 0);
 
 	/* enable MPU for all memory regions */
-	writel(0xff, scp->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_MEM_ATT_PREDEF);
+	writel(0xff, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_MEM_ATT_PREDEF);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -479,10 +479,10 @@ static int mt8195_scp_c1_before_load(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 {
 	scp->data->scp_reset_assert(scp);
 
-	scp_sram_power_on(scp->reg_base + MT8195_CPU1_SRAM_PD, 0);
+	scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8195_CPU1_SRAM_PD, 0);
 
 	/* enable MPU for all memory regions */
-	writel(0xff, scp->reg_base + MT8195_CORE1_MEM_ATT_PREDEF);
+	writel(0xff, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8195_CORE1_MEM_ATT_PREDEF);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -601,11 +601,11 @@ static void *mt8192_scp_da_to_va(struct mtk_scp *scp, u64 da, size_t len)
 	}
 
 	/* optional memory region */
-	if (scp->l1tcm_size &&
-	    da >= scp->l1tcm_phys &&
-	    (da + len) <= scp->l1tcm_phys + scp->l1tcm_size) {
-		offset = da - scp->l1tcm_phys;
-		return (void __force *)scp->l1tcm_base + offset;
+	if (scp->cluster->l1tcm_size &&
+	    da >= scp->cluster->l1tcm_phys &&
+	    (da + len) <= scp->cluster->l1tcm_phys + scp->cluster->l1tcm_size) {
+		offset = da - scp->cluster->l1tcm_phys;
+		return (void __force *)scp->cluster->l1tcm_base + offset;
 	}
 
 	/* optional memory region */
@@ -629,43 +629,43 @@ static void *scp_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, size_t len, bool *is_iome
 static void mt8183_scp_stop(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 {
 	/* Disable SCP watchdog */
-	writel(0, scp->reg_base + MT8183_WDT_CFG);
+	writel(0, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_WDT_CFG);
 }
 
 static void mt8192_scp_stop(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 {
 	/* Disable SRAM clock */
-	scp_sram_power_off(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_0, 0);
-	scp_sram_power_off(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_1, 0);
-	scp_sram_power_off(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_2, 0);
-	scp_sram_power_off(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN, 0);
-	scp_sram_power_off(scp->reg_base + MT8192_CPU0_SRAM_PD, 0);
+	scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_0, 0);
+	scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_1, 0);
+	scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_2, 0);
+	scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN, 0);
+	scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_CPU0_SRAM_PD, 0);
 
 	/* Disable SCP watchdog */
-	writel(0, scp->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_WDT_CFG);
+	writel(0, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_WDT_CFG);
 }
 
 static void mt8195_scp_stop(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 {
 	/* Disable SRAM clock */
-	scp_sram_power_off(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_0, 0);
-	scp_sram_power_off(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_1, 0);
-	scp_sram_power_off(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_2, 0);
-	scp_sram_power_off(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN,
+	scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_0, 0);
+	scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_1, 0);
+	scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_2, 0);
+	scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN,
 			   MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_RSI_BITS);
-	scp_sram_power_off(scp->reg_base + MT8192_CPU0_SRAM_PD, 0);
+	scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_CPU0_SRAM_PD, 0);
 
 	/* Disable SCP watchdog */
-	writel(0, scp->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_WDT_CFG);
+	writel(0, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_WDT_CFG);
 }
 
 static void mt8195_scp_c1_stop(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 {
 	/* Power off CPU SRAM */
-	scp_sram_power_off(scp->reg_base + MT8195_CPU1_SRAM_PD, 0);
+	scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8195_CPU1_SRAM_PD, 0);
 
 	/* Disable SCP watchdog */
-	writel(0, scp->reg_base + MT8195_CORE1_WDT_CFG);
+	writel(0, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8195_CORE1_WDT_CFG);
 }
 
 static int scp_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
@@ -854,7 +854,8 @@ static void scp_remove_rpmsg_subdev(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 	}
 }
 
-static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+static int scp_cluster_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
+			    struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster)
 {
 	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
 	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
@@ -876,6 +877,7 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	scp->rproc = rproc;
 	scp->dev = dev;
 	scp->data = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
+	scp->cluster = scp_cluster;
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, scp);
 
 	res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "sram");
@@ -887,24 +889,6 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	scp->sram_size = resource_size(res);
 	scp->sram_phys = res->start;
 
-	/* l1tcm is an optional memory region */
-	res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "l1tcm");
-	scp->l1tcm_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
-	if (IS_ERR(scp->l1tcm_base)) {
-		ret = PTR_ERR(scp->l1tcm_base);
-		if (ret != -EINVAL) {
-			return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to map l1tcm memory\n");
-		}
-	} else {
-		scp->l1tcm_size = resource_size(res);
-		scp->l1tcm_phys = res->start;
-	}
-
-	scp->reg_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "cfg");
-	if (IS_ERR(scp->reg_base))
-		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(scp->reg_base),
-				     "Failed to parse and map cfg memory\n");
-
 	ret = scp->data->scp_clk_get(scp);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
@@ -956,6 +940,43 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	return ret;
 }
 
+static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+	struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster;
+	struct resource *res;
+	int ret;
+
+	scp_cluster = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*scp_cluster), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!scp_cluster)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	scp_cluster->reg_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "cfg");
+	if (IS_ERR(scp_cluster->reg_base))
+		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(scp_cluster->reg_base),
+				     "Failed to parse and map cfg memory\n");
+
+	/* l1tcm is an optional memory region */
+	res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "l1tcm");
+	scp_cluster->l1tcm_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
+	if (IS_ERR(scp_cluster->l1tcm_base)) {
+		ret = PTR_ERR(scp_cluster->l1tcm_base);
+		if (ret != -EINVAL)
+			return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to map l1tcm memory\n");
+
+		scp_cluster->l1tcm_base = NULL;
+	} else {
+		scp_cluster->l1tcm_size = resource_size(res);
+		scp_cluster->l1tcm_phys = res->start;
+	}
+
+	ret = scp_cluster_init(pdev, scp_cluster);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static void scp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct mtk_scp *scp = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp_ipi.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp_ipi.c
index 9c7c17b9d181..cd0b60106ec2 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp_ipi.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp_ipi.c
@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ int scp_ipi_send(struct mtk_scp *scp, u32 id, void *buf, unsigned int len,
 	mutex_lock(&scp->send_lock);
 
 	 /* Wait until SCP receives the last command */
-	ret = readl_poll_timeout_atomic(scp->reg_base + scp->data->host_to_scp_reg,
+	ret = readl_poll_timeout_atomic(scp->cluster->reg_base + scp->data->host_to_scp_reg,
 					val, !val, 0, SCP_TIMEOUT_US);
 	if (ret) {
 		dev_err(scp->dev, "%s: IPI timeout!\n", __func__);
@@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ int scp_ipi_send(struct mtk_scp *scp, u32 id, void *buf, unsigned int len,
 	scp->ipi_id_ack[id] = false;
 	/* send the command to SCP */
 	writel(scp->data->host_to_scp_int_bit,
-	       scp->reg_base + scp->data->host_to_scp_reg);
+	       scp->cluster->reg_base + scp->data->host_to_scp_reg);
 
 	if (wait) {
 		/* wait for SCP's ACK */
-- 
2.18.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v15 06/13] remoteproc: mediatek: Probe SCP cluster on single-core SCP
  2023-07-21  2:41 ` Tinghan Shen
@ 2023-07-21  2:41   ` Tinghan Shen
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Tinghan Shen @ 2023-07-21  2:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bjorn Andersson, Mathieu Poirier, Rob Herring,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Matthias Brugger,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno, Tinghan Shen
  Cc: linux-remoteproc, devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-mediatek, Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group

This is the 2nd preliminary step for probing multi-core SCP.
The initialization procedure for remoteproc is similar for both
single-core and multi-core architectures and is reusing to avoid
redundant code.

Rewrite the probing flow of single-core SCP to adapt with the 'cluster'
concept needed by the multi-core SCP. The SCP core object(s)
is maintained at the cluster list.

Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h |  2 +
 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c    | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 2 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
index b04d71277c1f..1438159ae736 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
@@ -105,6 +105,7 @@ struct mtk_scp_of_cluster {
 	void __iomem *l1tcm_base;
 	size_t l1tcm_size;
 	phys_addr_t l1tcm_phys;
+	struct list_head mtk_scp_list;
 };
 
 struct mtk_scp {
@@ -132,6 +133,7 @@ struct mtk_scp {
 
 	struct rproc_subdev *rpmsg_subdev;
 
+	struct list_head elem;
 	struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *cluster;
 };
 
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
index 9486f5020946..d67dcabdab9e 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
@@ -854,8 +854,8 @@ static void scp_remove_rpmsg_subdev(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 	}
 }
 
-static int scp_cluster_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
-			    struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster)
+static struct mtk_scp *scp_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
+				      struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster)
 {
 	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
 	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
@@ -867,11 +867,13 @@ static int scp_cluster_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
 
 	ret = rproc_of_parse_firmware(dev, 0, &fw_name);
 	if (ret < 0 && ret != -EINVAL)
-		return ret;
+		return ERR_PTR(ret);
 
 	rproc = devm_rproc_alloc(dev, np->name, &scp_ops, fw_name, sizeof(*scp));
-	if (!rproc)
-		return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENOMEM, "unable to allocate remoteproc\n");
+	if (!rproc) {
+		dev_err(dev, "unable to allocate remoteproc\n");
+		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+	}
 
 	scp = rproc->priv;
 	scp->rproc = rproc;
@@ -882,20 +884,21 @@ static int scp_cluster_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
 
 	res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "sram");
 	scp->sram_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
-	if (IS_ERR(scp->sram_base))
-		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(scp->sram_base),
-				     "Failed to parse and map sram memory\n");
+	if (IS_ERR(scp->sram_base)) {
+		dev_err(dev, "Failed to parse and map sram memory\n");
+		return ERR_CAST(scp->sram_base);
+	}
 
 	scp->sram_size = resource_size(res);
 	scp->sram_phys = res->start;
 
 	ret = scp->data->scp_clk_get(scp);
 	if (ret)
-		return ret;
+		return ERR_PTR(ret);
 
 	ret = scp_map_memory_region(scp);
 	if (ret)
-		return ret;
+		return ERR_PTR(ret);
 
 	mutex_init(&scp->send_lock);
 	for (i = 0; i < SCP_IPI_MAX; i++)
@@ -922,11 +925,7 @@ static int scp_cluster_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
 		goto remove_subdev;
 	}
 
-	ret = rproc_add(rproc);
-	if (ret)
-		goto remove_subdev;
-
-	return 0;
+	return scp;
 
 remove_subdev:
 	scp_remove_rpmsg_subdev(scp);
@@ -937,7 +936,43 @@ static int scp_cluster_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
 		mutex_destroy(&scp->ipi_desc[i].lock);
 	mutex_destroy(&scp->send_lock);
 
-	return ret;
+	return ERR_PTR(ret);
+}
+
+static void scp_free(struct mtk_scp *scp)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	scp_remove_rpmsg_subdev(scp);
+	scp_ipi_unregister(scp, SCP_IPI_INIT);
+	scp_unmap_memory_region(scp);
+	for (i = 0; i < SCP_IPI_MAX; i++)
+		mutex_destroy(&scp->ipi_desc[i].lock);
+	mutex_destroy(&scp->send_lock);
+}
+
+static int scp_cluster_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
+			    struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster)
+{
+	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+	struct list_head *scp_list = &scp_cluster->mtk_scp_list;
+	struct mtk_scp *scp;
+	int ret;
+
+	scp = scp_rproc_init(pdev, scp_cluster);
+	if (IS_ERR(scp))
+		return PTR_ERR(scp);
+
+	ret = rproc_add(scp->rproc);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(dev, "Failed to add rproc\n");
+		scp_free(scp);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	list_add_tail(&scp->elem, scp_list);
+
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
@@ -970,6 +1005,8 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		scp_cluster->l1tcm_phys = res->start;
 	}
 
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&scp_cluster->mtk_scp_list);
+
 	ret = scp_cluster_init(pdev, scp_cluster);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
@@ -980,15 +1017,14 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 static void scp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct mtk_scp *scp = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
-	int i;
+	struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster = scp->cluster;
+	struct mtk_scp *temp;
 
-	rproc_del(scp->rproc);
-	scp_remove_rpmsg_subdev(scp);
-	scp_ipi_unregister(scp, SCP_IPI_INIT);
-	scp_unmap_memory_region(scp);
-	for (i = 0; i < SCP_IPI_MAX; i++)
-		mutex_destroy(&scp->ipi_desc[i].lock);
-	mutex_destroy(&scp->send_lock);
+	list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(scp, temp, &scp_cluster->mtk_scp_list, elem) {
+		list_del(&scp->elem);
+		rproc_del(scp->rproc);
+		scp_free(scp);
+	}
 }
 
 static const struct mtk_scp_of_data mt8183_of_data = {
-- 
2.18.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v15 06/13] remoteproc: mediatek: Probe SCP cluster on single-core SCP
@ 2023-07-21  2:41   ` Tinghan Shen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Tinghan Shen @ 2023-07-21  2:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bjorn Andersson, Mathieu Poirier, Rob Herring,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Matthias Brugger,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno, Tinghan Shen
  Cc: linux-remoteproc, devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-mediatek, Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group

This is the 2nd preliminary step for probing multi-core SCP.
The initialization procedure for remoteproc is similar for both
single-core and multi-core architectures and is reusing to avoid
redundant code.

Rewrite the probing flow of single-core SCP to adapt with the 'cluster'
concept needed by the multi-core SCP. The SCP core object(s)
is maintained at the cluster list.

Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h |  2 +
 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c    | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 2 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
index b04d71277c1f..1438159ae736 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
@@ -105,6 +105,7 @@ struct mtk_scp_of_cluster {
 	void __iomem *l1tcm_base;
 	size_t l1tcm_size;
 	phys_addr_t l1tcm_phys;
+	struct list_head mtk_scp_list;
 };
 
 struct mtk_scp {
@@ -132,6 +133,7 @@ struct mtk_scp {
 
 	struct rproc_subdev *rpmsg_subdev;
 
+	struct list_head elem;
 	struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *cluster;
 };
 
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
index 9486f5020946..d67dcabdab9e 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
@@ -854,8 +854,8 @@ static void scp_remove_rpmsg_subdev(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 	}
 }
 
-static int scp_cluster_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
-			    struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster)
+static struct mtk_scp *scp_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
+				      struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster)
 {
 	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
 	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
@@ -867,11 +867,13 @@ static int scp_cluster_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
 
 	ret = rproc_of_parse_firmware(dev, 0, &fw_name);
 	if (ret < 0 && ret != -EINVAL)
-		return ret;
+		return ERR_PTR(ret);
 
 	rproc = devm_rproc_alloc(dev, np->name, &scp_ops, fw_name, sizeof(*scp));
-	if (!rproc)
-		return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENOMEM, "unable to allocate remoteproc\n");
+	if (!rproc) {
+		dev_err(dev, "unable to allocate remoteproc\n");
+		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+	}
 
 	scp = rproc->priv;
 	scp->rproc = rproc;
@@ -882,20 +884,21 @@ static int scp_cluster_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
 
 	res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "sram");
 	scp->sram_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
-	if (IS_ERR(scp->sram_base))
-		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(scp->sram_base),
-				     "Failed to parse and map sram memory\n");
+	if (IS_ERR(scp->sram_base)) {
+		dev_err(dev, "Failed to parse and map sram memory\n");
+		return ERR_CAST(scp->sram_base);
+	}
 
 	scp->sram_size = resource_size(res);
 	scp->sram_phys = res->start;
 
 	ret = scp->data->scp_clk_get(scp);
 	if (ret)
-		return ret;
+		return ERR_PTR(ret);
 
 	ret = scp_map_memory_region(scp);
 	if (ret)
-		return ret;
+		return ERR_PTR(ret);
 
 	mutex_init(&scp->send_lock);
 	for (i = 0; i < SCP_IPI_MAX; i++)
@@ -922,11 +925,7 @@ static int scp_cluster_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
 		goto remove_subdev;
 	}
 
-	ret = rproc_add(rproc);
-	if (ret)
-		goto remove_subdev;
-
-	return 0;
+	return scp;
 
 remove_subdev:
 	scp_remove_rpmsg_subdev(scp);
@@ -937,7 +936,43 @@ static int scp_cluster_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
 		mutex_destroy(&scp->ipi_desc[i].lock);
 	mutex_destroy(&scp->send_lock);
 
-	return ret;
+	return ERR_PTR(ret);
+}
+
+static void scp_free(struct mtk_scp *scp)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	scp_remove_rpmsg_subdev(scp);
+	scp_ipi_unregister(scp, SCP_IPI_INIT);
+	scp_unmap_memory_region(scp);
+	for (i = 0; i < SCP_IPI_MAX; i++)
+		mutex_destroy(&scp->ipi_desc[i].lock);
+	mutex_destroy(&scp->send_lock);
+}
+
+static int scp_cluster_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
+			    struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster)
+{
+	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+	struct list_head *scp_list = &scp_cluster->mtk_scp_list;
+	struct mtk_scp *scp;
+	int ret;
+
+	scp = scp_rproc_init(pdev, scp_cluster);
+	if (IS_ERR(scp))
+		return PTR_ERR(scp);
+
+	ret = rproc_add(scp->rproc);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(dev, "Failed to add rproc\n");
+		scp_free(scp);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	list_add_tail(&scp->elem, scp_list);
+
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
@@ -970,6 +1005,8 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		scp_cluster->l1tcm_phys = res->start;
 	}
 
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&scp_cluster->mtk_scp_list);
+
 	ret = scp_cluster_init(pdev, scp_cluster);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
@@ -980,15 +1017,14 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 static void scp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct mtk_scp *scp = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
-	int i;
+	struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster = scp->cluster;
+	struct mtk_scp *temp;
 
-	rproc_del(scp->rproc);
-	scp_remove_rpmsg_subdev(scp);
-	scp_ipi_unregister(scp, SCP_IPI_INIT);
-	scp_unmap_memory_region(scp);
-	for (i = 0; i < SCP_IPI_MAX; i++)
-		mutex_destroy(&scp->ipi_desc[i].lock);
-	mutex_destroy(&scp->send_lock);
+	list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(scp, temp, &scp_cluster->mtk_scp_list, elem) {
+		list_del(&scp->elem);
+		rproc_del(scp->rproc);
+		scp_free(scp);
+	}
 }
 
 static const struct mtk_scp_of_data mt8183_of_data = {
-- 
2.18.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v15 07/13] remoteproc: mediatek: Probe SCP cluster on multi-core SCP
  2023-07-21  2:41 ` Tinghan Shen
@ 2023-07-21  2:41   ` Tinghan Shen
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Tinghan Shen @ 2023-07-21  2:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bjorn Andersson, Mathieu Poirier, Rob Herring,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Matthias Brugger,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno, Tinghan Shen
  Cc: linux-remoteproc, devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-mediatek, Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group

The difference of single-core SCP and multi-core SCP device tree is
the presence of child device nodes described SCP cores. The SCP
driver populates the platform device and checks the child nodes
to identify whether it's a single-core SCP or a multi-core SCP.

Add the remoteproc instances of multi-core SCP to the SCP cluster list.
When the SCP driver is removed, it cleanup resources by walking
through the cluster list.

Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c | 118 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 113 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
index d67dcabdab9e..34095a461e15 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
@@ -855,7 +855,8 @@ static void scp_remove_rpmsg_subdev(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 }
 
 static struct mtk_scp *scp_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
-				      struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster)
+				      struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster,
+				      const struct mtk_scp_of_data *of_data)
 {
 	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
 	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
@@ -878,7 +879,7 @@ static struct mtk_scp *scp_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
 	scp = rproc->priv;
 	scp->rproc = rproc;
 	scp->dev = dev;
-	scp->data = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
+	scp->data = of_data;
 	scp->cluster = scp_cluster;
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, scp);
 
@@ -951,15 +952,15 @@ static void scp_free(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 	mutex_destroy(&scp->send_lock);
 }
 
-static int scp_cluster_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
-			    struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster)
+static int scp_add_single_core(struct platform_device *pdev,
+			       struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster)
 {
 	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
 	struct list_head *scp_list = &scp_cluster->mtk_scp_list;
 	struct mtk_scp *scp;
 	int ret;
 
-	scp = scp_rproc_init(pdev, scp_cluster);
+	scp = scp_rproc_init(pdev, scp_cluster, of_device_get_match_data(dev));
 	if (IS_ERR(scp))
 		return PTR_ERR(scp);
 
@@ -975,6 +976,102 @@ static int scp_cluster_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int scp_add_multi_core(struct platform_device *pdev,
+			      struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster)
+{
+	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+	struct device_node *np = dev_of_node(dev);
+	struct platform_device *cpdev;
+	struct device_node *child;
+	struct list_head *scp_list = &scp_cluster->mtk_scp_list;
+	const struct mtk_scp_of_data **cluster_of_data;
+	struct mtk_scp *scp, *temp;
+	int core_id = 0;
+	int ret;
+
+	cluster_of_data = (const struct mtk_scp_of_data **)of_device_get_match_data(dev);
+
+	for_each_available_child_of_node(np, child) {
+		if (!cluster_of_data[core_id]) {
+			ret = -EINVAL;
+			dev_err(dev, "Not support core %d\n", core_id);
+			of_node_put(child);
+			goto init_fail;
+		}
+
+		cpdev = of_find_device_by_node(child);
+		if (!cpdev) {
+			ret = -ENODEV;
+			dev_err(dev, "Not found platform device for core %d\n", core_id);
+			of_node_put(child);
+			goto init_fail;
+		}
+
+		scp = scp_rproc_init(cpdev, scp_cluster, cluster_of_data[core_id]);
+		put_device(&cpdev->dev);
+		if (IS_ERR(scp)) {
+			ret = PTR_ERR(scp);
+			dev_err(dev, "Failed to initialize core %d rproc\n", core_id);
+			of_node_put(child);
+			goto init_fail;
+		}
+
+		ret = rproc_add(scp->rproc);
+		if (ret) {
+			dev_err(dev, "Failed to add rproc of core %d\n", core_id);
+			of_node_put(child);
+			scp_free(scp);
+			goto init_fail;
+		}
+
+		list_add_tail(&scp->elem, scp_list);
+		core_id++;
+	}
+
+	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, list_first_entry(scp_list, struct mtk_scp, elem));
+
+	return 0;
+
+init_fail:
+	list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(scp, temp, scp_list, elem) {
+		list_del(&scp->elem);
+		rproc_del(scp->rproc);
+		scp_free(scp);
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int scp_is_single_core(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+	struct device_node *np = dev_of_node(dev);
+	struct device_node *child;
+
+	child = of_get_next_available_child(np, NULL);
+	if (!child)
+		return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENODEV, "No child node\n");
+
+	of_node_put(child);
+	return of_node_name_eq(child, "cros-ec-rpmsg");
+}
+
+static int scp_cluster_init(struct platform_device *pdev, struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = scp_is_single_core(pdev);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
+
+	if (ret)
+		ret = scp_add_single_core(pdev, scp_cluster);
+	else
+		ret = scp_add_multi_core(pdev, scp_cluster);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
@@ -1007,6 +1104,10 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&scp_cluster->mtk_scp_list);
 
+	ret = devm_of_platform_populate(dev);
+	if (ret)
+		return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to populate platform devices\n");
+
 	ret = scp_cluster_init(pdev, scp_cluster);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
@@ -1101,12 +1202,19 @@ static const struct mtk_scp_of_data mt8195_of_data_c1 = {
 	.host_to_scp_int_bit = MT8195_CORE1_HOST_IPC_INT_BIT,
 };
 
+static const struct mtk_scp_of_data *mt8195_of_data_cores[] = {
+	&mt8195_of_data,
+	&mt8195_of_data_c1,
+	NULL
+};
+
 static const struct of_device_id mtk_scp_of_match[] = {
 	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8183-scp", .data = &mt8183_of_data },
 	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8186-scp", .data = &mt8186_of_data },
 	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8188-scp", .data = &mt8188_of_data },
 	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8192-scp", .data = &mt8192_of_data },
 	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-scp", .data = &mt8195_of_data },
+	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-scp-dual", .data = &mt8195_of_data_cores },
 	{},
 };
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mtk_scp_of_match);
-- 
2.18.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v15 07/13] remoteproc: mediatek: Probe SCP cluster on multi-core SCP
@ 2023-07-21  2:41   ` Tinghan Shen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Tinghan Shen @ 2023-07-21  2:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bjorn Andersson, Mathieu Poirier, Rob Herring,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Matthias Brugger,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno, Tinghan Shen
  Cc: linux-remoteproc, devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-mediatek, Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group

The difference of single-core SCP and multi-core SCP device tree is
the presence of child device nodes described SCP cores. The SCP
driver populates the platform device and checks the child nodes
to identify whether it's a single-core SCP or a multi-core SCP.

Add the remoteproc instances of multi-core SCP to the SCP cluster list.
When the SCP driver is removed, it cleanup resources by walking
through the cluster list.

Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c | 118 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 113 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
index d67dcabdab9e..34095a461e15 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
@@ -855,7 +855,8 @@ static void scp_remove_rpmsg_subdev(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 }
 
 static struct mtk_scp *scp_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
-				      struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster)
+				      struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster,
+				      const struct mtk_scp_of_data *of_data)
 {
 	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
 	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
@@ -878,7 +879,7 @@ static struct mtk_scp *scp_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
 	scp = rproc->priv;
 	scp->rproc = rproc;
 	scp->dev = dev;
-	scp->data = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
+	scp->data = of_data;
 	scp->cluster = scp_cluster;
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, scp);
 
@@ -951,15 +952,15 @@ static void scp_free(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 	mutex_destroy(&scp->send_lock);
 }
 
-static int scp_cluster_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
-			    struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster)
+static int scp_add_single_core(struct platform_device *pdev,
+			       struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster)
 {
 	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
 	struct list_head *scp_list = &scp_cluster->mtk_scp_list;
 	struct mtk_scp *scp;
 	int ret;
 
-	scp = scp_rproc_init(pdev, scp_cluster);
+	scp = scp_rproc_init(pdev, scp_cluster, of_device_get_match_data(dev));
 	if (IS_ERR(scp))
 		return PTR_ERR(scp);
 
@@ -975,6 +976,102 @@ static int scp_cluster_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int scp_add_multi_core(struct platform_device *pdev,
+			      struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster)
+{
+	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+	struct device_node *np = dev_of_node(dev);
+	struct platform_device *cpdev;
+	struct device_node *child;
+	struct list_head *scp_list = &scp_cluster->mtk_scp_list;
+	const struct mtk_scp_of_data **cluster_of_data;
+	struct mtk_scp *scp, *temp;
+	int core_id = 0;
+	int ret;
+
+	cluster_of_data = (const struct mtk_scp_of_data **)of_device_get_match_data(dev);
+
+	for_each_available_child_of_node(np, child) {
+		if (!cluster_of_data[core_id]) {
+			ret = -EINVAL;
+			dev_err(dev, "Not support core %d\n", core_id);
+			of_node_put(child);
+			goto init_fail;
+		}
+
+		cpdev = of_find_device_by_node(child);
+		if (!cpdev) {
+			ret = -ENODEV;
+			dev_err(dev, "Not found platform device for core %d\n", core_id);
+			of_node_put(child);
+			goto init_fail;
+		}
+
+		scp = scp_rproc_init(cpdev, scp_cluster, cluster_of_data[core_id]);
+		put_device(&cpdev->dev);
+		if (IS_ERR(scp)) {
+			ret = PTR_ERR(scp);
+			dev_err(dev, "Failed to initialize core %d rproc\n", core_id);
+			of_node_put(child);
+			goto init_fail;
+		}
+
+		ret = rproc_add(scp->rproc);
+		if (ret) {
+			dev_err(dev, "Failed to add rproc of core %d\n", core_id);
+			of_node_put(child);
+			scp_free(scp);
+			goto init_fail;
+		}
+
+		list_add_tail(&scp->elem, scp_list);
+		core_id++;
+	}
+
+	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, list_first_entry(scp_list, struct mtk_scp, elem));
+
+	return 0;
+
+init_fail:
+	list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(scp, temp, scp_list, elem) {
+		list_del(&scp->elem);
+		rproc_del(scp->rproc);
+		scp_free(scp);
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int scp_is_single_core(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+	struct device_node *np = dev_of_node(dev);
+	struct device_node *child;
+
+	child = of_get_next_available_child(np, NULL);
+	if (!child)
+		return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENODEV, "No child node\n");
+
+	of_node_put(child);
+	return of_node_name_eq(child, "cros-ec-rpmsg");
+}
+
+static int scp_cluster_init(struct platform_device *pdev, struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = scp_is_single_core(pdev);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
+
+	if (ret)
+		ret = scp_add_single_core(pdev, scp_cluster);
+	else
+		ret = scp_add_multi_core(pdev, scp_cluster);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
@@ -1007,6 +1104,10 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&scp_cluster->mtk_scp_list);
 
+	ret = devm_of_platform_populate(dev);
+	if (ret)
+		return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to populate platform devices\n");
+
 	ret = scp_cluster_init(pdev, scp_cluster);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
@@ -1101,12 +1202,19 @@ static const struct mtk_scp_of_data mt8195_of_data_c1 = {
 	.host_to_scp_int_bit = MT8195_CORE1_HOST_IPC_INT_BIT,
 };
 
+static const struct mtk_scp_of_data *mt8195_of_data_cores[] = {
+	&mt8195_of_data,
+	&mt8195_of_data_c1,
+	NULL
+};
+
 static const struct of_device_id mtk_scp_of_match[] = {
 	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8183-scp", .data = &mt8183_of_data },
 	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8186-scp", .data = &mt8186_of_data },
 	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8188-scp", .data = &mt8188_of_data },
 	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8192-scp", .data = &mt8192_of_data },
 	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-scp", .data = &mt8195_of_data },
+	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-scp-dual", .data = &mt8195_of_data_cores },
 	{},
 };
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mtk_scp_of_match);
-- 
2.18.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v15 08/13] remoteproc: mediatek: Remove dependency of MT8195 SCP L2TCM power control on dual-core SCP
  2023-07-21  2:41 ` Tinghan Shen
@ 2023-07-21  2:41   ` Tinghan Shen
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Tinghan Shen @ 2023-07-21  2:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bjorn Andersson, Mathieu Poirier, Rob Herring,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Matthias Brugger,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno, Tinghan Shen
  Cc: linux-remoteproc, devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-mediatek, Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group

Previously, SCP core 0 controlled the power of L2TCM and dictated that
SCP core 1 could only boot after SCP core 0. To address this constraint,
extracted the power control flow of L2TCM and made it shared
between both cores, enabling support of arbitrary boot order.

The flow for controlling L2TCM power has been incorporated into the
mt8195_scp_before_load() and mt8195_scp_stop() APIs, which are
respectively invoked during the rproc->ops->start() and
rproc->ops->stop() operations. These APIs effectively serve the same
purpose as the rproc prepare()/unprepare() APIs."

Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h |  3 ++
 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c    | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 2 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
index 1438159ae736..fea05bbba9aa 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
@@ -106,6 +106,9 @@ struct mtk_scp_of_cluster {
 	size_t l1tcm_size;
 	phys_addr_t l1tcm_phys;
 	struct list_head mtk_scp_list;
+	/* Prevent concurrent operations of this structure and L2TCM power control. */
+	struct mutex cluster_lock;
+	u32 l2tcm_refcnt;
 };
 
 struct mtk_scp {
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
index 34095a461e15..c624f9c3db17 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
@@ -454,19 +454,37 @@ static int mt8192_scp_before_load(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int mt8195_scp_before_load(struct mtk_scp *scp)
+static int mt8195_scp_l2tcm_on(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 {
-	/* clear SPM interrupt, SCP2SPM_IPC_CLR */
-	writel(0xff, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_SCP2SPM_IPC_CLR);
+	struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster = scp->cluster;
+
+	mutex_lock(&scp_cluster->cluster_lock);
+
+	if (scp_cluster->l2tcm_refcnt == 0) {
+		/* clear SPM interrupt, SCP2SPM_IPC_CLR */
+		writel(0xff, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_SCP2SPM_IPC_CLR);
+
+		/* Power on L2TCM */
+		scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_0, 0);
+		scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_1, 0);
+		scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_2, 0);
+		scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN,
+				  MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_RSI_BITS);
+	}
+
+	scp_cluster->l2tcm_refcnt += 1;
 
+	mutex_unlock(&scp_cluster->cluster_lock);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int mt8195_scp_before_load(struct mtk_scp *scp)
+{
 	writel(1, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_SW_RSTN_SET);
 
-	/* enable SRAM clock */
-	scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_0, 0);
-	scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_1, 0);
-	scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_2, 0);
-	scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN,
-			  MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_RSI_BITS);
+	mt8195_scp_l2tcm_on(scp);
+
 	scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_CPU0_SRAM_PD, 0);
 
 	/* enable MPU for all memory regions */
@@ -479,6 +497,8 @@ static int mt8195_scp_c1_before_load(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 {
 	scp->data->scp_reset_assert(scp);
 
+	mt8195_scp_l2tcm_on(scp);
+
 	scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8195_CPU1_SRAM_PD, 0);
 
 	/* enable MPU for all memory regions */
@@ -645,14 +665,31 @@ static void mt8192_scp_stop(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 	writel(0, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_WDT_CFG);
 }
 
+static void mt8195_scp_l2tcm_off(struct mtk_scp *scp)
+{
+	struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster = scp->cluster;
+
+	mutex_lock(&scp_cluster->cluster_lock);
+
+	if (scp_cluster->l2tcm_refcnt > 0)
+		scp_cluster->l2tcm_refcnt -= 1;
+
+	if (scp_cluster->l2tcm_refcnt == 0) {
+		/* Power off L2TCM */
+		scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_0, 0);
+		scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_1, 0);
+		scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_2, 0);
+		scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN,
+				   MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_RSI_BITS);
+	}
+
+	mutex_unlock(&scp_cluster->cluster_lock);
+}
+
 static void mt8195_scp_stop(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 {
-	/* Disable SRAM clock */
-	scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_0, 0);
-	scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_1, 0);
-	scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_2, 0);
-	scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN,
-			   MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_RSI_BITS);
+	mt8195_scp_l2tcm_off(scp);
+
 	scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_CPU0_SRAM_PD, 0);
 
 	/* Disable SCP watchdog */
@@ -661,6 +698,8 @@ static void mt8195_scp_stop(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 
 static void mt8195_scp_c1_stop(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 {
+	mt8195_scp_l2tcm_off(scp);
+
 	/* Power off CPU SRAM */
 	scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8195_CPU1_SRAM_PD, 0);
 
@@ -1103,6 +1142,7 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	}
 
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&scp_cluster->mtk_scp_list);
+	mutex_init(&scp_cluster->cluster_lock);
 
 	ret = devm_of_platform_populate(dev);
 	if (ret)
@@ -1126,6 +1166,7 @@ static void scp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		rproc_del(scp->rproc);
 		scp_free(scp);
 	}
+	mutex_destroy(&scp_cluster->cluster_lock);
 }
 
 static const struct mtk_scp_of_data mt8183_of_data = {
-- 
2.18.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v15 08/13] remoteproc: mediatek: Remove dependency of MT8195 SCP L2TCM power control on dual-core SCP
@ 2023-07-21  2:41   ` Tinghan Shen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Tinghan Shen @ 2023-07-21  2:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bjorn Andersson, Mathieu Poirier, Rob Herring,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Matthias Brugger,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno, Tinghan Shen
  Cc: linux-remoteproc, devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-mediatek, Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group

Previously, SCP core 0 controlled the power of L2TCM and dictated that
SCP core 1 could only boot after SCP core 0. To address this constraint,
extracted the power control flow of L2TCM and made it shared
between both cores, enabling support of arbitrary boot order.

The flow for controlling L2TCM power has been incorporated into the
mt8195_scp_before_load() and mt8195_scp_stop() APIs, which are
respectively invoked during the rproc->ops->start() and
rproc->ops->stop() operations. These APIs effectively serve the same
purpose as the rproc prepare()/unprepare() APIs."

Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h |  3 ++
 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c    | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 2 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
index 1438159ae736..fea05bbba9aa 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
@@ -106,6 +106,9 @@ struct mtk_scp_of_cluster {
 	size_t l1tcm_size;
 	phys_addr_t l1tcm_phys;
 	struct list_head mtk_scp_list;
+	/* Prevent concurrent operations of this structure and L2TCM power control. */
+	struct mutex cluster_lock;
+	u32 l2tcm_refcnt;
 };
 
 struct mtk_scp {
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
index 34095a461e15..c624f9c3db17 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
@@ -454,19 +454,37 @@ static int mt8192_scp_before_load(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int mt8195_scp_before_load(struct mtk_scp *scp)
+static int mt8195_scp_l2tcm_on(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 {
-	/* clear SPM interrupt, SCP2SPM_IPC_CLR */
-	writel(0xff, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_SCP2SPM_IPC_CLR);
+	struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster = scp->cluster;
+
+	mutex_lock(&scp_cluster->cluster_lock);
+
+	if (scp_cluster->l2tcm_refcnt == 0) {
+		/* clear SPM interrupt, SCP2SPM_IPC_CLR */
+		writel(0xff, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_SCP2SPM_IPC_CLR);
+
+		/* Power on L2TCM */
+		scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_0, 0);
+		scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_1, 0);
+		scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_2, 0);
+		scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN,
+				  MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_RSI_BITS);
+	}
+
+	scp_cluster->l2tcm_refcnt += 1;
 
+	mutex_unlock(&scp_cluster->cluster_lock);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int mt8195_scp_before_load(struct mtk_scp *scp)
+{
 	writel(1, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_SW_RSTN_SET);
 
-	/* enable SRAM clock */
-	scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_0, 0);
-	scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_1, 0);
-	scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_2, 0);
-	scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN,
-			  MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_RSI_BITS);
+	mt8195_scp_l2tcm_on(scp);
+
 	scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_CPU0_SRAM_PD, 0);
 
 	/* enable MPU for all memory regions */
@@ -479,6 +497,8 @@ static int mt8195_scp_c1_before_load(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 {
 	scp->data->scp_reset_assert(scp);
 
+	mt8195_scp_l2tcm_on(scp);
+
 	scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8195_CPU1_SRAM_PD, 0);
 
 	/* enable MPU for all memory regions */
@@ -645,14 +665,31 @@ static void mt8192_scp_stop(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 	writel(0, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_WDT_CFG);
 }
 
+static void mt8195_scp_l2tcm_off(struct mtk_scp *scp)
+{
+	struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster = scp->cluster;
+
+	mutex_lock(&scp_cluster->cluster_lock);
+
+	if (scp_cluster->l2tcm_refcnt > 0)
+		scp_cluster->l2tcm_refcnt -= 1;
+
+	if (scp_cluster->l2tcm_refcnt == 0) {
+		/* Power off L2TCM */
+		scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_0, 0);
+		scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_1, 0);
+		scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_2, 0);
+		scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN,
+				   MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_RSI_BITS);
+	}
+
+	mutex_unlock(&scp_cluster->cluster_lock);
+}
+
 static void mt8195_scp_stop(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 {
-	/* Disable SRAM clock */
-	scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_0, 0);
-	scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_1, 0);
-	scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_2, 0);
-	scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN,
-			   MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_RSI_BITS);
+	mt8195_scp_l2tcm_off(scp);
+
 	scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_CPU0_SRAM_PD, 0);
 
 	/* Disable SCP watchdog */
@@ -661,6 +698,8 @@ static void mt8195_scp_stop(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 
 static void mt8195_scp_c1_stop(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 {
+	mt8195_scp_l2tcm_off(scp);
+
 	/* Power off CPU SRAM */
 	scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8195_CPU1_SRAM_PD, 0);
 
@@ -1103,6 +1142,7 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	}
 
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&scp_cluster->mtk_scp_list);
+	mutex_init(&scp_cluster->cluster_lock);
 
 	ret = devm_of_platform_populate(dev);
 	if (ret)
@@ -1126,6 +1166,7 @@ static void scp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		rproc_del(scp->rproc);
 		scp_free(scp);
 	}
+	mutex_destroy(&scp_cluster->cluster_lock);
 }
 
 static const struct mtk_scp_of_data mt8183_of_data = {
-- 
2.18.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v15 09/13] remoteproc: mediatek: Setup MT8195 SCP core 1 SRAM offset
  2023-07-21  2:41 ` Tinghan Shen
@ 2023-07-21  2:41   ` Tinghan Shen
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Tinghan Shen @ 2023-07-21  2:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bjorn Andersson, Mathieu Poirier, Rob Herring,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Matthias Brugger,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno, Tinghan Shen
  Cc: linux-remoteproc, devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-mediatek, Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group

Because MT8195 SCP core 0 and core 1 both boot from head of SRAM and
have the same viewpoint of SRAM, SCP has a "core 1 SRAM offset"
configuration to control the access destination of SCP core 1 to boot
core 1 from different SRAM location.

The "core 1 SRAM offset" configuration is composed by a range
and an offset. It works like a simple memory mapped mechanism.
When SCP core 1 accesses a SRAM address located in the range,
the SCP bus adds the configured offset to the address to
shift the physical destination address on SCP SRAM. This shifting is
transparent to the software running on SCP core 1.

Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h |  7 +++++++
 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c    | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
index fea05bbba9aa..3d6b53b9f374 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
@@ -65,6 +65,13 @@
 #define MT8195_CORE1_MEM_ATT_PREDEF		0x20008
 #define MT8195_CORE1_WDT_CFG			0x20034
 
+#define MT8195_SEC_CTRL				0x85000
+#define MT8195_CORE_OFFSET_ENABLE_D		BIT(13)
+#define MT8195_CORE_OFFSET_ENABLE_I		BIT(12)
+#define MT8195_L2TCM_OFFSET_RANGE_0_LOW		0x850b0
+#define MT8195_L2TCM_OFFSET_RANGE_0_HIGH	0x850b4
+#define MT8195_L2TCM_OFFSET			0x850d0
+
 #define SCP_FW_VER_LEN			32
 #define SCP_SHARE_BUFFER_SIZE		288
 
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
index c624f9c3db17..d1d0d7fb574c 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
@@ -495,6 +495,10 @@ static int mt8195_scp_before_load(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 
 static int mt8195_scp_c1_before_load(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 {
+	u32 sec_ctrl;
+	struct mtk_scp *scp_c0;
+	struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster = scp->cluster;
+
 	scp->data->scp_reset_assert(scp);
 
 	mt8195_scp_l2tcm_on(scp);
@@ -504,6 +508,30 @@ static int mt8195_scp_c1_before_load(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 	/* enable MPU for all memory regions */
 	writel(0xff, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8195_CORE1_MEM_ATT_PREDEF);
 
+	/*
+	 * The L2TCM_OFFSET_RANGE and L2TCM_OFFSET shift the destination address
+	 * on SRAM when SCP core 1 accesses SRAM.
+	 *
+	 * This configuration solves booting the SCP core 0 and core 1 from
+	 * different SRAM address because core 0 and core 1 both boot from
+	 * the head of SRAM by default. this must be configured before boot SCP core 1.
+	 *
+	 * The value of L2TCM_OFFSET_RANGE is from the viewpoint of SCP core 1.
+	 * When SCP core 1 issues address within the range (L2TCM_OFFSET_RANGE),
+	 * the address will be added with a fixed offset (L2TCM_OFFSET) on the bus.
+	 * The shift action is tranparent to software.
+	 */
+	writel(0, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8195_L2TCM_OFFSET_RANGE_0_LOW);
+	writel(scp->sram_size, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8195_L2TCM_OFFSET_RANGE_0_HIGH);
+
+	scp_c0 = list_first_entry(&scp_cluster->mtk_scp_list, struct mtk_scp, elem);
+	writel(scp->sram_phys - scp_c0->sram_phys, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8195_L2TCM_OFFSET);
+
+	/* enable SRAM offset when fetching instruction and data */
+	sec_ctrl = readl(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8195_SEC_CTRL);
+	sec_ctrl |= MT8195_CORE_OFFSET_ENABLE_I | MT8195_CORE_OFFSET_ENABLE_D;
+	writel(sec_ctrl, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8195_SEC_CTRL);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.18.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v15 09/13] remoteproc: mediatek: Setup MT8195 SCP core 1 SRAM offset
@ 2023-07-21  2:41   ` Tinghan Shen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Tinghan Shen @ 2023-07-21  2:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bjorn Andersson, Mathieu Poirier, Rob Herring,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Matthias Brugger,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno, Tinghan Shen
  Cc: linux-remoteproc, devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-mediatek, Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group

Because MT8195 SCP core 0 and core 1 both boot from head of SRAM and
have the same viewpoint of SRAM, SCP has a "core 1 SRAM offset"
configuration to control the access destination of SCP core 1 to boot
core 1 from different SRAM location.

The "core 1 SRAM offset" configuration is composed by a range
and an offset. It works like a simple memory mapped mechanism.
When SCP core 1 accesses a SRAM address located in the range,
the SCP bus adds the configured offset to the address to
shift the physical destination address on SCP SRAM. This shifting is
transparent to the software running on SCP core 1.

Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h |  7 +++++++
 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c    | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
index fea05bbba9aa..3d6b53b9f374 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
@@ -65,6 +65,13 @@
 #define MT8195_CORE1_MEM_ATT_PREDEF		0x20008
 #define MT8195_CORE1_WDT_CFG			0x20034
 
+#define MT8195_SEC_CTRL				0x85000
+#define MT8195_CORE_OFFSET_ENABLE_D		BIT(13)
+#define MT8195_CORE_OFFSET_ENABLE_I		BIT(12)
+#define MT8195_L2TCM_OFFSET_RANGE_0_LOW		0x850b0
+#define MT8195_L2TCM_OFFSET_RANGE_0_HIGH	0x850b4
+#define MT8195_L2TCM_OFFSET			0x850d0
+
 #define SCP_FW_VER_LEN			32
 #define SCP_SHARE_BUFFER_SIZE		288
 
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
index c624f9c3db17..d1d0d7fb574c 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
@@ -495,6 +495,10 @@ static int mt8195_scp_before_load(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 
 static int mt8195_scp_c1_before_load(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 {
+	u32 sec_ctrl;
+	struct mtk_scp *scp_c0;
+	struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster = scp->cluster;
+
 	scp->data->scp_reset_assert(scp);
 
 	mt8195_scp_l2tcm_on(scp);
@@ -504,6 +508,30 @@ static int mt8195_scp_c1_before_load(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 	/* enable MPU for all memory regions */
 	writel(0xff, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8195_CORE1_MEM_ATT_PREDEF);
 
+	/*
+	 * The L2TCM_OFFSET_RANGE and L2TCM_OFFSET shift the destination address
+	 * on SRAM when SCP core 1 accesses SRAM.
+	 *
+	 * This configuration solves booting the SCP core 0 and core 1 from
+	 * different SRAM address because core 0 and core 1 both boot from
+	 * the head of SRAM by default. this must be configured before boot SCP core 1.
+	 *
+	 * The value of L2TCM_OFFSET_RANGE is from the viewpoint of SCP core 1.
+	 * When SCP core 1 issues address within the range (L2TCM_OFFSET_RANGE),
+	 * the address will be added with a fixed offset (L2TCM_OFFSET) on the bus.
+	 * The shift action is tranparent to software.
+	 */
+	writel(0, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8195_L2TCM_OFFSET_RANGE_0_LOW);
+	writel(scp->sram_size, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8195_L2TCM_OFFSET_RANGE_0_HIGH);
+
+	scp_c0 = list_first_entry(&scp_cluster->mtk_scp_list, struct mtk_scp, elem);
+	writel(scp->sram_phys - scp_c0->sram_phys, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8195_L2TCM_OFFSET);
+
+	/* enable SRAM offset when fetching instruction and data */
+	sec_ctrl = readl(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8195_SEC_CTRL);
+	sec_ctrl |= MT8195_CORE_OFFSET_ENABLE_I | MT8195_CORE_OFFSET_ENABLE_D;
+	writel(sec_ctrl, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8195_SEC_CTRL);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.18.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v15 10/13] remoteproc: mediatek: Handle MT8195 SCP core 1 watchdog timeout
  2023-07-21  2:41 ` Tinghan Shen
@ 2023-07-21  2:41   ` Tinghan Shen
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Tinghan Shen @ 2023-07-21  2:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bjorn Andersson, Mathieu Poirier, Rob Herring,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Matthias Brugger,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno, Tinghan Shen
  Cc: linux-remoteproc, devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-mediatek, Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group

The MT8195 SCP core 1 watchdog timeout needs to be handled in the
SCP core 0 IRQ handler because the MT8195 SCP core 1 watchdog timeout
IRQ is wired on the same IRQ entry for core 0 watchdog timeout.
MT8195 SCP has a watchdog status register to identify the watchdog
timeout source when IRQ triggered.

Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h |  5 +++++
 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c    | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
index 3d6b53b9f374..6d7736a031f7 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
@@ -55,6 +55,10 @@
 #define MT8192_CORE0_WDT_IRQ		0x10030
 #define MT8192_CORE0_WDT_CFG		0x10034
 
+#define MT8195_SYS_STATUS		0x4004
+#define MT8195_CORE0_WDT		BIT(16)
+#define MT8195_CORE1_WDT		BIT(17)
+
 #define MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_RSI_BITS		GENMASK(7, 4)
 
 #define MT8195_CPU1_SRAM_PD			0x1084
@@ -63,6 +67,7 @@
 #define MT8195_CORE1_SW_RSTN_CLR		0x20000
 #define MT8195_CORE1_SW_RSTN_SET		0x20004
 #define MT8195_CORE1_MEM_ATT_PREDEF		0x20008
+#define MT8195_CORE1_WDT_IRQ			0x20030
 #define MT8195_CORE1_WDT_CFG			0x20034
 
 #define MT8195_SEC_CTRL				0x85000
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
index d1d0d7fb574c..fcd1dd9b3580 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
@@ -222,6 +222,29 @@ static void mt8192_scp_irq_handler(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 	}
 }
 
+static void mt8195_scp_irq_handler(struct mtk_scp *scp)
+{
+	u32 scp_to_host;
+
+	scp_to_host = readl(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_SCP2APMCU_IPC_SET);
+
+	if (scp_to_host & MT8192_SCP_IPC_INT_BIT) {
+		scp_ipi_handler(scp);
+	} else {
+		u32 reason = readl(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8195_SYS_STATUS);
+
+		if (reason & MT8195_CORE0_WDT)
+			writel(1, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_WDT_IRQ);
+
+		if (reason & MT8195_CORE1_WDT)
+			writel(1, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8195_CORE1_WDT_IRQ);
+
+		scp_wdt_handler(scp, reason);
+	}
+
+	writel(scp_to_host, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_SCP2APMCU_IPC_CLR);
+}
+
 static void mt8195_scp_c1_irq_handler(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 {
 	u32 scp_to_host;
@@ -1250,7 +1273,7 @@ static const struct mtk_scp_of_data mt8192_of_data = {
 static const struct mtk_scp_of_data mt8195_of_data = {
 	.scp_clk_get = mt8195_scp_clk_get,
 	.scp_before_load = mt8195_scp_before_load,
-	.scp_irq_handler = mt8192_scp_irq_handler,
+	.scp_irq_handler = mt8195_scp_irq_handler,
 	.scp_reset_assert = mt8192_scp_reset_assert,
 	.scp_reset_deassert = mt8192_scp_reset_deassert,
 	.scp_stop = mt8195_scp_stop,
-- 
2.18.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v15 10/13] remoteproc: mediatek: Handle MT8195 SCP core 1 watchdog timeout
@ 2023-07-21  2:41   ` Tinghan Shen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Tinghan Shen @ 2023-07-21  2:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bjorn Andersson, Mathieu Poirier, Rob Herring,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Matthias Brugger,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno, Tinghan Shen
  Cc: linux-remoteproc, devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-mediatek, Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group

The MT8195 SCP core 1 watchdog timeout needs to be handled in the
SCP core 0 IRQ handler because the MT8195 SCP core 1 watchdog timeout
IRQ is wired on the same IRQ entry for core 0 watchdog timeout.
MT8195 SCP has a watchdog status register to identify the watchdog
timeout source when IRQ triggered.

Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h |  5 +++++
 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c    | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
index 3d6b53b9f374..6d7736a031f7 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
@@ -55,6 +55,10 @@
 #define MT8192_CORE0_WDT_IRQ		0x10030
 #define MT8192_CORE0_WDT_CFG		0x10034
 
+#define MT8195_SYS_STATUS		0x4004
+#define MT8195_CORE0_WDT		BIT(16)
+#define MT8195_CORE1_WDT		BIT(17)
+
 #define MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_RSI_BITS		GENMASK(7, 4)
 
 #define MT8195_CPU1_SRAM_PD			0x1084
@@ -63,6 +67,7 @@
 #define MT8195_CORE1_SW_RSTN_CLR		0x20000
 #define MT8195_CORE1_SW_RSTN_SET		0x20004
 #define MT8195_CORE1_MEM_ATT_PREDEF		0x20008
+#define MT8195_CORE1_WDT_IRQ			0x20030
 #define MT8195_CORE1_WDT_CFG			0x20034
 
 #define MT8195_SEC_CTRL				0x85000
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
index d1d0d7fb574c..fcd1dd9b3580 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
@@ -222,6 +222,29 @@ static void mt8192_scp_irq_handler(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 	}
 }
 
+static void mt8195_scp_irq_handler(struct mtk_scp *scp)
+{
+	u32 scp_to_host;
+
+	scp_to_host = readl(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_SCP2APMCU_IPC_SET);
+
+	if (scp_to_host & MT8192_SCP_IPC_INT_BIT) {
+		scp_ipi_handler(scp);
+	} else {
+		u32 reason = readl(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8195_SYS_STATUS);
+
+		if (reason & MT8195_CORE0_WDT)
+			writel(1, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_WDT_IRQ);
+
+		if (reason & MT8195_CORE1_WDT)
+			writel(1, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8195_CORE1_WDT_IRQ);
+
+		scp_wdt_handler(scp, reason);
+	}
+
+	writel(scp_to_host, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_SCP2APMCU_IPC_CLR);
+}
+
 static void mt8195_scp_c1_irq_handler(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 {
 	u32 scp_to_host;
@@ -1250,7 +1273,7 @@ static const struct mtk_scp_of_data mt8192_of_data = {
 static const struct mtk_scp_of_data mt8195_of_data = {
 	.scp_clk_get = mt8195_scp_clk_get,
 	.scp_before_load = mt8195_scp_before_load,
-	.scp_irq_handler = mt8192_scp_irq_handler,
+	.scp_irq_handler = mt8195_scp_irq_handler,
 	.scp_reset_assert = mt8192_scp_reset_assert,
 	.scp_reset_deassert = mt8192_scp_reset_deassert,
 	.scp_stop = mt8195_scp_stop,
-- 
2.18.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v15 11/13] remoteproc: mediatek: Report watchdog crash to all cores
  2023-07-21  2:41 ` Tinghan Shen
@ 2023-07-21  2:41   ` Tinghan Shen
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Tinghan Shen @ 2023-07-21  2:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bjorn Andersson, Mathieu Poirier, Rob Herring,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Matthias Brugger,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno, Tinghan Shen
  Cc: linux-remoteproc, devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-mediatek, Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group

To ensure consistent behavior, the watchdog timeout handling of the
multi-core SCP should reset the whole SCP sub-system when watchdog
timeout. Triggering the rproc recovery flow on all instances will
ensure proper recovery of the SCP sub-system.

Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c | 8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
index fcd1dd9b3580..9ed2e18e36ba 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
@@ -68,8 +68,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(scp_put);
 
 static void scp_wdt_handler(struct mtk_scp *scp, u32 scp_to_host)
 {
+	struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster = scp->cluster;
+	struct mtk_scp *scp_node;
+
 	dev_err(scp->dev, "SCP watchdog timeout! 0x%x", scp_to_host);
-	rproc_report_crash(scp->rproc, RPROC_WATCHDOG);
+
+	/* report watchdog timeout to all cores */
+	list_for_each_entry(scp_node, &scp_cluster->mtk_scp_list, elem)
+		rproc_report_crash(scp_node->rproc, RPROC_WATCHDOG);
 }
 
 static void scp_init_ipi_handler(void *data, unsigned int len, void *priv)
-- 
2.18.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v15 11/13] remoteproc: mediatek: Report watchdog crash to all cores
@ 2023-07-21  2:41   ` Tinghan Shen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Tinghan Shen @ 2023-07-21  2:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bjorn Andersson, Mathieu Poirier, Rob Herring,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Matthias Brugger,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno, Tinghan Shen
  Cc: linux-remoteproc, devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-mediatek, Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group

To ensure consistent behavior, the watchdog timeout handling of the
multi-core SCP should reset the whole SCP sub-system when watchdog
timeout. Triggering the rproc recovery flow on all instances will
ensure proper recovery of the SCP sub-system.

Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c | 8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
index fcd1dd9b3580..9ed2e18e36ba 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
@@ -68,8 +68,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(scp_put);
 
 static void scp_wdt_handler(struct mtk_scp *scp, u32 scp_to_host)
 {
+	struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster = scp->cluster;
+	struct mtk_scp *scp_node;
+
 	dev_err(scp->dev, "SCP watchdog timeout! 0x%x", scp_to_host);
-	rproc_report_crash(scp->rproc, RPROC_WATCHDOG);
+
+	/* report watchdog timeout to all cores */
+	list_for_each_entry(scp_node, &scp_cluster->mtk_scp_list, elem)
+		rproc_report_crash(scp_node->rproc, RPROC_WATCHDOG);
 }
 
 static void scp_init_ipi_handler(void *data, unsigned int len, void *priv)
-- 
2.18.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v15 12/13] remoteproc: mediatek: Refine ipi handler error message
  2023-07-21  2:41 ` Tinghan Shen
@ 2023-07-21  2:41   ` Tinghan Shen
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Tinghan Shen @ 2023-07-21  2:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bjorn Andersson, Mathieu Poirier, Rob Herring,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Matthias Brugger,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno, Tinghan Shen
  Cc: linux-remoteproc, devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-mediatek, Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group

The error message doesn't accurately reflect the cause of
the error. The error is due to a handler not being found,
not an invalid IPI ID.

Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
index 9ed2e18e36ba..38fb85dd6fb6 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ static void scp_ipi_handler(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 	scp_ipi_lock(scp, id);
 	handler = ipi_desc[id].handler;
 	if (!handler) {
-		dev_err(scp->dev, "No such ipi id = %d\n", id);
+		dev_err(scp->dev, "No handler for ipi id = %d\n", id);
 		scp_ipi_unlock(scp, id);
 		return;
 	}
-- 
2.18.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v15 12/13] remoteproc: mediatek: Refine ipi handler error message
@ 2023-07-21  2:41   ` Tinghan Shen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Tinghan Shen @ 2023-07-21  2:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bjorn Andersson, Mathieu Poirier, Rob Herring,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Matthias Brugger,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno, Tinghan Shen
  Cc: linux-remoteproc, devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-mediatek, Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group

The error message doesn't accurately reflect the cause of
the error. The error is due to a handler not being found,
not an invalid IPI ID.

Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
index 9ed2e18e36ba..38fb85dd6fb6 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ static void scp_ipi_handler(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 	scp_ipi_lock(scp, id);
 	handler = ipi_desc[id].handler;
 	if (!handler) {
-		dev_err(scp->dev, "No such ipi id = %d\n", id);
+		dev_err(scp->dev, "No handler for ipi id = %d\n", id);
 		scp_ipi_unlock(scp, id);
 		return;
 	}
-- 
2.18.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v15 13/13] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8195: Add SCP 2nd core
  2023-07-21  2:41 ` Tinghan Shen
@ 2023-07-21  2:41   ` Tinghan Shen
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Tinghan Shen @ 2023-07-21  2:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bjorn Andersson, Mathieu Poirier, Rob Herring,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Matthias Brugger,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno, Tinghan Shen
  Cc: linux-remoteproc, devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-mediatek, Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group

Rewrite the MT8195 SCP device node as a cluster and
add the SCP 2nd core in it.

Since the SCP device node is changed to multi-core structure,
enable SCP cluster to enable probing SCP core 0.

Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
---
 .../boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195-cherry.dtsi      |  6 +++-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi      | 34 ++++++++++++++-----
 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195-cherry.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195-cherry.dtsi
index 37a3e9de90ff..4584077d3a4c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195-cherry.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195-cherry.dtsi
@@ -991,7 +991,11 @@
 	interrupts-extended = <&pio 222 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
 };
 
-&scp {
+&scp_cluster {
+	status = "okay";
+};
+
+&scp_c0 {
 	status = "okay";
 
 	firmware-name = "mediatek/mt8195/scp.img";
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi
index 48b72b3645e1..7809118f74fb 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi
@@ -922,14 +922,30 @@
 			clocks = <&infracfg_ao CLK_INFRA_AO_GCE2>;
 		};
 
-		scp: scp@10500000 {
-			compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-scp";
-			reg = <0 0x10500000 0 0x100000>,
-			      <0 0x10720000 0 0xe0000>,
-			      <0 0x10700000 0 0x8000>;
-			reg-names = "sram", "cfg", "l1tcm";
-			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 462 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>;
+		scp_cluster: scp@10500000 {
+			compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-scp-dual";
+			reg = <0 0x10720000 0 0xe0000>, <0 0x10700000 0 0x8000>;
+			reg-names = "cfg", "l1tcm";
+			#address-cells = <1>;
+			#size-cells = <1>;
+			ranges = <0 0 0x10500000 0x100000>;
 			status = "disabled";
+
+			scp_c0: scp@0 {
+				compatible = "mediatek,scp-core";
+				reg = <0x0 0xa0000>;
+				reg-names = "sram";
+				interrupts = <GIC_SPI 462 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>;
+				status = "disabled";
+			};
+
+			scp_c1: scp@a0000 {
+				compatible = "mediatek,scp-core";
+				reg = <0xa0000 0x20000>;
+				reg-names = "sram";
+				interrupts = <GIC_SPI 463 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>;
+				status = "disabled";
+			};
 		};
 
 		scp_adsp: clock-controller@10720000 {
@@ -2374,7 +2390,7 @@
 
 		video-codec@18000000 {
 			compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-vcodec-dec";
-			mediatek,scp = <&scp>;
+			mediatek,scp = <&scp_c0>;
 			iommus = <&iommu_vdo M4U_PORT_L21_VDEC_MC_EXT>;
 			#address-cells = <2>;
 			#size-cells = <2>;
@@ -2540,7 +2556,7 @@
 				 <&iommu_vdo M4U_PORT_L19_VENC_REF_LUMA>,
 				 <&iommu_vdo M4U_PORT_L19_VENC_REF_CHROMA>;
 			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 341 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>;
-			mediatek,scp = <&scp>;
+			mediatek,scp = <&scp_c0>;
 			clocks = <&vencsys CLK_VENC_VENC>;
 			clock-names = "venc_sel";
 			assigned-clocks = <&topckgen CLK_TOP_VENC>;
-- 
2.18.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v15 13/13] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8195: Add SCP 2nd core
@ 2023-07-21  2:41   ` Tinghan Shen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Tinghan Shen @ 2023-07-21  2:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bjorn Andersson, Mathieu Poirier, Rob Herring,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Matthias Brugger,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno, Tinghan Shen
  Cc: linux-remoteproc, devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-mediatek, Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group

Rewrite the MT8195 SCP device node as a cluster and
add the SCP 2nd core in it.

Since the SCP device node is changed to multi-core structure,
enable SCP cluster to enable probing SCP core 0.

Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
---
 .../boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195-cherry.dtsi      |  6 +++-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi      | 34 ++++++++++++++-----
 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195-cherry.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195-cherry.dtsi
index 37a3e9de90ff..4584077d3a4c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195-cherry.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195-cherry.dtsi
@@ -991,7 +991,11 @@
 	interrupts-extended = <&pio 222 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
 };
 
-&scp {
+&scp_cluster {
+	status = "okay";
+};
+
+&scp_c0 {
 	status = "okay";
 
 	firmware-name = "mediatek/mt8195/scp.img";
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi
index 48b72b3645e1..7809118f74fb 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi
@@ -922,14 +922,30 @@
 			clocks = <&infracfg_ao CLK_INFRA_AO_GCE2>;
 		};
 
-		scp: scp@10500000 {
-			compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-scp";
-			reg = <0 0x10500000 0 0x100000>,
-			      <0 0x10720000 0 0xe0000>,
-			      <0 0x10700000 0 0x8000>;
-			reg-names = "sram", "cfg", "l1tcm";
-			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 462 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>;
+		scp_cluster: scp@10500000 {
+			compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-scp-dual";
+			reg = <0 0x10720000 0 0xe0000>, <0 0x10700000 0 0x8000>;
+			reg-names = "cfg", "l1tcm";
+			#address-cells = <1>;
+			#size-cells = <1>;
+			ranges = <0 0 0x10500000 0x100000>;
 			status = "disabled";
+
+			scp_c0: scp@0 {
+				compatible = "mediatek,scp-core";
+				reg = <0x0 0xa0000>;
+				reg-names = "sram";
+				interrupts = <GIC_SPI 462 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>;
+				status = "disabled";
+			};
+
+			scp_c1: scp@a0000 {
+				compatible = "mediatek,scp-core";
+				reg = <0xa0000 0x20000>;
+				reg-names = "sram";
+				interrupts = <GIC_SPI 463 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>;
+				status = "disabled";
+			};
 		};
 
 		scp_adsp: clock-controller@10720000 {
@@ -2374,7 +2390,7 @@
 
 		video-codec@18000000 {
 			compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-vcodec-dec";
-			mediatek,scp = <&scp>;
+			mediatek,scp = <&scp_c0>;
 			iommus = <&iommu_vdo M4U_PORT_L21_VDEC_MC_EXT>;
 			#address-cells = <2>;
 			#size-cells = <2>;
@@ -2540,7 +2556,7 @@
 				 <&iommu_vdo M4U_PORT_L19_VENC_REF_LUMA>,
 				 <&iommu_vdo M4U_PORT_L19_VENC_REF_CHROMA>;
 			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 341 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>;
-			mediatek,scp = <&scp>;
+			mediatek,scp = <&scp_c0>;
 			clocks = <&vencsys CLK_VENC_VENC>;
 			clock-names = "venc_sel";
 			assigned-clocks = <&topckgen CLK_TOP_VENC>;
-- 
2.18.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v15 05/13] remoteproc: mediatek: Extract SCP common registers
  2023-07-21  2:41   ` Tinghan Shen
  (?)
@ 2023-07-25 19:56   ` Mathieu Poirier
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Mathieu Poirier @ 2023-07-25 19:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tinghan Shen
  Cc: Bjorn Andersson, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley,
	Matthias Brugger, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno, linux-remoteproc,
	devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, linux-mediatek,
	Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group

On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 10:41:24AM +0800, Tinghan Shen wrote:
> This is the 1st preliminary steps for probing multi-core SCP.
> The registers of config and l1tcm are common on single-core SCP
> and multi-core SCP. Extract these registers out to reduce duplicated
> fields in mtk_scp when probing multi-core SCP.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h  |  13 +-
>  drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c     | 201 +++++++++++++++++--------------
>  drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp_ipi.c |   4 +-
>  3 files changed, 122 insertions(+), 96 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
> index c0905aec3b4b..b04d71277c1f 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
> @@ -100,17 +100,20 @@ struct mtk_scp_of_data {
>  	size_t ipi_buf_offset;
>  };
>  
> +struct mtk_scp_of_cluster {
> +	void __iomem *reg_base;
> +	void __iomem *l1tcm_base;
> +	size_t l1tcm_size;
> +	phys_addr_t l1tcm_phys;
> +};
> +

Ok

>  struct mtk_scp {
>  	struct device *dev;
>  	struct rproc *rproc;
>  	struct clk *clk;
> -	void __iomem *reg_base;
>  	void __iomem *sram_base;
>  	size_t sram_size;
>  	phys_addr_t sram_phys;
> -	void __iomem *l1tcm_base;
> -	size_t l1tcm_size;
> -	phys_addr_t l1tcm_phys;
> 

Ok

>  	const struct mtk_scp_of_data *data;
>  
> @@ -128,6 +131,8 @@ struct mtk_scp {
>  	size_t dram_size;
>  
>  	struct rproc_subdev *rpmsg_subdev;
> +
> +	struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *cluster;

Ok

>  };
>  
>  /**
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> index 48e759c2d486..9486f5020946 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> @@ -152,45 +152,45 @@ static void mt8183_scp_reset_assert(struct mtk_scp *scp)
>  {
>  	u32 val;
>  
> -	val = readl(scp->reg_base + MT8183_SW_RSTN);
> +	val = readl(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SW_RSTN);
>  	val &= ~MT8183_SW_RSTN_BIT;
> -	writel(val, scp->reg_base + MT8183_SW_RSTN);
> +	writel(val, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SW_RSTN);
>  }
>  
>  static void mt8183_scp_reset_deassert(struct mtk_scp *scp)
>  {
>  	u32 val;
>  
> -	val = readl(scp->reg_base + MT8183_SW_RSTN);
> +	val = readl(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SW_RSTN);
>  	val |= MT8183_SW_RSTN_BIT;
> -	writel(val, scp->reg_base + MT8183_SW_RSTN);
> +	writel(val, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SW_RSTN);
>  }
>  
>  static void mt8192_scp_reset_assert(struct mtk_scp *scp)
>  {
> -	writel(1, scp->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_SW_RSTN_SET);
> +	writel(1, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_SW_RSTN_SET);
>  }
>  
>  static void mt8192_scp_reset_deassert(struct mtk_scp *scp)
>  {
> -	writel(1, scp->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_SW_RSTN_CLR);
> +	writel(1, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_SW_RSTN_CLR);
>  }
>  
>  static void mt8195_scp_c1_reset_assert(struct mtk_scp *scp)
>  {
> -	writel(1, scp->reg_base + MT8195_CORE1_SW_RSTN_SET);
> +	writel(1, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8195_CORE1_SW_RSTN_SET);
>  }
>  
>  static void mt8195_scp_c1_reset_deassert(struct mtk_scp *scp)
>  {
> -	writel(1, scp->reg_base + MT8195_CORE1_SW_RSTN_CLR);
> +	writel(1, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8195_CORE1_SW_RSTN_CLR);
>  }
>  
>  static void mt8183_scp_irq_handler(struct mtk_scp *scp)
>  {
>  	u32 scp_to_host;
>  
> -	scp_to_host = readl(scp->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_TO_HOST);
> +	scp_to_host = readl(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_TO_HOST);
>  	if (scp_to_host & MT8183_SCP_IPC_INT_BIT)
>  		scp_ipi_handler(scp);
>  	else
> @@ -198,14 +198,14 @@ static void mt8183_scp_irq_handler(struct mtk_scp *scp)
>  
>  	/* SCP won't send another interrupt until we set SCP_TO_HOST to 0. */
>  	writel(MT8183_SCP_IPC_INT_BIT | MT8183_SCP_WDT_INT_BIT,
> -	       scp->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_TO_HOST);
> +	       scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_TO_HOST);
>  }
>  
>  static void mt8192_scp_irq_handler(struct mtk_scp *scp)
>  {
>  	u32 scp_to_host;
>  
> -	scp_to_host = readl(scp->reg_base + MT8192_SCP2APMCU_IPC_SET);
> +	scp_to_host = readl(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_SCP2APMCU_IPC_SET);
>  
>  	if (scp_to_host & MT8192_SCP_IPC_INT_BIT) {
>  		scp_ipi_handler(scp);
> @@ -215,10 +215,10 @@ static void mt8192_scp_irq_handler(struct mtk_scp *scp)
>  		 * MT8192_SCP2APMCU_IPC.
>  		 */
>  		writel(MT8192_SCP_IPC_INT_BIT,
> -		       scp->reg_base + MT8192_SCP2APMCU_IPC_CLR);
> +		       scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_SCP2APMCU_IPC_CLR);
>  	} else {
>  		scp_wdt_handler(scp, scp_to_host);
> -		writel(1, scp->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_WDT_IRQ);
> +		writel(1, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_WDT_IRQ);
>  	}
>  }
>  
> @@ -226,12 +226,12 @@ static void mt8195_scp_c1_irq_handler(struct mtk_scp *scp)
>  {
>  	u32 scp_to_host;
>  
> -	scp_to_host = readl(scp->reg_base + MT8195_SSHUB2APMCU_IPC_SET);
> +	scp_to_host = readl(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8195_SSHUB2APMCU_IPC_SET);
>  
>  	if (scp_to_host & MT8192_SCP_IPC_INT_BIT)
>  		scp_ipi_handler(scp);
>  
> -	writel(scp_to_host, scp->reg_base + MT8195_SSHUB2APMCU_IPC_CLR);
> +	writel(scp_to_host, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8195_SSHUB2APMCU_IPC_CLR);
>  }
>  
>  static irqreturn_t scp_irq_handler(int irq, void *priv)
> @@ -363,26 +363,26 @@ static int mt8195_scp_clk_get(struct mtk_scp *scp)
>  static int mt8183_scp_before_load(struct mtk_scp *scp)
>  {
>  	/* Clear SCP to host interrupt */
> -	writel(MT8183_SCP_IPC_INT_BIT, scp->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_TO_HOST);
> +	writel(MT8183_SCP_IPC_INT_BIT, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_TO_HOST);
>  
>  	/* Reset clocks before loading FW */
> -	writel(0x0, scp->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_CLK_SW_SEL);
> -	writel(0x0, scp->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_CLK_DIV_SEL);
> +	writel(0x0, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_CLK_SW_SEL);
> +	writel(0x0, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_CLK_DIV_SEL);
>  
>  	/* Initialize TCM before loading FW. */
> -	writel(0x0, scp->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_L1_SRAM_PD);
> -	writel(0x0, scp->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_TCM_TAIL_SRAM_PD);
> +	writel(0x0, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_L1_SRAM_PD);
> +	writel(0x0, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_TCM_TAIL_SRAM_PD);
>  
>  	/* Turn on the power of SCP's SRAM before using it. */
> -	writel(0x0, scp->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_SRAM_PDN);
> +	writel(0x0, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_SRAM_PDN);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Set I-cache and D-cache size before loading SCP FW.
>  	 * SCP SRAM logical address may change when cache size setting differs.
>  	 */
>  	writel(MT8183_SCP_CACHE_CON_WAYEN | MT8183_SCP_CACHESIZE_8KB,
> -	       scp->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_CACHE_CON);
> -	writel(MT8183_SCP_CACHESIZE_8KB, scp->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_DCACHE_CON);
> +	       scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_CACHE_CON);
> +	writel(MT8183_SCP_CACHESIZE_8KB, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_DCACHE_CON);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -408,28 +408,28 @@ static void scp_sram_power_off(void __iomem *addr, u32 reserved_mask)
>  static int mt8186_scp_before_load(struct mtk_scp *scp)
>  {
>  	/* Clear SCP to host interrupt */
> -	writel(MT8183_SCP_IPC_INT_BIT, scp->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_TO_HOST);
> +	writel(MT8183_SCP_IPC_INT_BIT, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_TO_HOST);
>  
>  	/* Reset clocks before loading FW */
> -	writel(0x0, scp->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_CLK_SW_SEL);
> -	writel(0x0, scp->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_CLK_DIV_SEL);
> +	writel(0x0, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_CLK_SW_SEL);
> +	writel(0x0, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_CLK_DIV_SEL);
>  
>  	/* Turn on the power of SCP's SRAM before using it. Enable 1 block per time*/
> -	scp_sram_power_on(scp->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_SRAM_PDN, 0);
> +	scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_SRAM_PDN, 0);
>  
>  	/* Initialize TCM before loading FW. */
> -	writel(0x0, scp->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_L1_SRAM_PD);
> -	writel(0x0, scp->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_TCM_TAIL_SRAM_PD);
> -	writel(0x0, scp->reg_base + MT8186_SCP_L1_SRAM_PD_P1);
> -	writel(0x0, scp->reg_base + MT8186_SCP_L1_SRAM_PD_p2);
> +	writel(0x0, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_L1_SRAM_PD);
> +	writel(0x0, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_TCM_TAIL_SRAM_PD);
> +	writel(0x0, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8186_SCP_L1_SRAM_PD_P1);
> +	writel(0x0, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8186_SCP_L1_SRAM_PD_p2);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Set I-cache and D-cache size before loading SCP FW.
>  	 * SCP SRAM logical address may change when cache size setting differs.
>  	 */
>  	writel(MT8183_SCP_CACHE_CON_WAYEN | MT8183_SCP_CACHESIZE_8KB,
> -	       scp->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_CACHE_CON);
> -	writel(MT8183_SCP_CACHESIZE_8KB, scp->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_DCACHE_CON);
> +	       scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_CACHE_CON);
> +	writel(MT8183_SCP_CACHESIZE_8KB, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_DCACHE_CON);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -437,19 +437,19 @@ static int mt8186_scp_before_load(struct mtk_scp *scp)
>  static int mt8192_scp_before_load(struct mtk_scp *scp)
>  {
>  	/* clear SPM interrupt, SCP2SPM_IPC_CLR */
> -	writel(0xff, scp->reg_base + MT8192_SCP2SPM_IPC_CLR);
> +	writel(0xff, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_SCP2SPM_IPC_CLR);
>  
> -	writel(1, scp->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_SW_RSTN_SET);
> +	writel(1, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_SW_RSTN_SET);
>  
>  	/* enable SRAM clock */
> -	scp_sram_power_on(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_0, 0);
> -	scp_sram_power_on(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_1, 0);
> -	scp_sram_power_on(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_2, 0);
> -	scp_sram_power_on(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN, 0);
> -	scp_sram_power_on(scp->reg_base + MT8192_CPU0_SRAM_PD, 0);
> +	scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_0, 0);
> +	scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_1, 0);
> +	scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_2, 0);
> +	scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN, 0);
> +	scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_CPU0_SRAM_PD, 0);
>  
>  	/* enable MPU for all memory regions */
> -	writel(0xff, scp->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_MEM_ATT_PREDEF);
> +	writel(0xff, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_MEM_ATT_PREDEF);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -457,20 +457,20 @@ static int mt8192_scp_before_load(struct mtk_scp *scp)
>  static int mt8195_scp_before_load(struct mtk_scp *scp)
>  {
>  	/* clear SPM interrupt, SCP2SPM_IPC_CLR */
> -	writel(0xff, scp->reg_base + MT8192_SCP2SPM_IPC_CLR);
> +	writel(0xff, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_SCP2SPM_IPC_CLR);
>  
> -	writel(1, scp->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_SW_RSTN_SET);
> +	writel(1, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_SW_RSTN_SET);
>  
>  	/* enable SRAM clock */
> -	scp_sram_power_on(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_0, 0);
> -	scp_sram_power_on(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_1, 0);
> -	scp_sram_power_on(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_2, 0);
> -	scp_sram_power_on(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN,
> +	scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_0, 0);
> +	scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_1, 0);
> +	scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_2, 0);
> +	scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN,
>  			  MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_RSI_BITS);
> -	scp_sram_power_on(scp->reg_base + MT8192_CPU0_SRAM_PD, 0);
> +	scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_CPU0_SRAM_PD, 0);
>  
>  	/* enable MPU for all memory regions */
> -	writel(0xff, scp->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_MEM_ATT_PREDEF);
> +	writel(0xff, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_MEM_ATT_PREDEF);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -479,10 +479,10 @@ static int mt8195_scp_c1_before_load(struct mtk_scp *scp)
>  {
>  	scp->data->scp_reset_assert(scp);
>  
> -	scp_sram_power_on(scp->reg_base + MT8195_CPU1_SRAM_PD, 0);
> +	scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8195_CPU1_SRAM_PD, 0);
>  
>  	/* enable MPU for all memory regions */
> -	writel(0xff, scp->reg_base + MT8195_CORE1_MEM_ATT_PREDEF);
> +	writel(0xff, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8195_CORE1_MEM_ATT_PREDEF);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -601,11 +601,11 @@ static void *mt8192_scp_da_to_va(struct mtk_scp *scp, u64 da, size_t len)
>  	}
>  
>  	/* optional memory region */
> -	if (scp->l1tcm_size &&
> -	    da >= scp->l1tcm_phys &&
> -	    (da + len) <= scp->l1tcm_phys + scp->l1tcm_size) {
> -		offset = da - scp->l1tcm_phys;
> -		return (void __force *)scp->l1tcm_base + offset;
> +	if (scp->cluster->l1tcm_size &&
> +	    da >= scp->cluster->l1tcm_phys &&
> +	    (da + len) <= scp->cluster->l1tcm_phys + scp->cluster->l1tcm_size) {
> +		offset = da - scp->cluster->l1tcm_phys;
> +		return (void __force *)scp->cluster->l1tcm_base + offset;
>  	}
>  
>  	/* optional memory region */
> @@ -629,43 +629,43 @@ static void *scp_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, size_t len, bool *is_iome
>  static void mt8183_scp_stop(struct mtk_scp *scp)
>  {
>  	/* Disable SCP watchdog */
> -	writel(0, scp->reg_base + MT8183_WDT_CFG);
> +	writel(0, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8183_WDT_CFG);
>  }
>  
>  static void mt8192_scp_stop(struct mtk_scp *scp)
>  {
>  	/* Disable SRAM clock */
> -	scp_sram_power_off(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_0, 0);
> -	scp_sram_power_off(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_1, 0);
> -	scp_sram_power_off(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_2, 0);
> -	scp_sram_power_off(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN, 0);
> -	scp_sram_power_off(scp->reg_base + MT8192_CPU0_SRAM_PD, 0);
> +	scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_0, 0);
> +	scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_1, 0);
> +	scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_2, 0);
> +	scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN, 0);
> +	scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_CPU0_SRAM_PD, 0);
>  
>  	/* Disable SCP watchdog */
> -	writel(0, scp->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_WDT_CFG);
> +	writel(0, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_WDT_CFG);
>  }
>  
>  static void mt8195_scp_stop(struct mtk_scp *scp)
>  {
>  	/* Disable SRAM clock */
> -	scp_sram_power_off(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_0, 0);
> -	scp_sram_power_off(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_1, 0);
> -	scp_sram_power_off(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_2, 0);
> -	scp_sram_power_off(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN,
> +	scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_0, 0);
> +	scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_1, 0);
> +	scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_2, 0);
> +	scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN,
>  			   MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_RSI_BITS);
> -	scp_sram_power_off(scp->reg_base + MT8192_CPU0_SRAM_PD, 0);
> +	scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_CPU0_SRAM_PD, 0);
>  
>  	/* Disable SCP watchdog */
> -	writel(0, scp->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_WDT_CFG);
> +	writel(0, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_WDT_CFG);
>  }
>  
>  static void mt8195_scp_c1_stop(struct mtk_scp *scp)
>  {
>  	/* Power off CPU SRAM */
> -	scp_sram_power_off(scp->reg_base + MT8195_CPU1_SRAM_PD, 0);
> +	scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8195_CPU1_SRAM_PD, 0);
>  
>  	/* Disable SCP watchdog */
> -	writel(0, scp->reg_base + MT8195_CORE1_WDT_CFG);
> +	writel(0, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8195_CORE1_WDT_CFG);
>  }
>  
>  static int scp_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
> @@ -854,7 +854,8 @@ static void scp_remove_rpmsg_subdev(struct mtk_scp *scp)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +static int scp_cluster_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
> +			    struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster)

Why is the mtk_scp and mtk_scp_of_cluster structure refactoring entangled with
scp_probe()?  Just add another patch to prepare the upcoming work, exactly the
same way pach 04/13 does.

>  {
>  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>  	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> @@ -876,6 +877,7 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	scp->rproc = rproc;
>  	scp->dev = dev;
>  	scp->data = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> +	scp->cluster = scp_cluster;
>  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, scp);
>  
>  	res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "sram");
> @@ -887,24 +889,6 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	scp->sram_size = resource_size(res);
>  	scp->sram_phys = res->start;
>  
> -	/* l1tcm is an optional memory region */
> -	res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "l1tcm");
> -	scp->l1tcm_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
> -	if (IS_ERR(scp->l1tcm_base)) {
> -		ret = PTR_ERR(scp->l1tcm_base);
> -		if (ret != -EINVAL) {
> -			return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to map l1tcm memory\n");
> -		}
> -	} else {
> -		scp->l1tcm_size = resource_size(res);
> -		scp->l1tcm_phys = res->start;
> -	}
> -
> -	scp->reg_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "cfg");
> -	if (IS_ERR(scp->reg_base))
> -		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(scp->reg_base),
> -				     "Failed to parse and map cfg memory\n");
> -
>  	ret = scp->data->scp_clk_get(scp);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
> @@ -956,6 +940,43 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster;
> +	struct resource *res;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	scp_cluster = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*scp_cluster), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!scp_cluster)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	scp_cluster->reg_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "cfg");
> +	if (IS_ERR(scp_cluster->reg_base))
> +		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(scp_cluster->reg_base),
> +				     "Failed to parse and map cfg memory\n");
> +
> +	/* l1tcm is an optional memory region */
> +	res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "l1tcm");
> +	scp_cluster->l1tcm_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
> +	if (IS_ERR(scp_cluster->l1tcm_base)) {
> +		ret = PTR_ERR(scp_cluster->l1tcm_base);
> +		if (ret != -EINVAL)
> +			return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to map l1tcm memory\n");
> +
> +		scp_cluster->l1tcm_base = NULL;
> +	} else {
> +		scp_cluster->l1tcm_size = resource_size(res);
> +		scp_cluster->l1tcm_phys = res->start;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = scp_cluster_init(pdev, scp_cluster);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static void scp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct mtk_scp *scp = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp_ipi.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp_ipi.c
> index 9c7c17b9d181..cd0b60106ec2 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp_ipi.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp_ipi.c
> @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ int scp_ipi_send(struct mtk_scp *scp, u32 id, void *buf, unsigned int len,
>  	mutex_lock(&scp->send_lock);
>  
>  	 /* Wait until SCP receives the last command */
> -	ret = readl_poll_timeout_atomic(scp->reg_base + scp->data->host_to_scp_reg,
> +	ret = readl_poll_timeout_atomic(scp->cluster->reg_base + scp->data->host_to_scp_reg,
>  					val, !val, 0, SCP_TIMEOUT_US);
>  	if (ret) {
>  		dev_err(scp->dev, "%s: IPI timeout!\n", __func__);
> @@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ int scp_ipi_send(struct mtk_scp *scp, u32 id, void *buf, unsigned int len,
>  	scp->ipi_id_ack[id] = false;
>  	/* send the command to SCP */
>  	writel(scp->data->host_to_scp_int_bit,
> -	       scp->reg_base + scp->data->host_to_scp_reg);
> +	       scp->cluster->reg_base + scp->data->host_to_scp_reg);
>  
>  	if (wait) {
>  		/* wait for SCP's ACK */
> -- 
> 2.18.0
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v15 07/13] remoteproc: mediatek: Probe SCP cluster on multi-core SCP
  2023-07-21  2:41   ` Tinghan Shen
  (?)
@ 2023-07-25 19:59   ` Mathieu Poirier
  2023-07-26  2:55     ` TingHan Shen (沈廷翰)
  -1 siblings, 1 reply; 33+ messages in thread
From: Mathieu Poirier @ 2023-07-25 19:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tinghan Shen
  Cc: Bjorn Andersson, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley,
	Matthias Brugger, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno, linux-remoteproc,
	devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, linux-mediatek,
	Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group

On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 10:41:26AM +0800, Tinghan Shen wrote:
> The difference of single-core SCP and multi-core SCP device tree is
> the presence of child device nodes described SCP cores. The SCP
> driver populates the platform device and checks the child nodes
> to identify whether it's a single-core SCP or a multi-core SCP.
> 
> Add the remoteproc instances of multi-core SCP to the SCP cluster list.
> When the SCP driver is removed, it cleanup resources by walking
> through the cluster list.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c | 118 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 113 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> index d67dcabdab9e..34095a461e15 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> @@ -855,7 +855,8 @@ static void scp_remove_rpmsg_subdev(struct mtk_scp *scp)
>  }
>  
>  static struct mtk_scp *scp_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
> -				      struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster)
> +				      struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster,
> +				      const struct mtk_scp_of_data *of_data)
>  {
>  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>  	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> @@ -878,7 +879,7 @@ static struct mtk_scp *scp_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
>  	scp = rproc->priv;
>  	scp->rproc = rproc;
>  	scp->dev = dev;
> -	scp->data = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> +	scp->data = of_data;
>  	scp->cluster = scp_cluster;
>  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, scp);
>  
> @@ -951,15 +952,15 @@ static void scp_free(struct mtk_scp *scp)
>  	mutex_destroy(&scp->send_lock);
>  }
>  
> -static int scp_cluster_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
> -			    struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster)
> +static int scp_add_single_core(struct platform_device *pdev,
> +			       struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster)
>  {
>  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>  	struct list_head *scp_list = &scp_cluster->mtk_scp_list;
>  	struct mtk_scp *scp;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	scp = scp_rproc_init(pdev, scp_cluster);
> +	scp = scp_rproc_init(pdev, scp_cluster, of_device_get_match_data(dev));
>  	if (IS_ERR(scp))
>  		return PTR_ERR(scp);
>  
> @@ -975,6 +976,102 @@ static int scp_cluster_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static int scp_add_multi_core(struct platform_device *pdev,
> +			      struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	struct device_node *np = dev_of_node(dev);
> +	struct platform_device *cpdev;
> +	struct device_node *child;
> +	struct list_head *scp_list = &scp_cluster->mtk_scp_list;
> +	const struct mtk_scp_of_data **cluster_of_data;
> +	struct mtk_scp *scp, *temp;
> +	int core_id = 0;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	cluster_of_data = (const struct mtk_scp_of_data **)of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> +
> +	for_each_available_child_of_node(np, child) {
> +		if (!cluster_of_data[core_id]) {
> +			ret = -EINVAL;
> +			dev_err(dev, "Not support core %d\n", core_id);
> +			of_node_put(child);
> +			goto init_fail;
> +		}
> +
> +		cpdev = of_find_device_by_node(child);
> +		if (!cpdev) {
> +			ret = -ENODEV;
> +			dev_err(dev, "Not found platform device for core %d\n", core_id);
> +			of_node_put(child);
> +			goto init_fail;
> +		}
> +
> +		scp = scp_rproc_init(cpdev, scp_cluster, cluster_of_data[core_id]);
> +		put_device(&cpdev->dev);
> +		if (IS_ERR(scp)) {
> +			ret = PTR_ERR(scp);
> +			dev_err(dev, "Failed to initialize core %d rproc\n", core_id);
> +			of_node_put(child);
> +			goto init_fail;
> +		}
> +
> +		ret = rproc_add(scp->rproc);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			dev_err(dev, "Failed to add rproc of core %d\n", core_id);
> +			of_node_put(child);
> +			scp_free(scp);
> +			goto init_fail;
> +		}
> +
> +		list_add_tail(&scp->elem, scp_list);
> +		core_id++;
> +	}
> +
> +	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, list_first_entry(scp_list, struct mtk_scp, elem));

(sigh)

Why is list_first_entry() used here rather than just @scp?  What is the purpose
of using the list API?

> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +init_fail:
> +	list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(scp, temp, scp_list, elem) {
> +		list_del(&scp->elem);
> +		rproc_del(scp->rproc);
> +		scp_free(scp);
> +	}
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int scp_is_single_core(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	struct device_node *np = dev_of_node(dev);
> +	struct device_node *child;
> +
> +	child = of_get_next_available_child(np, NULL);
> +	if (!child)
> +		return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENODEV, "No child node\n");
> +
> +	of_node_put(child);
> +	return of_node_name_eq(child, "cros-ec-rpmsg");
> +}
> +
> +static int scp_cluster_init(struct platform_device *pdev, struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = scp_is_single_core(pdev);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	if (ret)
> +		ret = scp_add_single_core(pdev, scp_cluster);
> +	else
> +		ret = scp_add_multi_core(pdev, scp_cluster);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>  static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> @@ -1007,6 +1104,10 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&scp_cluster->mtk_scp_list);
>  
> +	ret = devm_of_platform_populate(dev);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to populate platform devices\n");
> +
>  	ret = scp_cluster_init(pdev, scp_cluster);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
> @@ -1101,12 +1202,19 @@ static const struct mtk_scp_of_data mt8195_of_data_c1 = {
>  	.host_to_scp_int_bit = MT8195_CORE1_HOST_IPC_INT_BIT,
>  };
>  
> +static const struct mtk_scp_of_data *mt8195_of_data_cores[] = {
> +	&mt8195_of_data,
> +	&mt8195_of_data_c1,
> +	NULL
> +};
> +
>  static const struct of_device_id mtk_scp_of_match[] = {
>  	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8183-scp", .data = &mt8183_of_data },
>  	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8186-scp", .data = &mt8186_of_data },
>  	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8188-scp", .data = &mt8188_of_data },
>  	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8192-scp", .data = &mt8192_of_data },
>  	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-scp", .data = &mt8195_of_data },
> +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-scp-dual", .data = &mt8195_of_data_cores },
>  	{},
>  };
>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mtk_scp_of_match);
> -- 
> 2.18.0
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v15 08/13] remoteproc: mediatek: Remove dependency of MT8195 SCP L2TCM power control on dual-core SCP
  2023-07-21  2:41   ` Tinghan Shen
  (?)
@ 2023-07-25 20:05   ` Mathieu Poirier
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Mathieu Poirier @ 2023-07-25 20:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tinghan Shen
  Cc: Bjorn Andersson, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley,
	Matthias Brugger, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno, linux-remoteproc,
	devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, linux-mediatek,
	Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group

On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 10:41:27AM +0800, Tinghan Shen wrote:
> Previously, SCP core 0 controlled the power of L2TCM and dictated that
> SCP core 1 could only boot after SCP core 0. To address this constraint,
> extracted the power control flow of L2TCM and made it shared
> between both cores, enabling support of arbitrary boot order.
>

s/of/for

> The flow for controlling L2TCM power has been incorporated into the
> mt8195_scp_before_load() and mt8195_scp_stop() APIs, which are
> respectively invoked during the rproc->ops->start() and
> rproc->ops->stop() operations. These APIs effectively serve the same
> purpose as the rproc prepare()/unprepare() APIs."
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h |  3 ++
>  drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c    | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  2 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
> index 1438159ae736..fea05bbba9aa 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
> @@ -106,6 +106,9 @@ struct mtk_scp_of_cluster {
>  	size_t l1tcm_size;
>  	phys_addr_t l1tcm_phys;
>  	struct list_head mtk_scp_list;
> +	/* Prevent concurrent operations of this structure and L2TCM power control. */
> +	struct mutex cluster_lock;
> +	u32 l2tcm_refcnt;
>  };
>  
>  struct mtk_scp {
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> index 34095a461e15..c624f9c3db17 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> @@ -454,19 +454,37 @@ static int mt8192_scp_before_load(struct mtk_scp *scp)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static int mt8195_scp_before_load(struct mtk_scp *scp)
> +static int mt8195_scp_l2tcm_on(struct mtk_scp *scp)
>  {
> -	/* clear SPM interrupt, SCP2SPM_IPC_CLR */
> -	writel(0xff, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_SCP2SPM_IPC_CLR);
> +	struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster = scp->cluster;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&scp_cluster->cluster_lock);
> +
> +	if (scp_cluster->l2tcm_refcnt == 0) {
> +		/* clear SPM interrupt, SCP2SPM_IPC_CLR */
> +		writel(0xff, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_SCP2SPM_IPC_CLR);
> +
> +		/* Power on L2TCM */
> +		scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_0, 0);
> +		scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_1, 0);
> +		scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_2, 0);
> +		scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN,
> +				  MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_RSI_BITS);
> +	}
> +
> +	scp_cluster->l2tcm_refcnt += 1;
>  
> +	mutex_unlock(&scp_cluster->cluster_lock);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int mt8195_scp_before_load(struct mtk_scp *scp)
> +{
>  	writel(1, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_SW_RSTN_SET);
>  
> -	/* enable SRAM clock */
> -	scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_0, 0);
> -	scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_1, 0);
> -	scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_2, 0);
> -	scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN,
> -			  MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_RSI_BITS);
> +	mt8195_scp_l2tcm_on(scp);
> +
>  	scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_CPU0_SRAM_PD, 0);
>  
>  	/* enable MPU for all memory regions */
> @@ -479,6 +497,8 @@ static int mt8195_scp_c1_before_load(struct mtk_scp *scp)
>  {
>  	scp->data->scp_reset_assert(scp);
>  
> +	mt8195_scp_l2tcm_on(scp);
> +
>  	scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8195_CPU1_SRAM_PD, 0);
>  
>  	/* enable MPU for all memory regions */
> @@ -645,14 +665,31 @@ static void mt8192_scp_stop(struct mtk_scp *scp)
>  	writel(0, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_WDT_CFG);
>  }
>  
> +static void mt8195_scp_l2tcm_off(struct mtk_scp *scp)
> +{
> +	struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster = scp->cluster;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&scp_cluster->cluster_lock);
> +
> +	if (scp_cluster->l2tcm_refcnt > 0)
> +		scp_cluster->l2tcm_refcnt -= 1;
> +
> +	if (scp_cluster->l2tcm_refcnt == 0) {
> +		/* Power off L2TCM */
> +		scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_0, 0);
> +		scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_1, 0);
> +		scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_2, 0);
> +		scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN,
> +				   MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_RSI_BITS);
> +	}
> +
> +	mutex_unlock(&scp_cluster->cluster_lock);
> +}
> +
>  static void mt8195_scp_stop(struct mtk_scp *scp)
>  {
> -	/* Disable SRAM clock */
> -	scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_0, 0);
> -	scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_1, 0);
> -	scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_2, 0);
> -	scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN,
> -			   MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_RSI_BITS);
> +	mt8195_scp_l2tcm_off(scp);
> +
>  	scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_CPU0_SRAM_PD, 0);
>  
>  	/* Disable SCP watchdog */
> @@ -661,6 +698,8 @@ static void mt8195_scp_stop(struct mtk_scp *scp)
>  
>  static void mt8195_scp_c1_stop(struct mtk_scp *scp)
>  {
> +	mt8195_scp_l2tcm_off(scp);
> +
>  	/* Power off CPU SRAM */
>  	scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8195_CPU1_SRAM_PD, 0);
>  
> @@ -1103,6 +1142,7 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	}
>  
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&scp_cluster->mtk_scp_list);
> +	mutex_init(&scp_cluster->cluster_lock);
>  
>  	ret = devm_of_platform_populate(dev);
>  	if (ret)
> @@ -1126,6 +1166,7 @@ static void scp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		rproc_del(scp->rproc);
>  		scp_free(scp);
>  	}
> +	mutex_destroy(&scp_cluster->cluster_lock);
>  }
>  
>  static const struct mtk_scp_of_data mt8183_of_data = {
> -- 
> 2.18.0
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v15 00/13] Add support for MT8195 SCP 2nd core
  2023-07-21  2:41 ` Tinghan Shen
                   ` (13 preceding siblings ...)
  (?)
@ 2023-07-25 20:34 ` Mathieu Poirier
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Mathieu Poirier @ 2023-07-25 20:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tinghan Shen
  Cc: Bjorn Andersson, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley,
	Matthias Brugger, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno, linux-remoteproc,
	devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, linux-mediatek,
	Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group

On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 10:41:19AM +0800, Tinghan Shen wrote:
> The mediatek remoteproc driver currently only allows bringing up a 
> single core SCP, e.g. MT8183. It also only bringing up the 1st 
> core in SoCs with a dual-core SCP, e.g. MT8195. This series support 
> to bring-up the 2nd core of the dual-core SCP.
> 
> v15 -> v14:
> 1. Use the common SCP registers in struct mtk_scp_of_cluster instead of
>    copy it to struct mtk_scp at patchset 5 
> 2. Use platform_set_drvdata instead of platform_device_add_data at patchset 5 
> 3. Rename l2tcm_lock to cluster_lock at patchset 8
> 4. Check l2tcm_refcnt value before decreasing at patchset 8
> 5. Revise the commit message at patchset 11

I am done reviewing this set.  Checkpatch is giving a warning for patch 01/13,
something I would expect to have been dealt with after 15 iterations.  I will be
away for the next 3 weeks so no point in rushing another revision to sqeeze
in the v6.6 merge window.

Mathieu

> 
> v13 -> v14:
> 1. add review tag to patchset 1,6
> 2. exchange the order of sram power on and reset assert in
> mt8195_scp_c1_before_load at patchset 2
> 3. Use ERR_CAST in patchset 5
> 4. Re-write patchset 7 to remove dependency between core 0 and core 1 
> 5. Add patch set 10 to report watchdot timeout to all cores
> 
> v12 -> v13:
> 1. replace subdevice with new mediatek scp operations in patchset 7 
> 2. add review tag to patchset 3
> 3. modify mediatek,scp phandle name of video-codec@18000000 at patchset 11
> 
> v11 -> v12:
> 1. add scp_add_single/multi_core() to patchset 6
> 2. remove unused comment in patchset 6
> 3. rename list name from mtk_scp_cluster to mtk_scp_list
> 4. rewrite the multi-core probe flow 
> 5. disable rproc->autoboot and boot rproc by request_firmware_nowait at patchset 7 
> 6. remove patchset 7 review tag  
> 
> v10 -> v11:
> 1. rewrite patchset 5 to probe single-core SCP with the cluster list
> 2. Also in patchset 5, move the pointer of mtk_scp object from the
>    platform data property to the driver data property 
> 3. move the appearance of mtk_scp cluster property to patcheset 7
> 
> v9 -> v10:
> 1. move the global mtk_scp list into the platform device driver data structure
> 2. remove an unnecessary if() condition
> 
> v8 -> v9:
> 1. initialize l1tcm_size/l1tcm_phys at patchset 05/11 
> 2. rewrite patchset 06/11 to unify the flow and remove hacks
> 
> v7 -> v8:
> 1. update the node name of mt8192 asurada SCP rpmsg subnode
> 2. squash register definitions into driver patches
> 3. initialize local variables on the declaration at patch v8 06/11 
> 
> v6 -> v7:
> 1. merge the mtk_scp_cluster struct into the mtk_scp structure
>    at the "Probe multi-core SCP" patch
> 
> v5 -> v6:
> 1. move the mtk_scp_of_regs structure from mtk_common.h to mtk_scp.c
> 2. rename the SCP core 0 label from 'scp' to 'scp_c0'
> 
> v4 -> v5:
> 1. move resource release actions to the platform driver remove operation 
> 2. fix dual-core watchdog handling
> 
> v3 -> v4:
> 1. change the representation of dual-core SCP in dts file and update SCP yaml
> 2. rewrite SCP driver to reflect the change of dts node
> 3. drop 'remove redundant call of rproc_boot for SCP' in v3 for further investigation
> 
> v2 -> v3:
> 1. change the representation of dual-core SCP in dts file and update SCP yaml
> 2. rewrite SCP driver to reflect the change of dts node
> 3. add SCP core 1 node to mt8195.dtsi
> 4. remove redundant call of rproc_boot for SCP
> 5. refine IPI error message
> 
> v1 -> v2:
> 1. update dt-binding property description
> 2. remove kconfig for scp dual driver
> 3. merge mtk_scp_dual.c and mtk_scp_subdev.c to mtk_scp.c
> 
> 
> Tinghan Shen (13):
>   dt-bindings: remoteproc: mediatek: Improve the rpmsg subnode
>     definition
>   arm64: dts: mediatek: Update the node name of SCP rpmsg subnode
>   dt-bindings: remoteproc: mediatek: Support MT8195 dual-core SCP
>   remoteproc: mediatek: Add MT8195 SCP core 1 operations
>   remoteproc: mediatek: Extract SCP common registers
>   remoteproc: mediatek: Probe SCP cluster on single-core SCP
>   remoteproc: mediatek: Probe SCP cluster on multi-core SCP
>   remoteproc: mediatek: Remove dependency of MT8195 SCP L2TCM power
>     control on dual-core SCP
>   remoteproc: mediatek: Setup MT8195 SCP core 1 SRAM offset
>   remoteproc: mediatek: Handle MT8195 SCP core 1 watchdog timeout
>   remoteproc: mediatek: Report watchdog crash to all cores
>   remoteproc: mediatek: Refine ipi handler error message
>   arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8195: Add SCP 2nd core
> 
>  .../bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml          | 176 +++++-
>  .../arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-kukui.dtsi |   2 +-
>  .../boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192-asurada.dtsi     |   2 +-
>  .../boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195-cherry.dtsi      |   6 +-
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi      |  34 +-
>  drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h               |  39 +-
>  drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c                  | 534 ++++++++++++++----
>  drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp_ipi.c              |   4 +-
>  8 files changed, 651 insertions(+), 146 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.18.0
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v15 07/13] remoteproc: mediatek: Probe SCP cluster on multi-core SCP
  2023-07-25 19:59   ` Mathieu Poirier
@ 2023-07-26  2:55     ` TingHan Shen (沈廷翰)
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: TingHan Shen (沈廷翰) @ 2023-07-26  2:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mathieu.poirier
  Cc: linux-kernel, robh+dt, linux-remoteproc, devicetree,
	linux-mediatek, conor+dt, Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group,
	linux-arm-kernel, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt, matthias.bgg,
	andersson, angelogioacchino.delregno

Hi Mathieu,

On Tue, 2023-07-25 at 13:59 -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 10:41:26AM +0800, Tinghan Shen wrote:
> > The difference of single-core SCP and multi-core SCP device tree is
> > the presence of child device nodes described SCP cores. The SCP
> > driver populates the platform device and checks the child nodes
> > to identify whether it's a single-core SCP or a multi-core SCP.
> > 
> > Add the remoteproc instances of multi-core SCP to the SCP cluster list.
> > When the SCP driver is removed, it cleanup resources by walking
> > through the cluster list.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
> > Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c | 118 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 113 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> > index d67dcabdab9e..34095a461e15 100644
> > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> > @@ -855,7 +855,8 @@ static void scp_remove_rpmsg_subdev(struct mtk_scp *scp)
> >  }
> >  
> >  static struct mtk_scp *scp_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > -				      struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster)
> > +				      struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster,
> > +				      const struct mtk_scp_of_data *of_data)
> >  {
> >  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> >  	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> > @@ -878,7 +879,7 @@ static struct mtk_scp *scp_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
> >  	scp = rproc->priv;
> >  	scp->rproc = rproc;
> >  	scp->dev = dev;
> > -	scp->data = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> > +	scp->data = of_data;
> >  	scp->cluster = scp_cluster;
> >  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, scp);
> >  
> > @@ -951,15 +952,15 @@ static void scp_free(struct mtk_scp *scp)
> >  	mutex_destroy(&scp->send_lock);
> >  }
> >  
> > -static int scp_cluster_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > -			    struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster)
> > +static int scp_add_single_core(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > +			       struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster)
> >  {
> >  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> >  	struct list_head *scp_list = &scp_cluster->mtk_scp_list;
> >  	struct mtk_scp *scp;
> >  	int ret;
> >  
> > -	scp = scp_rproc_init(pdev, scp_cluster);
> > +	scp = scp_rproc_init(pdev, scp_cluster, of_device_get_match_data(dev));
> >  	if (IS_ERR(scp))
> >  		return PTR_ERR(scp);
> >  
> > @@ -975,6 +976,102 @@ static int scp_cluster_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static int scp_add_multi_core(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > +			      struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster)
> > +{
> > +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > +	struct device_node *np = dev_of_node(dev);
> > +	struct platform_device *cpdev;
> > +	struct device_node *child;
> > +	struct list_head *scp_list = &scp_cluster->mtk_scp_list;
> > +	const struct mtk_scp_of_data **cluster_of_data;
> > +	struct mtk_scp *scp, *temp;
> > +	int core_id = 0;
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	cluster_of_data = (const struct mtk_scp_of_data **)of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> > +
> > +	for_each_available_child_of_node(np, child) {
> > +		if (!cluster_of_data[core_id]) {
> > +			ret = -EINVAL;
> > +			dev_err(dev, "Not support core %d\n", core_id);
> > +			of_node_put(child);
> > +			goto init_fail;
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		cpdev = of_find_device_by_node(child);
> > +		if (!cpdev) {
> > +			ret = -ENODEV;
> > +			dev_err(dev, "Not found platform device for core %d\n", core_id);
> > +			of_node_put(child);
> > +			goto init_fail;
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		scp = scp_rproc_init(cpdev, scp_cluster, cluster_of_data[core_id]);
> > +		put_device(&cpdev->dev);
> > +		if (IS_ERR(scp)) {
> > +			ret = PTR_ERR(scp);
> > +			dev_err(dev, "Failed to initialize core %d rproc\n", core_id);
> > +			of_node_put(child);
> > +			goto init_fail;
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		ret = rproc_add(scp->rproc);
> > +		if (ret) {
> > +			dev_err(dev, "Failed to add rproc of core %d\n", core_id);
> > +			of_node_put(child);
> > +			scp_free(scp);
> > +			goto init_fail;
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		list_add_tail(&scp->elem, scp_list);
> > +		core_id++;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, list_first_entry(scp_list, struct mtk_scp, elem));
> 
> (sigh)
> 
> Why is list_first_entry() used here rather than just @scp?  What is the purpose
> of using the list API?

I thought it would be more consistent to use the head node when removing the scp drvier.
I'll do what you suggest.


Best regards,
TingHan

> 
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +
> > +init_fail:
> > +	list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(scp, temp, scp_list, elem) {
> > +		list_del(&scp->elem);
> > +		rproc_del(scp->rproc);
> > +		scp_free(scp);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int scp_is_single_core(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > +	struct device_node *np = dev_of_node(dev);
> > +	struct device_node *child;
> > +
> > +	child = of_get_next_available_child(np, NULL);
> > +	if (!child)
> > +		return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENODEV, "No child node\n");
> > +
> > +	of_node_put(child);
> > +	return of_node_name_eq(child, "cros-ec-rpmsg");
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int scp_cluster_init(struct platform_device *pdev, struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster)
> > +{
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	ret = scp_is_single_core(pdev);
> > +	if (ret < 0)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		ret = scp_add_single_core(pdev, scp_cluster);
> > +	else
> > +		ret = scp_add_multi_core(pdev, scp_cluster);
> > +
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  {
> >  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > @@ -1007,6 +1104,10 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  
> >  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&scp_cluster->mtk_scp_list);
> >  
> > +	ret = devm_of_platform_populate(dev);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to populate platform devices\n");
> > +
> >  	ret = scp_cluster_init(pdev, scp_cluster);
> >  	if (ret)
> >  		return ret;
> > @@ -1101,12 +1202,19 @@ static const struct mtk_scp_of_data mt8195_of_data_c1 = {
> >  	.host_to_scp_int_bit = MT8195_CORE1_HOST_IPC_INT_BIT,
> >  };
> >  
> > +static const struct mtk_scp_of_data *mt8195_of_data_cores[] = {
> > +	&mt8195_of_data,
> > +	&mt8195_of_data_c1,
> > +	NULL
> > +};
> > +
> >  static const struct of_device_id mtk_scp_of_match[] = {
> >  	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8183-scp", .data = &mt8183_of_data },
> >  	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8186-scp", .data = &mt8186_of_data },
> >  	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8188-scp", .data = &mt8188_of_data },
> >  	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8192-scp", .data = &mt8192_of_data },
> >  	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-scp", .data = &mt8195_of_data },
> > +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-scp-dual", .data = &mt8195_of_data_cores },
> >  	{},
> >  };
> >  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mtk_scp_of_match);
> > -- 
> > 2.18.0



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-07-26  2:55 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-07-21  2:41 [PATCH v15 00/13] Add support for MT8195 SCP 2nd core Tinghan Shen
2023-07-21  2:41 ` Tinghan Shen
2023-07-21  2:41 ` [PATCH v15 01/13] dt-bindings: remoteproc: mediatek: Improve the rpmsg subnode definition Tinghan Shen
2023-07-21  2:41   ` Tinghan Shen
2023-07-21  2:41 ` [PATCH v15 02/13] arm64: dts: mediatek: Update the node name of SCP rpmsg subnode Tinghan Shen
2023-07-21  2:41   ` Tinghan Shen
2023-07-21  2:41 ` [PATCH v15 03/13] dt-bindings: remoteproc: mediatek: Support MT8195 dual-core SCP Tinghan Shen
2023-07-21  2:41   ` Tinghan Shen
2023-07-21  2:41 ` [PATCH v15 04/13] remoteproc: mediatek: Add MT8195 SCP core 1 operations Tinghan Shen
2023-07-21  2:41   ` Tinghan Shen
2023-07-21  2:41 ` [PATCH v15 05/13] remoteproc: mediatek: Extract SCP common registers Tinghan Shen
2023-07-21  2:41   ` Tinghan Shen
2023-07-25 19:56   ` Mathieu Poirier
2023-07-21  2:41 ` [PATCH v15 06/13] remoteproc: mediatek: Probe SCP cluster on single-core SCP Tinghan Shen
2023-07-21  2:41   ` Tinghan Shen
2023-07-21  2:41 ` [PATCH v15 07/13] remoteproc: mediatek: Probe SCP cluster on multi-core SCP Tinghan Shen
2023-07-21  2:41   ` Tinghan Shen
2023-07-25 19:59   ` Mathieu Poirier
2023-07-26  2:55     ` TingHan Shen (沈廷翰)
2023-07-21  2:41 ` [PATCH v15 08/13] remoteproc: mediatek: Remove dependency of MT8195 SCP L2TCM power control on dual-core SCP Tinghan Shen
2023-07-21  2:41   ` Tinghan Shen
2023-07-25 20:05   ` Mathieu Poirier
2023-07-21  2:41 ` [PATCH v15 09/13] remoteproc: mediatek: Setup MT8195 SCP core 1 SRAM offset Tinghan Shen
2023-07-21  2:41   ` Tinghan Shen
2023-07-21  2:41 ` [PATCH v15 10/13] remoteproc: mediatek: Handle MT8195 SCP core 1 watchdog timeout Tinghan Shen
2023-07-21  2:41   ` Tinghan Shen
2023-07-21  2:41 ` [PATCH v15 11/13] remoteproc: mediatek: Report watchdog crash to all cores Tinghan Shen
2023-07-21  2:41   ` Tinghan Shen
2023-07-21  2:41 ` [PATCH v15 12/13] remoteproc: mediatek: Refine ipi handler error message Tinghan Shen
2023-07-21  2:41   ` Tinghan Shen
2023-07-21  2:41 ` [PATCH v15 13/13] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8195: Add SCP 2nd core Tinghan Shen
2023-07-21  2:41   ` Tinghan Shen
2023-07-25 20:34 ` [PATCH v15 00/13] Add support for MT8195 " Mathieu Poirier

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.