From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> To: mathieu.poirier@linaro.org Cc: andersson@kernel.org, matthias.bgg@gmail.com, angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com, tinghan.shen@mediatek.com, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, wenst@chromium.org, kernel@collabora.com Subject: [PATCH] remoteproc: mediatek: Refactor single core check and fix retrocompatibility Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2023 11:23:36 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20230919092336.51007-1-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> (raw) In older devicetrees we had the ChromeOS EC in a node called "cros-ec" instead of the newer "cros-ec-rpmsg", but this driver is now checking only for the latter, breaking compatibility with those. Besides, we can check if the SCP is single or dual core by simply walking through the children of the main SCP node and checking if if there's more than one "mediatek,scp-core" compatible node. Fixes: 1fdbf0cdde98 ("remoteproc: mediatek: Probe SCP cluster on multi-core SCP") Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> --- drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c | 18 +++++++----------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c index ea227b566c54..a35409eda0cf 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c @@ -1144,29 +1144,25 @@ static int scp_add_multi_core(struct platform_device *pdev, return ret; } -static int scp_is_single_core(struct platform_device *pdev) +static bool scp_is_single_core(struct platform_device *pdev) { struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; struct device_node *np = dev_of_node(dev); struct device_node *child; + int num_cores = 0; - child = of_get_next_available_child(np, NULL); - if (!child) - return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENODEV, "No child node\n"); + for_each_child_of_node(np, child) + if (of_device_is_compatible(child, "mediatek,scp-core")) + num_cores++; - of_node_put(child); - return of_node_name_eq(child, "cros-ec-rpmsg"); + return num_cores < 2; } static int scp_cluster_init(struct platform_device *pdev, struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster) { int ret; - ret = scp_is_single_core(pdev); - if (ret < 0) - return ret; - - if (ret) + if (scp_is_single_core(pdev)) ret = scp_add_single_core(pdev, scp_cluster); else ret = scp_add_multi_core(pdev, scp_cluster); -- 2.42.0
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> To: mathieu.poirier@linaro.org Cc: andersson@kernel.org, matthias.bgg@gmail.com, angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com, tinghan.shen@mediatek.com, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, wenst@chromium.org, kernel@collabora.com Subject: [PATCH] remoteproc: mediatek: Refactor single core check and fix retrocompatibility Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2023 11:23:36 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20230919092336.51007-1-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> (raw) In older devicetrees we had the ChromeOS EC in a node called "cros-ec" instead of the newer "cros-ec-rpmsg", but this driver is now checking only for the latter, breaking compatibility with those. Besides, we can check if the SCP is single or dual core by simply walking through the children of the main SCP node and checking if if there's more than one "mediatek,scp-core" compatible node. Fixes: 1fdbf0cdde98 ("remoteproc: mediatek: Probe SCP cluster on multi-core SCP") Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> --- drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c | 18 +++++++----------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c index ea227b566c54..a35409eda0cf 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c @@ -1144,29 +1144,25 @@ static int scp_add_multi_core(struct platform_device *pdev, return ret; } -static int scp_is_single_core(struct platform_device *pdev) +static bool scp_is_single_core(struct platform_device *pdev) { struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; struct device_node *np = dev_of_node(dev); struct device_node *child; + int num_cores = 0; - child = of_get_next_available_child(np, NULL); - if (!child) - return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENODEV, "No child node\n"); + for_each_child_of_node(np, child) + if (of_device_is_compatible(child, "mediatek,scp-core")) + num_cores++; - of_node_put(child); - return of_node_name_eq(child, "cros-ec-rpmsg"); + return num_cores < 2; } static int scp_cluster_init(struct platform_device *pdev, struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster) { int ret; - ret = scp_is_single_core(pdev); - if (ret < 0) - return ret; - - if (ret) + if (scp_is_single_core(pdev)) ret = scp_add_single_core(pdev, scp_cluster); else ret = scp_add_multi_core(pdev, scp_cluster); -- 2.42.0 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next reply other threads:[~2023-09-19 9:23 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2023-09-19 9:23 AngeloGioacchino Del Regno [this message] 2023-09-19 9:23 ` [PATCH] remoteproc: mediatek: Refactor single core check and fix retrocompatibility AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 2023-09-20 13:28 ` Mathieu Poirier 2023-09-20 13:28 ` Mathieu Poirier 2023-09-20 15:03 ` Laura Nao 2023-09-20 15:03 ` Laura Nao 2023-09-21 4:09 ` Chen-Yu Tsai 2023-09-21 4:09 ` Chen-Yu Tsai 2023-09-21 7:17 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 2023-09-21 7:17 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 2023-09-21 12:51 ` Mathieu Poirier 2023-09-21 12:51 ` Mathieu Poirier
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20230919092336.51007-1-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \ --to=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \ --cc=andersson@kernel.org \ --cc=kernel@collabora.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \ --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \ --cc=tinghan.shen@mediatek.com \ --cc=wenst@chromium.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.