All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com>
Cc: Mark Yao <mark.yao@rock-chips.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com>,
	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>,
	Archit Taneja <architt@codeaurora.org>,
	Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>,
	Carlos Palminha <CARLOS.PALMINHA@synopsys.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: bridge: synopsys/dw-hdmi: Provide default configuration function for HDMI 2.0 PHY
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 17:28:21 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2032791.zG0HDMl4PB@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1941ce39-1a8e-5e16-bdc2-71d988ee00d6@synopsys.com>

Hi Jose,

On Tuesday 13 Jun 2017 15:11:27 Jose Abreu wrote:
> Hi Laurent,
> 
> Sorry for the late reply!

No worries.

> On 10-06-2017 09:50, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Friday 09 Jun 2017 13:53:12 Jose Abreu wrote:
> >> On 09-06-2017 12:04, Jose Abreu wrote:
> >>> Currently HDMI 2.0 PHYs do not have a default configuration function.
> >>> 
> >>> As these PHYs have the same register layout as the 3D PHYs we can
> >>> safely use the default configuration function.
> >> 
> >> I may have been a little to fast arriving at this conclusion. I
> >> mean most of the registers match but in the configuration
> >> function there are registers that do not match. Did you actually
> >> test this configuration function with an HDMI 2.0 phy? And did
> >> you test with different video modes? From my experience the phy
> >> may be wrongly configured and sometimes work anyway.
> >> 
> >> Do please retest with as many video modes as you can and give me
> >> your phy ID (read from controller config reg HDMI_CONFIG2_ID).
> > 
> > The Renesas R-Car Gen3 HDMI PHY reports an DWC HDMI 2.0 TX PHY ID, but has
> > a configuration function (rcar_hdmi_phy_configure() in
> > drivers/gpu/drm/rcar- du/rcar_dw_hdmi.c) that doesn't match
> > hdmi_phy_configure_dwc_hdmi_3d_tx(). From the information I have been
> > given the layout of the configuration registers haven't been changed by
> > Renesas. I know we've briefly discussed this in the past, but I'd
> > appreciate if you could have a second look and tell me what you think.
> 
> Yup, yours seems correct. Though at the time you submitted I
> found it odd that only 3 registers needed to be written whilst
> for HDMI 2.0 phys I have here 6 registers, but you said it is
> working so I though your phy was different ...
> 
> Even so, one thing I would like to know is what was the max
> resolution you tested? I see you have clock values up to 297MHz,
> so 4k@30Hz?

The highest resolution I've personally tested is 1440x900. I'd need to buy 
another monitor to go higher than that, but maybe this is the excuse I've been 
waiting for :-)

> If I send a patch with a general config function for HDMI 2.0 phys can you
> test it on your platform?

Sure, I'd be glad to.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Carlos Palminha <CARLOS.PALMINHA@synopsys.com>,
	Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: bridge: synopsys/dw-hdmi: Provide default configuration function for HDMI 2.0 PHY
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 17:28:21 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2032791.zG0HDMl4PB@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1941ce39-1a8e-5e16-bdc2-71d988ee00d6@synopsys.com>

Hi Jose,

On Tuesday 13 Jun 2017 15:11:27 Jose Abreu wrote:
> Hi Laurent,
> 
> Sorry for the late reply!

No worries.

> On 10-06-2017 09:50, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Friday 09 Jun 2017 13:53:12 Jose Abreu wrote:
> >> On 09-06-2017 12:04, Jose Abreu wrote:
> >>> Currently HDMI 2.0 PHYs do not have a default configuration function.
> >>> 
> >>> As these PHYs have the same register layout as the 3D PHYs we can
> >>> safely use the default configuration function.
> >> 
> >> I may have been a little to fast arriving at this conclusion. I
> >> mean most of the registers match but in the configuration
> >> function there are registers that do not match. Did you actually
> >> test this configuration function with an HDMI 2.0 phy? And did
> >> you test with different video modes? From my experience the phy
> >> may be wrongly configured and sometimes work anyway.
> >> 
> >> Do please retest with as many video modes as you can and give me
> >> your phy ID (read from controller config reg HDMI_CONFIG2_ID).
> > 
> > The Renesas R-Car Gen3 HDMI PHY reports an DWC HDMI 2.0 TX PHY ID, but has
> > a configuration function (rcar_hdmi_phy_configure() in
> > drivers/gpu/drm/rcar- du/rcar_dw_hdmi.c) that doesn't match
> > hdmi_phy_configure_dwc_hdmi_3d_tx(). From the information I have been
> > given the layout of the configuration registers haven't been changed by
> > Renesas. I know we've briefly discussed this in the past, but I'd
> > appreciate if you could have a second look and tell me what you think.
> 
> Yup, yours seems correct. Though at the time you submitted I
> found it odd that only 3 registers needed to be written whilst
> for HDMI 2.0 phys I have here 6 registers, but you said it is
> working so I though your phy was different ...
> 
> Even so, one thing I would like to know is what was the max
> resolution you tested? I see you have clock values up to 297MHz,
> so 4k@30Hz?

The highest resolution I've personally tested is 1440x900. I'd need to buy 
another monitor to go higher than that, but maybe this is the excuse I've been 
waiting for :-)

> If I send a patch with a general config function for HDMI 2.0 phys can you
> test it on your platform?

Sure, I'd be glad to.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-06-22 14:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-09 11:04 [PATCH] drm: bridge: synopsys/dw-hdmi: Provide default configuration function for HDMI 2.0 PHY Jose Abreu
2017-06-09 12:53 ` Jose Abreu
2017-06-09 12:53   ` Jose Abreu
2017-06-10  8:50   ` Laurent Pinchart
2017-06-13 14:11     ` Jose Abreu
2017-06-13 14:11       ` Jose Abreu
2017-06-22  8:25       ` Mark yao
2017-06-22  8:25         ` Mark yao
2017-06-22  8:59         ` Zheng Yang
2017-06-22 14:28       ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2017-06-22 14:28         ` Laurent Pinchart
2017-06-20 14:17   ` Heiko Stübner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2032791.zG0HDMl4PB@avalon \
    --to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=CARLOS.PALMINHA@synopsys.com \
    --cc=Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com \
    --cc=a.hajda@samsung.com \
    --cc=architt@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.yao@rock-chips.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.