* [BUG} t2201.7+ Failure to Create Thread in 2.39.0-rc0
@ 2022-11-24 17:59 rsbecker
2022-11-24 18:40 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: rsbecker @ 2022-11-24 17:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: git
While running t2201.7 (and subsequent) for 2.39.0-rc0, I hit a condition
where:
<snip>
+ test_when_finished rm trace.perf actual
+ test_config_global trace2.perfBrief 1
+ pwd
+ test_config_global trace2.perfTarget
/home/ituglib/randall/jenkins/.jenkins/workspace/Git_Pipeline/t/trash
directory.t0211-trace2-perf/trace.perf
+ test-tool trace2 101timer 5 10 3
fatal: failed to create thread[0]
was encountered, causing the test to fail. Pointers on resolving this would
be helpful.
Thanks,
Randall
--
Brief whoami: NonStop&UNIX developer since approximately
UNIX(421664400)
NonStop(211288444200000000)
-- In real life, I talk too much.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [BUG} t2201.7+ Failure to Create Thread in 2.39.0-rc0
2022-11-24 17:59 [BUG} t2201.7+ Failure to Create Thread in 2.39.0-rc0 rsbecker
@ 2022-11-24 18:40 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-11-24 19:18 ` rsbecker
2022-11-24 21:51 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason @ 2022-11-24 18:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rsbecker; +Cc: git, Jeff Hostetler
[CC-ing Jeff, this is from the "stopwatch timers" topic]
On Thu, Nov 24 2022, rsbecker@nexbridge.com wrote:
> While running t2201.7 (and subsequent) for 2.39.0-rc0, I hit a condition
> where:
Don't you mean t0211-trace2-perf.sh?
> <snip>
> + test_when_finished rm trace.perf actual
> + test_config_global trace2.perfBrief 1
> + pwd
> + test_config_global trace2.perfTarget
> /home/ituglib/randall/jenkins/.jenkins/workspace/Git_Pipeline/t/trash
> directory.t0211-trace2-perf/trace.perf
> + test-tool trace2 101timer 5 10 3
> fatal: failed to create thread[0]
>
> was encountered, causing the test to fail. Pointers on resolving this would
> be helpful.
Apparently we really could use a NO_PTHREADS=Y CI setup, because that's
all that's needed to reproduce this on linux & elsewhere. Running the
test with that:
+ test-tool trace2 101timer 5 10 3
fatal: failed to create thread[0]
error: last command exited with $?=128
For that all that's needed is this:
diff --git a/t/t0211-trace2-perf.sh b/t/t0211-trace2-perf.sh
index 0b3436e8cac..cfba6861322 100755
--- a/t/t0211-trace2-perf.sh
+++ b/t/t0211-trace2-perf.sh
@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ test_expect_success 'stopwatch timer test/test1' '
have_timer_event "main" "timer" "test" "test1" 5 actual
'
-test_expect_success 'stopwatch timer test/test2' '
+test_expect_success PTHREADS 'stopwatch timer test/test2' '
test_when_finished "rm trace.perf actual" &&
test_config_global trace2.perfBrief 1 &&
test_config_global trace2.perfTarget "$(pwd)/trace.perf" &&
@@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ test_expect_success 'global counter test/test1' '
have_counter_event "main" "counter" "test" "test1" 15 actual
'
-test_expect_success 'global counter test/test2' '
+test_expect_success PTHREADS 'global counter test/test2' '
test_when_finished "rm trace.perf actual" &&
test_config_global trace2.perfBrief 1 &&
test_config_global trace2.perfTarget "$(pwd)/trace.perf" &&
I think that's the correct fix here, and it should go into rc1.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* RE: [BUG} t2201.7+ Failure to Create Thread in 2.39.0-rc0
2022-11-24 18:40 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
@ 2022-11-24 19:18 ` rsbecker
2022-11-24 21:35 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-11-24 21:51 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: rsbecker @ 2022-11-24 19:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason'
Cc: git, 'Jeff Hostetler'
On November 24, 2022 1:41 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
>[CC-ing Jeff, this is from the "stopwatch timers" topic]
>
>On Thu, Nov 24 2022, rsbecker@nexbridge.com wrote:
>
>> While running t2201.7 (and subsequent) for 2.39.0-rc0, I hit a
>> condition
>> where:
>
>Don't you mean t0211-trace2-perf.sh?
>
>> <snip>
>> + test_when_finished rm trace.perf actual test_config_global
>> + trace2.perfBrief 1 pwd test_config_global trace2.perfTarget
>> /home/ituglib/randall/jenkins/.jenkins/workspace/Git_Pipeline/t/trash
>> directory.t0211-trace2-perf/trace.perf
>> + test-tool trace2 101timer 5 10 3
>> fatal: failed to create thread[0]
>>
>> was encountered, causing the test to fail. Pointers on resolving this
>> would be helpful.
>
>Apparently we really could use a NO_PTHREADS=Y CI setup, because that's all
>that's needed to reproduce this on linux & elsewhere. Running the test with that:
>
> + test-tool trace2 101timer 5 10 3
> fatal: failed to create thread[0]
> error: last command exited with $?=128
>
>For that all that's needed is this:
>
> diff --git a/t/t0211-trace2-perf.sh b/t/t0211-trace2-perf.sh
> index 0b3436e8cac..cfba6861322 100755
> --- a/t/t0211-trace2-perf.sh
> +++ b/t/t0211-trace2-perf.sh
> @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ test_expect_success 'stopwatch timer test/test1' '
> have_timer_event "main" "timer" "test" "test1" 5 actual
> '
>
> -test_expect_success 'stopwatch timer test/test2' '
> +test_expect_success PTHREADS 'stopwatch timer test/test2' '
> test_when_finished "rm trace.perf actual" &&
> test_config_global trace2.perfBrief 1 &&
> test_config_global trace2.perfTarget "$(pwd)/trace.perf" &&
> @@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ test_expect_success 'global counter test/test1' '
> have_counter_event "main" "counter" "test" "test1" 15 actual
> '
>
> -test_expect_success 'global counter test/test2' '
> +test_expect_success PTHREADS 'global counter test/test2' '
> test_when_finished "rm trace.perf actual" &&
> test_config_global trace2.perfBrief 1 &&
> test_config_global trace2.perfTarget "$(pwd)/trace.perf" &&
>
>I think that's the correct fix here, and it should go into rc1.
I assume we do not have to modify the platform's entry in config.mak.uname, which already has NO_PTHREADS=UnfortunatelyYes.
Thanks,
Randall
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [BUG} t2201.7+ Failure to Create Thread in 2.39.0-rc0
2022-11-24 19:18 ` rsbecker
@ 2022-11-24 21:35 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason @ 2022-11-24 21:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rsbecker; +Cc: git, 'Jeff Hostetler'
On Thu, Nov 24 2022, rsbecker@nexbridge.com wrote:
> On November 24, 2022 1:41 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
>>[CC-ing Jeff, this is from the "stopwatch timers" topic]
>>
>>On Thu, Nov 24 2022, rsbecker@nexbridge.com wrote:
>>
>>> While running t2201.7 (and subsequent) for 2.39.0-rc0, I hit a
>>> condition
>>> where:
>>
>>Don't you mean t0211-trace2-perf.sh?
>>
>>> <snip>
>>> + test_when_finished rm trace.perf actual test_config_global
>>> + trace2.perfBrief 1 pwd test_config_global trace2.perfTarget
>>> /home/ituglib/randall/jenkins/.jenkins/workspace/Git_Pipeline/t/trash
>>> directory.t0211-trace2-perf/trace.perf
>>> + test-tool trace2 101timer 5 10 3
>>> fatal: failed to create thread[0]
>>>
>>> was encountered, causing the test to fail. Pointers on resolving this
>>> would be helpful.
>>
>>Apparently we really could use a NO_PTHREADS=Y CI setup, because that's all
>>that's needed to reproduce this on linux & elsewhere. Running the test with that:
>>
>> + test-tool trace2 101timer 5 10 3
>> fatal: failed to create thread[0]
>> error: last command exited with $?=128
>>
>>For that all that's needed is this:
>>
>> diff --git a/t/t0211-trace2-perf.sh b/t/t0211-trace2-perf.sh
>> index 0b3436e8cac..cfba6861322 100755
>> --- a/t/t0211-trace2-perf.sh
>> +++ b/t/t0211-trace2-perf.sh
>> @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ test_expect_success 'stopwatch timer test/test1' '
>> have_timer_event "main" "timer" "test" "test1" 5 actual
>> '
>>
>> -test_expect_success 'stopwatch timer test/test2' '
>> +test_expect_success PTHREADS 'stopwatch timer test/test2' '
>> test_when_finished "rm trace.perf actual" &&
>> test_config_global trace2.perfBrief 1 &&
>> test_config_global trace2.perfTarget "$(pwd)/trace.perf" &&
>> @@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ test_expect_success 'global counter test/test1' '
>> have_counter_event "main" "counter" "test" "test1" 15 actual
>> '
>>
>> -test_expect_success 'global counter test/test2' '
>> +test_expect_success PTHREADS 'global counter test/test2' '
>> test_when_finished "rm trace.perf actual" &&
>> test_config_global trace2.perfBrief 1 &&
>> test_config_global trace2.perfTarget "$(pwd)/trace.perf" &&
>>
>>I think that's the correct fix here, and it should go into rc1.
>
> I assume we do not have to modify the platform's entry in config.mak.uname, which already has NO_PTHREADS=UnfortunatelyYes.
Yes, that's the part where you declare that the platform doesn't have
threading, this is where the tests are then guarded using that setting.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [BUG} t2201.7+ Failure to Create Thread in 2.39.0-rc0
2022-11-24 18:40 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-11-24 19:18 ` rsbecker
@ 2022-11-24 21:51 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-11-24 22:22 ` rsbecker
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason @ 2022-11-24 21:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rsbecker; +Cc: git, Jeff Hostetler
On Thu, Nov 24 2022, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> [CC-ing Jeff, this is from the "stopwatch timers" topic]
>
> On Thu, Nov 24 2022, rsbecker@nexbridge.com wrote:
>
>> While running t2201.7 (and subsequent) for 2.39.0-rc0, I hit a condition
>> where:
>
> Don't you mean t0211-trace2-perf.sh?
>
>> <snip>
>> + test_when_finished rm trace.perf actual
>> + test_config_global trace2.perfBrief 1
>> + pwd
>> + test_config_global trace2.perfTarget
>> /home/ituglib/randall/jenkins/.jenkins/workspace/Git_Pipeline/t/trash
>> directory.t0211-trace2-perf/trace.perf
>> + test-tool trace2 101timer 5 10 3
>> fatal: failed to create thread[0]
>>
>> was encountered, causing the test to fail. Pointers on resolving this would
>> be helpful.
>
> Apparently we really could use a NO_PTHREADS=Y CI setup, because that's
> all that's needed to reproduce this on linux & elsewhere. Running the
> test with that:
>
> + test-tool trace2 101timer 5 10 3
> fatal: failed to create thread[0]
> error: last command exited with $?=128
>
> For that all that's needed is this:
>
> diff --git a/t/t0211-trace2-perf.sh b/t/t0211-trace2-perf.sh
> index 0b3436e8cac..cfba6861322 100755
> --- a/t/t0211-trace2-perf.sh
> +++ b/t/t0211-trace2-perf.sh
> @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ test_expect_success 'stopwatch timer test/test1' '
> have_timer_event "main" "timer" "test" "test1" 5 actual
> '
>
> -test_expect_success 'stopwatch timer test/test2' '
> +test_expect_success PTHREADS 'stopwatch timer test/test2' '
> test_when_finished "rm trace.perf actual" &&
> test_config_global trace2.perfBrief 1 &&
> test_config_global trace2.perfTarget "$(pwd)/trace.perf" &&
> @@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ test_expect_success 'global counter test/test1' '
> have_counter_event "main" "counter" "test" "test1" 15 actual
> '
>
> -test_expect_success 'global counter test/test2' '
> +test_expect_success PTHREADS 'global counter test/test2' '
> test_when_finished "rm trace.perf actual" &&
> test_config_global trace2.perfBrief 1 &&
> test_config_global trace2.perfTarget "$(pwd)/trace.perf" &&
>
> I think that's the correct fix here, and it should go into rc1.
I submitted a fix at
https://lore.kernel.org/git/patch-1.1-f7f21c94a6c-20221124T214813Z-avarab@gmail.com/;
but I see that since your message-id's contain "$" I got the In-Reply-To
wrong, sorry :)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* RE: [BUG} t2201.7+ Failure to Create Thread in 2.39.0-rc0
2022-11-24 21:51 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
@ 2022-11-24 22:22 ` rsbecker
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rsbecker @ 2022-11-24 22:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason'
Cc: git, 'Jeff Hostetler'
On November 24, 2022 4:51 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
>On Thu, Nov 24 2022, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
>
>> [CC-ing Jeff, this is from the "stopwatch timers" topic]
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 24 2022, rsbecker@nexbridge.com wrote:
>>
>>> While running t2201.7 (and subsequent) for 2.39.0-rc0, I hit a
>>> condition
>>> where:
>>
>> Don't you mean t0211-trace2-perf.sh?
>>
>>> <snip>
>>> + test_when_finished rm trace.perf actual test_config_global
>>> + trace2.perfBrief 1 pwd test_config_global trace2.perfTarget
>>> /home/ituglib/randall/jenkins/.jenkins/workspace/Git_Pipeline/t/trash
>>> directory.t0211-trace2-perf/trace.perf
>>> + test-tool trace2 101timer 5 10 3
>>> fatal: failed to create thread[0]
>>>
>>> was encountered, causing the test to fail. Pointers on resolving this
>>> would be helpful.
>>
>> Apparently we really could use a NO_PTHREADS=Y CI setup, because
>> that's all that's needed to reproduce this on linux & elsewhere.
>> Running the test with that:
>>
>> + test-tool trace2 101timer 5 10 3
>> fatal: failed to create thread[0]
>> error: last command exited with $?=128
>>
>> For that all that's needed is this:
>>
>> diff --git a/t/t0211-trace2-perf.sh b/t/t0211-trace2-perf.sh
>> index 0b3436e8cac..cfba6861322 100755
>> --- a/t/t0211-trace2-perf.sh
>> +++ b/t/t0211-trace2-perf.sh
>> @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ test_expect_success 'stopwatch timer test/test1' '
>> have_timer_event "main" "timer" "test" "test1" 5 actual
>> '
>>
>> -test_expect_success 'stopwatch timer test/test2' '
>> +test_expect_success PTHREADS 'stopwatch timer test/test2' '
>> test_when_finished "rm trace.perf actual" &&
>> test_config_global trace2.perfBrief 1 &&
>> test_config_global trace2.perfTarget "$(pwd)/trace.perf" &&
>> @@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ test_expect_success 'global counter test/test1' '
>> have_counter_event "main" "counter" "test" "test1" 15 actual
>> '
>>
>> -test_expect_success 'global counter test/test2' '
>> +test_expect_success PTHREADS 'global counter test/test2' '
>> test_when_finished "rm trace.perf actual" &&
>> test_config_global trace2.perfBrief 1 &&
>> test_config_global trace2.perfTarget "$(pwd)/trace.perf" &&
>>
>> I think that's the correct fix here, and it should go into rc1.
>
>I submitted a fix at
>https://lore.kernel.org/git/patch-1.1-f7f21c94a6c-20221124T214813Z-
>avarab@gmail.com/;
>but I see that since your message-id's contain "$" I got the In-Reply-To wrong,
>sorry :)
Thanks
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-11-24 22:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-11-24 17:59 [BUG} t2201.7+ Failure to Create Thread in 2.39.0-rc0 rsbecker
2022-11-24 18:40 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-11-24 19:18 ` rsbecker
2022-11-24 21:35 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-11-24 21:51 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-11-24 22:22 ` rsbecker
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.