warning: stable kernel rule is not satisfied

warning: stable kernel rule is not satisfied

[kernel test robot]

Hi,

Thanks for your patch.

FYI: kernel test robot notices the stable kernel rule is not satisfied.

Rule: 'Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org' or 'commit <sha1> upstream.'
Subject: [PATCH 5.10] block: fix null-deref in percpu_ref_put
Link: 
https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20220729065243.1786222-1-zhangwensheng%40huaweicloud.com

The check is based on 
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://01.org/lkp

Fwd: warning: stable kernel rule is not satisfied

[kernel test robot]

Hi Greg, Sasha,

Sorry to bother you, this is kernel test robot, we have sent some
reports related to the stable kernel rule, do you want to receive such
report? or any suggestion for us to improve it, or disable it?

Best Regards,
Rong Chen

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: warning: stable kernel rule is not satisfied
<snip>

Hi,

Thanks for your patch.

FYI: kernel test robot notices the stable kernel rule is not satisfied.

Rule: 'Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org' or 'commit <sha1> upstream.'
Subject: [PATCH 5.10] block: fix null-deref in percpu_ref_put
Link: 
https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20220729065243.1786222-1-zhangwensheng%40huaweicloud.com

The check is based on 
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://01.org/lkp

Re: Fwd: warning: stable kernel rule is not satisfied

[Greg KH]

On Mon, Aug 08, 2022 at 10:51:08AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi Greg, Sasha,
> 
> Sorry to bother you, this is kernel test robot, we have sent some
> reports related to the stable kernel rule, do you want to receive such
> report? or any suggestion for us to improve it, or disable it?

Yes, can you respond with the same subject line as the original email,
to make it obvious what this is referring to?  Much like your other
emails for when a submission breaks the build.

thanks,

greg k-h

Re: Fwd: warning: stable kernel rule is not satisfied

[Chen, Rong A]

On 8/8/2022 2:02 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2022 at 10:51:08AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
>> Hi Greg, Sasha,
>>
>> Sorry to bother you, this is kernel test robot, we have sent some
>> reports related to the stable kernel rule, do you want to receive such
>> report? or any suggestion for us to improve it, or disable it?
> 
> Yes, can you respond with the same subject line as the original email,
> to make it obvious what this is referring to?  Much like your other
> emails for when a submission breaks the build.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 

Hi Greg,

Thanks for your reply, we'll update the report subject to point to the
original mail.

Best Regards,
Rong Chen

Re: Fwd: warning: stable kernel rule is not satisfied

[Bagas Sanjaya]

On 8/8/22 09:51, kernel test robot wrote:
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: warning: stable kernel rule is not satisfied
> <snip>
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Thanks for your patch.
> 
> FYI: kernel test robot notices the stable kernel rule is not satisfied.
> 
> Rule: 'Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org' or 'commit <sha1> upstream.'
> Subject: [PATCH 5.10] block: fix null-deref in percpu_ref_put
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20220729065243.1786222-1-zhangwensheng%40huaweicloud.com
> 
> The check is based on https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
> 

Sasha uses "[ Upstream commit <sha1> ]", so his syntax should be
accepted, too.

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

Re: Fwd: warning: stable kernel rule is not satisfied

[Greg KH]

On Mon, Aug 08, 2022 at 03:12:36PM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> On 8/8/22 09:51, kernel test robot wrote:
> > -------- Forwarded Message --------
> > Subject: warning: stable kernel rule is not satisfied
> > <snip>
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Thanks for your patch.
> > 
> > FYI: kernel test robot notices the stable kernel rule is not satisfied.
> > 
> > Rule: 'Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org' or 'commit <sha1> upstream.'
> > Subject: [PATCH 5.10] block: fix null-deref in percpu_ref_put
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20220729065243.1786222-1-zhangwensheng%40huaweicloud.com
> > 
> > The check is based on https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
> > 
> 
> Sasha uses "[ Upstream commit <sha1> ]", so his syntax should be
> accepted, too.

That's not the "rule" that is being checked here at all from what I have
seen so far when this email has been sent out.

thanks,

greg k-h

warning: stable kernel rule is not satisfied

[kernel test robot]

Hi,

Thanks for your patch.

FYI: kernel test robot notices the stable kernel rule is not satisfied.

Rule: 'Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org' or 'commit <sha1> upstream.'
Subject: [PATCH] lockdown: Fix kexec lockdown bypass with ima policy
Link: 
https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20220719171647.3574253-1-eric.snowberg@oracle.com

The check is based on 
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://01.org/lkp