All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Minghuan Lian <minghuan.Lian@nxp.com>,
	Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@nxp.com>, Roy Zang <roy.zang@nxp.com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: dwc: layerscape: convert to builtin_platform_driver()
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 15:34:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2495e985839f3b05ef5e00b58a05ecb7@walle.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL_JsqLSJCLtgPyAdKSqsy=JoHSLYef_0s-stTbiJ+VCq2qaSA@mail.gmail.com>

Am 2021-01-20 15:23, schrieb Rob Herring:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 4:53 AM Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc> wrote:
>> 
>> fw_devlink will defer the probe until all suppliers are ready. We 
>> can't
>> use builtin_platform_driver_probe() because it doesn't retry after 
>> probe
>> deferral. Convert it to builtin_platform_driver().
> 
> If builtin_platform_driver_probe() doesn't work with fw_devlink, then
> shouldn't it be fixed or removed? Then we're not fixing drivers later
> when folks start caring about deferred probe and devlink.
> 
> I'd really prefer if we convert this to a module instead. (And all the
> other PCI host drivers.)

I briefly looked into adding a remove() op. But I don't know what will
have to be undo of the ls_pcie_host_init(). That would be up to the
maintainers of this driver.

_But_ I'd really like to see PCI working on my board again ;) At
least until the end of this development cycle.

-michael

>> Fixes: e590474768f1 ("driver core: Set fw_devlink=on by default")
> 
> This happened!?
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
>> ---
>>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c | 5 +++--
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c 
>> b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c
>> index 44ad34cdc3bc..5b9c625df7b8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c
>> @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id 
>> ls_pcie_of_match[] = {
>>         { },
>>  };
>> 
>> -static int __init ls_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +static int ls_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  {
>>         struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>>         struct dw_pcie *pci;
>> @@ -271,10 +271,11 @@ static int __init ls_pcie_probe(struct 
>> platform_device *pdev)
>>  }
>> 
>>  static struct platform_driver ls_pcie_driver = {
>> +       .probe = ls_pcie_probe,
>>         .driver = {
>>                 .name = "layerscape-pcie",
>>                 .of_match_table = ls_pcie_of_match,
>>                 .suppress_bind_attrs = true,
>>         },
>>  };
>> -builtin_platform_driver_probe(ls_pcie_driver, ls_pcie_probe);
>> +builtin_platform_driver(ls_pcie_driver);
>> --
>> 2.20.1
>> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: Roy Zang <roy.zang@nxp.com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
	PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Minghuan Lian <minghuan.Lian@nxp.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: dwc: layerscape: convert to builtin_platform_driver()
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 15:34:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2495e985839f3b05ef5e00b58a05ecb7@walle.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL_JsqLSJCLtgPyAdKSqsy=JoHSLYef_0s-stTbiJ+VCq2qaSA@mail.gmail.com>

Am 2021-01-20 15:23, schrieb Rob Herring:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 4:53 AM Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc> wrote:
>> 
>> fw_devlink will defer the probe until all suppliers are ready. We 
>> can't
>> use builtin_platform_driver_probe() because it doesn't retry after 
>> probe
>> deferral. Convert it to builtin_platform_driver().
> 
> If builtin_platform_driver_probe() doesn't work with fw_devlink, then
> shouldn't it be fixed or removed? Then we're not fixing drivers later
> when folks start caring about deferred probe and devlink.
> 
> I'd really prefer if we convert this to a module instead. (And all the
> other PCI host drivers.)

I briefly looked into adding a remove() op. But I don't know what will
have to be undo of the ls_pcie_host_init(). That would be up to the
maintainers of this driver.

_But_ I'd really like to see PCI working on my board again ;) At
least until the end of this development cycle.

-michael

>> Fixes: e590474768f1 ("driver core: Set fw_devlink=on by default")
> 
> This happened!?
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
>> ---
>>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c | 5 +++--
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c 
>> b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c
>> index 44ad34cdc3bc..5b9c625df7b8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c
>> @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id 
>> ls_pcie_of_match[] = {
>>         { },
>>  };
>> 
>> -static int __init ls_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +static int ls_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  {
>>         struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>>         struct dw_pcie *pci;
>> @@ -271,10 +271,11 @@ static int __init ls_pcie_probe(struct 
>> platform_device *pdev)
>>  }
>> 
>>  static struct platform_driver ls_pcie_driver = {
>> +       .probe = ls_pcie_probe,
>>         .driver = {
>>                 .name = "layerscape-pcie",
>>                 .of_match_table = ls_pcie_of_match,
>>                 .suppress_bind_attrs = true,
>>         },
>>  };
>> -builtin_platform_driver_probe(ls_pcie_driver, ls_pcie_probe);
>> +builtin_platform_driver(ls_pcie_driver);
>> --
>> 2.20.1
>> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: Roy Zang <roy.zang@nxp.com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
	PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Minghuan Lian <minghuan.Lian@nxp.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: dwc: layerscape: convert to builtin_platform_driver()
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 15:34:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2495e985839f3b05ef5e00b58a05ecb7@walle.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL_JsqLSJCLtgPyAdKSqsy=JoHSLYef_0s-stTbiJ+VCq2qaSA@mail.gmail.com>

Am 2021-01-20 15:23, schrieb Rob Herring:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 4:53 AM Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc> wrote:
>> 
>> fw_devlink will defer the probe until all suppliers are ready. We 
>> can't
>> use builtin_platform_driver_probe() because it doesn't retry after 
>> probe
>> deferral. Convert it to builtin_platform_driver().
> 
> If builtin_platform_driver_probe() doesn't work with fw_devlink, then
> shouldn't it be fixed or removed? Then we're not fixing drivers later
> when folks start caring about deferred probe and devlink.
> 
> I'd really prefer if we convert this to a module instead. (And all the
> other PCI host drivers.)

I briefly looked into adding a remove() op. But I don't know what will
have to be undo of the ls_pcie_host_init(). That would be up to the
maintainers of this driver.

_But_ I'd really like to see PCI working on my board again ;) At
least until the end of this development cycle.

-michael

>> Fixes: e590474768f1 ("driver core: Set fw_devlink=on by default")
> 
> This happened!?
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
>> ---
>>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c | 5 +++--
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c 
>> b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c
>> index 44ad34cdc3bc..5b9c625df7b8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c
>> @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id 
>> ls_pcie_of_match[] = {
>>         { },
>>  };
>> 
>> -static int __init ls_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +static int ls_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  {
>>         struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>>         struct dw_pcie *pci;
>> @@ -271,10 +271,11 @@ static int __init ls_pcie_probe(struct 
>> platform_device *pdev)
>>  }
>> 
>>  static struct platform_driver ls_pcie_driver = {
>> +       .probe = ls_pcie_probe,
>>         .driver = {
>>                 .name = "layerscape-pcie",
>>                 .of_match_table = ls_pcie_of_match,
>>                 .suppress_bind_attrs = true,
>>         },
>>  };
>> -builtin_platform_driver_probe(ls_pcie_driver, ls_pcie_probe);
>> +builtin_platform_driver(ls_pcie_driver);
>> --
>> 2.20.1
>> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-20 15:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 88+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-20 10:52 [PATCH] PCI: dwc: layerscape: convert to builtin_platform_driver() Michael Walle
2021-01-20 10:52 ` Michael Walle
2021-01-20 10:52 ` Michael Walle
2021-01-20 14:23 ` Rob Herring
2021-01-20 14:23   ` Rob Herring
2021-01-20 14:23   ` Rob Herring
2021-01-20 14:34   ` Michael Walle [this message]
2021-01-20 14:34     ` Michael Walle
2021-01-20 14:34     ` Michael Walle
2021-01-20 15:50   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-01-20 15:50     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-01-20 15:50     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-01-20 19:02   ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-20 19:02     ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-20 19:02     ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-20 19:25     ` Michael Walle
2021-01-20 19:28     ` Michael Walle
2021-01-20 19:28       ` Michael Walle
2021-01-20 19:28       ` Michael Walle
2021-01-20 19:47       ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-20 19:47         ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-20 19:47         ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-20 19:47         ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-20 19:47           ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-20 19:47           ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-20 23:53         ` Michael Walle
2021-01-20 23:53           ` Michael Walle
2021-01-20 23:53           ` Michael Walle
2021-01-20 23:58           ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-20 23:58             ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-20 23:58             ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-21 11:01             ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-01-21 11:01               ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-01-21 11:01               ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-01-25 19:49               ` Michael Walle
2021-01-25 19:49                 ` Michael Walle
2021-01-25 19:49                 ` Michael Walle
2021-01-25 22:41                 ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-25 22:41                   ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-25 22:41                   ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-26  8:50                   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-01-26  8:50                     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-01-26  8:50                     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-01-27  0:44                     ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-27  0:44                       ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-27  0:44                       ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-27  7:43                       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-01-27  7:43                         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-01-27  7:43                         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-01-27 16:41                         ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-27 16:41                           ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-27 16:41                           ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-27 16:56                           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-01-27 16:56                             ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-01-27 16:56                             ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-01-27 17:10                             ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-27 17:10                               ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-27 17:10                               ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-28  9:25                               ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-01-28  9:25                                 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-01-28  9:25                                 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-01-28 10:35                                 ` Tony Lindgren
2021-01-28 10:35                                   ` Tony Lindgren
2021-01-28 10:35                                   ` Tony Lindgren
2021-01-28 10:00                 ` Tony Lindgren
2021-01-28 10:00                   ` Tony Lindgren
2021-01-28 10:00                   ` Tony Lindgren
2021-01-25 16:50       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-01-25 16:50         ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-01-25 16:50         ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-01-25 18:58         ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-25 18:58           ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-25 18:58           ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-25 19:44           ` Michael Walle
2021-01-25 19:44             ` Michael Walle
2021-01-25 19:44             ` Michael Walle
2021-01-26 10:02 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-01-26 10:02   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-01-26 10:02   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-01-26 10:39   ` Michael Walle
2021-01-26 10:39     ` Michael Walle
2021-01-26 10:39     ` Michael Walle
2021-01-26 10:56     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-01-26 10:56       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-01-26 10:56       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-01-26 10:55 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-01-26 10:55   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-01-26 10:55   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2495e985839f3b05ef5e00b58a05ecb7@walle.cc \
    --to=michael@walle.cc \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=minghuan.Lian@nxp.com \
    --cc=mingkai.hu@nxp.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=roy.zang@nxp.com \
    --cc=saravanak@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.