All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Gabriele Paoloni <gabriele.paoloni@huawei.com>
Cc: "Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com" <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>,
	"jcm@redhat.com" <jcm@redhat.com>,
	"tn@semihalf.com" <tn@semihalf.com>,
	"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
	"xuwei (O)" <xuwei5@hisilicon.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Wangzhou (B)" <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>,
	"liudongdong (C)" <liudongdong3@huawei.com>,
	"Guohanjun (Hanjun Guo)" <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
	"bhelgaas@google.com" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	zhangjukuo <zhangjukuo@huawei.com>,
	"Liguozhu (Kenneth)" <liguozhu@hisilicon.com>,
	qiujiang <qiujiang@huawei.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/3] PCI: hisi: Make the HiSilicon PCIe host controller ECAM compliant
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 17:29:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2599997.xBRrI3qHak@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <EE11001F9E5DDD47B7634E2F8A612F2E1ECACF44@lhreml503-mbs>

On Monday 08 February 2016 15:55:35 Gabriele Paoloni wrote:
> > Doesn't this break backwards compatibility?
> 
> Well Hip05/Hip06 SoCs are used into evaluation boards
> For the Estuary project.
> 
> https://github.com/hisilicon/estuary
> 
> As this new driver gets upstream we'll merge this new driver into estuary
> and release a new version of the firmware to support it.

So what happens to folks running the old firmware then?

> > I think you need to use a new compatible string in the firmware
> > if you change the register layout, and then change the driver
> > to support both the old and the new layout.
> 
> You are right, for some reason in this patchset I missed the Documentation
> update that I posted in the previous one, i.e.:
> 
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/hisilicon-pcie.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/hisilicon-pcie.txt
> @@ -23,8 +23,8 @@ Optional properties:
>  Hip05 Example (note that Hip06 is the same except compatible):
>         pcie@0xb0080000 {
>                 compatible = "hisilicon,hip05-pcie", "snps,dw-pcie";
> -               reg = <0 0xb0080000 0 0x10000>, <0x220 0x00000000 0 0x2000>;
> -               reg-names = "rc_dbi", "config";
> +               reg = <0 0xb0080000 0 0x10000>, <0x220 0x00100000 0 0x0f00000>;
> +               reg-names = "rc_dbi", "ecam-cfg";
> 

That is not the compatible string, it's an undocumented register set.
You can either define the a new compatible string that gives the "config"
registers a new meaning, or you change the binding to allow two either
a "config" or an "ecam-cfg" register set, and let the driver handle both.

	Arnd

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Gabriele Paoloni <gabriele.paoloni@huawei.com>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"Guohanjun (Hanjun Guo)" <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
	"Wangzhou (B)" <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>,
	"liudongdong (C)" <liudongdong3@huawei.com>,
	Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>, qiujiang <qiujiang@huawei.com>,
	"bhelgaas@google.com" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com" <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>,
	"tn@semihalf.com" <tn@semihalf.com>,
	"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"xuwei (O)" <xuwei5@hisilicon.com>,
	"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"jcm@redhat.com" <jcm@redhat.com>,
	zhangjukuo <zhangjukuo@huawei.com>,
	"Liguozhu (Kenneth)" <liguozhu@hisilicon.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/3] PCI: hisi: Make the HiSilicon PCIe host controller ECAM compliant
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 17:29:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2599997.xBRrI3qHak@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <EE11001F9E5DDD47B7634E2F8A612F2E1ECACF44@lhreml503-mbs>

On Monday 08 February 2016 15:55:35 Gabriele Paoloni wrote:
> > Doesn't this break backwards compatibility?
> 
> Well Hip05/Hip06 SoCs are used into evaluation boards
> For the Estuary project.
> 
> https://github.com/hisilicon/estuary
> 
> As this new driver gets upstream we'll merge this new driver into estuary
> and release a new version of the firmware to support it.

So what happens to folks running the old firmware then?

> > I think you need to use a new compatible string in the firmware
> > if you change the register layout, and then change the driver
> > to support both the old and the new layout.
> 
> You are right, for some reason in this patchset I missed the Documentation
> update that I posted in the previous one, i.e.:
> 
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/hisilicon-pcie.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/hisilicon-pcie.txt
> @@ -23,8 +23,8 @@ Optional properties:
>  Hip05 Example (note that Hip06 is the same except compatible):
>         pcie@0xb0080000 {
>                 compatible = "hisilicon,hip05-pcie", "snps,dw-pcie";
> -               reg = <0 0xb0080000 0 0x10000>, <0x220 0x00000000 0 0x2000>;
> -               reg-names = "rc_dbi", "config";
> +               reg = <0 0xb0080000 0 0x10000>, <0x220 0x00100000 0 0x0f00000>;
> +               reg-names = "rc_dbi", "ecam-cfg";
> 

That is not the compatible string, it's an undocumented register set.
You can either define the a new compatible string that gives the "config"
registers a new meaning, or you change the binding to allow two either
a "config" or an "ecam-cfg" register set, and let the driver handle both.

	Arnd

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Gabriele Paoloni <gabriele.paoloni@huawei.com>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"Guohanjun (Hanjun Guo)" <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
	"Wangzhou (B)" <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>,
	"liudongdong (C)" <liudongdong3@huawei.com>,
	Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>, qiujiang <qiujiang@huawei.com>,
	"bhelgaas@google.com" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com" <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>,
	"tn@semihalf.com" <tn@semihalf.com>,
	"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"xuwei (O)" <xuwei5@hisilicon.com>,
	"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"jcm@redhat.com" <jcm@redhat.com>,
	zhangjukuo <zhangjukuo@huawei.com>,
	"Liguozhu (Kenneth)" <liguozhu@hisilicon.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/3] PCI: hisi: Make the HiSilicon PCIe host controller ECAM compliant
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 17:29:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2599997.xBRrI3qHak@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <EE11001F9E5DDD47B7634E2F8A612F2E1ECACF44@lhreml503-mbs>

On Monday 08 February 2016 15:55:35 Gabriele Paoloni wrote:
> > Doesn't this break backwards compatibility?
> 
> Well Hip05/Hip06 SoCs are used into evaluation boards
> For the Estuary project.
> 
> https://github.com/hisilicon/estuary
> 
> As this new driver gets upstream we'll merge this new driver into estuary
> and release a new version of the firmware to support it.

So what happens to folks running the old firmware then?

> > I think you need to use a new compatible string in the firmware
> > if you change the register layout, and then change the driver
> > to support both the old and the new layout.
> 
> You are right, for some reason in this patchset I missed the Documentation
> update that I posted in the previous one, i.e.:
> 
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/hisilicon-pcie.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/hisilicon-pcie.txt
> @@ -23,8 +23,8 @@ Optional properties:
>  Hip05 Example (note that Hip06 is the same except compatible):
>         pcie@0xb0080000 {
>                 compatible = "hisilicon,hip05-pcie", "snps,dw-pcie";
> -               reg = <0 0xb0080000 0 0x10000>, <0x220 0x00000000 0 0x2000>;
> -               reg-names = "rc_dbi", "config";
> +               reg = <0 0xb0080000 0 0x10000>, <0x220 0x00100000 0 0x0f00000>;
> +               reg-names = "rc_dbi", "ecam-cfg";
> 

That is not the compatible string, it's an undocumented register set.
You can either define the a new compatible string that gives the "config"
registers a new meaning, or you change the binding to allow two either
a "config" or an "ecam-cfg" register set, and let the driver handle both.

	Arnd

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 2/3] PCI: hisi: Make the HiSilicon PCIe host controller ECAM compliant
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 17:29:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2599997.xBRrI3qHak@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <EE11001F9E5DDD47B7634E2F8A612F2E1ECACF44@lhreml503-mbs>

On Monday 08 February 2016 15:55:35 Gabriele Paoloni wrote:
> > Doesn't this break backwards compatibility?
> 
> Well Hip05/Hip06 SoCs are used into evaluation boards
> For the Estuary project.
> 
> https://github.com/hisilicon/estuary
> 
> As this new driver gets upstream we'll merge this new driver into estuary
> and release a new version of the firmware to support it.

So what happens to folks running the old firmware then?

> > I think you need to use a new compatible string in the firmware
> > if you change the register layout, and then change the driver
> > to support both the old and the new layout.
> 
> You are right, for some reason in this patchset I missed the Documentation
> update that I posted in the previous one, i.e.:
> 
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/hisilicon-pcie.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/hisilicon-pcie.txt
> @@ -23,8 +23,8 @@ Optional properties:
>  Hip05 Example (note that Hip06 is the same except compatible):
>         pcie at 0xb0080000 {
>                 compatible = "hisilicon,hip05-pcie", "snps,dw-pcie";
> -               reg = <0 0xb0080000 0 0x10000>, <0x220 0x00000000 0 0x2000>;
> -               reg-names = "rc_dbi", "config";
> +               reg = <0 0xb0080000 0 0x10000>, <0x220 0x00100000 0 0x0f00000>;
> +               reg-names = "rc_dbi", "ecam-cfg";
> 

That is not the compatible string, it's an undocumented register set.
You can either define the a new compatible string that gives the "config"
registers a new meaning, or you change the binding to allow two either
a "config" or an "ecam-cfg" register set, and let the driver handle both.

	Arnd

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-08 16:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-08 12:41 [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] Add ACPI support for HiSilicon PCIe Host Controllers Gabriele Paoloni
2016-02-08 12:41 ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-02-08 12:41 ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-02-08 12:41 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] PCI: hisi: re-architect Hip05/Hip06 controllers driver to preapare for ACPI Gabriele Paoloni
2016-02-08 12:41   ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-02-08 12:41   ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-02-08 13:50   ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-02-08 13:50     ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-02-08 16:06     ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-02-08 16:06       ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-02-08 16:06       ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-02-08 16:32       ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-02-08 16:32         ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-02-08 16:32         ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-02-08 16:51         ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-02-08 16:51           ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-02-08 16:51           ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-02-09 16:27           ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-02-09 16:27             ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-02-09 16:27             ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-02-09 16:52             ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-02-09 16:52               ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-02-09 16:52               ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-02-08 12:41 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/3] PCI: hisi: Make the HiSilicon PCIe host controller ECAM compliant Gabriele Paoloni
2016-02-08 12:41   ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-02-08 12:41   ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-02-08 13:48   ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-02-08 13:48     ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-02-08 15:55     ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-02-08 15:55       ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-02-08 15:55       ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-02-08 16:29       ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2016-02-08 16:29         ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-02-08 16:29         ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-02-08 16:29         ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-02-08 17:21         ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-02-08 17:21           ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-02-08 17:21           ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-02-09 15:32           ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-02-09 15:32             ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-02-09 15:56             ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-02-09 15:56               ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-02-09 15:56               ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-02-08 12:41 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/3] PCI/ACPI: hisi: Add ACPI support for HiSilicon SoCs Host Controllers Gabriele Paoloni
2016-02-08 12:41   ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-02-08 12:41   ` Gabriele Paoloni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2599997.xBRrI3qHak@wuerfel \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=gabriele.paoloni@huawei.com \
    --cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=jcm@redhat.com \
    --cc=liguozhu@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=liudongdong3@huawei.com \
    --cc=qiujiang@huawei.com \
    --cc=tn@semihalf.com \
    --cc=wangzhou1@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=xuwei5@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=zhangjukuo@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.