All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: roel kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Cc: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sha: prevent removal of memset as dead store in sha1_update()
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:33:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <25e057c01002250833n1e13391drfcc806df369c5a55@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <84144f021002250816o2c2cef0fke484c7e43256dba4@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se> wrote:
>> I fear that the only portable (across compiler versions) and safe
>> solution is to invoke an assembly-coded dummy function with prototype
>>
>>        void use(void *p);
>>
>> and rewrite the code above as
>>
>>        {
>>                u32 temp[...];
>>                ...
>>                memset(temp, 0, sizeof temp);
>>                use(temp);
>>        }
>>
>> This forces the compiler to consider the buffer live after the
>> memset, so the memset cannot be eliminated.
>
> So is there some "do not optimize" GCC magic that we could use for a
> memzero_secret() helper function?
>
>                        Pekka
>

        *(volatile char *)p = *(volatile char *)p;

appears to work when called after the memset:

---
inline void ensure_memset(void* p)
{
        *(volatile char *)p = *(volatile char *)p;
}

void foo()
{
        char password[] = "secret";
        password[0]='S';
        printf ("Don't show again: %s\n", password);
        memset(password, 0, sizeof(password));
        ensure_memset(password);
}

int main(int argc, char* argv[])
{

        foo();
        int i;
        char foo3[] = "";
        char* bar = &foo3[0];
        for (i = -50; i < 50; i++)
                printf ("%c.", bar[i]);
        printf("\n");
        return 0;
}

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: roel kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Cc: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sha: prevent removal of memset as dead store in  sha1_update()
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:33:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <25e057c01002250833n1e13391drfcc806df369c5a55@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <84144f021002250816o2c2cef0fke484c7e43256dba4@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se> wrote:
>> I fear that the only portable (across compiler versions) and safe
>> solution is to invoke an assembly-coded dummy function with prototype
>>
>>        void use(void *p);
>>
>> and rewrite the code above as
>>
>>        {
>>                u32 temp[...];
>>                ...
>>                memset(temp, 0, sizeof temp);
>>                use(temp);
>>        }
>>
>> This forces the compiler to consider the buffer live after the
>> memset, so the memset cannot be eliminated.
>
> So is there some "do not optimize" GCC magic that we could use for a
> memzero_secret() helper function?
>
>                        Pekka
>

        *(volatile char *)p = *(volatile char *)p;

appears to work when called after the memset:

---
inline void ensure_memset(void* p)
{
        *(volatile char *)p = *(volatile char *)p;
}

void foo()
{
        char password[] = "secret";
        password[0]='S';
        printf ("Don't show again: %s\n", password);
        memset(password, 0, sizeof(password));
        ensure_memset(password);
}

int main(int argc, char* argv[])
{

        foo();
        int i;
        char foo3[] = "";
        char* bar = &foo3[0];
        for (i = -50; i < 50; i++)
                printf ("%c.", bar[i]);
        printf("\n");
        return 0;
}

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-02-25 16:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-25 15:10 [PATCH] sha: prevent removal of memset as dead store in sha1_update() Roel Kluin
2010-02-25 15:10 ` Roel Kluin
2010-02-25 15:17 ` David Miller
2010-02-25 15:31   ` roel kluin
2010-02-25 15:31     ` roel kluin
2010-02-25 15:37     ` David Miller
2010-02-26 11:55     ` Andi Kleen
2010-02-26 14:20       ` Mikael Pettersson
2010-02-26 15:46         ` Mikael Pettersson
2010-02-26 15:55           ` Andi Kleen
2010-02-25 15:56 ` Mikael Pettersson
2010-02-25 16:16   ` Pekka Enberg
2010-02-25 16:16     ` Pekka Enberg
2010-02-25 16:29     ` Mikael Pettersson
2010-02-25 16:29       ` Mikael Pettersson
2010-02-25 16:33     ` roel kluin [this message]
2010-02-25 16:33       ` roel kluin
2010-02-25 17:06       ` roel kluin
2010-02-25 17:06         ` roel kluin
2010-02-25 16:33   ` Brian Gerst
2010-02-25 16:33     ` Brian Gerst
2010-02-25 17:09     ` Mikael Pettersson
2010-02-25 17:09       ` Mikael Pettersson
2010-02-25 17:32       ` Brian Gerst
2010-02-25 17:32         ` Brian Gerst
2010-02-25 19:47         ` Roel Kluin
2010-02-25 20:43           ` Roel Kluin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=25e057c01002250833n1e13391drfcc806df369c5a55@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=roel.kluin@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mikpe@it.uu.se \
    --cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.