Re: ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915 / LPSS / mfd: Select correct PWM controller to use based on VBT

[Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>]

Hi,

On 19-11-2019 20:33, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
> 
> Series: drm/i915 / LPSS / mfd: Select correct PWM controller to use based on VBT
> URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/69686/
> State : failure
> 
> == Summary ==
> 
> CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_7377 -> Patchwork_15332
> ====================================================
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
>    **FAILURE**
> 
>    Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_15332 absolutely need to be
>    verified manually.
>    
>    If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
>    introduced in Patchwork_15332, please notify your bug team to allow them
>    to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
> 
>    External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15332/index.html
> 
> Possible new issues
> -------------------
> 
>    Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_15332:
> 
> ### IGT changes ###
> 
> #### Possible regressions ####
> 
>    * igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s0:
>      - fi-icl-u3:          [PASS][1] -> [DMESG-WARN][2]
>     [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7377/fi-icl-u3/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s0.html
>     [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15332/fi-icl-u3/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s0.html

False positive, the oops reported here has nothing to do with this patch series, the
test system in question does not even seem to use a DSI panel, so this entire patch-set
basically is a no-op.

Regards,

Hans

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx