All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc: "Hans de Goede" <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
	"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	"Joonas Lahtinen" <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Rodrigo Vivi" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	"Len Brown" <lenb@kernel.org>,
	"Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mfd: intel_soc_pmic: Rename pwm_backlight pwm-lookup to pwm_pmic_backlight
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 09:14:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a77q14wo.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191217135140.GL18955@dell>

On Tue, 17 Dec 2019, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
> Hans was making the case that this was impractical for DRM, due to the
> amount of churn you guys receive, hence the discussion.  I'm very
> pleased that this is not the case.

Heh, well, it is the case, but the point is that should be our problem,
not yours. ;)

BR,
Jani.


-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mfd: intel_soc_pmic: Rename pwm_backlight pwm-lookup to pwm_pmic_backlight
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 09:14:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a77q14wo.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191217135140.GL18955@dell>

On Tue, 17 Dec 2019, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
> Hans was making the case that this was impractical for DRM, due to the
> amount of churn you guys receive, hence the discussion.  I'm very
> pleased that this is not the case.

Heh, well, it is the case, but the point is that should be our problem,
not yours. ;)

BR,
Jani.


-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] mfd: intel_soc_pmic: Rename pwm_backlight pwm-lookup to pwm_pmic_backlight
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 09:14:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a77q14wo.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191217135140.GL18955@dell>

On Tue, 17 Dec 2019, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
> Hans was making the case that this was impractical for DRM, due to the
> amount of churn you guys receive, hence the discussion.  I'm very
> pleased that this is not the case.

Heh, well, it is the case, but the point is that should be our problem,
not yours. ;)

BR,
Jani.


-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2019-12-18  7:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 87+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-19 15:18 [PATCH 0/3] drm/i915 / LPSS / mfd: Select correct PWM controller to use based on VBT Hans de Goede
2019-11-19 15:18 ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2019-11-19 15:18 ` Hans de Goede
2019-11-19 15:18 ` [PATCH 1/3] ACPI / LPSS: Rename pwm_backlight pwm-lookup to pwm_soc_backlight Hans de Goede
2019-11-19 15:18   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2019-11-19 15:18   ` Hans de Goede
2019-11-29 11:59   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-11-29 11:59     ` [Intel-gfx] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-11-29 11:59     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-11-19 15:18 ` [PATCH 2/3] mfd: intel_soc_pmic: Rename pwm_backlight pwm-lookup to pwm_pmic_backlight Hans de Goede
2019-11-19 15:18   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2019-11-19 15:18   ` Hans de Goede
2019-12-10  8:51   ` Lee Jones
2019-12-10  8:51     ` [Intel-gfx] " Lee Jones
2019-12-10  8:51     ` Lee Jones
2019-12-11 17:29     ` Hans de Goede
2019-12-11 17:29       ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2019-12-11 17:29       ` Hans de Goede
2019-12-12  8:45       ` Lee Jones
2019-12-12  8:45         ` [Intel-gfx] " Lee Jones
2019-12-12  8:45         ` Lee Jones
2019-12-12 14:34         ` Hans de Goede
2019-12-12 14:34           ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2019-12-12 14:34           ` Hans de Goede
2019-12-12 15:52           ` Lee Jones
2019-12-12 15:52             ` [Intel-gfx] " Lee Jones
2019-12-12 15:52             ` Lee Jones
2019-12-12 19:02             ` Hans de Goede
2019-12-12 19:02               ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2019-12-12 19:02               ` Hans de Goede
2019-12-13  8:27               ` Lee Jones
2019-12-13  8:27                 ` [Intel-gfx] " Lee Jones
2019-12-13  8:27                 ` Lee Jones
2019-12-13 12:40                 ` Hans de Goede
2019-12-13 12:40                   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2019-12-13 12:40                   ` Hans de Goede
2019-12-16  9:30                   ` Lee Jones
2019-12-16  9:30                     ` [Intel-gfx] " Lee Jones
2019-12-16  9:30                     ` Lee Jones
2019-12-16 10:04                     ` Hans de Goede
2019-12-16 10:04                       ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2019-12-16 10:04                       ` Hans de Goede
2019-12-17  8:11                       ` Lee Jones
2019-12-17  8:11                         ` [Intel-gfx] " Lee Jones
2019-12-17  8:11                         ` Lee Jones
2019-12-17 13:25                         ` Jani Nikula
2019-12-17 13:25                           ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2019-12-17 13:25                           ` Jani Nikula
2019-12-17 13:51                           ` Lee Jones
2019-12-17 13:51                             ` [Intel-gfx] " Lee Jones
2019-12-17 13:51                             ` Lee Jones
2019-12-18  7:14                             ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2019-12-18  7:14                               ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2019-12-18  7:14                               ` Jani Nikula
2019-12-18  9:38                               ` Lee Jones
2019-12-18  9:38                                 ` [Intel-gfx] " Lee Jones
2019-12-18  9:38                                 ` Lee Jones
2019-11-19 15:18 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: DSI: select correct PWM controller to use based on the VBT Hans de Goede
2019-11-19 15:18   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2019-11-19 15:18   ` Hans de Goede
2019-11-19 15:18   ` Hans de Goede
2019-11-19 15:47   ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-11-19 15:47     ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2019-11-19 15:47     ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-11-19 16:48     ` Hans de Goede
2019-11-19 16:48       ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2019-11-19 16:48       ` Hans de Goede
2019-11-19 15:43 ` [PATCH 0/3] drm/i915 / LPSS / mfd: Select correct PWM controller to use based on VBT Jani Nikula
2019-11-19 15:43   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2019-11-19 15:43   ` Jani Nikula
2019-11-19 15:43   ` Jani Nikula
2019-11-19 16:32 ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-11-19 16:32   ` [Intel-gfx] " Andy Shevchenko
2019-11-19 16:32   ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-11-19 16:32   ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-11-19 19:10 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
2019-11-19 19:10   ` [Intel-gfx] " Patchwork
2019-11-19 19:33 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2019-11-19 19:33   ` [Intel-gfx] " Patchwork
2019-11-19 21:11   ` Hans de Goede
2019-11-19 21:11     ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2019-11-20 13:00 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915 / LPSS / mfd: Select correct PWM controller to use based on VBT (rev2) Patchwork
2019-11-20 13:00   ` [Intel-gfx] " Patchwork
2019-11-20 13:48 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2019-11-20 13:48   ` [Intel-gfx] " Patchwork
2019-11-21  4:17 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2019-11-21  4:17   ` [Intel-gfx] " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87a77q14wo.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.