All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_oss@crudebyte.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
	"Shinde, Archana M" <archana.m.shinde@intel.com>,
	"Venegas Munoz,
	Jose Carlos" <jose.carlos.venegas.munoz@intel.com>,
	"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
	virtio-fs-list <virtio-fs@redhat.com>, Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>,
	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	"cdupontd@redhat.com" <cdupontd@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Can not set high msize with virtio-9p (Was: Re: virtiofs vs 9p performance)
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 18:33:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2709384.cAWMFGR5kF@silver> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210219160848.GB3270@redhat.com>

On Freitag, 19. Februar 2021 17:08:48 CET Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 10:06:41AM +0200, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> > On Freitag, 25. September 2020 00:10:23 CEST Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > > In my testing, with cache=none, virtiofs performed better than 9p in
> > > all the fio jobs I was running. For the case of cache=auto  for virtiofs
> > > (with xattr enabled), 9p performed better in certain write workloads. I
> > > have identified root cause of that problem and working on
> > > HANDLE_KILLPRIV_V2 patches to improve WRITE performance of virtiofs
> > > with cache=auto and xattr enabled.
> > 
> > Please note, when it comes to performance aspects, you should set a
> > reasonable high value for 'msize' on 9p client side:
> > https://wiki.qemu.org/Documentation/9psetup#msize
> 
> Hi Christian,
> 
> I am not able to set msize to a higher value. If I try to specify msize
> 16MB, and then read back msize from /proc/mounts, it sees to cap it
> at 512000. Is that intended?

9p server side in QEMU does not perform any msize capping. The code in this
case is very simple, it's just what you see in function v9fs_version():

https://github.com/qemu/qemu/blob/6de76c5f324904c93e69f9a1e8e4fd0bd6f6b57a/hw/9pfs/9p.c#L1332

> $ mount -t 9p -o trans=virtio,version=9p2000.L,cache=none,msize=16777216
> hostShared /mnt/virtio-9p
> 
> $ cat /proc/mounts | grep 9p
> hostShared /mnt/virtio-9p 9p
> rw,sync,dirsync,relatime,access=client,msize=512000,trans=virtio 0 0
> 
> I am using 5.11 kernel.

Must be something on client (guest kernel) side. I don't see this here with
guest kernel 4.9.0 happening with my setup in a quick test:

$ cat /etc/mtab | grep 9p
svnRoot / 9p rw,dirsync,relatime,trans=virtio,version=9p2000.L,msize=104857600,cache=mmap 0 0
$ 

Looks like the root cause of your issue is this:

struct p9_client *p9_client_create(const char *dev_name, char *options)
{
	...
	if (clnt->msize > clnt->trans_mod->maxsize)
		clnt->msize = clnt->trans_mod->maxsize;

https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/f40ddce88593482919761f74910f42f4b84c004b/net/9p/client.c#L1045

Best regards,
Christian Schoenebeck




WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_oss@crudebyte.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "cdupontd@redhat.com" <cdupontd@redhat.com>,
	"Venegas Munoz,
	Jose Carlos" <jose.carlos.venegas.munoz@intel.com>,
	virtio-fs-list <virtio-fs@redhat.com>,
	"Shinde, Archana M" <archana.m.shinde@intel.com>,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Virtio-fs] Can not set high msize with virtio-9p (Was: Re: virtiofs vs 9p performance)
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 18:33:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2709384.cAWMFGR5kF@silver> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210219160848.GB3270@redhat.com>

On Freitag, 19. Februar 2021 17:08:48 CET Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 10:06:41AM +0200, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> > On Freitag, 25. September 2020 00:10:23 CEST Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > > In my testing, with cache=none, virtiofs performed better than 9p in
> > > all the fio jobs I was running. For the case of cache=auto  for virtiofs
> > > (with xattr enabled), 9p performed better in certain write workloads. I
> > > have identified root cause of that problem and working on
> > > HANDLE_KILLPRIV_V2 patches to improve WRITE performance of virtiofs
> > > with cache=auto and xattr enabled.
> > 
> > Please note, when it comes to performance aspects, you should set a
> > reasonable high value for 'msize' on 9p client side:
> > https://wiki.qemu.org/Documentation/9psetup#msize
> 
> Hi Christian,
> 
> I am not able to set msize to a higher value. If I try to specify msize
> 16MB, and then read back msize from /proc/mounts, it sees to cap it
> at 512000. Is that intended?

9p server side in QEMU does not perform any msize capping. The code in this
case is very simple, it's just what you see in function v9fs_version():

https://github.com/qemu/qemu/blob/6de76c5f324904c93e69f9a1e8e4fd0bd6f6b57a/hw/9pfs/9p.c#L1332

> $ mount -t 9p -o trans=virtio,version=9p2000.L,cache=none,msize=16777216
> hostShared /mnt/virtio-9p
> 
> $ cat /proc/mounts | grep 9p
> hostShared /mnt/virtio-9p 9p
> rw,sync,dirsync,relatime,access=client,msize=512000,trans=virtio 0 0
> 
> I am using 5.11 kernel.

Must be something on client (guest kernel) side. I don't see this here with
guest kernel 4.9.0 happening with my setup in a quick test:

$ cat /etc/mtab | grep 9p
svnRoot / 9p rw,dirsync,relatime,trans=virtio,version=9p2000.L,msize=104857600,cache=mmap 0 0
$ 

Looks like the root cause of your issue is this:

struct p9_client *p9_client_create(const char *dev_name, char *options)
{
	...
	if (clnt->msize > clnt->trans_mod->maxsize)
		clnt->msize = clnt->trans_mod->maxsize;

https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/f40ddce88593482919761f74910f42f4b84c004b/net/9p/client.c#L1045

Best regards,
Christian Schoenebeck



  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-19 17:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 107+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-18 21:34 tools/virtiofs: Multi threading seems to hurt performance Vivek Goyal
2020-09-18 21:34 ` [Virtio-fs] " Vivek Goyal
2020-09-21  8:39 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-09-21  8:39   ` [Virtio-fs] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-09-21 13:39   ` Vivek Goyal
2020-09-21 13:39     ` [Virtio-fs] " Vivek Goyal
2020-09-21 16:57     ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-09-21 16:57       ` [Virtio-fs] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-09-21  8:50 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-09-21  8:50   ` [Virtio-fs] " Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-09-21 13:35   ` Vivek Goyal
2020-09-21 13:35     ` [Virtio-fs] " Vivek Goyal
2020-09-21 14:08     ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-09-21 14:08       ` [Virtio-fs] " Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-09-21 15:32 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-09-21 15:32   ` [Virtio-fs] " Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-09-22 10:25   ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-09-22 10:25     ` [Virtio-fs] " Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-09-22 17:47     ` Vivek Goyal
2020-09-22 17:47       ` [Virtio-fs] " Vivek Goyal
2020-09-24 21:33       ` Venegas Munoz, Jose Carlos
2020-09-24 21:33         ` [Virtio-fs] " Venegas Munoz, Jose Carlos
2020-09-24 22:10         ` virtiofs vs 9p performance(Re: tools/virtiofs: Multi threading seems to hurt performance) Vivek Goyal
2020-09-24 22:10           ` [Virtio-fs] " Vivek Goyal
2020-09-25  8:06           ` virtiofs vs 9p performance Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-25  8:06             ` [Virtio-fs] " Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-25 13:13             ` Vivek Goyal
2020-09-25 13:13               ` [Virtio-fs] " Vivek Goyal
2020-09-25 15:47               ` Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-25 15:47                 ` [Virtio-fs] " Christian Schoenebeck
2021-02-19 16:08             ` Can not set high msize with virtio-9p (Was: Re: virtiofs vs 9p performance) Vivek Goyal
2021-02-19 16:08               ` [Virtio-fs] " Vivek Goyal
2021-02-19 17:33               ` Christian Schoenebeck [this message]
2021-02-19 17:33                 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2021-02-19 19:01                 ` Vivek Goyal
2021-02-19 19:01                   ` [Virtio-fs] " Vivek Goyal
2021-02-20 15:38                   ` Christian Schoenebeck
2021-02-20 15:38                     ` [Virtio-fs] " Christian Schoenebeck
2021-02-22 12:18                     ` Greg Kurz
2021-02-22 12:18                       ` [Virtio-fs] " Greg Kurz
2021-02-22 15:08                       ` Christian Schoenebeck
2021-02-22 15:08                         ` [Virtio-fs] " Christian Schoenebeck
2021-02-22 17:11                         ` Greg Kurz
2021-02-22 17:11                           ` [Virtio-fs] " Greg Kurz
2021-02-23 13:39                           ` Christian Schoenebeck
2021-02-23 13:39                             ` [Virtio-fs] " Christian Schoenebeck
2021-02-23 14:07                             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-02-23 14:07                               ` [Virtio-fs] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-02-24 15:16                               ` Christian Schoenebeck
2021-02-24 15:16                                 ` [Virtio-fs] " Christian Schoenebeck
2021-02-24 15:43                                 ` Dominique Martinet
2021-02-24 15:43                                   ` [Virtio-fs] " Dominique Martinet
2021-02-26 13:49                                   ` Christian Schoenebeck
2021-02-26 13:49                                     ` [Virtio-fs] " Christian Schoenebeck
2021-02-27  0:03                                     ` Dominique Martinet
2021-02-27  0:03                                       ` [Virtio-fs] " Dominique Martinet
2021-03-03 14:04                                       ` Christian Schoenebeck
2021-03-03 14:04                                         ` [Virtio-fs] " Christian Schoenebeck
2021-03-03 14:50                                         ` Dominique Martinet
2021-03-03 14:50                                           ` [Virtio-fs] " Dominique Martinet
2021-03-05 14:57                                           ` Christian Schoenebeck
2021-03-05 14:57                                             ` [Virtio-fs] " Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-25 12:41           ` virtiofs vs 9p performance(Re: tools/virtiofs: Multi threading seems to hurt performance) Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-09-25 12:41             ` [Virtio-fs] " Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-09-25 13:04             ` Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-25 13:04               ` [Virtio-fs] " Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-25 13:05               ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-09-25 13:05                 ` [Virtio-fs] " Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-09-25 16:05                 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-25 16:05                   ` [Virtio-fs] " Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-25 16:33                   ` Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-25 16:33                     ` [Virtio-fs] " Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-25 18:51                   ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-09-25 18:51                     ` [Virtio-fs] " Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-09-27 12:14                     ` Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-27 12:14                       ` [Virtio-fs] " Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-29 13:03                       ` Vivek Goyal
2020-09-29 13:03                         ` [Virtio-fs] " Vivek Goyal
2020-09-29 13:28                         ` Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-29 13:28                           ` [Virtio-fs] " Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-29 13:49                           ` Vivek Goyal
2020-09-29 13:49                             ` [Virtio-fs] " Vivek Goyal
2020-09-29 13:59                             ` Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-29 13:59                               ` [Virtio-fs] " Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-29 13:17             ` Vivek Goyal
2020-09-29 13:17               ` [Virtio-fs] " Vivek Goyal
2020-09-29 13:49               ` Miklos Szeredi
2020-09-29 13:49                 ` Miklos Szeredi
2020-09-29 14:01                 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-09-29 14:01                   ` Vivek Goyal
2020-09-29 14:54                   ` Miklos Szeredi
2020-09-29 14:54                     ` Miklos Szeredi
2020-09-29 15:28                 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-09-29 15:28                   ` Vivek Goyal
2020-09-25 12:11       ` tools/virtiofs: Multi threading seems to hurt performance Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-09-25 12:11         ` [Virtio-fs] " Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-09-25 13:11         ` Vivek Goyal
2020-09-25 13:11           ` [Virtio-fs] " Vivek Goyal
2020-09-21 20:16 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-09-21 20:16   ` [Virtio-fs] " Vivek Goyal
2020-09-22 11:09   ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-09-22 11:09     ` [Virtio-fs] " Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-09-22 22:56     ` Vivek Goyal
2020-09-22 22:56       ` [Virtio-fs] " Vivek Goyal
2020-09-23 12:50 ` Chirantan Ekbote
2020-09-23 12:59   ` Vivek Goyal
2020-09-25 11:35   ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2709384.cAWMFGR5kF@silver \
    --to=qemu_oss@crudebyte.com \
    --cc=archana.m.shinde@intel.com \
    --cc=cdupontd@redhat.com \
    --cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=groug@kaod.org \
    --cc=jose.carlos.venegas.munoz@intel.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtio-fs@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.