All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>, <swboyd@chromium.org>,
	<nganji@codeaurora.org>, <seanpaul@chromium.org>,
	<markyacoub@chromium.org>, <quic_jesszhan@quicinc.com>,
	<aravindh@codeaurora.org>, <freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Freedreno] [PATCH 04/12] drm/msm/dpu: add changes to support writeback in hw_ctl
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 17:30:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2732b7b0-f88d-f27a-54cb-781a810dad3c@quicinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8c356cec-1bf3-5aa6-6eba-62c21a6e282d@quicinc.com>

Sorry for multiple replies on this, I missed responding to one question.

On 4/14/2022 5:27 PM, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
> 
> 
> On 4/14/2022 5:19 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>> On 15/04/2022 03:01, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 4/14/2022 4:25 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>>> On 15/04/2022 00:50, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2/4/2022 2:19 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>>>>> On 05/02/2022 00:17, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
>>>>>>> Add changes to support writeback module in the dpu_hw_ctl
>>>>>>> interface. In addition inroduce a reset_intf_cfg op to reset
>>>>>>> the interface bits for the currently active interfaces in
>>>>>>> the ctl path.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>   .../gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_cmd.c   |  3 +-
>>>>>>>   .../gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_vid.c   |  6 +-
>>>>>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_ctl.c         | 65 
>>>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++--
>>>>>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_ctl.h         | 27 ++++++++-
>>>>>>>   4 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_cmd.c 
>>>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_cmd.c
>>>>>>> index 34a6940..4cb72fa 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_cmd.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_cmd.c
>>>>>>> @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
>>>>>>>   // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>>>>>>>   /*
>>>>>>> + * Copyright (c) 2022 Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All 
>>>>>>> rights reserved.
>>>>>>>    * Copyright (c) 2015-2018, 2020-2021 The Linux Foundation. All 
>>>>>>> rights reserved.
>>>>>>>    */
>>>>>>> @@ -70,7 +71,7 @@ static void _dpu_encoder_phys_cmd_update_intf_cfg(
>>>>>>>       intf_cfg.intf_mode_sel = DPU_CTL_MODE_SEL_CMD;
>>>>>>>       intf_cfg.stream_sel = cmd_enc->stream_sel;
>>>>>>>       intf_cfg.mode_3d = 
>>>>>>> dpu_encoder_helper_get_3d_blend_mode(phys_enc);
>>>>>>> -    ctl->ops.setup_intf_cfg(ctl, &intf_cfg);
>>>>>>> +    ctl->ops.setup_intf_cfg(ctl, &intf_cfg, false);
>>>>>>>   }
>>>>>>>   static void dpu_encoder_phys_cmd_pp_tx_done_irq(void *arg, int 
>>>>>>> irq_idx)
>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_vid.c 
>>>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_vid.c
>>>>>>> index ddd9d89..950fcd6 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_vid.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_vid.c
>>>>>>> @@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
>>>>>>>   // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>>>>>>> -/* Copyright (c) 2015-2018, 2020-2021 The Linux Foundation. All 
>>>>>>> rights reserved.
>>>>>>> +/*
>>>>>>> + *  Copyright (c) 2022 Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All 
>>>>>>> rights reserved.
>>>>>>> + *  Copyright (c) 2015-2018, 2020-2021 The Linux Foundation. All 
>>>>>>> rights reserved.
>>>>>>>    */
>>>>>>>   #define pr_fmt(fmt)    "[drm:%s:%d] " fmt, __func__, __LINE__
>>>>>>> @@ -290,7 +292,7 @@ static void 
>>>>>>> dpu_encoder_phys_vid_setup_timing_engine(
>>>>>>>       spin_lock_irqsave(phys_enc->enc_spinlock, lock_flags);
>>>>>>>       phys_enc->hw_intf->ops.setup_timing_gen(phys_enc->hw_intf,
>>>>>>>               &timing_params, fmt);
>>>>>>> -    phys_enc->hw_ctl->ops.setup_intf_cfg(phys_enc->hw_ctl, 
>>>>>>> &intf_cfg);
>>>>>>> +    phys_enc->hw_ctl->ops.setup_intf_cfg(phys_enc->hw_ctl, 
>>>>>>> &intf_cfg, false);
>>>>>>>       /* setup which pp blk will connect to this intf */
>>>>>>>       if (phys_enc->hw_intf->ops.bind_pingpong_blk)
>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_ctl.c 
>>>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_ctl.c
>>>>>>> index 02da9ec..a2069af 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_ctl.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_ctl.c
>>>>>>> @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
>>>>>>>   // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>>>>>>> -/* Copyright (c) 2015-2018, The Linux Foundation. All rights 
>>>>>>> reserved.
>>>>>>> +/* Copyright (c) 2022 Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All 
>>>>>>> rights reserved.
>>>>>>> + * Copyright (c) 2015-2018, The Linux Foundation. All rights 
>>>>>>> reserved.
>>>>>>>    */
>>>>>>>   #include <linux/delay.h>
>>>>>>> @@ -23,8 +24,10 @@
>>>>>>>   #define   CTL_SW_RESET                  0x030
>>>>>>>   #define   CTL_LAYER_EXTN_OFFSET         0x40
>>>>>>>   #define   CTL_MERGE_3D_ACTIVE           0x0E4
>>>>>>> +#define   CTL_WB_ACTIVE                 0x0EC
>>>>>>>   #define   CTL_INTF_ACTIVE               0x0F4
>>>>>>>   #define   CTL_MERGE_3D_FLUSH            0x100
>>>>>>> +#define   CTL_WB_FLUSH                  0x108
>>>>>>>   #define   CTL_INTF_FLUSH                0x110
>>>>>>>   #define   CTL_INTF_MASTER               0x134
>>>>>>>   #define   CTL_FETCH_PIPE_ACTIVE         0x0FC
>>>>>>> @@ -35,6 +38,7 @@
>>>>>>>   #define DPU_REG_RESET_TIMEOUT_US        2000
>>>>>>>   #define  MERGE_3D_IDX   23
>>>>>>>   #define  INTF_IDX       31
>>>>>>> +#define WB_IDX          16
>>>>>>>   #define CTL_INVALID_BIT                 0xffff
>>>>>>>   #define CTL_DEFAULT_GROUP_ID        0xf
>>>>>>> @@ -128,6 +132,9 @@ static inline void 
>>>>>>> dpu_hw_ctl_trigger_flush_v1(struct dpu_hw_ctl *ctx)
>>>>>>>       if (ctx->pending_flush_mask & BIT(INTF_IDX))
>>>>>>>           DPU_REG_WRITE(&ctx->hw, CTL_INTF_FLUSH,
>>>>>>>                   ctx->pending_intf_flush_mask);
>>>>>>> +    if (ctx->pending_flush_mask & BIT(WB_IDX))
>>>>>>> +        DPU_REG_WRITE(&ctx->hw, CTL_WB_FLUSH,
>>>>>>> +                ctx->pending_wb_flush_mask);
>>>>>>>       DPU_REG_WRITE(&ctx->hw, CTL_FLUSH, ctx->pending_flush_mask);
>>>>>>>   }
>>>>>>> @@ -248,6 +255,13 @@ static void 
>>>>>>> dpu_hw_ctl_update_pending_flush_intf(struct dpu_hw_ctl *ctx,
>>>>>>>       }
>>>>>>>   }
>>>>>>> +static void dpu_hw_ctl_update_pending_flush_wb_v1(struct 
>>>>>>> dpu_hw_ctl *ctx,
>>>>>>> +        enum dpu_wb wb)
>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>> +    ctx->pending_wb_flush_mask |= BIT(wb - WB_0);
>>>>>>> +    ctx->pending_flush_mask |= BIT(WB_IDX);
>>>>>>> +}
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>   static void dpu_hw_ctl_update_pending_flush_intf_v1(struct 
>>>>>>> dpu_hw_ctl *ctx,
>>>>>>>           enum dpu_intf intf)
>>>>>>>   {
>>>>>>> @@ -493,10 +507,11 @@ static void 
>>>>>>> dpu_hw_ctl_setup_blendstage(struct dpu_hw_ctl *ctx,
>>>>>>>   static void dpu_hw_ctl_intf_cfg_v1(struct dpu_hw_ctl *ctx,
>>>>>>> -        struct dpu_hw_intf_cfg *cfg)
>>>>>>> +        struct dpu_hw_intf_cfg *cfg, bool is_wb)
>>>>>>>   {
>>>>>>>       struct dpu_hw_blk_reg_map *c = &ctx->hw;
>>>>>>>       u32 intf_active = 0;
>>>>>>> +    u32 wb_active = 0;
>>>>>>>       u32 mode_sel = 0;
>>>>>>>       /* CTL_TOP[31:28] carries group_id to collate CTL paths
>>>>>>> @@ -509,18 +524,25 @@ static void dpu_hw_ctl_intf_cfg_v1(struct 
>>>>>>> dpu_hw_ctl *ctx,
>>>>>>>       if (cfg->intf_mode_sel == DPU_CTL_MODE_SEL_CMD)
>>>>>>>           mode_sel |= BIT(17);
>>>>>>> -    intf_active = DPU_REG_READ(c, CTL_INTF_ACTIVE);
>>>>>>> -    intf_active |= BIT(cfg->intf - INTF_0);
>>>>>>> +    if (!is_wb) {
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think we can judge if it is an INTF of WB by checking the 
>>>>>> cfg->intf and cfg->wb, thus the is_wb argument is not needed.
>>>>>
>>>>> cfg->intf and cfg->wb are enums storing what is the index of the 
>>>>> current WB being used.
>>>>>
>>>>> If both intf and wb are used (which is possible) and if both have 
>>>>> been configured before calling this function cfg->intf and cfg->wb 
>>>>> will be valid so we cannot distinguish for which one we called this 
>>>>> function for and can end up programming both.
>>>>
>>>> First of all, I think cloning CRTCs is not supported by the msm 
>>>> driver at this moment (yet), so it's not possible to share the same 
>>>> crtc (and so the same ctl) between INTF and WB.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Next, for each encoder the cfg is recreated from the empty struct. 
>>>> Thus INTF's encoder will pass a struct with only cfg->intf being set 
>>>> and WB's encoder will pass a struct with cfg->wb being set.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Ok, in that case we can get away with using cfg->intf OR cfg->wb checks.
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> intf calls its own dpu_hw_ctl_intf_cfg_v1 and wb calls its own.
>>>>>
>>>>> So i thought its better to check who is the caller of this before 
>>>>> configuring the block for the caller.
>>>>>
>>>>> Let me know if now it makes sense to have a "is_wb" or this can be 
>>>>> covered differently.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +        intf_active = DPU_REG_READ(c, CTL_INTF_ACTIVE);
>>>>>>> +        intf_active |= BIT(cfg->intf - INTF_0) > +    } else {
>>>>>>> +        wb_active = DPU_REG_READ(c, CTL_WB_ACTIVE);
>>>>>>> +        wb_active = BIT(cfg->wb - WB_0);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> wb_active |= BIT(...) ?
>>>>> ack
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +    }
>>>>>>>       DPU_REG_WRITE(c, CTL_TOP, mode_sel);
>>>>>>>       DPU_REG_WRITE(c, CTL_INTF_ACTIVE, intf_active);
>>>>>>> +    DPU_REG_WRITE(c, CTL_WB_ACTIVE, wb_active);
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>       if (cfg->merge_3d)
>>>>>>>           DPU_REG_WRITE(c, CTL_MERGE_3D_ACTIVE,
>>>>>>>                     BIT(cfg->merge_3d - MERGE_3D_0));
>>>>>>>   }
>>>>>>>   static void dpu_hw_ctl_intf_cfg(struct dpu_hw_ctl *ctx,
>>>>>>> -        struct dpu_hw_intf_cfg *cfg)
>>>>>>> +        struct dpu_hw_intf_cfg *cfg, bool is_wb)
>>>>>>>   {
>>>>>>>       struct dpu_hw_blk_reg_map *c = &ctx->hw;
>>>>>>>       u32 intf_cfg = 0;
>>>>>>> @@ -532,6 +554,9 @@ static void dpu_hw_ctl_intf_cfg(struct 
>>>>>>> dpu_hw_ctl *ctx,
>>>>>>>           intf_cfg |= (cfg->mode_3d - 0x1) << 20;
>>>>>>>       }
>>>>>>> +    if (is_wb)
>>>>>>> +        intf_cfg |= (cfg->wb & 0x3) + 2;
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>       switch (cfg->intf_mode_sel) {
>>>>>>>       case DPU_CTL_MODE_SEL_VID:
>>>>>>>           intf_cfg &= ~BIT(17);
>>>>>>> @@ -549,6 +574,34 @@ static void dpu_hw_ctl_intf_cfg(struct 
>>>>>>> dpu_hw_ctl *ctx,
>>>>>>>       DPU_REG_WRITE(c, CTL_TOP, intf_cfg);
>>>>>>>   }
>>>>>>> +static void dpu_hw_ctl_reset_intf_cfg_v1(struct dpu_hw_ctl *ctx,
>>>>>>> +    struct dpu_hw_intf_cfg *cfg, bool is_wb)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Could you please be more specific here (or in the documentation 
>>>>>> comment bellow), what exactly is reset? For example the merge3d 
>>>>>> config is left intact.
>>>>>
>>>>> Looks like I have made some mistake in the reset logic. we should 
>>>>> have reset the merge_3d block. The goal is the reset the WB related 
>>>>> pipeline.
>>>>> Let me fix this code in the next version and it will be more clear.
>>>>> Will update the doc too.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>> +    struct dpu_hw_blk_reg_map *c = &ctx->hw;
>>>>>>> +    u32 intf_active = 0;
>>>>>>> +    u32 wb_active = 0;
>>>>>>> +    u32 merge3d_active = 0;
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> +    if (cfg->merge_3d) {
>>>>>>> +        merge3d_active = DPU_REG_READ(c, CTL_MERGE_3D_ACTIVE);
>>>>>>> +        DPU_REG_WRITE(c, CTL_MERGE_3D_ACTIVE,
>>>>>>> +                  BIT(cfg->merge_3d - MERGE_3D_0));
>>>>>>> +    }
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> +    dpu_hw_ctl_clear_all_blendstages(ctx);
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> +    if (!is_wb) {
>>>>>>> +        intf_active = DPU_REG_READ(c, CTL_INTF_ACTIVE);
>>>>>>> +        intf_active &= ~BIT(cfg->intf - INTF_0);
>>>>>>> +        DPU_REG_WRITE(c, CTL_INTF_ACTIVE, intf_active);
>>>>>>> +    } else {
>>>>>>> +        wb_active = DPU_REG_READ(c, CTL_WB_ACTIVE);
>>>>>>> +        wb_active &= ~BIT(cfg->wb - WB_0);
>>>>>>> +        DPU_REG_WRITE(c, CTL_WB_ACTIVE, wb_active);
>>>>>>> +    }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The same comment as for the setup_intf_cfg(). Also can we just 
>>>>>> write both CTL_INTF_ACTIVE and CTL_WB_ACTIVE to 0?
>>>>>
>>>>> We want to clear only the INTF OR WB for which this cfg was called 
>>>>> with.
>>>>> So we should only clear that bit.
>>>>
>>>> Then it would be better to call this function "disable" rather than 
>>>> reset. Because I'd assume that reset_ would reset the whole CTL 
>>>> configuration.
>>>
>>> Well, this is resetting the entire ctl path ( 3dmerge, sspps, 
>>> intf/wb_actives ).
>>>
>>> But i guess you are right that we dont clear ALL the interfaces and 
>>> ALL the wb_actives.
>>>
>>> I can try it out.
>>
>> No need to. In fact, I might even like this granularity. For resets we 
>> have Bjorn's "toggle reset during probe" patchset. So your change 
>> allows for the gracial teardown of the pipeline.
>>
>>>
>>> Let me try it out to see if there are no issues with that. If so, 
>>> will make the change.
>>>
>>>> And last, but not least, I think you should also clear INTF_MASTER 
>>>> if it is set to be equal to the cfg->intf.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I believe you are referring to CTL_INTF_MASTER.
>>>
>>> Downstream wasnt touching this register in the reset path so I left 
>>> it out. I have to check the programming guide to see if its needed.
>>>
>>> But for upstream we are not touching CTL_INTF_MASTER even when 
>>> setting up the CTL path. So i think its not required here.
>>
>> Ah, yes. CTL_INTF_MASTER is still pending in our tree. I used it, but 
>> I never liked the code that I endeed up with.
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +}
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>   static void dpu_hw_ctl_set_fetch_pipe_active(struct dpu_hw_ctl 
>>>>>>> *ctx,
>>>>>>>       unsigned long *fetch_active)
>>>>>>>   {
>>>>>>> @@ -572,10 +625,12 @@ static void _setup_ctl_ops(struct 
>>>>>>> dpu_hw_ctl_ops *ops,
>>>>>>>       if (cap & BIT(DPU_CTL_ACTIVE_CFG)) {
>>>>>>>           ops->trigger_flush = dpu_hw_ctl_trigger_flush_v1;
>>>>>>>           ops->setup_intf_cfg = dpu_hw_ctl_intf_cfg_v1;
>>>>>>> +        ops->reset_intf_cfg = dpu_hw_ctl_reset_intf_cfg_v1;
>>>>>>>           ops->update_pending_flush_intf =
>>>>>>>               dpu_hw_ctl_update_pending_flush_intf_v1;
>>>>>>>           ops->update_pending_flush_merge_3d =
>>>>>>>               dpu_hw_ctl_update_pending_flush_merge_3d_v1;
>>>>>>> +        ops->update_pending_flush_wb = 
>>>>>>> dpu_hw_ctl_update_pending_flush_wb_v1;
>>>>>>>       } else {
>>>>
>>>> Do we also need to provide reset_intf_cfg for non-active CTLs?
>>>>
>>>
>>> No we dont need to. So the reset sequence for non-active CTL's will 
>>> consist of pusing null commits from within the driver.
>>>
>>> I will implement that when I add support for writeback for those 
>>> chipsets.
>>>
>>> Are you suggesting that we dont need a ops? I believe the design here 
>>> is all clients of dpu_hw_*** go through ops?
>>>
>>>> I think the whole reset_intf_cfg warrants a separate commit (or 
>>>> series of commits). Then this patch would have just the "add a touch 
>>>> of WB" to existing function.
>>>
>>> I didnt follow this comment. For active CTLs, We only need to do a 
>>> flush on the required registers which we already do.
>>>
>>> Only for non-active CTLs we need a separate commit.
>>
>> A separate git commit/patch. Please excuse me for being non explicit 
>> here.
>>
>> What I have expected to see:
>>   - add reset_intf_cfg op
>>   - add dpu_encoder_helpe_phys_cleanup
>>   - call it from encoder teardown
>>
>>   - teach reset_intf_cfg about WB handling
>>   - call it from WB code
>>
>> However I see that we do not call dpu_encoder_helper_phys_cleanup() 
>> from other dpu_encoder_phys_foo files. Should we do it?

Yes, so as indicated in 
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/472317/?series=99724&rev=1, I do 
want to start using this even for non-WB interfaces.

I just want to test it little more before using it.

So I plan to add this in this series and in another change I will start 
using it for all encoder types.

> 
> Thanks for clarifying. I was thinking "commit" as in frame push NOT git 
> commit :D
> 
> Yes, I can certainly break up the reset into smaller commits and re-post 
> this.
> 
> 
>>
>>>>>>>           ops->trigger_flush = dpu_hw_ctl_trigger_flush;
>>>>>>>           ops->setup_intf_cfg = dpu_hw_ctl_intf_cfg;
>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_ctl.h 
>>>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_ctl.h
>>>>>>> index 806c171..fb4baca 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_ctl.h
>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_ctl.h
>>>>>>> @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
>>>>>>>   /* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
>>>>>>> -/* Copyright (c) 2015-2018, The Linux Foundation. All rights 
>>>>>>> reserved.
>>>>>>> +/* Copyright (c) 2022 Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All 
>>>>>>> rights reserved.
>>>>>>> + * Copyright (c) 2015-2018, The Linux Foundation. All rights 
>>>>>>> reserved.
>>>>>>>    */
>>>>>>>   #ifndef _DPU_HW_CTL_H
>>>>>>> @@ -43,6 +44,7 @@ struct dpu_hw_stage_cfg {
>>>>>>>    */
>>>>>>>   struct dpu_hw_intf_cfg {
>>>>>>>       enum dpu_intf intf;
>>>>>>> +    enum dpu_wb wb;
>>>>>>>       enum dpu_3d_blend_mode mode_3d;
>>>>>>>       enum dpu_merge_3d merge_3d;
>>>>>>>       enum dpu_ctl_mode_sel intf_mode_sel;
>>>>>>> @@ -93,6 +95,15 @@ struct dpu_hw_ctl_ops {
>>>>>>>           u32 flushbits);
>>>>>>>       /**
>>>>>>> +     * OR in the given flushbits to the cached 
>>>>>>> pending_(wb_)flush_mask
>>>>>>> +     * No effect on hardware
>>>>>>> +     * @ctx       : ctl path ctx pointer
>>>>>>> +     * @blk       : writeback block index
>>>>>>> +     */
>>>>>>> +    void (*update_pending_flush_wb)(struct dpu_hw_ctl *ctx,
>>>>>>> +        enum dpu_wb blk);
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> +    /**
>>>>>>>        * OR in the given flushbits to the cached 
>>>>>>> pending_(intf_)flush_mask
>>>>>>>        * No effect on hardware
>>>>>>>        * @ctx       : ctl path ctx pointer
>>>>>>> @@ -127,9 +138,19 @@ struct dpu_hw_ctl_ops {
>>>>>>>        * Setup ctl_path interface config
>>>>>>>        * @ctx
>>>>>>>        * @cfg    : interface config structure pointer
>>>>>>> +     * @is_wb  : to indicate wb mode for programming the ctl path
>>>>>>>        */
>>>>>>>       void (*setup_intf_cfg)(struct dpu_hw_ctl *ctx,
>>>>>>> -        struct dpu_hw_intf_cfg *cfg);
>>>>>>> +        struct dpu_hw_intf_cfg *cfg, bool is_wb);
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> +    /**
>>>>>>> +     * reset ctl_path interface config
>>>>>>> +     * @ctx
>>>>>>> +     * @cfg    : interface config structure pointer
>>>>>>> +     * @is_wb  : to indicate wb mode for programming the ctl path
>>>>>>> +     */
>>>>>>> +    void (*reset_intf_cfg)(struct dpu_hw_ctl *ctx,
>>>>>>> +        struct dpu_hw_intf_cfg *cfg, bool is_wb);
>>>>>>>       int (*reset)(struct dpu_hw_ctl *c);
>>>>>>> @@ -182,6 +203,7 @@ struct dpu_hw_ctl_ops {
>>>>>>>    * @mixer_hw_caps: mixer hardware capabilities
>>>>>>>    * @pending_flush_mask: storage for pending ctl_flush managed 
>>>>>>> via ops
>>>>>>>    * @pending_intf_flush_mask: pending INTF flush
>>>>>>> + * @pending_wb_flush_mask: pending WB flush
>>>>>>>    * @ops: operation list
>>>>>>>    */
>>>>>>>   struct dpu_hw_ctl {
>>>>>>> @@ -195,6 +217,7 @@ struct dpu_hw_ctl {
>>>>>>>       const struct dpu_lm_cfg *mixer_hw_caps;
>>>>>>>       u32 pending_flush_mask;
>>>>>>>       u32 pending_intf_flush_mask;
>>>>>>> +    u32 pending_wb_flush_mask;
>>>>>>>       u32 pending_merge_3d_flush_mask;
>>>>>>>       /* ops */
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, swboyd@chromium.org,
	nganji@codeaurora.org, seanpaul@chromium.org,
	markyacoub@chromium.org, quic_jesszhan@quicinc.com,
	aravindh@codeaurora.org, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Freedreno] [PATCH 04/12] drm/msm/dpu: add changes to support writeback in hw_ctl
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 17:30:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2732b7b0-f88d-f27a-54cb-781a810dad3c@quicinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8c356cec-1bf3-5aa6-6eba-62c21a6e282d@quicinc.com>

Sorry for multiple replies on this, I missed responding to one question.

On 4/14/2022 5:27 PM, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
> 
> 
> On 4/14/2022 5:19 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>> On 15/04/2022 03:01, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 4/14/2022 4:25 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>>> On 15/04/2022 00:50, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2/4/2022 2:19 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>>>>> On 05/02/2022 00:17, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
>>>>>>> Add changes to support writeback module in the dpu_hw_ctl
>>>>>>> interface. In addition inroduce a reset_intf_cfg op to reset
>>>>>>> the interface bits for the currently active interfaces in
>>>>>>> the ctl path.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>   .../gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_cmd.c   |  3 +-
>>>>>>>   .../gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_vid.c   |  6 +-
>>>>>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_ctl.c         | 65 
>>>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++--
>>>>>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_ctl.h         | 27 ++++++++-
>>>>>>>   4 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_cmd.c 
>>>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_cmd.c
>>>>>>> index 34a6940..4cb72fa 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_cmd.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_cmd.c
>>>>>>> @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
>>>>>>>   // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>>>>>>>   /*
>>>>>>> + * Copyright (c) 2022 Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All 
>>>>>>> rights reserved.
>>>>>>>    * Copyright (c) 2015-2018, 2020-2021 The Linux Foundation. All 
>>>>>>> rights reserved.
>>>>>>>    */
>>>>>>> @@ -70,7 +71,7 @@ static void _dpu_encoder_phys_cmd_update_intf_cfg(
>>>>>>>       intf_cfg.intf_mode_sel = DPU_CTL_MODE_SEL_CMD;
>>>>>>>       intf_cfg.stream_sel = cmd_enc->stream_sel;
>>>>>>>       intf_cfg.mode_3d = 
>>>>>>> dpu_encoder_helper_get_3d_blend_mode(phys_enc);
>>>>>>> -    ctl->ops.setup_intf_cfg(ctl, &intf_cfg);
>>>>>>> +    ctl->ops.setup_intf_cfg(ctl, &intf_cfg, false);
>>>>>>>   }
>>>>>>>   static void dpu_encoder_phys_cmd_pp_tx_done_irq(void *arg, int 
>>>>>>> irq_idx)
>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_vid.c 
>>>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_vid.c
>>>>>>> index ddd9d89..950fcd6 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_vid.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_vid.c
>>>>>>> @@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
>>>>>>>   // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>>>>>>> -/* Copyright (c) 2015-2018, 2020-2021 The Linux Foundation. All 
>>>>>>> rights reserved.
>>>>>>> +/*
>>>>>>> + *  Copyright (c) 2022 Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All 
>>>>>>> rights reserved.
>>>>>>> + *  Copyright (c) 2015-2018, 2020-2021 The Linux Foundation. All 
>>>>>>> rights reserved.
>>>>>>>    */
>>>>>>>   #define pr_fmt(fmt)    "[drm:%s:%d] " fmt, __func__, __LINE__
>>>>>>> @@ -290,7 +292,7 @@ static void 
>>>>>>> dpu_encoder_phys_vid_setup_timing_engine(
>>>>>>>       spin_lock_irqsave(phys_enc->enc_spinlock, lock_flags);
>>>>>>>       phys_enc->hw_intf->ops.setup_timing_gen(phys_enc->hw_intf,
>>>>>>>               &timing_params, fmt);
>>>>>>> -    phys_enc->hw_ctl->ops.setup_intf_cfg(phys_enc->hw_ctl, 
>>>>>>> &intf_cfg);
>>>>>>> +    phys_enc->hw_ctl->ops.setup_intf_cfg(phys_enc->hw_ctl, 
>>>>>>> &intf_cfg, false);
>>>>>>>       /* setup which pp blk will connect to this intf */
>>>>>>>       if (phys_enc->hw_intf->ops.bind_pingpong_blk)
>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_ctl.c 
>>>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_ctl.c
>>>>>>> index 02da9ec..a2069af 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_ctl.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_ctl.c
>>>>>>> @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
>>>>>>>   // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>>>>>>> -/* Copyright (c) 2015-2018, The Linux Foundation. All rights 
>>>>>>> reserved.
>>>>>>> +/* Copyright (c) 2022 Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All 
>>>>>>> rights reserved.
>>>>>>> + * Copyright (c) 2015-2018, The Linux Foundation. All rights 
>>>>>>> reserved.
>>>>>>>    */
>>>>>>>   #include <linux/delay.h>
>>>>>>> @@ -23,8 +24,10 @@
>>>>>>>   #define   CTL_SW_RESET                  0x030
>>>>>>>   #define   CTL_LAYER_EXTN_OFFSET         0x40
>>>>>>>   #define   CTL_MERGE_3D_ACTIVE           0x0E4
>>>>>>> +#define   CTL_WB_ACTIVE                 0x0EC
>>>>>>>   #define   CTL_INTF_ACTIVE               0x0F4
>>>>>>>   #define   CTL_MERGE_3D_FLUSH            0x100
>>>>>>> +#define   CTL_WB_FLUSH                  0x108
>>>>>>>   #define   CTL_INTF_FLUSH                0x110
>>>>>>>   #define   CTL_INTF_MASTER               0x134
>>>>>>>   #define   CTL_FETCH_PIPE_ACTIVE         0x0FC
>>>>>>> @@ -35,6 +38,7 @@
>>>>>>>   #define DPU_REG_RESET_TIMEOUT_US        2000
>>>>>>>   #define  MERGE_3D_IDX   23
>>>>>>>   #define  INTF_IDX       31
>>>>>>> +#define WB_IDX          16
>>>>>>>   #define CTL_INVALID_BIT                 0xffff
>>>>>>>   #define CTL_DEFAULT_GROUP_ID        0xf
>>>>>>> @@ -128,6 +132,9 @@ static inline void 
>>>>>>> dpu_hw_ctl_trigger_flush_v1(struct dpu_hw_ctl *ctx)
>>>>>>>       if (ctx->pending_flush_mask & BIT(INTF_IDX))
>>>>>>>           DPU_REG_WRITE(&ctx->hw, CTL_INTF_FLUSH,
>>>>>>>                   ctx->pending_intf_flush_mask);
>>>>>>> +    if (ctx->pending_flush_mask & BIT(WB_IDX))
>>>>>>> +        DPU_REG_WRITE(&ctx->hw, CTL_WB_FLUSH,
>>>>>>> +                ctx->pending_wb_flush_mask);
>>>>>>>       DPU_REG_WRITE(&ctx->hw, CTL_FLUSH, ctx->pending_flush_mask);
>>>>>>>   }
>>>>>>> @@ -248,6 +255,13 @@ static void 
>>>>>>> dpu_hw_ctl_update_pending_flush_intf(struct dpu_hw_ctl *ctx,
>>>>>>>       }
>>>>>>>   }
>>>>>>> +static void dpu_hw_ctl_update_pending_flush_wb_v1(struct 
>>>>>>> dpu_hw_ctl *ctx,
>>>>>>> +        enum dpu_wb wb)
>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>> +    ctx->pending_wb_flush_mask |= BIT(wb - WB_0);
>>>>>>> +    ctx->pending_flush_mask |= BIT(WB_IDX);
>>>>>>> +}
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>   static void dpu_hw_ctl_update_pending_flush_intf_v1(struct 
>>>>>>> dpu_hw_ctl *ctx,
>>>>>>>           enum dpu_intf intf)
>>>>>>>   {
>>>>>>> @@ -493,10 +507,11 @@ static void 
>>>>>>> dpu_hw_ctl_setup_blendstage(struct dpu_hw_ctl *ctx,
>>>>>>>   static void dpu_hw_ctl_intf_cfg_v1(struct dpu_hw_ctl *ctx,
>>>>>>> -        struct dpu_hw_intf_cfg *cfg)
>>>>>>> +        struct dpu_hw_intf_cfg *cfg, bool is_wb)
>>>>>>>   {
>>>>>>>       struct dpu_hw_blk_reg_map *c = &ctx->hw;
>>>>>>>       u32 intf_active = 0;
>>>>>>> +    u32 wb_active = 0;
>>>>>>>       u32 mode_sel = 0;
>>>>>>>       /* CTL_TOP[31:28] carries group_id to collate CTL paths
>>>>>>> @@ -509,18 +524,25 @@ static void dpu_hw_ctl_intf_cfg_v1(struct 
>>>>>>> dpu_hw_ctl *ctx,
>>>>>>>       if (cfg->intf_mode_sel == DPU_CTL_MODE_SEL_CMD)
>>>>>>>           mode_sel |= BIT(17);
>>>>>>> -    intf_active = DPU_REG_READ(c, CTL_INTF_ACTIVE);
>>>>>>> -    intf_active |= BIT(cfg->intf - INTF_0);
>>>>>>> +    if (!is_wb) {
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think we can judge if it is an INTF of WB by checking the 
>>>>>> cfg->intf and cfg->wb, thus the is_wb argument is not needed.
>>>>>
>>>>> cfg->intf and cfg->wb are enums storing what is the index of the 
>>>>> current WB being used.
>>>>>
>>>>> If both intf and wb are used (which is possible) and if both have 
>>>>> been configured before calling this function cfg->intf and cfg->wb 
>>>>> will be valid so we cannot distinguish for which one we called this 
>>>>> function for and can end up programming both.
>>>>
>>>> First of all, I think cloning CRTCs is not supported by the msm 
>>>> driver at this moment (yet), so it's not possible to share the same 
>>>> crtc (and so the same ctl) between INTF and WB.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Next, for each encoder the cfg is recreated from the empty struct. 
>>>> Thus INTF's encoder will pass a struct with only cfg->intf being set 
>>>> and WB's encoder will pass a struct with cfg->wb being set.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Ok, in that case we can get away with using cfg->intf OR cfg->wb checks.
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> intf calls its own dpu_hw_ctl_intf_cfg_v1 and wb calls its own.
>>>>>
>>>>> So i thought its better to check who is the caller of this before 
>>>>> configuring the block for the caller.
>>>>>
>>>>> Let me know if now it makes sense to have a "is_wb" or this can be 
>>>>> covered differently.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +        intf_active = DPU_REG_READ(c, CTL_INTF_ACTIVE);
>>>>>>> +        intf_active |= BIT(cfg->intf - INTF_0) > +    } else {
>>>>>>> +        wb_active = DPU_REG_READ(c, CTL_WB_ACTIVE);
>>>>>>> +        wb_active = BIT(cfg->wb - WB_0);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> wb_active |= BIT(...) ?
>>>>> ack
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +    }
>>>>>>>       DPU_REG_WRITE(c, CTL_TOP, mode_sel);
>>>>>>>       DPU_REG_WRITE(c, CTL_INTF_ACTIVE, intf_active);
>>>>>>> +    DPU_REG_WRITE(c, CTL_WB_ACTIVE, wb_active);
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>       if (cfg->merge_3d)
>>>>>>>           DPU_REG_WRITE(c, CTL_MERGE_3D_ACTIVE,
>>>>>>>                     BIT(cfg->merge_3d - MERGE_3D_0));
>>>>>>>   }
>>>>>>>   static void dpu_hw_ctl_intf_cfg(struct dpu_hw_ctl *ctx,
>>>>>>> -        struct dpu_hw_intf_cfg *cfg)
>>>>>>> +        struct dpu_hw_intf_cfg *cfg, bool is_wb)
>>>>>>>   {
>>>>>>>       struct dpu_hw_blk_reg_map *c = &ctx->hw;
>>>>>>>       u32 intf_cfg = 0;
>>>>>>> @@ -532,6 +554,9 @@ static void dpu_hw_ctl_intf_cfg(struct 
>>>>>>> dpu_hw_ctl *ctx,
>>>>>>>           intf_cfg |= (cfg->mode_3d - 0x1) << 20;
>>>>>>>       }
>>>>>>> +    if (is_wb)
>>>>>>> +        intf_cfg |= (cfg->wb & 0x3) + 2;
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>       switch (cfg->intf_mode_sel) {
>>>>>>>       case DPU_CTL_MODE_SEL_VID:
>>>>>>>           intf_cfg &= ~BIT(17);
>>>>>>> @@ -549,6 +574,34 @@ static void dpu_hw_ctl_intf_cfg(struct 
>>>>>>> dpu_hw_ctl *ctx,
>>>>>>>       DPU_REG_WRITE(c, CTL_TOP, intf_cfg);
>>>>>>>   }
>>>>>>> +static void dpu_hw_ctl_reset_intf_cfg_v1(struct dpu_hw_ctl *ctx,
>>>>>>> +    struct dpu_hw_intf_cfg *cfg, bool is_wb)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Could you please be more specific here (or in the documentation 
>>>>>> comment bellow), what exactly is reset? For example the merge3d 
>>>>>> config is left intact.
>>>>>
>>>>> Looks like I have made some mistake in the reset logic. we should 
>>>>> have reset the merge_3d block. The goal is the reset the WB related 
>>>>> pipeline.
>>>>> Let me fix this code in the next version and it will be more clear.
>>>>> Will update the doc too.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>> +    struct dpu_hw_blk_reg_map *c = &ctx->hw;
>>>>>>> +    u32 intf_active = 0;
>>>>>>> +    u32 wb_active = 0;
>>>>>>> +    u32 merge3d_active = 0;
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> +    if (cfg->merge_3d) {
>>>>>>> +        merge3d_active = DPU_REG_READ(c, CTL_MERGE_3D_ACTIVE);
>>>>>>> +        DPU_REG_WRITE(c, CTL_MERGE_3D_ACTIVE,
>>>>>>> +                  BIT(cfg->merge_3d - MERGE_3D_0));
>>>>>>> +    }
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> +    dpu_hw_ctl_clear_all_blendstages(ctx);
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> +    if (!is_wb) {
>>>>>>> +        intf_active = DPU_REG_READ(c, CTL_INTF_ACTIVE);
>>>>>>> +        intf_active &= ~BIT(cfg->intf - INTF_0);
>>>>>>> +        DPU_REG_WRITE(c, CTL_INTF_ACTIVE, intf_active);
>>>>>>> +    } else {
>>>>>>> +        wb_active = DPU_REG_READ(c, CTL_WB_ACTIVE);
>>>>>>> +        wb_active &= ~BIT(cfg->wb - WB_0);
>>>>>>> +        DPU_REG_WRITE(c, CTL_WB_ACTIVE, wb_active);
>>>>>>> +    }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The same comment as for the setup_intf_cfg(). Also can we just 
>>>>>> write both CTL_INTF_ACTIVE and CTL_WB_ACTIVE to 0?
>>>>>
>>>>> We want to clear only the INTF OR WB for which this cfg was called 
>>>>> with.
>>>>> So we should only clear that bit.
>>>>
>>>> Then it would be better to call this function "disable" rather than 
>>>> reset. Because I'd assume that reset_ would reset the whole CTL 
>>>> configuration.
>>>
>>> Well, this is resetting the entire ctl path ( 3dmerge, sspps, 
>>> intf/wb_actives ).
>>>
>>> But i guess you are right that we dont clear ALL the interfaces and 
>>> ALL the wb_actives.
>>>
>>> I can try it out.
>>
>> No need to. In fact, I might even like this granularity. For resets we 
>> have Bjorn's "toggle reset during probe" patchset. So your change 
>> allows for the gracial teardown of the pipeline.
>>
>>>
>>> Let me try it out to see if there are no issues with that. If so, 
>>> will make the change.
>>>
>>>> And last, but not least, I think you should also clear INTF_MASTER 
>>>> if it is set to be equal to the cfg->intf.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I believe you are referring to CTL_INTF_MASTER.
>>>
>>> Downstream wasnt touching this register in the reset path so I left 
>>> it out. I have to check the programming guide to see if its needed.
>>>
>>> But for upstream we are not touching CTL_INTF_MASTER even when 
>>> setting up the CTL path. So i think its not required here.
>>
>> Ah, yes. CTL_INTF_MASTER is still pending in our tree. I used it, but 
>> I never liked the code that I endeed up with.
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +}
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>   static void dpu_hw_ctl_set_fetch_pipe_active(struct dpu_hw_ctl 
>>>>>>> *ctx,
>>>>>>>       unsigned long *fetch_active)
>>>>>>>   {
>>>>>>> @@ -572,10 +625,12 @@ static void _setup_ctl_ops(struct 
>>>>>>> dpu_hw_ctl_ops *ops,
>>>>>>>       if (cap & BIT(DPU_CTL_ACTIVE_CFG)) {
>>>>>>>           ops->trigger_flush = dpu_hw_ctl_trigger_flush_v1;
>>>>>>>           ops->setup_intf_cfg = dpu_hw_ctl_intf_cfg_v1;
>>>>>>> +        ops->reset_intf_cfg = dpu_hw_ctl_reset_intf_cfg_v1;
>>>>>>>           ops->update_pending_flush_intf =
>>>>>>>               dpu_hw_ctl_update_pending_flush_intf_v1;
>>>>>>>           ops->update_pending_flush_merge_3d =
>>>>>>>               dpu_hw_ctl_update_pending_flush_merge_3d_v1;
>>>>>>> +        ops->update_pending_flush_wb = 
>>>>>>> dpu_hw_ctl_update_pending_flush_wb_v1;
>>>>>>>       } else {
>>>>
>>>> Do we also need to provide reset_intf_cfg for non-active CTLs?
>>>>
>>>
>>> No we dont need to. So the reset sequence for non-active CTL's will 
>>> consist of pusing null commits from within the driver.
>>>
>>> I will implement that when I add support for writeback for those 
>>> chipsets.
>>>
>>> Are you suggesting that we dont need a ops? I believe the design here 
>>> is all clients of dpu_hw_*** go through ops?
>>>
>>>> I think the whole reset_intf_cfg warrants a separate commit (or 
>>>> series of commits). Then this patch would have just the "add a touch 
>>>> of WB" to existing function.
>>>
>>> I didnt follow this comment. For active CTLs, We only need to do a 
>>> flush on the required registers which we already do.
>>>
>>> Only for non-active CTLs we need a separate commit.
>>
>> A separate git commit/patch. Please excuse me for being non explicit 
>> here.
>>
>> What I have expected to see:
>>   - add reset_intf_cfg op
>>   - add dpu_encoder_helpe_phys_cleanup
>>   - call it from encoder teardown
>>
>>   - teach reset_intf_cfg about WB handling
>>   - call it from WB code
>>
>> However I see that we do not call dpu_encoder_helper_phys_cleanup() 
>> from other dpu_encoder_phys_foo files. Should we do it?

Yes, so as indicated in 
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/472317/?series=99724&rev=1, I do 
want to start using this even for non-WB interfaces.

I just want to test it little more before using it.

So I plan to add this in this series and in another change I will start 
using it for all encoder types.

> 
> Thanks for clarifying. I was thinking "commit" as in frame push NOT git 
> commit :D
> 
> Yes, I can certainly break up the reset into smaller commits and re-post 
> this.
> 
> 
>>
>>>>>>>           ops->trigger_flush = dpu_hw_ctl_trigger_flush;
>>>>>>>           ops->setup_intf_cfg = dpu_hw_ctl_intf_cfg;
>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_ctl.h 
>>>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_ctl.h
>>>>>>> index 806c171..fb4baca 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_ctl.h
>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_ctl.h
>>>>>>> @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
>>>>>>>   /* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
>>>>>>> -/* Copyright (c) 2015-2018, The Linux Foundation. All rights 
>>>>>>> reserved.
>>>>>>> +/* Copyright (c) 2022 Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All 
>>>>>>> rights reserved.
>>>>>>> + * Copyright (c) 2015-2018, The Linux Foundation. All rights 
>>>>>>> reserved.
>>>>>>>    */
>>>>>>>   #ifndef _DPU_HW_CTL_H
>>>>>>> @@ -43,6 +44,7 @@ struct dpu_hw_stage_cfg {
>>>>>>>    */
>>>>>>>   struct dpu_hw_intf_cfg {
>>>>>>>       enum dpu_intf intf;
>>>>>>> +    enum dpu_wb wb;
>>>>>>>       enum dpu_3d_blend_mode mode_3d;
>>>>>>>       enum dpu_merge_3d merge_3d;
>>>>>>>       enum dpu_ctl_mode_sel intf_mode_sel;
>>>>>>> @@ -93,6 +95,15 @@ struct dpu_hw_ctl_ops {
>>>>>>>           u32 flushbits);
>>>>>>>       /**
>>>>>>> +     * OR in the given flushbits to the cached 
>>>>>>> pending_(wb_)flush_mask
>>>>>>> +     * No effect on hardware
>>>>>>> +     * @ctx       : ctl path ctx pointer
>>>>>>> +     * @blk       : writeback block index
>>>>>>> +     */
>>>>>>> +    void (*update_pending_flush_wb)(struct dpu_hw_ctl *ctx,
>>>>>>> +        enum dpu_wb blk);
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> +    /**
>>>>>>>        * OR in the given flushbits to the cached 
>>>>>>> pending_(intf_)flush_mask
>>>>>>>        * No effect on hardware
>>>>>>>        * @ctx       : ctl path ctx pointer
>>>>>>> @@ -127,9 +138,19 @@ struct dpu_hw_ctl_ops {
>>>>>>>        * Setup ctl_path interface config
>>>>>>>        * @ctx
>>>>>>>        * @cfg    : interface config structure pointer
>>>>>>> +     * @is_wb  : to indicate wb mode for programming the ctl path
>>>>>>>        */
>>>>>>>       void (*setup_intf_cfg)(struct dpu_hw_ctl *ctx,
>>>>>>> -        struct dpu_hw_intf_cfg *cfg);
>>>>>>> +        struct dpu_hw_intf_cfg *cfg, bool is_wb);
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> +    /**
>>>>>>> +     * reset ctl_path interface config
>>>>>>> +     * @ctx
>>>>>>> +     * @cfg    : interface config structure pointer
>>>>>>> +     * @is_wb  : to indicate wb mode for programming the ctl path
>>>>>>> +     */
>>>>>>> +    void (*reset_intf_cfg)(struct dpu_hw_ctl *ctx,
>>>>>>> +        struct dpu_hw_intf_cfg *cfg, bool is_wb);
>>>>>>>       int (*reset)(struct dpu_hw_ctl *c);
>>>>>>> @@ -182,6 +203,7 @@ struct dpu_hw_ctl_ops {
>>>>>>>    * @mixer_hw_caps: mixer hardware capabilities
>>>>>>>    * @pending_flush_mask: storage for pending ctl_flush managed 
>>>>>>> via ops
>>>>>>>    * @pending_intf_flush_mask: pending INTF flush
>>>>>>> + * @pending_wb_flush_mask: pending WB flush
>>>>>>>    * @ops: operation list
>>>>>>>    */
>>>>>>>   struct dpu_hw_ctl {
>>>>>>> @@ -195,6 +217,7 @@ struct dpu_hw_ctl {
>>>>>>>       const struct dpu_lm_cfg *mixer_hw_caps;
>>>>>>>       u32 pending_flush_mask;
>>>>>>>       u32 pending_intf_flush_mask;
>>>>>>> +    u32 pending_wb_flush_mask;
>>>>>>>       u32 pending_merge_3d_flush_mask;
>>>>>>>       /* ops */
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>

  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-15  0:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 100+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-04 21:17 [PATCH 00/12] Add writeback block support for DPU Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-04 21:17 ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-04 21:17 ` [PATCH 01/12] drm/msm/dpu: add writeback blocks to the sm8250 DPU catalog Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-04 21:17   ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-04 22:48   ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-02-04 22:48     ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-02-04 21:17 ` [PATCH 02/12] drm/msm/dpu: add dpu_hw_wb abstraction for writeback blocks Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-04 21:17   ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-04 22:56   ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-02-04 22:56     ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-04-14 21:28     ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-04-14 21:28       ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-04-14 21:41       ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-04-14 21:41         ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-02-04 21:17 ` [PATCH 03/12] drm/msm/dpu: add writeback blocks to DPU RM Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-04 21:17   ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-04 23:43   ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-02-04 23:43     ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-04-14 21:30     ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-04-14 21:30       ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-04 21:17 ` [PATCH 04/12] drm/msm/dpu: add changes to support writeback in hw_ctl Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-04 21:17   ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-04 22:19   ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-02-04 22:19     ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-04-14 21:50     ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-04-14 21:50       ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-04-14 23:25       ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-04-14 23:25         ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-04-15  0:01         ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-04-15  0:01           ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-04-15  0:19           ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-04-15  0:27             ` [Freedreno] " Abhinav Kumar
2022-04-15  0:27               ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-04-15  0:30               ` Abhinav Kumar [this message]
2022-04-15  0:30                 ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-04 23:35   ` kernel test robot
2022-02-04 21:17 ` [PATCH 05/12] drm/msm/dpu: add an API to reset the encoder related hw blocks Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-04 21:17   ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-04 23:46   ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-02-04 23:46     ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-04-14 21:53     ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-04-14 21:53       ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-04 21:17 ` [PATCH 06/12] drm/msm/dpu: make changes to dpu_encoder to support virtual encoder Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-04 21:17   ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-04 23:36   ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-02-04 23:36     ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-04-14 21:54     ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-04-14 21:54       ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-04-14 22:26   ` Marijn Suijten
2022-04-14 22:26     ` Marijn Suijten
2022-04-14 22:30     ` [Freedreno] " Abhinav Kumar
2022-04-14 22:30       ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-04-15 19:25       ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-04-15 19:25         ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-04-15 23:14         ` Marijn Suijten
2022-04-15 23:14           ` Marijn Suijten
2022-02-04 21:17 ` [PATCH 07/12] drm/msm/dpu: add encoder operations to prepare/cleanup wb job Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-04 21:17   ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-04 23:42   ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-02-04 23:42     ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-02-04 21:17 ` [PATCH 08/12] drm/msm/dpu: introduce the dpu_encoder_phys_* for writeback Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-04 21:17   ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-04 23:19   ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-02-04 23:19     ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-04-14 22:16     ` [Freedreno] " Abhinav Kumar
2022-04-14 22:16       ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-04-15  0:24       ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-04-15  0:24         ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-04-19 20:19         ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-04-19 20:19           ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-05  0:46   ` kernel test robot
2022-02-04 21:17 ` [PATCH 09/12] drm/msm/dpu: add the writeback connector layer Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-04 21:17   ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-04 23:24   ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-02-04 23:24     ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-02-05  2:08   ` kernel test robot
2022-02-04 21:17 ` [PATCH 10/12] drm/msm/dpu: initialize dpu encoder and connector for writeback Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-04 21:17   ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-04 22:34   ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-02-04 22:34     ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-04-14 22:21     ` [Freedreno] " Abhinav Kumar
2022-04-14 22:21       ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-04 21:17 ` [PATCH 11/12] drm/msm/dpu: gracefully handle null fb commits " Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-04 21:17   ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-04 22:43   ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-02-04 22:43     ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-04-14 23:17     ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-04-14 23:17       ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-04-15  0:36       ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-04-15  0:36         ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-04-15  1:50         ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-04-15  1:50           ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-04 21:17 ` [PATCH 12/12] drm/msm/dpu: add writeback blocks to the display snapshot Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-04 21:17   ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-04 22:36   ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-02-04 22:36     ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-03-03 22:46 ` [PATCH 00/12] Add writeback block support for DPU Stephen Boyd
2022-03-03 22:46   ` Stephen Boyd
2022-03-03 23:40   ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-03-03 23:40     ` Abhinav Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2732b7b0-f88d-f27a-54cb-781a810dad3c@quicinc.com \
    --to=quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com \
    --cc=aravindh@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=markyacoub@chromium.org \
    --cc=nganji@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=quic_jesszhan@quicinc.com \
    --cc=seanpaul@chromium.org \
    --cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.