All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mason <slash.tmp@free.fr>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	linux-pm <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Thibaud Cornic <thibaud_cornic@sigmadesigns.com>
Subject: Re: cpufreq: frequency scaling spec in DT node
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 13:56:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3095a4bb-39d0-5d91-e6e8-b39811e24ec1@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c0838592-5613-660d-56fc-e7022a38a86d@free.fr>

On 11/07/2017 13:09, Mason wrote:
> On 11/07/2017 12:25, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> On 11-07-17, 11:27, Mason wrote:
>>> On 29/06/2017 16:34, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 29-06-17, 13:41, Mason wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'm on SoC B, where nominal/max freq is expected to be 1206 MHz.
>>>>> So the OPPs in the DT are:
>>>>> operating-points = <1206000 0 603000 0 402000 0 241200 0 134000 0>;
>>>>> *But* FW changed the max freq behind my back, to 1215 MHz.
>>
>> What does this line mean really? Where is this frequency changed?
>> In the OPP table in DT?
> 
> I apologize for being unclear.
> 
> What I meant is that the bootloader originally set the max frequency
> to 1206 MHz. The OPP table in DTS was written based on that value.
> 
> Later, someone changed the bootloader code to set a slightly higher
> max frequency. When I flashed the new bootloader on my board, the
> OPP table no longer matches the actual frequency.
> 
> But I am not notified when bootloader authors change max frequencies,
> which is why I wrote "changed the max freq behind my back".
> 
> Again, sorry for the confusing statements.
> 
> (The bootloader is not DT-aware, so it leaves the DT untouched.)

I just realized that there's another unstated assumption.

Since the bootloader is not DT-aware, the DTB is, in fact, appended
to the kernel image. This is why it's possible to have "mismatching"
kernel and bootloader.

Regards.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: slash.tmp@free.fr (Mason)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: cpufreq: frequency scaling spec in DT node
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 13:56:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3095a4bb-39d0-5d91-e6e8-b39811e24ec1@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c0838592-5613-660d-56fc-e7022a38a86d@free.fr>

On 11/07/2017 13:09, Mason wrote:
> On 11/07/2017 12:25, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> On 11-07-17, 11:27, Mason wrote:
>>> On 29/06/2017 16:34, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 29-06-17, 13:41, Mason wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'm on SoC B, where nominal/max freq is expected to be 1206 MHz.
>>>>> So the OPPs in the DT are:
>>>>> operating-points = <1206000 0 603000 0 402000 0 241200 0 134000 0>;
>>>>> *But* FW changed the max freq behind my back, to 1215 MHz.
>>
>> What does this line mean really? Where is this frequency changed?
>> In the OPP table in DT?
> 
> I apologize for being unclear.
> 
> What I meant is that the bootloader originally set the max frequency
> to 1206 MHz. The OPP table in DTS was written based on that value.
> 
> Later, someone changed the bootloader code to set a slightly higher
> max frequency. When I flashed the new bootloader on my board, the
> OPP table no longer matches the actual frequency.
> 
> But I am not notified when bootloader authors change max frequencies,
> which is why I wrote "changed the max freq behind my back".
> 
> Again, sorry for the confusing statements.
> 
> (The bootloader is not DT-aware, so it leaves the DT untouched.)

I just realized that there's another unstated assumption.

Since the bootloader is not DT-aware, the DTB is, in fact, appended
to the kernel image. This is why it's possible to have "mismatching"
kernel and bootloader.

Regards.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-07-11 11:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-29  9:48 cpufreq: frequency scaling spec in DT node Mason
2017-06-29  9:48 ` Mason
2017-06-29 10:04 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-06-29 10:04   ` Viresh Kumar
2017-06-29 11:41   ` Mason
2017-06-29 11:41     ` Mason
2017-06-29 13:01     ` Mason
2017-06-29 13:01       ` Mason
2017-06-29 14:35       ` Viresh Kumar
2017-06-29 14:35         ` Viresh Kumar
2017-06-29 14:34     ` Viresh Kumar
2017-06-29 14:34       ` Viresh Kumar
2017-07-11  9:27       ` Mason
2017-07-11  9:27         ` Mason
2017-07-11 10:25         ` Viresh Kumar
2017-07-11 10:25           ` Viresh Kumar
2017-07-11 11:09           ` Mason
2017-07-11 11:09             ` Mason
2017-07-11 11:56             ` Mason [this message]
2017-07-11 11:56               ` Mason
2017-07-12  3:41             ` Viresh Kumar
2017-07-12  3:41               ` Viresh Kumar
2017-07-12  9:58               ` Mason
2017-07-12  9:58                 ` Mason
2017-07-12 10:09                 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-07-12 10:09                   ` Viresh Kumar
2017-07-12 11:25                   ` Mason
2017-07-12 11:25                     ` Mason
2017-07-12 14:08                     ` Viresh Kumar
2017-07-12 14:08                       ` Viresh Kumar
2017-07-11 13:36         ` Mason
2017-07-11 13:36           ` Mason
2017-07-12  3:56           ` Viresh Kumar
2017-07-12  3:56             ` Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3095a4bb-39d0-5d91-e6e8-b39811e24ec1@free.fr \
    --to=slash.tmp@free.fr \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=thibaud_cornic@sigmadesigns.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.