All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>,
	Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>,
	Sylwester Nawrocki <sylvester.nawrocki@gmail.com>,
	linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
	Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@iki.fi>,
	Prabhakar Lad <prabhakar.lad@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/7] media: soc-camera: switch I2C subdevice drivers to use v4l2-clk
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 23:54:04 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3250836.ovo27np6Xb@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1363382873-20077-4-git-send-email-g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>

Hi Guennadi,

Thanks for the patch.

On Friday 15 March 2013 22:27:49 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Instead of centrally enabling and disabling subdevice master clocks in
> soc-camera core, let subdevice drivers do that themselves, using the
> V4L2 clock API and soc-camera convenience wrappers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>

[snip]

> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/soc_camera.c
> b/drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/soc_camera.c index 4e626a6..01cd5a0
> 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/soc_camera.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/soc_camera.c
> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
>  #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
> 
>  #include <media/soc_camera.h>
> +#include <media/v4l2-clk.h>
>  #include <media/v4l2-common.h>
>  #include <media/v4l2-ioctl.h>
>  #include <media/v4l2-dev.h>
> @@ -50,13 +51,19 @@ static LIST_HEAD(hosts);
>  static LIST_HEAD(devices);
>  static DEFINE_MUTEX(list_lock);		/* Protects the list of hosts */
> 
> -int soc_camera_power_on(struct device *dev, struct soc_camera_subdev_desc
> *ssdd)
> +int soc_camera_power_on(struct device *dev, struct soc_camera_subdev_desc
> *ssdd,
> +			struct v4l2_clk *clk)
>  {
> -	int ret = regulator_bulk_enable(ssdd->num_regulators,
> +	int ret = clk ? v4l2_clk_enable(clk) : 0;
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "Cannot enable clock\n");
> +		return ret;
> +	}

Will that work for all devices ? Aren't there devices that would need the 
clock to be turned on after the power supply is stable ?

> +	ret = regulator_bulk_enable(ssdd->num_regulators,
>  					ssdd->regulators);
>  	if (ret < 0) {
>  		dev_err(dev, "Cannot enable regulators\n");
> -		return ret;
> +		goto eregenable;;
>  	}
> 
>  	if (ssdd->power) {
> @@ -64,16 +71,25 @@ int soc_camera_power_on(struct device *dev, struct
> soc_camera_subdev_desc *ssdd) if (ret < 0) {
>  			dev_err(dev,
>  				"Platform failed to power-on the camera.\n");
> -			regulator_bulk_disable(ssdd->num_regulators,
> -					       ssdd->regulators);
> +			goto epwron;
>  		}
>  	}
> 
> +	return 0;
> +
> +epwron:
> +	regulator_bulk_disable(ssdd->num_regulators,
> +			       ssdd->regulators);
> +eregenable:
> +	if (clk)
> +		v4l2_clk_disable(clk);
> +
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(soc_camera_power_on);
> 
> -int soc_camera_power_off(struct device *dev, struct soc_camera_subdev_desc
> *ssdd)
> +int soc_camera_power_off(struct device *dev, struct soc_camera_subdev_desc
> *ssdd,
> +			 struct v4l2_clk *clk)
>  {
>  	int ret = 0;
>  	int err;
> @@ -94,28 +110,44 @@ int soc_camera_power_off(struct device *dev, struct
> soc_camera_subdev_desc *ssdd ret = ret ? : err;
>  	}
> 
> +	if (clk)
> +		v4l2_clk_disable(clk);
> +
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(soc_camera_power_off);
> 
>  static int __soc_camera_power_on(struct soc_camera_device *icd)
>  {
> +	struct soc_camera_host *ici = to_soc_camera_host(icd->parent);
>  	struct v4l2_subdev *sd = soc_camera_to_subdev(icd);
>  	int ret;
> 
> +	if (!icd->clk) {
> +		ret = ici->ops->add(icd);
> +		if (ret < 0)
> +			return ret;
> +	}
> +
>  	ret = v4l2_subdev_call(sd, core, s_power, 1);
> -	if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENOIOCTLCMD && ret != -ENODEV)
> +	if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENOIOCTLCMD && ret != -ENODEV) {
> +		if (!icd->clk)
> +			ici->ops->remove(icd);
>  		return ret;
> +	}
> 
>  	return 0;
>  }
> 
>  static int __soc_camera_power_off(struct soc_camera_device *icd)
>  {
> +	struct soc_camera_host *ici = to_soc_camera_host(icd->parent);
>  	struct v4l2_subdev *sd = soc_camera_to_subdev(icd);
>  	int ret;
> 
>  	ret = v4l2_subdev_call(sd, core, s_power, 0);
> +	if (!icd->clk)
> +		ici->ops->remove(icd);
>  	if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENOIOCTLCMD && ret != -ENODEV)
>  		return ret;
> 
> @@ -563,12 +595,6 @@ static int soc_camera_open(struct file *file)
>  		if (sdesc->subdev_desc.reset)
>  			sdesc->subdev_desc.reset(icd->pdev);
> 
> -		ret = ici->ops->add(icd);
> -		if (ret < 0) {
> -			dev_err(icd->pdev, "Couldn't activate the camera: %d\n", ret);
> -			goto eiciadd;
> -		}
> -
>  		ret = __soc_camera_power_on(icd);
>  		if (ret < 0)
>  			goto epower;
> @@ -614,8 +640,6 @@ esfmt:
>  eresume:
>  	__soc_camera_power_off(icd);
>  epower:
> -	ici->ops->remove(icd);
> -eiciadd:
>  	icd->use_count--;
>  	mutex_unlock(&ici->host_lock);
>  elockhost:
> @@ -638,7 +662,6 @@ static int soc_camera_close(struct file *file)
> 
>  		if (ici->ops->init_videobuf2)
>  			vb2_queue_release(&icd->vb2_vidq);
> -		ici->ops->remove(icd);
> 
>  		__soc_camera_power_off(icd);
>  	}
> @@ -1079,6 +1102,57 @@ static void scan_add_host(struct soc_camera_host
> *ici) mutex_unlock(&list_lock);
>  }
> 
> +/*
> + * It is invalid to call v4l2_clk_enable() after a successful probing
> + * asynchronously outside of V4L2 operations, i.e. with .host_lock not
> held.
> + */
> +static int soc_camera_clk_enable(struct v4l2_clk *clk)
> +{
> +	struct soc_camera_device *icd = clk->priv;
> +	struct soc_camera_host *ici;
> +
> +	if (!icd || !icd->parent)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	ici = to_soc_camera_host(icd->parent);
> +
> +	if (!try_module_get(ici->ops->owner))
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * If a different client is currently being probed, the host will tell
> +	 * you to go
> +	 */
> +	return ici->ops->add(icd);

You don't use clk->subdev here. Why is the struct v4l2_clk subdev field thus 
needed ?

> +}
> +
> +static void soc_camera_clk_disable(struct v4l2_clk *clk)
> +{
> +	struct soc_camera_device *icd = clk->priv;
> +	struct soc_camera_host *ici;
> +
> +	if (!icd || !icd->parent)
> +		return;
> +
> +	ici = to_soc_camera_host(icd->parent);
> +
> +	ici->ops->remove(icd);
> +
> +	module_put(ici->ops->owner);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Eventually, it would be more logical to make the respective host the
> clock + * owner, but then we would have to copy this struct for each ici.
> Besides, it + * would introduce the circular dependency problem, unless we
> port all client + * drivers to release the clock, when not in use.
> + */
> +static const struct v4l2_clk_ops soc_camera_clk_ops = {
> +	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
> +	.enable = soc_camera_clk_enable,
> +	.disable = soc_camera_clk_disable,
> +};
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_I2C_BOARDINFO
>  static int soc_camera_init_i2c(struct soc_camera_device *icd,
>  			       struct soc_camera_desc *sdesc)
> @@ -1088,19 +1162,32 @@ static int soc_camera_init_i2c(struct
> soc_camera_device *icd, struct soc_camera_host_desc *shd > &sdesc->host_desc;
>  	struct i2c_adapter *adap = i2c_get_adapter(shd->i2c_adapter_id);
>  	struct v4l2_subdev *subdev;
> +	char clk_name[V4L2_SUBDEV_NAME_SIZE];
> +	int ret;
> 
>  	if (!adap) {
>  		dev_err(icd->pdev, "Cannot get I2C adapter #%d. No driver?\n",
>  			shd->i2c_adapter_id);
> -		goto ei2cga;
> +		return -ENODEV;
>  	}
> 
>  	shd->board_info->platform_data = &sdesc->subdev_desc;
> 
> +	snprintf(clk_name, sizeof(clk_name), "%d-%04x",
> +		 shd->i2c_adapter_id, shd->board_info->addr);
> +
> +	icd->clk = v4l2_clk_register(&soc_camera_clk_ops, clk_name, "mclk", icd);
> +	if (IS_ERR(icd->clk)) {
> +		ret = PTR_ERR(icd->clk);
> +		goto eclkreg;
> +	}
> +
>  	subdev = v4l2_i2c_new_subdev_board(&ici->v4l2_dev, adap,
>  				shd->board_info, NULL);
> -	if (!subdev)
> +	if (!subdev) {
> +		ret = -ENODEV;
>  		goto ei2cnd;
> +	}
> 
>  	client = v4l2_get_subdevdata(subdev);
> 
> @@ -1109,9 +1196,11 @@ static int soc_camera_init_i2c(struct
> soc_camera_device *icd,
> 
>  	return 0;
>  ei2cnd:
> +	v4l2_clk_unregister(icd->clk);
> +	icd->clk = NULL;
> +eclkreg:
>  	i2c_put_adapter(adap);
> -ei2cga:
> -	return -ENODEV;
> +	return ret;
>  }
> 
>  static void soc_camera_free_i2c(struct soc_camera_device *icd)
> @@ -1124,6 +1213,8 @@ static void soc_camera_free_i2c(struct
> soc_camera_device *icd)
> v4l2_device_unregister_subdev(i2c_get_clientdata(client));
>  	i2c_unregister_device(client);
>  	i2c_put_adapter(adap);
> +	v4l2_clk_unregister(icd->clk);
> +	icd->clk = NULL;
>  }
>  #else
>  #define soc_camera_init_i2c(icd, sdesc)	(-ENODEV)
> @@ -1161,26 +1252,31 @@ static int soc_camera_probe(struct soc_camera_device
> *icd) if (ssdd->reset)
>  		ssdd->reset(icd->pdev);
> 
> -	mutex_lock(&ici->host_lock);
> -	ret = ici->ops->add(icd);
> -	mutex_unlock(&ici->host_lock);
> -	if (ret < 0)
> -		goto eadd;
> -
>  	/* Must have icd->vdev before registering the device */
>  	ret = video_dev_create(icd);
>  	if (ret < 0)
>  		goto evdc;
> 
> +	/*
> +	 * ..._video_start() will create a device node, video_register_device()
> +	 * itself is protected against concurrent open() calls, but we also have
> +	 * to protect our data also during client probing.
> +	 */
> +	mutex_lock(&ici->host_lock);
> +
>  	/* Non-i2c cameras, e.g., soc_camera_platform, have no board_info */
>  	if (shd->board_info) {
>  		ret = soc_camera_init_i2c(icd, sdesc);
>  		if (ret < 0)
> -			goto eadddev;
> +			goto eadd;
>  	} else if (!shd->add_device || !shd->del_device) {
>  		ret = -EINVAL;
> -		goto eadddev;
> +		goto eadd;
>  	} else {
> +		ret = ici->ops->add(icd);
> +		if (ret < 0)
> +			goto eadd;
> +
>  		if (shd->module_name)
>  			ret = request_module(shd->module_name);
> 
> @@ -1216,13 +1312,6 @@ static int soc_camera_probe(struct soc_camera_device
> *icd)
> 
>  	icd->field = V4L2_FIELD_ANY;
> 
> -	/*
> -	 * ..._video_start() will create a device node, video_register_device()
> -	 * itself is protected against concurrent open() calls, but we also have
> -	 * to protect our data.
> -	 */
> -	mutex_lock(&ici->host_lock);
> -
>  	ret = soc_camera_video_start(icd);
>  	if (ret < 0)
>  		goto evidstart;
> @@ -1235,14 +1324,14 @@ static int soc_camera_probe(struct soc_camera_device
> *icd) icd->field		= mf.field;
>  	}
> 
> -	ici->ops->remove(icd);
> +	if (!shd->board_info)
> +		ici->ops->remove(icd);
> 
>  	mutex_unlock(&ici->host_lock);
> 
>  	return 0;
> 
>  evidstart:
> -	mutex_unlock(&ici->host_lock);
>  	soc_camera_free_user_formats(icd);
>  eiufmt:
>  ectrl:
> @@ -1251,16 +1340,15 @@ ectrl:
>  	} else {
>  		shd->del_device(icd);
>  		module_put(control->driver->owner);
> -	}
>  enodrv:
>  eadddev:
> +		ici->ops->remove(icd);
> +	}
> +eadd:
>  	video_device_release(icd->vdev);
>  	icd->vdev = NULL;
> -evdc:
> -	mutex_lock(&ici->host_lock);
> -	ici->ops->remove(icd);
>  	mutex_unlock(&ici->host_lock);
> -eadd:
> +evdc:
>  	v4l2_ctrl_handler_free(&icd->ctrl_handler);
>  	return ret;
>  }

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>,
	Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>,
	Sylwester Nawrocki <sylvester.nawrocki@gmail.com>,
	linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
	Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@iki.fi>,
	Prabhakar Lad <prabhakar.lad@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/7] media: soc-camera: switch I2C subdevice drivers to use v4l2-clk
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 00:54:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3250836.ovo27np6Xb@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1363382873-20077-4-git-send-email-g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>

Hi Guennadi,

Thanks for the patch.

On Friday 15 March 2013 22:27:49 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Instead of centrally enabling and disabling subdevice master clocks in
> soc-camera core, let subdevice drivers do that themselves, using the
> V4L2 clock API and soc-camera convenience wrappers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>

[snip]

> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/soc_camera.c
> b/drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/soc_camera.c index 4e626a6..01cd5a0
> 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/soc_camera.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/soc_camera.c
> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
>  #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
> 
>  #include <media/soc_camera.h>
> +#include <media/v4l2-clk.h>
>  #include <media/v4l2-common.h>
>  #include <media/v4l2-ioctl.h>
>  #include <media/v4l2-dev.h>
> @@ -50,13 +51,19 @@ static LIST_HEAD(hosts);
>  static LIST_HEAD(devices);
>  static DEFINE_MUTEX(list_lock);		/* Protects the list of hosts */
> 
> -int soc_camera_power_on(struct device *dev, struct soc_camera_subdev_desc
> *ssdd)
> +int soc_camera_power_on(struct device *dev, struct soc_camera_subdev_desc
> *ssdd,
> +			struct v4l2_clk *clk)
>  {
> -	int ret = regulator_bulk_enable(ssdd->num_regulators,
> +	int ret = clk ? v4l2_clk_enable(clk) : 0;
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "Cannot enable clock\n");
> +		return ret;
> +	}

Will that work for all devices ? Aren't there devices that would need the 
clock to be turned on after the power supply is stable ?

> +	ret = regulator_bulk_enable(ssdd->num_regulators,
>  					ssdd->regulators);
>  	if (ret < 0) {
>  		dev_err(dev, "Cannot enable regulators\n");
> -		return ret;
> +		goto eregenable;;
>  	}
> 
>  	if (ssdd->power) {
> @@ -64,16 +71,25 @@ int soc_camera_power_on(struct device *dev, struct
> soc_camera_subdev_desc *ssdd) if (ret < 0) {
>  			dev_err(dev,
>  				"Platform failed to power-on the camera.\n");
> -			regulator_bulk_disable(ssdd->num_regulators,
> -					       ssdd->regulators);
> +			goto epwron;
>  		}
>  	}
> 
> +	return 0;
> +
> +epwron:
> +	regulator_bulk_disable(ssdd->num_regulators,
> +			       ssdd->regulators);
> +eregenable:
> +	if (clk)
> +		v4l2_clk_disable(clk);
> +
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(soc_camera_power_on);
> 
> -int soc_camera_power_off(struct device *dev, struct soc_camera_subdev_desc
> *ssdd)
> +int soc_camera_power_off(struct device *dev, struct soc_camera_subdev_desc
> *ssdd,
> +			 struct v4l2_clk *clk)
>  {
>  	int ret = 0;
>  	int err;
> @@ -94,28 +110,44 @@ int soc_camera_power_off(struct device *dev, struct
> soc_camera_subdev_desc *ssdd ret = ret ? : err;
>  	}
> 
> +	if (clk)
> +		v4l2_clk_disable(clk);
> +
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(soc_camera_power_off);
> 
>  static int __soc_camera_power_on(struct soc_camera_device *icd)
>  {
> +	struct soc_camera_host *ici = to_soc_camera_host(icd->parent);
>  	struct v4l2_subdev *sd = soc_camera_to_subdev(icd);
>  	int ret;
> 
> +	if (!icd->clk) {
> +		ret = ici->ops->add(icd);
> +		if (ret < 0)
> +			return ret;
> +	}
> +
>  	ret = v4l2_subdev_call(sd, core, s_power, 1);
> -	if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENOIOCTLCMD && ret != -ENODEV)
> +	if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENOIOCTLCMD && ret != -ENODEV) {
> +		if (!icd->clk)
> +			ici->ops->remove(icd);
>  		return ret;
> +	}
> 
>  	return 0;
>  }
> 
>  static int __soc_camera_power_off(struct soc_camera_device *icd)
>  {
> +	struct soc_camera_host *ici = to_soc_camera_host(icd->parent);
>  	struct v4l2_subdev *sd = soc_camera_to_subdev(icd);
>  	int ret;
> 
>  	ret = v4l2_subdev_call(sd, core, s_power, 0);
> +	if (!icd->clk)
> +		ici->ops->remove(icd);
>  	if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENOIOCTLCMD && ret != -ENODEV)
>  		return ret;
> 
> @@ -563,12 +595,6 @@ static int soc_camera_open(struct file *file)
>  		if (sdesc->subdev_desc.reset)
>  			sdesc->subdev_desc.reset(icd->pdev);
> 
> -		ret = ici->ops->add(icd);
> -		if (ret < 0) {
> -			dev_err(icd->pdev, "Couldn't activate the camera: %d\n", ret);
> -			goto eiciadd;
> -		}
> -
>  		ret = __soc_camera_power_on(icd);
>  		if (ret < 0)
>  			goto epower;
> @@ -614,8 +640,6 @@ esfmt:
>  eresume:
>  	__soc_camera_power_off(icd);
>  epower:
> -	ici->ops->remove(icd);
> -eiciadd:
>  	icd->use_count--;
>  	mutex_unlock(&ici->host_lock);
>  elockhost:
> @@ -638,7 +662,6 @@ static int soc_camera_close(struct file *file)
> 
>  		if (ici->ops->init_videobuf2)
>  			vb2_queue_release(&icd->vb2_vidq);
> -		ici->ops->remove(icd);
> 
>  		__soc_camera_power_off(icd);
>  	}
> @@ -1079,6 +1102,57 @@ static void scan_add_host(struct soc_camera_host
> *ici) mutex_unlock(&list_lock);
>  }
> 
> +/*
> + * It is invalid to call v4l2_clk_enable() after a successful probing
> + * asynchronously outside of V4L2 operations, i.e. with .host_lock not
> held.
> + */
> +static int soc_camera_clk_enable(struct v4l2_clk *clk)
> +{
> +	struct soc_camera_device *icd = clk->priv;
> +	struct soc_camera_host *ici;
> +
> +	if (!icd || !icd->parent)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	ici = to_soc_camera_host(icd->parent);
> +
> +	if (!try_module_get(ici->ops->owner))
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * If a different client is currently being probed, the host will tell
> +	 * you to go
> +	 */
> +	return ici->ops->add(icd);

You don't use clk->subdev here. Why is the struct v4l2_clk subdev field thus 
needed ?

> +}
> +
> +static void soc_camera_clk_disable(struct v4l2_clk *clk)
> +{
> +	struct soc_camera_device *icd = clk->priv;
> +	struct soc_camera_host *ici;
> +
> +	if (!icd || !icd->parent)
> +		return;
> +
> +	ici = to_soc_camera_host(icd->parent);
> +
> +	ici->ops->remove(icd);
> +
> +	module_put(ici->ops->owner);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Eventually, it would be more logical to make the respective host the
> clock + * owner, but then we would have to copy this struct for each ici.
> Besides, it + * would introduce the circular dependency problem, unless we
> port all client + * drivers to release the clock, when not in use.
> + */
> +static const struct v4l2_clk_ops soc_camera_clk_ops = {
> +	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
> +	.enable = soc_camera_clk_enable,
> +	.disable = soc_camera_clk_disable,
> +};
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_I2C_BOARDINFO
>  static int soc_camera_init_i2c(struct soc_camera_device *icd,
>  			       struct soc_camera_desc *sdesc)
> @@ -1088,19 +1162,32 @@ static int soc_camera_init_i2c(struct
> soc_camera_device *icd, struct soc_camera_host_desc *shd =
> &sdesc->host_desc;
>  	struct i2c_adapter *adap = i2c_get_adapter(shd->i2c_adapter_id);
>  	struct v4l2_subdev *subdev;
> +	char clk_name[V4L2_SUBDEV_NAME_SIZE];
> +	int ret;
> 
>  	if (!adap) {
>  		dev_err(icd->pdev, "Cannot get I2C adapter #%d. No driver?\n",
>  			shd->i2c_adapter_id);
> -		goto ei2cga;
> +		return -ENODEV;
>  	}
> 
>  	shd->board_info->platform_data = &sdesc->subdev_desc;
> 
> +	snprintf(clk_name, sizeof(clk_name), "%d-%04x",
> +		 shd->i2c_adapter_id, shd->board_info->addr);
> +
> +	icd->clk = v4l2_clk_register(&soc_camera_clk_ops, clk_name, "mclk", icd);
> +	if (IS_ERR(icd->clk)) {
> +		ret = PTR_ERR(icd->clk);
> +		goto eclkreg;
> +	}
> +
>  	subdev = v4l2_i2c_new_subdev_board(&ici->v4l2_dev, adap,
>  				shd->board_info, NULL);
> -	if (!subdev)
> +	if (!subdev) {
> +		ret = -ENODEV;
>  		goto ei2cnd;
> +	}
> 
>  	client = v4l2_get_subdevdata(subdev);
> 
> @@ -1109,9 +1196,11 @@ static int soc_camera_init_i2c(struct
> soc_camera_device *icd,
> 
>  	return 0;
>  ei2cnd:
> +	v4l2_clk_unregister(icd->clk);
> +	icd->clk = NULL;
> +eclkreg:
>  	i2c_put_adapter(adap);
> -ei2cga:
> -	return -ENODEV;
> +	return ret;
>  }
> 
>  static void soc_camera_free_i2c(struct soc_camera_device *icd)
> @@ -1124,6 +1213,8 @@ static void soc_camera_free_i2c(struct
> soc_camera_device *icd)
> v4l2_device_unregister_subdev(i2c_get_clientdata(client));
>  	i2c_unregister_device(client);
>  	i2c_put_adapter(adap);
> +	v4l2_clk_unregister(icd->clk);
> +	icd->clk = NULL;
>  }
>  #else
>  #define soc_camera_init_i2c(icd, sdesc)	(-ENODEV)
> @@ -1161,26 +1252,31 @@ static int soc_camera_probe(struct soc_camera_device
> *icd) if (ssdd->reset)
>  		ssdd->reset(icd->pdev);
> 
> -	mutex_lock(&ici->host_lock);
> -	ret = ici->ops->add(icd);
> -	mutex_unlock(&ici->host_lock);
> -	if (ret < 0)
> -		goto eadd;
> -
>  	/* Must have icd->vdev before registering the device */
>  	ret = video_dev_create(icd);
>  	if (ret < 0)
>  		goto evdc;
> 
> +	/*
> +	 * ..._video_start() will create a device node, video_register_device()
> +	 * itself is protected against concurrent open() calls, but we also have
> +	 * to protect our data also during client probing.
> +	 */
> +	mutex_lock(&ici->host_lock);
> +
>  	/* Non-i2c cameras, e.g., soc_camera_platform, have no board_info */
>  	if (shd->board_info) {
>  		ret = soc_camera_init_i2c(icd, sdesc);
>  		if (ret < 0)
> -			goto eadddev;
> +			goto eadd;
>  	} else if (!shd->add_device || !shd->del_device) {
>  		ret = -EINVAL;
> -		goto eadddev;
> +		goto eadd;
>  	} else {
> +		ret = ici->ops->add(icd);
> +		if (ret < 0)
> +			goto eadd;
> +
>  		if (shd->module_name)
>  			ret = request_module(shd->module_name);
> 
> @@ -1216,13 +1312,6 @@ static int soc_camera_probe(struct soc_camera_device
> *icd)
> 
>  	icd->field = V4L2_FIELD_ANY;
> 
> -	/*
> -	 * ..._video_start() will create a device node, video_register_device()
> -	 * itself is protected against concurrent open() calls, but we also have
> -	 * to protect our data.
> -	 */
> -	mutex_lock(&ici->host_lock);
> -
>  	ret = soc_camera_video_start(icd);
>  	if (ret < 0)
>  		goto evidstart;
> @@ -1235,14 +1324,14 @@ static int soc_camera_probe(struct soc_camera_device
> *icd) icd->field		= mf.field;
>  	}
> 
> -	ici->ops->remove(icd);
> +	if (!shd->board_info)
> +		ici->ops->remove(icd);
> 
>  	mutex_unlock(&ici->host_lock);
> 
>  	return 0;
> 
>  evidstart:
> -	mutex_unlock(&ici->host_lock);
>  	soc_camera_free_user_formats(icd);
>  eiufmt:
>  ectrl:
> @@ -1251,16 +1340,15 @@ ectrl:
>  	} else {
>  		shd->del_device(icd);
>  		module_put(control->driver->owner);
> -	}
>  enodrv:
>  eadddev:
> +		ici->ops->remove(icd);
> +	}
> +eadd:
>  	video_device_release(icd->vdev);
>  	icd->vdev = NULL;
> -evdc:
> -	mutex_lock(&ici->host_lock);
> -	ici->ops->remove(icd);
>  	mutex_unlock(&ici->host_lock);
> -eadd:
> +evdc:
>  	v4l2_ctrl_handler_free(&icd->ctrl_handler);
>  	return ret;
>  }

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-03-26 23:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-15 21:27 [PATCH v6 0/7] V4L2 clock and async patches and soc-camera example Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-03-15 21:27 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-03-15 21:27 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] media: V4L2: add temporary clock helpers Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-03-15 21:27   ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-03-18 22:21   ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2013-03-18 22:21     ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2013-03-19  7:32     ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-03-19  7:32       ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-03-19  9:52       ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2013-03-19  9:52         ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2013-03-19 10:27         ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-03-19 10:27           ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-03-26 23:09           ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-03-26 23:09             ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-03-26 23:08         ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-03-26 23:08           ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-04-08 10:36     ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-04-08 10:36       ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-04-08 15:20       ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2013-04-08 15:20         ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2013-03-21  8:19   ` Prabhakar Lad
2013-03-21  8:31     ` Prabhakar Lad
2013-03-21  9:10     ` Anatolij Gustschin
2013-03-21  9:10       ` Anatolij Gustschin
2013-03-21  9:13       ` Prabhakar Lad
2013-03-21  9:25         ` Prabhakar Lad
2013-03-15 21:27 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] media: V4L2: support asynchronous subdevice registration Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-03-15 21:27   ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-03-26 23:41   ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-03-26 23:41     ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-03-15 21:27 ` [PATCH v6 3/7] media: soc-camera: switch I2C subdevice drivers to use v4l2-clk Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-03-15 21:27   ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-03-18  7:47   ` Hans Verkuil
2013-03-18  7:47     ` Hans Verkuil
2013-03-18 10:08     ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-03-18 10:08       ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-03-18 10:23       ` Hans Verkuil
2013-03-18 10:23         ` Hans Verkuil
2013-03-18 22:48         ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2013-03-18 22:48           ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2013-03-26 23:54   ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2013-03-26 23:54     ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-04-08 10:53     ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-04-08 10:53       ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-03-15 21:27 ` [PATCH v6 4/7] soc-camera: add V4L2-async support Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-03-15 21:27   ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-03-15 21:27 ` [PATCH v6 5/7] sh_mobile_ceu_camera: add asynchronous subdevice probing support Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-03-15 21:27   ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-03-15 21:27 ` [PATCH v6 6/7] imx074: support asynchronous probing Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-03-15 21:27   ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-03-15 21:27 ` [PATCH v6 7/7] ARM: shmobile: convert ap4evb to asynchronously register camera subdevices Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-03-15 21:27   ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-03-19  3:36   ` Simon Horman
2013-03-19  3:36     ` Simon Horman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3250836.ovo27np6Xb@avalon \
    --to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=g.liakhovetski@gmx.de \
    --cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
    --cc=prabhakar.lad@ti.com \
    --cc=s.nawrocki@samsung.com \
    --cc=sakari.ailus@iki.fi \
    --cc=sylvester.nawrocki@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.