From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de> To: Sandy Huang <hjc@rock-chips.com> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>, Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>, huangtao@rock-chips.com, andy.yan@rock-chips.com, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, kever.yang@rock-chips.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/of: Consider the state in which the ep is disabled Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 21:01:56 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <3361390.LkKjKlf5PX@phil> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20200707112526.18438-1-hjc@rock-chips.com> Am Dienstag, 7. Juli 2020, 13:25:26 CEST schrieb Sandy Huang: > don't mask possible_crtcs if remote-point is disabled. > > Signed-off-by: Sandy Huang <hjc@rock-chips.com> Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> changes in v2: - drop additional of_node_put, as ep will be put with the next iteration of for_each_endpoint_of_node() As this touches a pretty central function is there something to keep in mind in regards to other DRM drivers? [question for the broader audience ;-) ] Heiko > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c > index fdb05fbf72a0..565f05f5f11b 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c > @@ -66,6 +66,9 @@ uint32_t drm_of_find_possible_crtcs(struct drm_device *dev, > uint32_t possible_crtcs = 0; > > for_each_endpoint_of_node(port, ep) { > + if (!of_device_is_available(ep)) > + continue; > + > remote_port = of_graph_get_remote_port(ep); > if (!remote_port) { > of_node_put(ep); >
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de> To: Sandy Huang <hjc@rock-chips.com> Cc: huangtao@rock-chips.com, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, kever.yang@rock-chips.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, andy.yan@rock-chips.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/of: Consider the state in which the ep is disabled Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 21:01:56 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <3361390.LkKjKlf5PX@phil> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20200707112526.18438-1-hjc@rock-chips.com> Am Dienstag, 7. Juli 2020, 13:25:26 CEST schrieb Sandy Huang: > don't mask possible_crtcs if remote-point is disabled. > > Signed-off-by: Sandy Huang <hjc@rock-chips.com> Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> changes in v2: - drop additional of_node_put, as ep will be put with the next iteration of for_each_endpoint_of_node() As this touches a pretty central function is there something to keep in mind in regards to other DRM drivers? [question for the broader audience ;-) ] Heiko > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c > index fdb05fbf72a0..565f05f5f11b 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c > @@ -66,6 +66,9 @@ uint32_t drm_of_find_possible_crtcs(struct drm_device *dev, > uint32_t possible_crtcs = 0; > > for_each_endpoint_of_node(port, ep) { > + if (!of_device_is_available(ep)) > + continue; > + > remote_port = of_graph_get_remote_port(ep); > if (!remote_port) { > of_node_put(ep); > _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-22 19:02 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-07-07 11:25 [PATCH v2] drm/of: Consider the state in which the ep is disabled Sandy Huang 2020-07-07 11:25 ` Sandy Huang 2020-07-07 11:33 ` Heiko Stübner 2020-07-07 11:33 ` Heiko Stübner 2020-07-22 19:01 ` Heiko Stübner [this message] 2020-07-22 19:01 ` Heiko Stübner 2020-08-13 6:31 ` Huang Jiachai 2020-08-13 6:31 ` Huang Jiachai 2020-08-13 6:31 ` Huang Jiachai 2020-09-02 11:56 ` Huang Jiachai 2020-09-02 11:56 ` Huang Jiachai 2020-09-02 11:56 ` Huang Jiachai 2020-10-14 1:48 ` Kever Yang 2020-10-14 1:48 ` Kever Yang 2020-10-14 1:48 ` Kever Yang 2020-10-15 15:23 ` Daniel Vetter 2020-10-15 15:23 ` Daniel Vetter 2020-10-15 15:23 ` Daniel Vetter 2020-10-19 3:43 ` Kever Yang 2020-10-19 3:43 ` Kever Yang 2020-10-19 3:43 ` Kever Yang 2020-10-20 8:13 ` Daniel Vetter 2020-10-20 8:13 ` Daniel Vetter 2020-10-20 8:13 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=3361390.LkKjKlf5PX@phil \ --to=heiko@sntech.de \ --cc=airlied@linux.ie \ --cc=andy.yan@rock-chips.com \ --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \ --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \ --cc=hjc@rock-chips.com \ --cc=huangtao@rock-chips.com \ --cc=kever.yang@rock-chips.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \ --cc=mripard@kernel.org \ --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.