All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aditya <yashsri421@gmail.com>
To: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: pkshih@realtek.com, kvalo@codeaurora.org, davem@davemloft.net,
	kuba@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
	lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: net: wireless: rtlwifi: fix bool comparison in expressions
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 22:41:06 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <37f9fb2c-56bb-b593-ae55-db8fce8304f9@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3c121981-1468-fc9d-7813-483246066cc4@lwfinger.net>

On 9/1/21 1:11 am, Larry Finger wrote:
> On 1/8/21 9:32 AM, Aditya Srivastava wrote:
>> There are certain conditional expressions in rtlwifi, where a boolean
>> variable is compared with true/false, in forms such as (foo == true) or
>> (false != bar), which does not comply with checkpatch.pl (CHECK:
>> BOOL_COMPARISON), according to which boolean variables should be
>> themselves used in the condition, rather than comparing with true/false
>>
>> E.g., in drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/ps.c,
>> "if (find_p2p_ie == true)" can be replaced with "if (find_p2p_ie)"
>>
>> Replace all such expressions with the bool variables appropriately
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Aditya Srivastava<yashsri421@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> - The changes made are compile tested
>> - Applies perfecly on next-20210108
>>
>>   drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/ps.c                 | 4 ++--
>>   drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8188ee/dm.c       | 8
>> ++++----
>>   drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8188ee/hw.c       | 4 ++--
>>   drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192c/dm_common.c | 4 ++--
>>   drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192se/hw.c       | 4 ++--
>>   drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8821ae/phy.c      | 8
>> ++++----
>>   6 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> As has been stated several times, this form of the subject is
> incorrect. It should be: "rtlwifi: <driver_name>: <subject>
> 
> I would prefer that there be separate patches for each driver, not
> that the changes be lumped into a single patch as was done here. Such
> organization makes it a lot easier to find the patches for a given
> driver in case something goes wrong.Note: The driver for ps is
> rtl_pci, and that for rtl8192c is rtl8192c-common. The other driver
> names match their directory.
> 
> Larry
> 

Hi Larry!
I sent the modified patches as patch series separately.
I probably missed CCing you :/

The patch series can be found at:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/20210110121525.2407-1-yashsri421@gmail.com/#t

Please review :)

Thanks
Aditya


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Aditya <yashsri421@gmail.com>
To: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: pkshih@realtek.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
	davem@davemloft.net, kvalo@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH] drivers: net: wireless: rtlwifi: fix bool comparison in expressions
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 22:41:06 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <37f9fb2c-56bb-b593-ae55-db8fce8304f9@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3c121981-1468-fc9d-7813-483246066cc4@lwfinger.net>

On 9/1/21 1:11 am, Larry Finger wrote:
> On 1/8/21 9:32 AM, Aditya Srivastava wrote:
>> There are certain conditional expressions in rtlwifi, where a boolean
>> variable is compared with true/false, in forms such as (foo == true) or
>> (false != bar), which does not comply with checkpatch.pl (CHECK:
>> BOOL_COMPARISON), according to which boolean variables should be
>> themselves used in the condition, rather than comparing with true/false
>>
>> E.g., in drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/ps.c,
>> "if (find_p2p_ie == true)" can be replaced with "if (find_p2p_ie)"
>>
>> Replace all such expressions with the bool variables appropriately
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Aditya Srivastava<yashsri421@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> - The changes made are compile tested
>> - Applies perfecly on next-20210108
>>
>>   drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/ps.c                 | 4 ++--
>>   drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8188ee/dm.c       | 8
>> ++++----
>>   drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8188ee/hw.c       | 4 ++--
>>   drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192c/dm_common.c | 4 ++--
>>   drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192se/hw.c       | 4 ++--
>>   drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8821ae/phy.c      | 8
>> ++++----
>>   6 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> As has been stated several times, this form of the subject is
> incorrect. It should be: "rtlwifi: <driver_name>: <subject>
> 
> I would prefer that there be separate patches for each driver, not
> that the changes be lumped into a single patch as was done here. Such
> organization makes it a lot easier to find the patches for a given
> driver in case something goes wrong.Note: The driver for ps is
> rtl_pci, and that for rtl8192c is rtl8192c-common. The other driver
> names match their directory.
> 
> Larry
> 

Hi Larry!
I sent the modified patches as patch series separately.
I probably missed CCing you :/

The patch series can be found at:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/20210110121525.2407-1-yashsri421@gmail.com/#t

Please review :)

Thanks
Aditya

_______________________________________________
Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list
Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-01-13 17:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-08 15:32 [PATCH] drivers: net: wireless: rtlwifi: fix bool comparison in expressions Aditya Srivastava
2021-01-08 15:32 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Aditya Srivastava
2021-01-08 19:41 ` Larry Finger
2021-01-08 19:41   ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Larry Finger
2021-01-10 12:15   ` [PATCH 0/5] " Aditya Srivastava
2021-01-10 12:15     ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Aditya Srivastava
2021-01-10 12:15     ` [PATCH 1/5] rtlwifi: rtl_pci: " Aditya Srivastava
2021-01-10 12:15       ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Aditya Srivastava
2021-01-25 14:22       ` Kalle Valo
2021-01-25 14:22       ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Kalle Valo
2021-01-10 12:15     ` [PATCH 2/5] rtlwifi: rtl8192c-common: " Aditya Srivastava
2021-01-10 12:15       ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Aditya Srivastava
2021-01-10 12:15     ` [PATCH 3/5] rtlwifi: rtl8188ee: " Aditya Srivastava
2021-01-10 12:15       ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Aditya Srivastava
2021-01-10 12:15     ` [PATCH 4/5] rtlwifi: rtl8192se: " Aditya Srivastava
2021-01-10 12:15       ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Aditya Srivastava
2021-01-10 12:15     ` [PATCH 5/5] rtlwifi: rtl8821ae: " Aditya Srivastava
2021-01-10 12:15       ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Aditya Srivastava
2021-01-13 17:11   ` Aditya [this message]
2021-01-13 17:11     ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH] drivers: net: wireless: rtlwifi: " Aditya

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=37f9fb2c-56bb-b593-ae55-db8fce8304f9@gmail.com \
    --to=yashsri421@gmail.com \
    --cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pkshih@realtek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.