All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
To: 'Noah Goldstein' <goldstein.w.n@gmail.com>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"edumazet@google.com" <edumazet@google.com>,
	"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"torvalds@linux-foundation.org" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	"bp@alien8.de" <bp@alien8.de>,
	"dave.hansen@linux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: RE: x86/csum: Remove unnecessary odd handling
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2023 13:49:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3883a2c481dc4facb4e732a4e46fe2a4@AcuMS.aculab.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230901222100.1027371-1-goldstein.w.n@gmail.com>

From: Noah Goldstein
> Sent: 01 September 2023 23:21
> 
> The special case for odd aligned buffers is unnecessary and mostly
> just adds overhead. Aligned buffers is the expectations, and even for
> unaligned buffer, the only case that was helped is if the buffer was
> 1-byte from word aligned which is ~1/7 of the cases. Overall it seems
> highly unlikely to be worth to extra branch.
> 
> It was left in the previous perf improvement patch because I was
> erroneously comparing the exact output of `csum_partial(...)`, but
> really we only need `csum_fold(csum_partial(...))` to match so its
> safe to remove.

This is pretty much the same patch I send in Dec 2021...

Reviewed-by: David Laight <david.laight@aculab.com>

> 
> All csum kunit tests pass.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Noah Goldstein <goldstein.w.n@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/lib/csum-partial_64.c | 37 ++--------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/csum-partial_64.c b/arch/x86/lib/csum-partial_64.c
> index cea25ca8b8cf..d06112e98893 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/lib/csum-partial_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/lib/csum-partial_64.c
> @@ -11,28 +11,6 @@
>  #include <asm/checksum.h>
>  #include <asm/word-at-a-time.h>
> 
> -static inline unsigned short from32to16(unsigned a)
> -{
> -	unsigned short b = a >> 16;
> -	asm("addw %w2,%w0\n\t"
> -	    "adcw $0,%w0\n"
> -	    : "=r" (b)
> -	    : "0" (b), "r" (a));
> -	return b;
> -}
> -
> -static inline __wsum csum_tail(u64 temp64, int odd)
> -{
> -	unsigned int result;
> -
> -	result = add32_with_carry(temp64 >> 32, temp64 & 0xffffffff);
> -	if (unlikely(odd)) {
> -		result = from32to16(result);
> -		result = ((result >> 8) & 0xff) | ((result & 0xff) << 8);
> -	}
> -	return (__force __wsum)result;
> -}
> -
>  /*
>   * Do a checksum on an arbitrary memory area.
>   * Returns a 32bit checksum.
> @@ -47,17 +25,6 @@ static inline __wsum csum_tail(u64 temp64, int odd)
>  __wsum csum_partial(const void *buff, int len, __wsum sum)
>  {
>  	u64 temp64 = (__force u64)sum;
> -	unsigned odd;
> -
> -	odd = 1 & (unsigned long) buff;
> -	if (unlikely(odd)) {
> -		if (unlikely(len == 0))
> -			return sum;
> -		temp64 = ror32((__force u32)sum, 8);
> -		temp64 += (*(unsigned char *)buff << 8);
> -		len--;
> -		buff++;
> -	}
> 
>  	/*
>  	 * len == 40 is the hot case due to IPv6 headers, but annotating it likely()
> @@ -73,7 +40,7 @@ __wsum csum_partial(const void *buff, int len, __wsum sum)
>  		    "adcq $0,%[res]"
>  		    : [res] "+r"(temp64)
>  		    : [src] "r"(buff), "m"(*(const char(*)[40])buff));
> -		return csum_tail(temp64, odd);
> +		return add32_with_carry(temp64 >> 32, temp64 & 0xffffffff);
>  	}
>  	if (unlikely(len >= 64)) {
>  		/*
> @@ -143,7 +110,7 @@ __wsum csum_partial(const void *buff, int len, __wsum sum)
>  		    : [res] "+r"(temp64)
>  		    : [trail] "r"(trail));
>  	}
> -	return csum_tail(temp64, odd);
> +	return add32_with_carry(temp64 >> 32, temp64 & 0xffffffff);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(csum_partial);
> 
> --
> 2.34.1

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)


  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-06 13:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20230628020657.957880-1-goldstein.w.n@gmail.com>
2023-06-28  9:12 ` x86/csum: Remove unnecessary odd handling Borislav Petkov
2023-06-28 15:32   ` Noah Goldstein
2023-06-28 17:44     ` Linus Torvalds
2023-06-28 18:34       ` Noah Goldstein
2023-06-28 20:02         ` Linus Torvalds
2023-06-29 14:04   ` David Laight
2023-06-29 14:27   ` David Laight
2023-09-01 22:21 ` Noah Goldstein
2023-09-06 13:49   ` David Laight [this message]
2023-09-06 14:38   ` David Laight
2023-09-20 19:20     ` Noah Goldstein
2023-09-20 19:23 ` Noah Goldstein
2023-09-23  3:24   ` kernel test robot
2023-09-23 14:05     ` Noah Goldstein
2023-09-23 21:13       ` David Laight
2023-09-24 14:35         ` Noah Goldstein
2023-12-23 22:18           ` Noah Goldstein
2024-01-04 23:28             ` Noah Goldstein
2024-01-04 23:34               ` Dave Hansen
2024-01-04 23:36               ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-05  0:33                 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-05 10:41                   ` David Laight
2024-01-05 16:12                     ` David Laight
2024-01-05 18:05                     ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-05 23:52                       ` David Laight
2024-01-06  0:18                         ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-06 10:26                           ` Eric Dumazet
2024-01-06 19:32                             ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-07 12:11                             ` David Laight
2024-01-06 22:08                       ` David Laight
2024-01-07  1:09                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2024-01-07 11:44                           ` David Laight
2023-09-24 14:35 ` Noah Goldstein

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3883a2c481dc4facb4e732a4e46fe2a4@AcuMS.aculab.com \
    --to=david.laight@aculab.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=goldstein.w.n@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.