From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Noah Goldstein <goldstein.w.n@gmail.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
x86@kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
mingo@redhat.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: x86/csum: Remove unnecessary odd handling
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2023 13:02:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wh7g131ZG=-HBc-3gMDS8RX-D97A5d3Nx66m9=ZxdXaOQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFUsyfJ-n53mXd1QZCtFfkCjux6Hy7iAG4-uALX0Uyofg=PTGg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 28 Jun 2023 at 11:34, Noah Goldstein <goldstein.w.n@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> There is a reasonably robust kunit for csum_partial: lib/checksum_kunit.c
> so if you happened to run the kunit testsuite with your patch, it's
> probably correct.
Testing? TESTING?
Why do you think I do open source? I like the programming part. I even
like the debugging part. But testing - that's what users are for. No?
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-28 20:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20230628020657.957880-1-goldstein.w.n@gmail.com>
2023-06-28 9:12 ` x86/csum: Remove unnecessary odd handling Borislav Petkov
2023-06-28 15:32 ` Noah Goldstein
2023-06-28 17:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-06-28 18:34 ` Noah Goldstein
2023-06-28 20:02 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2023-06-29 14:04 ` David Laight
2023-06-29 14:27 ` David Laight
2023-09-01 22:21 ` Noah Goldstein
2023-09-06 13:49 ` David Laight
2023-09-06 14:38 ` David Laight
2023-09-20 19:20 ` Noah Goldstein
2023-09-20 19:23 ` Noah Goldstein
2023-09-23 3:24 ` kernel test robot
2023-09-23 14:05 ` Noah Goldstein
2023-09-23 21:13 ` David Laight
2023-09-24 14:35 ` Noah Goldstein
2023-12-23 22:18 ` Noah Goldstein
2024-01-04 23:28 ` Noah Goldstein
2024-01-04 23:34 ` Dave Hansen
2024-01-04 23:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-05 0:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-05 10:41 ` David Laight
2024-01-05 16:12 ` David Laight
2024-01-05 18:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-05 23:52 ` David Laight
2024-01-06 0:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-06 10:26 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-01-06 19:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-07 12:11 ` David Laight
2024-01-06 22:08 ` David Laight
2024-01-07 1:09 ` H. Peter Anvin
2024-01-07 11:44 ` David Laight
2023-09-24 14:35 ` Noah Goldstein
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAHk-=wh7g131ZG=-HBc-3gMDS8RX-D97A5d3Nx66m9=ZxdXaOQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=goldstein.w.n@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.