All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Noah Goldstein <goldstein.w.n@gmail.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	x86@kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	mingo@redhat.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: x86/csum: Remove unnecessary odd handling
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2023 10:32:12 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFUsyfKYQk87fxCDj9FpM9xzLwZVRrfUZgyUCF5G+HuC0N2pXg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230628091241.GAZJv5ie0xVGvnMKIM@fat_crate.local>

On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 4:12 AM Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> wrote:
>
> + Linus who's been poking at this yesterday.
>
Linus, if you're planning a patch and want to just integrate the codes
here I'm happy drop this patch

> + lkml. Please always CC lkml when sending patches.

Ah, will do so in the future.
>
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 09:06:57PM -0500, Noah Goldstein wrote:
> > The special case for odd aligned buffers is unnecessary and mostly
> > just adds overhead. Aligned buffers is the expectations, and even for
> > unaligned buffer, the only case that was helped is if the buffer was
> > 1-byte from word aligned which is ~1/7 of the cases. Overall it seems
> > highly unlikely to be worth to extra branch.
> >
> > It was left in the previous perf improvement patch because I was
> > erroneously comparing the exact output of `csum_partial(...)`, but
> > really we only need `csum_fold(csum_partial(...))` to match so its
> > safe to remove.
> >
> > All csum kunit tests pass.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Noah Goldstein <goldstein.w.n@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/lib/csum-partial_64.c | 37 ++--------------------------------
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/csum-partial_64.c b/arch/x86/lib/csum-partial_64.c
> > index cea25ca8b8cf..d06112e98893 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/lib/csum-partial_64.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/lib/csum-partial_64.c
> > @@ -11,28 +11,6 @@
> >  #include <asm/checksum.h>
> >  #include <asm/word-at-a-time.h>
> >
> > -static inline unsigned short from32to16(unsigned a)
> > -{
> > -     unsigned short b = a >> 16;
> > -     asm("addw %w2,%w0\n\t"
> > -         "adcw $0,%w0\n"
> > -         : "=r" (b)
> > -         : "0" (b), "r" (a));
> > -     return b;
> > -}
> > -
> > -static inline __wsum csum_tail(u64 temp64, int odd)
> > -{
> > -     unsigned int result;
> > -
> > -     result = add32_with_carry(temp64 >> 32, temp64 & 0xffffffff);
> > -     if (unlikely(odd)) {
> > -             result = from32to16(result);
> > -             result = ((result >> 8) & 0xff) | ((result & 0xff) << 8);
> > -     }
> > -     return (__force __wsum)result;
> > -}
> > -
> >  /*
> >   * Do a checksum on an arbitrary memory area.
> >   * Returns a 32bit checksum.
> > @@ -47,17 +25,6 @@ static inline __wsum csum_tail(u64 temp64, int odd)
> >  __wsum csum_partial(const void *buff, int len, __wsum sum)
> >  {
> >       u64 temp64 = (__force u64)sum;
> > -     unsigned odd;
> > -
> > -     odd = 1 & (unsigned long) buff;
> > -     if (unlikely(odd)) {
> > -             if (unlikely(len == 0))
> > -                     return sum;
> > -             temp64 = ror32((__force u32)sum, 8);
> > -             temp64 += (*(unsigned char *)buff << 8);
> > -             len--;
> > -             buff++;
> > -     }
> >
> >       /*
> >        * len == 40 is the hot case due to IPv6 headers, but annotating it likely()
> > @@ -73,7 +40,7 @@ __wsum csum_partial(const void *buff, int len, __wsum sum)
> >                   "adcq $0,%[res]"
> >                   : [res] "+r"(temp64)
> >                   : [src] "r"(buff), "m"(*(const char(*)[40])buff));
> > -             return csum_tail(temp64, odd);
> > +             return add32_with_carry(temp64 >> 32, temp64 & 0xffffffff);
> >       }
> >       if (unlikely(len >= 64)) {
> >               /*
> > @@ -143,7 +110,7 @@ __wsum csum_partial(const void *buff, int len, __wsum sum)
> >                   : [res] "+r"(temp64)
> >                   : [trail] "r"(trail));
> >       }
> > -     return csum_tail(temp64, odd);
> > +     return add32_with_carry(temp64 >> 32, temp64 & 0xffffffff);
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(csum_partial);
> >
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
>
> --
> Regards/Gruss,
>     Boris.
>
> https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-28 15:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20230628020657.957880-1-goldstein.w.n@gmail.com>
2023-06-28  9:12 ` x86/csum: Remove unnecessary odd handling Borislav Petkov
2023-06-28 15:32   ` Noah Goldstein [this message]
2023-06-28 17:44     ` Linus Torvalds
2023-06-28 18:34       ` Noah Goldstein
2023-06-28 20:02         ` Linus Torvalds
2023-06-29 14:04   ` David Laight
2023-06-29 14:27   ` David Laight
2023-09-01 22:21 ` Noah Goldstein
2023-09-06 13:49   ` David Laight
2023-09-06 14:38   ` David Laight
2023-09-20 19:20     ` Noah Goldstein
2023-09-20 19:23 ` Noah Goldstein
2023-09-23  3:24   ` kernel test robot
2023-09-23 14:05     ` Noah Goldstein
2023-09-23 21:13       ` David Laight
2023-09-24 14:35         ` Noah Goldstein
2023-12-23 22:18           ` Noah Goldstein
2024-01-04 23:28             ` Noah Goldstein
2024-01-04 23:34               ` Dave Hansen
2024-01-04 23:36               ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-05  0:33                 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-05 10:41                   ` David Laight
2024-01-05 16:12                     ` David Laight
2024-01-05 18:05                     ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-05 23:52                       ` David Laight
2024-01-06  0:18                         ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-06 10:26                           ` Eric Dumazet
2024-01-06 19:32                             ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-07 12:11                             ` David Laight
2024-01-06 22:08                       ` David Laight
2024-01-07  1:09                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2024-01-07 11:44                           ` David Laight
2023-09-24 14:35 ` Noah Goldstein

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAFUsyfKYQk87fxCDj9FpM9xzLwZVRrfUZgyUCF5G+HuC0N2pXg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=goldstein.w.n@gmail.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.