From: Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
Cc: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>,
Dave McCracken <dmccr@us.ibm.com>,
Linux Memory Management <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Optimize out pte_chain take three
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 13:28:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D2C9900.EF65CE2E@zip.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Pine.LNX.4.44L.0207101712120.14432-100000@imladris.surriel.com
Rik van Riel wrote:
>
> ...
> Any way out of this chicken&egg situation ?
Well yes. We can say "this is a sound design, and we
believe we can make it work well. Let's merge it and
get going on it".
That's perfectly legitimate and sensible. But it would be
better to not have to go this route just through lack of tools
or effort. Probably, this is what we'll end up doing :( But
we'll be much, much better off long term if we have those tests.
How do the BSD and proprietary kernel developers evaluate
their VMs?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-10 20:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-09 19:04 [PATCH] Optimize out pte_chain take two Dave McCracken
2002-07-10 0:21 ` Andrew Morton
2002-07-10 14:33 ` [PATCH] Optimize out pte_chain take three Dave McCracken
2002-07-10 15:18 ` Rik van Riel
2002-07-10 17:32 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-07-10 20:01 ` Andrew Morton
2002-07-10 20:14 ` Rik van Riel
2002-07-10 20:28 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2002-07-10 20:38 ` Rik van Riel
2002-07-13 13:42 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-07-10 20:33 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-07-10 22:22 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-07-11 0:39 ` Andrew Morton
2002-07-11 0:47 ` Rik van Riel
2002-07-11 1:27 ` Andrew Morton
2002-07-13 14:10 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-07-11 1:51 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-07-11 2:28 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-07-11 19:54 ` Andrew Morton
2002-07-11 20:05 ` Rik van Riel
2002-07-11 20:42 ` Andrew Morton
2002-07-11 20:54 ` Rik van Riel
2002-07-11 21:16 ` Andrew Morton
2002-07-11 21:41 ` Rik van Riel
2002-07-11 22:38 ` Andrew Morton
2002-07-11 23:18 ` Rik van Riel
2002-07-12 18:27 ` Paul Larson
2002-07-12 19:06 ` Andrew Morton
2002-07-12 19:28 ` Andrew Morton
2002-07-13 15:08 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-07-11 22:54 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-07-13 14:52 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-07-13 14:08 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-07-13 14:20 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-07-13 14:45 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-07-13 13:22 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-07-13 13:30 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-07-13 13:55 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-07-13 13:41 ` Daniel Phillips
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D2C9900.EF65CE2E@zip.com.au \
--to=akpm@zip.com.au \
--cc=dmccr@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.