From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@arcor.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>, Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
Cc: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>,
Dave McCracken <dmccr@us.ibm.com>,
Linux Memory Management <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Optimize out pte_chain take three
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 17:08:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E17TOVd-0003Je-00@starship> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3D2E08DE.3C0D619@zip.com.au>
On Friday 12 July 2002 00:38, Andrew Morton wrote:
> But yes, at some point you do need to stop carving away at the
> clean pagecache and wait on writeback completion. Not sure
> how to balance that.
Alert alert! We're supposed to be benchmarking rmap, not fixing the
world just now. We should just ensure that our rmap and non-rmap
kernels are equally crippled with respect to purging of streaming
IO, unless we have a very specific reason why the situation should
be affected by the difference in scanning strategies.
--
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-13 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-09 19:04 [PATCH] Optimize out pte_chain take two Dave McCracken
2002-07-10 0:21 ` Andrew Morton
2002-07-10 14:33 ` [PATCH] Optimize out pte_chain take three Dave McCracken
2002-07-10 15:18 ` Rik van Riel
2002-07-10 17:32 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-07-10 20:01 ` Andrew Morton
2002-07-10 20:14 ` Rik van Riel
2002-07-10 20:28 ` Andrew Morton
2002-07-10 20:38 ` Rik van Riel
2002-07-13 13:42 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-07-10 20:33 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-07-10 22:22 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-07-11 0:39 ` Andrew Morton
2002-07-11 0:47 ` Rik van Riel
2002-07-11 1:27 ` Andrew Morton
2002-07-13 14:10 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-07-11 1:51 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-07-11 2:28 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-07-11 19:54 ` Andrew Morton
2002-07-11 20:05 ` Rik van Riel
2002-07-11 20:42 ` Andrew Morton
2002-07-11 20:54 ` Rik van Riel
2002-07-11 21:16 ` Andrew Morton
2002-07-11 21:41 ` Rik van Riel
2002-07-11 22:38 ` Andrew Morton
2002-07-11 23:18 ` Rik van Riel
2002-07-12 18:27 ` Paul Larson
2002-07-12 19:06 ` Andrew Morton
2002-07-12 19:28 ` Andrew Morton
2002-07-13 15:08 ` Daniel Phillips [this message]
2002-07-11 22:54 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-07-13 14:52 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-07-13 14:08 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-07-13 14:20 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-07-13 14:45 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-07-13 13:22 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-07-13 13:30 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-07-13 13:55 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-07-13 13:41 ` Daniel Phillips
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E17TOVd-0003Je-00@starship \
--to=phillips@arcor.de \
--cc=akpm@zip.com.au \
--cc=dmccr@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.