All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	Dominik Brugger <ml.dominik83@gmx.net>,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: OHCI problems with suspend/resume
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 06:30:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F291A0F.1050406@pacbell.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030731094749.GB464@elf.ucw.cz>

Pavel Machek wrote:
>>The "initiators" all talk to _both_ infrastructures, but they
>>don't talk to the driver model stuff in the same way.  For
>>example, on suspend:
>>
>> ...
> 
> Where does acpi call pm_*()? It seems like it does not and it seems
> like a bug to me.

Doesn't; it showed up in a 'grep' that I should have examined
more closely.  Sorry!  But both swsusp and APM have the "using
both registration schemes" issue (consistency matters here).

Why does it seem like a bug -- because it's using only the "new"
infrastructure, while there are still a few drivers that only
register to the old one?  I'd rather see those drivers (about
a dozen) have compile time #ifdef CONFIG_PM #warnings, and call
them the bug...

- Dave





  reply	other threads:[~2003-07-31 13:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-07-23 22:08 OHCI problems with suspend/resume Pavel Machek
2003-07-24  1:19 ` [linux-usb-devel] " David Brownell
2003-07-24 10:24   ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-24 17:10     ` David Brownell
2003-07-24 22:10       ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-24 12:37 ` Dominik Brugger
2003-07-24 12:56   ` Dominik Brugger
2003-07-24 22:04   ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-24 22:46   ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-25  7:52     ` Dominik Brugger
2003-07-25 15:06       ` [linux-usb-devel] " Alan Stern
2003-07-25 17:20         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-07-25 22:48           ` David Brownell
2003-07-26 16:02             ` Alan Stern
2003-07-26 21:01             ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-26 21:16               ` David Brownell
2003-07-27 14:57               ` Alan Stern
2003-07-31  3:27               ` David Brownell
2003-07-31  3:51                 ` David Brownell
2003-07-31  9:42                 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-31 13:37                   ` David Brownell
2003-07-31 14:09                     ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-31 17:32                       ` David Brownell
2003-07-31 17:31                         ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-31 21:32                         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-07-31 21:30                       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-07-31 21:29                     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-07-31  9:47                 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-31 13:30                   ` David Brownell [this message]
2003-07-31 16:06                     ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-31  9:49                 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-31 13:23                   ` David Brownell
2003-07-31 16:07                     ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-31 21:25                     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-07-31 21:25                   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-07-31 22:08                     ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-31 21:23                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-07-31 21:55                   ` David Brownell
2003-07-31 22:05                     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-07-31 22:09                       ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-31 23:12                         ` Oliver Neukum
2003-08-01  9:33                           ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-31 22:03                   ` Pavel Machek
2003-08-01  0:27                     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-08-04 19:25                       ` Pavel Machek
2003-08-01 18:20       ` Dominik Brugger
2003-07-29 13:16 ` [linux-usb-devel] " David Brownell
2003-07-31 14:18   ` Pavel Machek
2003-08-01 17:41     ` David Brownell
2003-08-07 22:35       ` Pavel Machek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3F291A0F.1050406@pacbell.net \
    --to=david-b@pacbell.net \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=ml.dominik83@gmx.net \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.