* Re: [PATCH] can: don't count arbitration lose as an error
@ 2020-11-27 11:09 ` Jeroen Hofstee
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Jeroen Hofstee @ 2020-11-27 11:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marc Kleine-Budde, linux-can
Cc: Oliver Hartkopp, Chen-Yu Tsai, Jernej Skrabec,
moderated list:ARM/Allwinner sunXi SoC support,
open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS
Hi,
On 11/27/20 11:30 AM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 11/27/20 10:59 AM, Jeroen Hofstee wrote:
>> Losing arbitration is normal in a CAN-bus network, it means that a
>> higher priority frame is being send and the pending message will be
>> retried later. Hence most driver only increment arbitration_lost, but
>> the sja1000 and sun4i driver also incremeant tx_error, causing errors
>> to be reported on a normal functioning CAN-bus. So stop counting them
>> as errors.
> Sounds plausible.
>
>> For completeness, the Kvaser USB hybra also increments the tx_error
>> on arbitration lose, but it does so in single shot. Since in that
>> case the message is not retried, that behaviour is kept.
> You mean only in one shot mode?
Yes, well at least the function is called kvaser_usb_hydra_one_shot_fail.
> What about one shot mode on the sja1000 cores?
That is a good question. I guess it will be counted as error by:
if (isrc & IRQ_TI) {
/* transmission buffer released */
if (priv->can.ctrlmode & CAN_CTRLMODE_ONE_SHOT &&
!(status & SR_TCS)) {
stats->tx_errors++;
can_free_echo_skb(dev, 0);
} else {
/* transmission complete */
stats->tx_bytes +=
priv->read_reg(priv, SJA1000_FI) & 0xf;
stats->tx_packets++;
can_get_echo_skb(dev, 0);
}
netif_wake_queue(dev);
can_led_event(dev, CAN_LED_EVENT_TX);
}
From the datasheet, Transmit Interrupt:
"set; this bit is set whenever the transmit bufferstatus
changes from ‘0-to-1’ (released) and the TIE bit is set
within the interrupt enable register".
I cannot test it though, since I don't have a sja1000.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Jeroen Hofstee <jhofstee@victronenergy.com>
> I've split this into two patches, and added Fixes: lines, and pushed this for
> now to linux-can/sja1000.
>
Thanks, regards,
Jeroen
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] can: don't count arbitration lose as an error
2020-11-27 11:09 ` Jeroen Hofstee
(?)
@ 2020-11-27 16:02 ` Jeroen Hofstee
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Jeroen Hofstee @ 2020-11-27 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marc Kleine-Budde, linux-can
Cc: Oliver Hartkopp, Chen-Yu Tsai, Jernej Skrabec,
open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS
Hello Marc,
[...]
>
>
>> What about one shot mode on the sja1000 cores?
>
>
> That is a good question. I guess it will be counted as error by:
>
> if (isrc & IRQ_TI) {
> /* transmission buffer released */
> if (priv->can.ctrlmode & CAN_CTRLMODE_ONE_SHOT &&
> !(status & SR_TCS)) {
> stats->tx_errors++;
> can_free_echo_skb(dev, 0);
> } else {
> /* transmission complete */
> stats->tx_bytes +=
> priv->read_reg(priv, SJA1000_FI) & 0xf;
> stats->tx_packets++;
> can_get_echo_skb(dev, 0);
> }
> netif_wake_queue(dev);
> can_led_event(dev, CAN_LED_EVENT_TX);
> }
>
>
I just realized this is likely the case. If it wasn't called,
can_free_echo_skb won't be called, causing a memory
leak. I guess someone would have noticed that.
Regards,
Jeroen
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] can: don't count arbitration lose as an error
2020-11-27 11:09 ` Jeroen Hofstee
@ 2020-11-28 17:23 ` Oliver Hartkopp
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Oliver Hartkopp @ 2020-11-28 17:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeroen Hofstee, Marc Kleine-Budde, linux-can
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai, Jernej Skrabec, open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS,
moderated list:ARM/Allwinner sunXi SoC support
On 27.11.20 12:09, Jeroen Hofstee wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 11/27/20 11:30 AM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>> On 11/27/20 10:59 AM, Jeroen Hofstee wrote:
>>> Losing arbitration is normal in a CAN-bus network, it means that a
>>> higher priority frame is being send and the pending message will be
>>> retried later. Hence most driver only increment arbitration_lost, but
>>> the sja1000 and sun4i driver also incremeant tx_error, causing errors
>>> to be reported on a normal functioning CAN-bus. So stop counting them
>>> as errors.
>> Sounds plausible.
>>
>>> For completeness, the Kvaser USB hybra also increments the tx_error
>>> on arbitration lose, but it does so in single shot. Since in that
>>> case the message is not retried, that behaviour is kept.
>> You mean only in one shot mode?
>
> Yes, well at least the function is called kvaser_usb_hydra_one_shot_fail.
>
>
>> What about one shot mode on the sja1000 cores?
>
>
> That is a good question. I guess it will be counted as error by:
>
> if (isrc & IRQ_TI) {
> /* transmission buffer released */
> if (priv->can.ctrlmode & CAN_CTRLMODE_ONE_SHOT &&
> !(status & SR_TCS)) {
> stats->tx_errors++;
> can_free_echo_skb(dev, 0);
> } else {
> /* transmission complete */
> stats->tx_bytes +=
> priv->read_reg(priv, SJA1000_FI) & 0xf;
> stats->tx_packets++;
> can_get_echo_skb(dev, 0);
> }
> netif_wake_queue(dev);
> can_led_event(dev, CAN_LED_EVENT_TX);
> }
>
> From the datasheet, Transmit Interrupt:
>
> "set; this bit is set whenever the transmit bufferstatus
> changes from ‘0-to-1’ (released) and the TIE bit is set
> within the interrupt enable register".
>
> I cannot test it though, since I don't have a sja1000.
I have a PCAN-ExpressCard 34 here, which should make it in a test setup
as it acts as a PCI attached SJA1000.
Will take a look at that arbitration lost behaviour on Monday. A really
interesting detail!
Best,
Oliver
>
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jeroen Hofstee <jhofstee@victronenergy.com>
>> I've split this into two patches, and added Fixes: lines, and pushed
>> this for
>> now to linux-can/sja1000.
>>
> Thanks, regards,
>
> Jeroen
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] can: don't count arbitration lose as an error
@ 2020-11-28 17:23 ` Oliver Hartkopp
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Oliver Hartkopp @ 2020-11-28 17:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeroen Hofstee, Marc Kleine-Budde, linux-can
Cc: open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS, Chen-Yu Tsai, Jernej Skrabec,
moderated list:ARM/Allwinner sunXi SoC support
On 27.11.20 12:09, Jeroen Hofstee wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 11/27/20 11:30 AM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>> On 11/27/20 10:59 AM, Jeroen Hofstee wrote:
>>> Losing arbitration is normal in a CAN-bus network, it means that a
>>> higher priority frame is being send and the pending message will be
>>> retried later. Hence most driver only increment arbitration_lost, but
>>> the sja1000 and sun4i driver also incremeant tx_error, causing errors
>>> to be reported on a normal functioning CAN-bus. So stop counting them
>>> as errors.
>> Sounds plausible.
>>
>>> For completeness, the Kvaser USB hybra also increments the tx_error
>>> on arbitration lose, but it does so in single shot. Since in that
>>> case the message is not retried, that behaviour is kept.
>> You mean only in one shot mode?
>
> Yes, well at least the function is called kvaser_usb_hydra_one_shot_fail.
>
>
>> What about one shot mode on the sja1000 cores?
>
>
> That is a good question. I guess it will be counted as error by:
>
> if (isrc & IRQ_TI) {
> /* transmission buffer released */
> if (priv->can.ctrlmode & CAN_CTRLMODE_ONE_SHOT &&
> !(status & SR_TCS)) {
> stats->tx_errors++;
> can_free_echo_skb(dev, 0);
> } else {
> /* transmission complete */
> stats->tx_bytes +=
> priv->read_reg(priv, SJA1000_FI) & 0xf;
> stats->tx_packets++;
> can_get_echo_skb(dev, 0);
> }
> netif_wake_queue(dev);
> can_led_event(dev, CAN_LED_EVENT_TX);
> }
>
> From the datasheet, Transmit Interrupt:
>
> "set; this bit is set whenever the transmit bufferstatus
> changes from ‘0-to-1’ (released) and the TIE bit is set
> within the interrupt enable register".
>
> I cannot test it though, since I don't have a sja1000.
I have a PCAN-ExpressCard 34 here, which should make it in a test setup
as it acts as a PCI attached SJA1000.
Will take a look at that arbitration lost behaviour on Monday. A really
interesting detail!
Best,
Oliver
>
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jeroen Hofstee <jhofstee@victronenergy.com>
>> I've split this into two patches, and added Fixes: lines, and pushed
>> this for
>> now to linux-can/sja1000.
>>
> Thanks, regards,
>
> Jeroen
>
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] can: don't count arbitration lose as an error
2020-11-28 17:23 ` Oliver Hartkopp
@ 2020-11-29 15:52 ` Jeroen Hofstee
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Jeroen Hofstee @ 2020-11-29 15:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oliver Hartkopp, Marc Kleine-Budde, linux-can
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai, Jernej Skrabec, open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS,
moderated list:ARM/Allwinner sunXi SoC support
Hello Oliver,
On 11/28/20 6:23 PM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
>
>
> On 27.11.20 12:09, Jeroen Hofstee wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 11/27/20 11:30 AM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>>> On 11/27/20 10:59 AM, Jeroen Hofstee wrote:
>>>> Losing arbitration is normal in a CAN-bus network, it means that a
>>>> higher priority frame is being send and the pending message will be
>>>> retried later. Hence most driver only increment arbitration_lost, but
>>>> the sja1000 and sun4i driver also incremeant tx_error, causing errors
>>>> to be reported on a normal functioning CAN-bus. So stop counting them
>>>> as errors.
>>> Sounds plausible.
>>>
>>>> For completeness, the Kvaser USB hybra also increments the tx_error
>>>> on arbitration lose, but it does so in single shot. Since in that
>>>> case the message is not retried, that behaviour is kept.
>>> You mean only in one shot mode?
>>
>> Yes, well at least the function is called
>> kvaser_usb_hydra_one_shot_fail.
>>
>>
>>> What about one shot mode on the sja1000 cores?
>>
>>
>> That is a good question. I guess it will be counted as error by:
>>
>> if (isrc & IRQ_TI) {
>> /* transmission buffer released */
>> if (priv->can.ctrlmode & CAN_CTRLMODE_ONE_SHOT &&
>> !(status & SR_TCS)) {
>> stats->tx_errors++;
>> can_free_echo_skb(dev, 0);
>> } else {
>> /* transmission complete */
>> stats->tx_bytes +=
>> priv->read_reg(priv, SJA1000_FI) & 0xf;
>> stats->tx_packets++;
>> can_get_echo_skb(dev, 0);
>> }
>> netif_wake_queue(dev);
>> can_led_event(dev, CAN_LED_EVENT_TX);
>> }
>>
>> From the datasheet, Transmit Interrupt:
>>
>> "set; this bit is set whenever the transmit bufferstatus
>> changes from ‘0-to-1’ (released) and the TIE bit is set
>> within the interrupt enable register".
>>
>> I cannot test it though, since I don't have a sja1000.
>
> I have a PCAN-ExpressCard 34 here, which should make it in a test
> setup as it acts as a PCI attached SJA1000.
>
> Will take a look at that arbitration lost behaviour on Monday. A
> really interesting detail!
>
>
Thanks, appreciated. I would be surprised if this path is not taken though.
With kind regards,
Jeroen
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] can: don't count arbitration lose as an error
@ 2020-11-29 15:52 ` Jeroen Hofstee
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Jeroen Hofstee @ 2020-11-29 15:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oliver Hartkopp, Marc Kleine-Budde, linux-can
Cc: open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS, Chen-Yu Tsai, Jernej Skrabec,
moderated list:ARM/Allwinner sunXi SoC support
Hello Oliver,
On 11/28/20 6:23 PM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
>
>
> On 27.11.20 12:09, Jeroen Hofstee wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 11/27/20 11:30 AM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>>> On 11/27/20 10:59 AM, Jeroen Hofstee wrote:
>>>> Losing arbitration is normal in a CAN-bus network, it means that a
>>>> higher priority frame is being send and the pending message will be
>>>> retried later. Hence most driver only increment arbitration_lost, but
>>>> the sja1000 and sun4i driver also incremeant tx_error, causing errors
>>>> to be reported on a normal functioning CAN-bus. So stop counting them
>>>> as errors.
>>> Sounds plausible.
>>>
>>>> For completeness, the Kvaser USB hybra also increments the tx_error
>>>> on arbitration lose, but it does so in single shot. Since in that
>>>> case the message is not retried, that behaviour is kept.
>>> You mean only in one shot mode?
>>
>> Yes, well at least the function is called
>> kvaser_usb_hydra_one_shot_fail.
>>
>>
>>> What about one shot mode on the sja1000 cores?
>>
>>
>> That is a good question. I guess it will be counted as error by:
>>
>> if (isrc & IRQ_TI) {
>> /* transmission buffer released */
>> if (priv->can.ctrlmode & CAN_CTRLMODE_ONE_SHOT &&
>> !(status & SR_TCS)) {
>> stats->tx_errors++;
>> can_free_echo_skb(dev, 0);
>> } else {
>> /* transmission complete */
>> stats->tx_bytes +=
>> priv->read_reg(priv, SJA1000_FI) & 0xf;
>> stats->tx_packets++;
>> can_get_echo_skb(dev, 0);
>> }
>> netif_wake_queue(dev);
>> can_led_event(dev, CAN_LED_EVENT_TX);
>> }
>>
>> From the datasheet, Transmit Interrupt:
>>
>> "set; this bit is set whenever the transmit bufferstatus
>> changes from ‘0-to-1’ (released) and the TIE bit is set
>> within the interrupt enable register".
>>
>> I cannot test it though, since I don't have a sja1000.
>
> I have a PCAN-ExpressCard 34 here, which should make it in a test
> setup as it acts as a PCI attached SJA1000.
>
> Will take a look at that arbitration lost behaviour on Monday. A
> really interesting detail!
>
>
Thanks, appreciated. I would be surprised if this path is not taken though.
With kind regards,
Jeroen
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] can: don't count arbitration lose as an error
2020-11-27 11:09 ` Jeroen Hofstee
@ 2020-12-02 14:35 ` Oliver Hartkopp
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Oliver Hartkopp @ 2020-12-02 14:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeroen Hofstee, Marc Kleine-Budde, linux-can
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai, Jernej Skrabec, open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS,
moderated list:ARM/Allwinner sunXi SoC support
Hi Jeroen,
On 27.11.20 12:09, Jeroen Hofstee wrote:
> On 11/27/20 11:30 AM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>> On 11/27/20 10:59 AM, Jeroen Hofstee wrote:
>>> Losing arbitration is normal in a CAN-bus network, it means that a
>>> higher priority frame is being send and the pending message will be
>>> retried later. Hence most driver only increment arbitration_lost, but
>>> the sja1000 and sun4i driver also incremeant tx_error, causing errors
>>> to be reported on a normal functioning CAN-bus. So stop counting them
>>> as errors.
>> Sounds plausible.
>>
>>> For completeness, the Kvaser USB hybra also increments the tx_error
>>> on arbitration lose, but it does so in single shot. Since in that
>>> case the message is not retried, that behaviour is kept.
>> You mean only in one shot mode?
>
> Yes, well at least the function is called kvaser_usb_hydra_one_shot_fail.
>
>
>> What about one shot mode on the sja1000 cores?
>
>
> That is a good question. I guess it will be counted as error by:
>
> if (isrc & IRQ_TI) {
> /* transmission buffer released */
> if (priv->can.ctrlmode & CAN_CTRLMODE_ONE_SHOT &&
> !(status & SR_TCS)) {
> stats->tx_errors++;
I can confirm with CAN_CTRLMODE_ONE_SHOT active and the patch ("can:
sja1000: sja1000_err(): don't count arbitration lose as an error")
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mkl/linux-can.git/commit/?h=testing&id=bd0ccb92efb09c7da5b55162b283b42a93539ed7
I now get ONE(!) increment for tx_errors and ONE increment in the
arbitration-lost counter.
Before the above patch I had TWO tx_errors for each arbitration lost case.
> can_free_echo_skb(dev, 0);
> } else {
> /* transmission complete */
> stats->tx_bytes +=
> priv->read_reg(priv, SJA1000_FI) & 0xf;
> stats->tx_packets++;
> can_get_echo_skb(dev, 0);
> }
> netif_wake_queue(dev);
> can_led_event(dev, CAN_LED_EVENT_TX);
> }
>
> From the datasheet, Transmit Interrupt:
>
> "set; this bit is set whenever the transmit bufferstatus
> changes from ‘0-to-1’ (released) and the TIE bit is set
> within the interrupt enable register".
>
> I cannot test it though, since I don't have a sja1000.
Do we agree that in one-shot mode both the tx_errors and the
arbitration_lost counters are increased in the arbitration-lost case?
At least this would fit to the Kvaser USB behaviour.
And btw. I wondered if we should remove the check for
CAN_CTRLMODE_ONE_SHOT here, as we ALWAYS should count a tx_error and
drop the echo_skb when we have a TX-interrupt and TX-complete flag is zero.
So replace:
if (priv->can.ctrlmode & CAN_CTRLMODE_ONE_SHOT &&
!(status & SR_TCS)) {
with:
if (!(status & SR_TCS)) {
Any suggestions?
Best regards,
Oliver
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] can: don't count arbitration lose as an error
@ 2020-12-02 14:35 ` Oliver Hartkopp
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Oliver Hartkopp @ 2020-12-02 14:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeroen Hofstee, Marc Kleine-Budde, linux-can
Cc: open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS, Chen-Yu Tsai, Jernej Skrabec,
moderated list:ARM/Allwinner sunXi SoC support
Hi Jeroen,
On 27.11.20 12:09, Jeroen Hofstee wrote:
> On 11/27/20 11:30 AM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>> On 11/27/20 10:59 AM, Jeroen Hofstee wrote:
>>> Losing arbitration is normal in a CAN-bus network, it means that a
>>> higher priority frame is being send and the pending message will be
>>> retried later. Hence most driver only increment arbitration_lost, but
>>> the sja1000 and sun4i driver also incremeant tx_error, causing errors
>>> to be reported on a normal functioning CAN-bus. So stop counting them
>>> as errors.
>> Sounds plausible.
>>
>>> For completeness, the Kvaser USB hybra also increments the tx_error
>>> on arbitration lose, but it does so in single shot. Since in that
>>> case the message is not retried, that behaviour is kept.
>> You mean only in one shot mode?
>
> Yes, well at least the function is called kvaser_usb_hydra_one_shot_fail.
>
>
>> What about one shot mode on the sja1000 cores?
>
>
> That is a good question. I guess it will be counted as error by:
>
> if (isrc & IRQ_TI) {
> /* transmission buffer released */
> if (priv->can.ctrlmode & CAN_CTRLMODE_ONE_SHOT &&
> !(status & SR_TCS)) {
> stats->tx_errors++;
I can confirm with CAN_CTRLMODE_ONE_SHOT active and the patch ("can:
sja1000: sja1000_err(): don't count arbitration lose as an error")
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mkl/linux-can.git/commit/?h=testing&id=bd0ccb92efb09c7da5b55162b283b42a93539ed7
I now get ONE(!) increment for tx_errors and ONE increment in the
arbitration-lost counter.
Before the above patch I had TWO tx_errors for each arbitration lost case.
> can_free_echo_skb(dev, 0);
> } else {
> /* transmission complete */
> stats->tx_bytes +=
> priv->read_reg(priv, SJA1000_FI) & 0xf;
> stats->tx_packets++;
> can_get_echo_skb(dev, 0);
> }
> netif_wake_queue(dev);
> can_led_event(dev, CAN_LED_EVENT_TX);
> }
>
> From the datasheet, Transmit Interrupt:
>
> "set; this bit is set whenever the transmit bufferstatus
> changes from ‘0-to-1’ (released) and the TIE bit is set
> within the interrupt enable register".
>
> I cannot test it though, since I don't have a sja1000.
Do we agree that in one-shot mode both the tx_errors and the
arbitration_lost counters are increased in the arbitration-lost case?
At least this would fit to the Kvaser USB behaviour.
And btw. I wondered if we should remove the check for
CAN_CTRLMODE_ONE_SHOT here, as we ALWAYS should count a tx_error and
drop the echo_skb when we have a TX-interrupt and TX-complete flag is zero.
So replace:
if (priv->can.ctrlmode & CAN_CTRLMODE_ONE_SHOT &&
!(status & SR_TCS)) {
with:
if (!(status & SR_TCS)) {
Any suggestions?
Best regards,
Oliver
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] can: don't count arbitration lose as an error
2020-12-02 14:35 ` Oliver Hartkopp
@ 2020-12-02 15:37 ` Jeroen Hofstee
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Jeroen Hofstee @ 2020-12-02 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oliver Hartkopp, Marc Kleine-Budde, linux-can
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai, Jernej Skrabec, open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS,
moderated list:ARM/Allwinner sunXi SoC support
Hello Oliver,
On 12/2/20 3:35 PM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
>
>
> On 27.11.20 12:09, Jeroen Hofstee wrote:
>> On 11/27/20 11:30 AM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>>> On 11/27/20 10:59 AM, Jeroen Hofstee wrote:
>>>> Losing arbitration is normal in a CAN-bus network, it means that a
>>>> higher priority frame is being send and the pending message will be
>>>> retried later. Hence most driver only increment arbitration_lost, but
>>>> the sja1000 and sun4i driver also incremeant tx_error, causing errors
>>>> to be reported on a normal functioning CAN-bus. So stop counting them
>>>> as errors.
>>> Sounds plausible.
>>>
>>>> For completeness, the Kvaser USB hybra also increments the tx_error
>>>> on arbitration lose, but it does so in single shot. Since in that
>>>> case the message is not retried, that behaviour is kept.
>>> You mean only in one shot mode?
>>
>> Yes, well at least the function is called
>> kvaser_usb_hydra_one_shot_fail.
>>
>>
>>> What about one shot mode on the sja1000 cores?
>>
>>
>> That is a good question. I guess it will be counted as error by:
>>
>> if (isrc & IRQ_TI) {
>> /* transmission buffer released */
>> if (priv->can.ctrlmode & CAN_CTRLMODE_ONE_SHOT &&
>> !(status & SR_TCS)) {
>> stats->tx_errors++;
>
> I can confirm with CAN_CTRLMODE_ONE_SHOT active and the patch ("can:
> sja1000: sja1000_err(): don't count arbitration lose as an error")
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mkl/linux-can.git/commit/?h=testing&id=bd0ccb92efb09c7da5b55162b283b42a93539ed7
>
>
> I now get ONE(!) increment for tx_errors and ONE increment in the
> arbitration-lost counter.
>
> Before the above patch I had TWO tx_errors for each arbitration lost case.
Good, thanks for checking!
>
>> can_free_echo_skb(dev, 0);
>> } else {
>> /* transmission complete */
>> stats->tx_bytes +=
>> priv->read_reg(priv, SJA1000_FI) & 0xf;
>> stats->tx_packets++;
>> can_get_echo_skb(dev, 0);
>> }
>> netif_wake_queue(dev);
>> can_led_event(dev, CAN_LED_EVENT_TX);
>> }
>>
>> From the datasheet, Transmit Interrupt:
>>
>> "set; this bit is set whenever the transmit bufferstatus
>> changes from ‘0-to-1’ (released) and the TIE bit is set
>> within the interrupt enable register".
>>
>> I cannot test it though, since I don't have a sja1000.
>
> Do we agree that in one-shot mode both the tx_errors and the
> arbitration_lost counters are increased in the arbitration-lost case?
>
> At least this would fit to the Kvaser USB behaviour.
I have no opinion about that. I just kept existing behavior.
>
> And btw. I wondered if we should remove the check for
> CAN_CTRLMODE_ONE_SHOT here, as we ALWAYS should count a tx_error and
> drop the echo_skb when we have a TX-interrupt and TX-complete flag is
> zero.
>
> So replace:
>
> if (priv->can.ctrlmode & CAN_CTRLMODE_ONE_SHOT &&
> !(status & SR_TCS)) {
>
> with:
>
> if (!(status & SR_TCS)) {
>
> Any suggestions?
>
In theory, yes. But I can't think of a reason you would end
up there without CAN_CTRLMODE_ONE_SHOT being set.
Aborting the current transmission in non single shot mode
will get you there and incorrectly report the message as
transmitted, but that is not implemented afaik.
Regards,
Jeroen
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] can: don't count arbitration lose as an error
@ 2020-12-02 15:37 ` Jeroen Hofstee
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Jeroen Hofstee @ 2020-12-02 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oliver Hartkopp, Marc Kleine-Budde, linux-can
Cc: open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS, Chen-Yu Tsai, Jernej Skrabec,
moderated list:ARM/Allwinner sunXi SoC support
Hello Oliver,
On 12/2/20 3:35 PM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
>
>
> On 27.11.20 12:09, Jeroen Hofstee wrote:
>> On 11/27/20 11:30 AM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>>> On 11/27/20 10:59 AM, Jeroen Hofstee wrote:
>>>> Losing arbitration is normal in a CAN-bus network, it means that a
>>>> higher priority frame is being send and the pending message will be
>>>> retried later. Hence most driver only increment arbitration_lost, but
>>>> the sja1000 and sun4i driver also incremeant tx_error, causing errors
>>>> to be reported on a normal functioning CAN-bus. So stop counting them
>>>> as errors.
>>> Sounds plausible.
>>>
>>>> For completeness, the Kvaser USB hybra also increments the tx_error
>>>> on arbitration lose, but it does so in single shot. Since in that
>>>> case the message is not retried, that behaviour is kept.
>>> You mean only in one shot mode?
>>
>> Yes, well at least the function is called
>> kvaser_usb_hydra_one_shot_fail.
>>
>>
>>> What about one shot mode on the sja1000 cores?
>>
>>
>> That is a good question. I guess it will be counted as error by:
>>
>> if (isrc & IRQ_TI) {
>> /* transmission buffer released */
>> if (priv->can.ctrlmode & CAN_CTRLMODE_ONE_SHOT &&
>> !(status & SR_TCS)) {
>> stats->tx_errors++;
>
> I can confirm with CAN_CTRLMODE_ONE_SHOT active and the patch ("can:
> sja1000: sja1000_err(): don't count arbitration lose as an error")
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mkl/linux-can.git/commit/?h=testing&id=bd0ccb92efb09c7da5b55162b283b42a93539ed7
>
>
> I now get ONE(!) increment for tx_errors and ONE increment in the
> arbitration-lost counter.
>
> Before the above patch I had TWO tx_errors for each arbitration lost case.
Good, thanks for checking!
>
>> can_free_echo_skb(dev, 0);
>> } else {
>> /* transmission complete */
>> stats->tx_bytes +=
>> priv->read_reg(priv, SJA1000_FI) & 0xf;
>> stats->tx_packets++;
>> can_get_echo_skb(dev, 0);
>> }
>> netif_wake_queue(dev);
>> can_led_event(dev, CAN_LED_EVENT_TX);
>> }
>>
>> From the datasheet, Transmit Interrupt:
>>
>> "set; this bit is set whenever the transmit bufferstatus
>> changes from ‘0-to-1’ (released) and the TIE bit is set
>> within the interrupt enable register".
>>
>> I cannot test it though, since I don't have a sja1000.
>
> Do we agree that in one-shot mode both the tx_errors and the
> arbitration_lost counters are increased in the arbitration-lost case?
>
> At least this would fit to the Kvaser USB behaviour.
I have no opinion about that. I just kept existing behavior.
>
> And btw. I wondered if we should remove the check for
> CAN_CTRLMODE_ONE_SHOT here, as we ALWAYS should count a tx_error and
> drop the echo_skb when we have a TX-interrupt and TX-complete flag is
> zero.
>
> So replace:
>
> if (priv->can.ctrlmode & CAN_CTRLMODE_ONE_SHOT &&
> !(status & SR_TCS)) {
>
> with:
>
> if (!(status & SR_TCS)) {
>
> Any suggestions?
>
In theory, yes. But I can't think of a reason you would end
up there without CAN_CTRLMODE_ONE_SHOT being set.
Aborting the current transmission in non single shot mode
will get you there and incorrectly report the message as
transmitted, but that is not implemented afaik.
Regards,
Jeroen
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] can: don't count arbitration lose as an error
2020-12-02 15:37 ` Jeroen Hofstee
@ 2020-12-02 16:22 ` Oliver Hartkopp
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Oliver Hartkopp @ 2020-12-02 16:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeroen Hofstee, Marc Kleine-Budde, linux-can
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai, Jernej Skrabec, open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS,
moderated list:ARM/Allwinner sunXi SoC support
Hello Jeroen,
On 02.12.20 16:37, Jeroen Hofstee wrote:
> On 12/2/20 3:35 PM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
>> Do we agree that in one-shot mode both the tx_errors and the
>> arbitration_lost counters are increased in the arbitration-lost case?
>>
>> At least this would fit to the Kvaser USB behaviour.
>
>
> I have no opinion about that. I just kept existing behavior.
That's ok for me either.
>> And btw. I wondered if we should remove the check for
>> CAN_CTRLMODE_ONE_SHOT here, as we ALWAYS should count a tx_error and
>> drop the echo_skb when we have a TX-interrupt and TX-complete flag is
>> zero.
>>
>> So replace:
>>
>> if (priv->can.ctrlmode & CAN_CTRLMODE_ONE_SHOT &&
>> !(status & SR_TCS)) {
>>
>> with:
>>
>> if (!(status & SR_TCS)) {
>>
>> Any suggestions?
>>
>
> In theory, yes. But I can't think of a reason you would end
> up there without CAN_CTRLMODE_ONE_SHOT being set.
Right. Me too. But for that reason I would remove that extra check to
catch this error even if CAN_CTRLMODE_ONE_SHOT is not enabled.
> Aborting the current transmission in non single shot mode
> will get you there and incorrectly report the message as
> transmitted, but that is not implemented afaik.
Ahem, no. If you get there the echo_skb is deleted and the tx_errors
counter is increased. Just as it should be.
Regards,
Oliver
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] can: don't count arbitration lose as an error
@ 2020-12-02 16:22 ` Oliver Hartkopp
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Oliver Hartkopp @ 2020-12-02 16:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeroen Hofstee, Marc Kleine-Budde, linux-can
Cc: open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS, Chen-Yu Tsai, Jernej Skrabec,
moderated list:ARM/Allwinner sunXi SoC support
Hello Jeroen,
On 02.12.20 16:37, Jeroen Hofstee wrote:
> On 12/2/20 3:35 PM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
>> Do we agree that in one-shot mode both the tx_errors and the
>> arbitration_lost counters are increased in the arbitration-lost case?
>>
>> At least this would fit to the Kvaser USB behaviour.
>
>
> I have no opinion about that. I just kept existing behavior.
That's ok for me either.
>> And btw. I wondered if we should remove the check for
>> CAN_CTRLMODE_ONE_SHOT here, as we ALWAYS should count a tx_error and
>> drop the echo_skb when we have a TX-interrupt and TX-complete flag is
>> zero.
>>
>> So replace:
>>
>> if (priv->can.ctrlmode & CAN_CTRLMODE_ONE_SHOT &&
>> !(status & SR_TCS)) {
>>
>> with:
>>
>> if (!(status & SR_TCS)) {
>>
>> Any suggestions?
>>
>
> In theory, yes. But I can't think of a reason you would end
> up there without CAN_CTRLMODE_ONE_SHOT being set.
Right. Me too. But for that reason I would remove that extra check to
catch this error even if CAN_CTRLMODE_ONE_SHOT is not enabled.
> Aborting the current transmission in non single shot mode
> will get you there and incorrectly report the message as
> transmitted, but that is not implemented afaik.
Ahem, no. If you get there the echo_skb is deleted and the tx_errors
counter is increased. Just as it should be.
Regards,
Oliver
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] can: don't count arbitration lose as an error
2020-12-02 16:22 ` Oliver Hartkopp
@ 2020-12-02 16:31 ` Jeroen Hofstee
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Jeroen Hofstee @ 2020-12-02 16:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oliver Hartkopp, Marc Kleine-Budde, linux-can
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai, Jernej Skrabec, open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS,
moderated list:ARM/Allwinner sunXi SoC support
Hello Oliver,
On 12/2/20 5:22 PM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
> [...]
>> Aborting the current transmission in non single shot mode
>> will get you there and incorrectly report the message as
>> transmitted, but that is not implemented afaik.
>
> Ahem, no. If you get there the echo_skb is deleted and the tx_errors
> counter is increased. Just as it should be.
>
>
>
Ahem, yes. I meant how it is, so it will take the else
without CAN_CTRLMODE_ONE_SHOT being set.
But since that is not implemented, it is not relevant.
Regards,
Jeroen
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] can: don't count arbitration lose as an error
@ 2020-12-02 16:31 ` Jeroen Hofstee
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Jeroen Hofstee @ 2020-12-02 16:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oliver Hartkopp, Marc Kleine-Budde, linux-can
Cc: open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS, Chen-Yu Tsai, Jernej Skrabec,
moderated list:ARM/Allwinner sunXi SoC support
Hello Oliver,
On 12/2/20 5:22 PM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
> [...]
>> Aborting the current transmission in non single shot mode
>> will get you there and incorrectly report the message as
>> transmitted, but that is not implemented afaik.
>
> Ahem, no. If you get there the echo_skb is deleted and the tx_errors
> counter is increased. Just as it should be.
>
>
>
Ahem, yes. I meant how it is, so it will take the else
without CAN_CTRLMODE_ONE_SHOT being set.
But since that is not implemented, it is not relevant.
Regards,
Jeroen
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread