KVM Call agenda for July 13th

KVM Call agenda for July 13th

[Juan Quintela]

Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.

Thanks, Juan.

[Qemu-devel] KVM Call agenda for July 13th

[Juan Quintela]

Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.

Thanks, Juan.

Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th

[Chris Wright]

* Juan Quintela (quintela@redhat.com) wrote:
> 
> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.

0.13 ;-)

[Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th

[Chris Wright]

* Juan Quintela (quintela@redhat.com) wrote:
> 
> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.

0.13 ;-)

Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th

[Anthony Liguori]

On 07/12/2010 04:57 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Juan Quintela (quintela@redhat.com) wrote:
>    
>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>>      
> 0.13 ;-)
>    

- vCPU limits; how much testing has anyone done of 64-way guests?
- Finding a way to enable virtio by default; any clever ideas?

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>    

[Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th

[Anthony Liguori]

On 07/12/2010 04:57 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Juan Quintela (quintela@redhat.com) wrote:
>    
>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>>      
> 0.13 ;-)
>    

- vCPU limits; how much testing has anyone done of 64-way guests?
- Finding a way to enable virtio by default; any clever ideas?

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>    

Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th

[Anthony Liguori]

On 07/12/2010 05:07 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 07/12/2010 04:57 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
>> * Juan Quintela (quintela@redhat.com) wrote:
>>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>> 0.13 ;-)
>
> - vCPU limits; how much testing has anyone done of 64-way guests?
> - Finding a way to enable virtio by default; any clever ideas?

Both of these are really in the category of, getting good performance 
out of KVM when running it as a casual user (like via virt-manager).

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

> Regards,
>
> Anthony Liguori
>
>> -- 
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>

[Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th

[Anthony Liguori]

On 07/12/2010 05:07 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 07/12/2010 04:57 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
>> * Juan Quintela (quintela@redhat.com) wrote:
>>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>> 0.13 ;-)
>
> - vCPU limits; how much testing has anyone done of 64-way guests?
> - Finding a way to enable virtio by default; any clever ideas?

Both of these are really in the category of, getting good performance 
out of KVM when running it as a casual user (like via virt-manager).

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

> Regards,
>
> Anthony Liguori
>
>> -- 
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>

Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th

[Avi Kivity]

On 07/12/2010 05:57 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>
>    

0.12.n+1

-- 
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.

[Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th

[Avi Kivity]

On 07/12/2010 05:57 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>
>    

0.12.n+1

-- 
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.

Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th

[Avi Kivity]

On 07/13/2010 01:08 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 07/12/2010 05:07 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> On 07/12/2010 04:57 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
>>> * Juan Quintela (quintela@redhat.com) wrote:
>>>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>>> 0.13 ;-)
>>
>> - vCPU limits; how much testing has anyone done of 64-way guests?
>> - Finding a way to enable virtio by default; any clever ideas?
>
> Both of these are really in the category of, getting good performance 
> out of KVM when running it as a casual user (like via virt-manager).

Casual users starting 64-way guests?

-- 
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.

[Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th

[Avi Kivity]

On 07/13/2010 01:08 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 07/12/2010 05:07 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> On 07/12/2010 04:57 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
>>> * Juan Quintela (quintela@redhat.com) wrote:
>>>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>>> 0.13 ;-)
>>
>> - vCPU limits; how much testing has anyone done of 64-way guests?
>> - Finding a way to enable virtio by default; any clever ideas?
>
> Both of these are really in the category of, getting good performance 
> out of KVM when running it as a casual user (like via virt-manager).

Casual users starting 64-way guests?

-- 
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.

Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th

[Avi Kivity]

On 07/12/2010 05:57 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>
>    

kvm testsuite

-- 
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.

[Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th

[Avi Kivity]

On 07/12/2010 05:57 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>
>    

kvm testsuite

-- 
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th

[Aurelien Jarno]

Avi Kivity a écrit :
> On 07/12/2010 05:57 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>>
>>    
> 
> 0.12.n+1
> 

I won't be at the KVM call, but I can work on that in the next days.

Basically the stable tree already contains a lot of fixes and we can do
a call for patches for this release. One week should be enough, so that
we can have the release at the end of next week (a few technical days
are needed in addition).

-- 
Aurelien Jarno                          GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurelien@aurel32.net                 http://www.aurel32.net

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th

[Aurelien Jarno]

Avi Kivity a écrit :
> On 07/12/2010 05:57 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>>
>>    
> 
> 0.12.n+1
> 

I won't be at the KVM call, but I can work on that in the next days.

Basically the stable tree already contains a lot of fixes and we can do
a call for patches for this release. One week should be enough, so that
we can have the release at the end of next week (a few technical days
are needed in addition).

-- 
Aurelien Jarno                          GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurelien@aurel32.net                 http://www.aurel32.net

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th

[Avi Kivity]

On 07/13/2010 09:57 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Avi Kivity a écrit :
>    
>> On 07/12/2010 05:57 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
>>      
>>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>>>
>>>
>>>        
>> 0.12.n+1
>>
>>      
> I won't be at the KVM call, but I can work on that in the next days.
>
> Basically the stable tree already contains a lot of fixes and we can do
> a call for patches for this release. One week should be enough, so that
> we can have the release at the end of next week (a few technical days
> are needed in addition).
>    

Thanks.

I'd like to see more frequent stable releases, at least if the stable 
branch contains fixes to user-reported bugs (or of course security or 
data integrity fixes).

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th

[Avi Kivity]

On 07/13/2010 09:57 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Avi Kivity a écrit :
>    
>> On 07/12/2010 05:57 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
>>      
>>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>>>
>>>
>>>        
>> 0.12.n+1
>>
>>      
> I won't be at the KVM call, but I can work on that in the next days.
>
> Basically the stable tree already contains a lot of fixes and we can do
> a call for patches for this release. One week should be enough, so that
> we can have the release at the end of next week (a few technical days
> are needed in addition).
>    

Thanks.

I'd like to see more frequent stable releases, at least if the stable 
branch contains fixes to user-reported bugs (or of course security or 
data integrity fixes).

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th

[Anthony Liguori]

On 07/12/2010 11:38 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 07/13/2010 01:08 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> On 07/12/2010 05:07 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>> On 07/12/2010 04:57 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
>>>> * Juan Quintela (quintela@redhat.com) wrote:
>>>>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>>>> 0.13 ;-)
>>>
>>> - vCPU limits; how much testing has anyone done of 64-way guests?
>>> - Finding a way to enable virtio by default; any clever ideas?
>>
>> Both of these are really in the category of, getting good performance 
>> out of KVM when running it as a casual user (like via virt-manager).
>
> Casual users starting 64-way guests?

A 4-socket octal core is 32 physical cores or 64 threads.  That's not a 
super high end system today and it's going to approach mid-range in the 
not too distant future.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

[Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th

[Anthony Liguori]

On 07/12/2010 11:38 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 07/13/2010 01:08 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> On 07/12/2010 05:07 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>> On 07/12/2010 04:57 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
>>>> * Juan Quintela (quintela@redhat.com) wrote:
>>>>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>>>> 0.13 ;-)
>>>
>>> - vCPU limits; how much testing has anyone done of 64-way guests?
>>> - Finding a way to enable virtio by default; any clever ideas?
>>
>> Both of these are really in the category of, getting good performance 
>> out of KVM when running it as a casual user (like via virt-manager).
>
> Casual users starting 64-way guests?

A 4-socket octal core is 32 physical cores or 64 threads.  That's not a 
super high end system today and it's going to approach mid-range in the 
not too distant future.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th

[Luiz Capitulino]

On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 10:40:40 +0300
Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> wrote:

> On 07/13/2010 09:57 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Avi Kivity a écrit :
> >    
> >> On 07/12/2010 05:57 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
> >>      
> >>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>        
> >> 0.12.n+1
> >>
> >>      
> > I won't be at the KVM call, but I can work on that in the next days.
> >
> > Basically the stable tree already contains a lot of fixes and we can do
> > a call for patches for this release. One week should be enough, so that
> > we can have the release at the end of next week (a few technical days
> > are needed in addition).
> >    
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> I'd like to see more frequent stable releases, at least if the stable 
> branch contains fixes to user-reported bugs (or of course security or 
> data integrity fixes).

I remember someone has stepped in to take that work, but I don't exactly
remember who.

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th

[Luiz Capitulino]

On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 10:40:40 +0300
Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> wrote:

> On 07/13/2010 09:57 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Avi Kivity a écrit :
> >    
> >> On 07/12/2010 05:57 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
> >>      
> >>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>        
> >> 0.12.n+1
> >>
> >>      
> > I won't be at the KVM call, but I can work on that in the next days.
> >
> > Basically the stable tree already contains a lot of fixes and we can do
> > a call for patches for this release. One week should be enough, so that
> > we can have the release at the end of next week (a few technical days
> > are needed in addition).
> >    
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> I'd like to see more frequent stable releases, at least if the stable 
> branch contains fixes to user-reported bugs (or of course security or 
> data integrity fixes).

I remember someone has stepped in to take that work, but I don't exactly
remember who.

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th

[Avi Kivity]

On 07/13/2010 05:08 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>
>> I'd like to see more frequent stable releases, at least if the stable
>> branch contains fixes to user-reported bugs (or of course security or
>> data integrity fixes).
>>      
> I remember someone has stepped in to take that work, but I don't exactly
> remember who.
>    

He doesn't either, presumably.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th

[Avi Kivity]

On 07/13/2010 05:08 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>
>> I'd like to see more frequent stable releases, at least if the stable
>> branch contains fixes to user-reported bugs (or of course security or
>> data integrity fixes).
>>      
> I remember someone has stepped in to take that work, but I don't exactly
> remember who.
>    

He doesn't either, presumably.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th

[Anthony Liguori]

On 07/13/2010 02:40 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 07/13/2010 09:57 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> Avi Kivity a écrit :
>>> On 07/12/2010 05:57 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
>>>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> 0.12.n+1
>>>
>> I won't be at the KVM call, but I can work on that in the next days.
>>
>> Basically the stable tree already contains a lot of fixes and we can do
>> a call for patches for this release. One week should be enough, so that
>> we can have the release at the end of next week (a few technical days
>> are needed in addition).
>
> Thanks.
>
> I'd like to see more frequent stable releases, at least if the stable 
> branch contains fixes to user-reported bugs (or of course security or 
> data integrity fixes).

Would you like to see more frequent stable releases or more frequent 
master releases?

The later is a bit easier since it doesn't involve maintaining and 
testing two code bases.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th

[Anthony Liguori]

On 07/13/2010 02:40 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 07/13/2010 09:57 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> Avi Kivity a écrit :
>>> On 07/12/2010 05:57 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
>>>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> 0.12.n+1
>>>
>> I won't be at the KVM call, but I can work on that in the next days.
>>
>> Basically the stable tree already contains a lot of fixes and we can do
>> a call for patches for this release. One week should be enough, so that
>> we can have the release at the end of next week (a few technical days
>> are needed in addition).
>
> Thanks.
>
> I'd like to see more frequent stable releases, at least if the stable 
> branch contains fixes to user-reported bugs (or of course security or 
> data integrity fixes).

Would you like to see more frequent stable releases or more frequent 
master releases?

The later is a bit easier since it doesn't involve maintaining and 
testing two code bases.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th

[Avi Kivity]

On 07/13/2010 07:57 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> I'd like to see more frequent stable releases, at least if the stable 
>> branch contains fixes to user-reported bugs (or of course security or 
>> data integrity fixes).
>
>
> Would you like to see more frequent stable releases or more frequent 
> master releases?
>

Yes.  But in this context I'm interested in stable releases.  We have 
bugs reported, fixed, and the fix applied, yet the fixes are unreachable 
to users.


-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th

[Avi Kivity]

On 07/13/2010 07:57 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> I'd like to see more frequent stable releases, at least if the stable 
>> branch contains fixes to user-reported bugs (or of course security or 
>> data integrity fixes).
>
>
> Would you like to see more frequent stable releases or more frequent 
> master releases?
>

Yes.  But in this context I'm interested in stable releases.  We have 
bugs reported, fixed, and the fix applied, yet the fixes are unreachable 
to users.


-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th

[Brian Jackson]

On Tuesday, July 13, 2010 12:01:22 pm Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 07/13/2010 07:57 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >> I'd like to see more frequent stable releases, at least if the stable
> >> branch contains fixes to user-reported bugs (or of course security or
> >> data integrity fixes).
> > 
> > Would you like to see more frequent stable releases or more frequent
> > master releases?
> 
> Yes.  But in this context I'm interested in stable releases.  We have
> bugs reported, fixed, and the fix applied, yet the fixes are unreachable
> to users.

Especially so since qemu-kvm 0.12-stable hasn't been merged with qemu 
basically since 0.12.4 came out. I was trying to help one of the Gentoo 
maintainers find post 0.12.4 patches the other day and had to point them to 
the upstream qemu stable tree.

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th

[Brian Jackson]

On Tuesday, July 13, 2010 12:01:22 pm Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 07/13/2010 07:57 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >> I'd like to see more frequent stable releases, at least if the stable
> >> branch contains fixes to user-reported bugs (or of course security or
> >> data integrity fixes).
> > 
> > Would you like to see more frequent stable releases or more frequent
> > master releases?
> 
> Yes.  But in this context I'm interested in stable releases.  We have
> bugs reported, fixed, and the fix applied, yet the fixes are unreachable
> to users.

Especially so since qemu-kvm 0.12-stable hasn't been merged with qemu 
basically since 0.12.4 came out. I was trying to help one of the Gentoo 
maintainers find post 0.12.4 patches the other day and had to point them to 
the upstream qemu stable tree.

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th

[Avi Kivity]

On 07/13/2010 08:19 PM, Brian Jackson wrote:
>
>> Yes.  But in this context I'm interested in stable releases.  We have
>> bugs reported, fixed, and the fix applied, yet the fixes are unreachable
>> to users.
>>      
> Especially so since qemu-kvm 0.12-stable hasn't been merged with qemu
> basically since 0.12.4 came out. I was trying to help one of the Gentoo
> maintainers find post 0.12.4 patches the other day and had to point them to
> the upstream qemu stable tree.
>    

An email should suffice to get things merged.

-- 
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th

[Avi Kivity]

On 07/13/2010 08:19 PM, Brian Jackson wrote:
>
>> Yes.  But in this context I'm interested in stable releases.  We have
>> bugs reported, fixed, and the fix applied, yet the fixes are unreachable
>> to users.
>>      
> Especially so since qemu-kvm 0.12-stable hasn't been merged with qemu
> basically since 0.12.4 came out. I was trying to help one of the Gentoo
> maintainers find post 0.12.4 patches the other day and had to point them to
> the upstream qemu stable tree.
>    

An email should suffice to get things merged.

-- 
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th

[Justin M. Forbes]

On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 12:19:21PM -0500, Brian Jackson wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 13, 2010 12:01:22 pm Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 07/13/2010 07:57 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > >> I'd like to see more frequent stable releases, at least if the stable
> > >> branch contains fixes to user-reported bugs (or of course security or
> > >> data integrity fixes).
> > > 
> > > Would you like to see more frequent stable releases or more frequent
> > > master releases?
> > 
> > Yes.  But in this context I'm interested in stable releases.  We have
> > bugs reported, fixed, and the fix applied, yet the fixes are unreachable
> > to users.
> 
> Especially so since qemu-kvm 0.12-stable hasn't been merged with qemu 
> basically since 0.12.4 came out. I was trying to help one of the Gentoo 
> maintainers find post 0.12.4 patches the other day and had to point them to 
> the upstream qemu stable tree.

I have offered to take care of this, but so far I do not have commit
access.

Justin

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th

[Justin M. Forbes]

On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 12:19:21PM -0500, Brian Jackson wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 13, 2010 12:01:22 pm Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 07/13/2010 07:57 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > >> I'd like to see more frequent stable releases, at least if the stable
> > >> branch contains fixes to user-reported bugs (or of course security or
> > >> data integrity fixes).
> > > 
> > > Would you like to see more frequent stable releases or more frequent
> > > master releases?
> > 
> > Yes.  But in this context I'm interested in stable releases.  We have
> > bugs reported, fixed, and the fix applied, yet the fixes are unreachable
> > to users.
> 
> Especially so since qemu-kvm 0.12-stable hasn't been merged with qemu 
> basically since 0.12.4 came out. I was trying to help one of the Gentoo 
> maintainers find post 0.12.4 patches the other day and had to point them to 
> the upstream qemu stable tree.

I have offered to take care of this, but so far I do not have commit
access.

Justin

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th

[Aurelien Jarno]

On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 01:43:28PM -0500, Justin M. Forbes wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 12:19:21PM -0500, Brian Jackson wrote:
> > On Tuesday, July 13, 2010 12:01:22 pm Avi Kivity wrote:
> > > On 07/13/2010 07:57 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > > >> I'd like to see more frequent stable releases, at least if the stable
> > > >> branch contains fixes to user-reported bugs (or of course security or
> > > >> data integrity fixes).
> > > > 
> > > > Would you like to see more frequent stable releases or more frequent
> > > > master releases?
> > > 
> > > Yes.  But in this context I'm interested in stable releases.  We have
> > > bugs reported, fixed, and the fix applied, yet the fixes are unreachable
> > > to users.
> > 
> > Especially so since qemu-kvm 0.12-stable hasn't been merged with qemu 
> > basically since 0.12.4 came out. I was trying to help one of the Gentoo 
> > maintainers find post 0.12.4 patches the other day and had to point them to 
> > the upstream qemu stable tree.
> 
> I have offered to take care of this, but so far I do not have commit
> access.
> 

You don't necessarily need commit access for that. Just create your own
tree with backported patches, and then send a stable pull request to 
the mailing list.

-- 
Aurelien Jarno	                        GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurelien@aurel32.net                 http://www.aurel32.net

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th

[Aurelien Jarno]

On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 01:43:28PM -0500, Justin M. Forbes wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 12:19:21PM -0500, Brian Jackson wrote:
> > On Tuesday, July 13, 2010 12:01:22 pm Avi Kivity wrote:
> > > On 07/13/2010 07:57 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > > >> I'd like to see more frequent stable releases, at least if the stable
> > > >> branch contains fixes to user-reported bugs (or of course security or
> > > >> data integrity fixes).
> > > > 
> > > > Would you like to see more frequent stable releases or more frequent
> > > > master releases?
> > > 
> > > Yes.  But in this context I'm interested in stable releases.  We have
> > > bugs reported, fixed, and the fix applied, yet the fixes are unreachable
> > > to users.
> > 
> > Especially so since qemu-kvm 0.12-stable hasn't been merged with qemu 
> > basically since 0.12.4 came out. I was trying to help one of the Gentoo 
> > maintainers find post 0.12.4 patches the other day and had to point them to 
> > the upstream qemu stable tree.
> 
> I have offered to take care of this, but so far I do not have commit
> access.
> 

You don't necessarily need commit access for that. Just create your own
tree with backported patches, and then send a stable pull request to 
the mailing list.

-- 
Aurelien Jarno	                        GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurelien@aurel32.net                 http://www.aurel32.net

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th

[Anthony Liguori]

On 07/15/2010 01:51 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 01:43:28PM -0500, Justin M. Forbes wrote:
>    
>> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 12:19:21PM -0500, Brian Jackson wrote:
>>      
>>> On Tuesday, July 13, 2010 12:01:22 pm Avi Kivity wrote:
>>>        
>>>> On 07/13/2010 07:57 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>>>          
>>>>>> I'd like to see more frequent stable releases, at least if the stable
>>>>>> branch contains fixes to user-reported bugs (or of course security or
>>>>>> data integrity fixes).
>>>>>>              
>>>>> Would you like to see more frequent stable releases or more frequent
>>>>> master releases?
>>>>>            
>>>> Yes.  But in this context I'm interested in stable releases.  We have
>>>> bugs reported, fixed, and the fix applied, yet the fixes are unreachable
>>>> to users.
>>>>          
>>> Especially so since qemu-kvm 0.12-stable hasn't been merged with qemu
>>> basically since 0.12.4 came out. I was trying to help one of the Gentoo
>>> maintainers find post 0.12.4 patches the other day and had to point them to
>>> the upstream qemu stable tree.
>>>        
>> I have offered to take care of this, but so far I do not have commit
>> access.
>>
>>      
> You don't necessarily need commit access for that. Just create your own
> tree with backported patches, and then send a stable pull request to
> the mailing list.
>    

Precisely.  In the case of stable, that means watching the mailing list 
and backporting patches as appropriate and periodically doing pull requests.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th

[Anthony Liguori]

On 07/15/2010 01:51 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 01:43:28PM -0500, Justin M. Forbes wrote:
>    
>> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 12:19:21PM -0500, Brian Jackson wrote:
>>      
>>> On Tuesday, July 13, 2010 12:01:22 pm Avi Kivity wrote:
>>>        
>>>> On 07/13/2010 07:57 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>>>          
>>>>>> I'd like to see more frequent stable releases, at least if the stable
>>>>>> branch contains fixes to user-reported bugs (or of course security or
>>>>>> data integrity fixes).
>>>>>>              
>>>>> Would you like to see more frequent stable releases or more frequent
>>>>> master releases?
>>>>>            
>>>> Yes.  But in this context I'm interested in stable releases.  We have
>>>> bugs reported, fixed, and the fix applied, yet the fixes are unreachable
>>>> to users.
>>>>          
>>> Especially so since qemu-kvm 0.12-stable hasn't been merged with qemu
>>> basically since 0.12.4 came out. I was trying to help one of the Gentoo
>>> maintainers find post 0.12.4 patches the other day and had to point them to
>>> the upstream qemu stable tree.
>>>        
>> I have offered to take care of this, but so far I do not have commit
>> access.
>>
>>      
> You don't necessarily need commit access for that. Just create your own
> tree with backported patches, and then send a stable pull request to
> the mailing list.
>    

Precisely.  In the case of stable, that means watching the mailing list 
and backporting patches as appropriate and periodically doing pull requests.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th

[Artyom Tarasenko]

2010/7/12 Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>:
> * Juan Quintela (quintela@redhat.com) wrote:
>>
>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>
> 0.13 ;-)

Is there a plan for it? Which way is it going to happen? Code freeze + rc[0-x]?


-- 
Regards,
Artyom Tarasenko

solaris/sparc under qemu blog: http://tyom.blogspot.com/