* KVM Call agenda for July 13th @ 2010-07-12 14:57 ` Juan Quintela 0 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Juan Quintela @ 2010-07-12 14:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: qemu-devel, kvm-devel Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. Thanks, Juan. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] KVM Call agenda for July 13th @ 2010-07-12 14:57 ` Juan Quintela 0 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Juan Quintela @ 2010-07-12 14:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: qemu-devel, kvm-devel Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. Thanks, Juan. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th 2010-07-12 14:57 ` [Qemu-devel] " Juan Quintela @ 2010-07-12 21:57 ` Chris Wright -1 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Chris Wright @ 2010-07-12 21:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Juan Quintela; +Cc: qemu-devel, kvm-devel * Juan Quintela (quintela@redhat.com) wrote: > > Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. 0.13 ;-) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th @ 2010-07-12 21:57 ` Chris Wright 0 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Chris Wright @ 2010-07-12 21:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Juan Quintela; +Cc: qemu-devel, kvm-devel * Juan Quintela (quintela@redhat.com) wrote: > > Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. 0.13 ;-) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th 2010-07-12 21:57 ` [Qemu-devel] " Chris Wright @ 2010-07-12 22:07 ` Anthony Liguori -1 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Anthony Liguori @ 2010-07-12 22:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chris Wright; +Cc: Juan Quintela, qemu-devel, kvm-devel On 07/12/2010 04:57 PM, Chris Wright wrote: > * Juan Quintela (quintela@redhat.com) wrote: > >> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. >> > 0.13 ;-) > - vCPU limits; how much testing has anyone done of 64-way guests? - Finding a way to enable virtio by default; any clever ideas? Regards, Anthony Liguori > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th @ 2010-07-12 22:07 ` Anthony Liguori 0 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Anthony Liguori @ 2010-07-12 22:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chris Wright; +Cc: qemu-devel, kvm-devel, Juan Quintela On 07/12/2010 04:57 PM, Chris Wright wrote: > * Juan Quintela (quintela@redhat.com) wrote: > >> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. >> > 0.13 ;-) > - vCPU limits; how much testing has anyone done of 64-way guests? - Finding a way to enable virtio by default; any clever ideas? Regards, Anthony Liguori > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th 2010-07-12 22:07 ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony Liguori @ 2010-07-12 22:08 ` Anthony Liguori -1 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Anthony Liguori @ 2010-07-12 22:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chris Wright; +Cc: Juan Quintela, qemu-devel, kvm-devel On 07/12/2010 05:07 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: > On 07/12/2010 04:57 PM, Chris Wright wrote: >> * Juan Quintela (quintela@redhat.com) wrote: >>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. >> 0.13 ;-) > > - vCPU limits; how much testing has anyone done of 64-way guests? > - Finding a way to enable virtio by default; any clever ideas? Both of these are really in the category of, getting good performance out of KVM when running it as a casual user (like via virt-manager). Regards, Anthony Liguori > Regards, > > Anthony Liguori > >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th @ 2010-07-12 22:08 ` Anthony Liguori 0 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Anthony Liguori @ 2010-07-12 22:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chris Wright; +Cc: qemu-devel, kvm-devel, Juan Quintela On 07/12/2010 05:07 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: > On 07/12/2010 04:57 PM, Chris Wright wrote: >> * Juan Quintela (quintela@redhat.com) wrote: >>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. >> 0.13 ;-) > > - vCPU limits; how much testing has anyone done of 64-way guests? > - Finding a way to enable virtio by default; any clever ideas? Both of these are really in the category of, getting good performance out of KVM when running it as a casual user (like via virt-manager). Regards, Anthony Liguori > Regards, > > Anthony Liguori > >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th 2010-07-12 22:08 ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony Liguori @ 2010-07-13 4:38 ` Avi Kivity -1 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Avi Kivity @ 2010-07-13 4:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Anthony Liguori; +Cc: Chris Wright, Juan Quintela, qemu-devel, kvm-devel On 07/13/2010 01:08 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote: > On 07/12/2010 05:07 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> On 07/12/2010 04:57 PM, Chris Wright wrote: >>> * Juan Quintela (quintela@redhat.com) wrote: >>>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. >>> 0.13 ;-) >> >> - vCPU limits; how much testing has anyone done of 64-way guests? >> - Finding a way to enable virtio by default; any clever ideas? > > Both of these are really in the category of, getting good performance > out of KVM when running it as a casual user (like via virt-manager). Casual users starting 64-way guests? -- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th @ 2010-07-13 4:38 ` Avi Kivity 0 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Avi Kivity @ 2010-07-13 4:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Anthony Liguori; +Cc: Chris Wright, qemu-devel, kvm-devel, Juan Quintela On 07/13/2010 01:08 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote: > On 07/12/2010 05:07 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> On 07/12/2010 04:57 PM, Chris Wright wrote: >>> * Juan Quintela (quintela@redhat.com) wrote: >>>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. >>> 0.13 ;-) >> >> - vCPU limits; how much testing has anyone done of 64-way guests? >> - Finding a way to enable virtio by default; any clever ideas? > > Both of these are really in the category of, getting good performance > out of KVM when running it as a casual user (like via virt-manager). Casual users starting 64-way guests? -- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th 2010-07-13 4:38 ` [Qemu-devel] " Avi Kivity @ 2010-07-13 14:03 ` Anthony Liguori -1 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Anthony Liguori @ 2010-07-13 14:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Avi Kivity; +Cc: Chris Wright, Juan Quintela, qemu-devel, kvm-devel On 07/12/2010 11:38 PM, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 07/13/2010 01:08 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> On 07/12/2010 05:07 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: >>> On 07/12/2010 04:57 PM, Chris Wright wrote: >>>> * Juan Quintela (quintela@redhat.com) wrote: >>>>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. >>>> 0.13 ;-) >>> >>> - vCPU limits; how much testing has anyone done of 64-way guests? >>> - Finding a way to enable virtio by default; any clever ideas? >> >> Both of these are really in the category of, getting good performance >> out of KVM when running it as a casual user (like via virt-manager). > > Casual users starting 64-way guests? A 4-socket octal core is 32 physical cores or 64 threads. That's not a super high end system today and it's going to approach mid-range in the not too distant future. Regards, Anthony Liguori ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th @ 2010-07-13 14:03 ` Anthony Liguori 0 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Anthony Liguori @ 2010-07-13 14:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Avi Kivity; +Cc: Chris Wright, qemu-devel, kvm-devel, Juan Quintela On 07/12/2010 11:38 PM, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 07/13/2010 01:08 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> On 07/12/2010 05:07 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: >>> On 07/12/2010 04:57 PM, Chris Wright wrote: >>>> * Juan Quintela (quintela@redhat.com) wrote: >>>>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. >>>> 0.13 ;-) >>> >>> - vCPU limits; how much testing has anyone done of 64-way guests? >>> - Finding a way to enable virtio by default; any clever ideas? >> >> Both of these are really in the category of, getting good performance >> out of KVM when running it as a casual user (like via virt-manager). > > Casual users starting 64-way guests? A 4-socket octal core is 32 physical cores or 64 threads. That's not a super high end system today and it's going to approach mid-range in the not too distant future. Regards, Anthony Liguori ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th 2010-07-12 21:57 ` [Qemu-devel] " Chris Wright (?) (?) @ 2010-07-16 22:13 ` Artyom Tarasenko -1 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Artyom Tarasenko @ 2010-07-16 22:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chris Wright; +Cc: qemu-devel 2010/7/12 Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>: > * Juan Quintela (quintela@redhat.com) wrote: >> >> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. > > 0.13 ;-) Is there a plan for it? Which way is it going to happen? Code freeze + rc[0-x]? -- Regards, Artyom Tarasenko solaris/sparc under qemu blog: http://tyom.blogspot.com/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th 2010-07-12 14:57 ` [Qemu-devel] " Juan Quintela @ 2010-07-13 4:37 ` Avi Kivity -1 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Avi Kivity @ 2010-07-13 4:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Juan Quintela; +Cc: qemu-devel, kvm-devel On 07/12/2010 05:57 PM, Juan Quintela wrote: > Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. > > 0.12.n+1 -- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th @ 2010-07-13 4:37 ` Avi Kivity 0 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Avi Kivity @ 2010-07-13 4:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Juan Quintela; +Cc: qemu-devel, kvm-devel On 07/12/2010 05:57 PM, Juan Quintela wrote: > Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. > > 0.12.n+1 -- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th 2010-07-13 4:37 ` [Qemu-devel] " Avi Kivity @ 2010-07-13 6:57 ` Aurelien Jarno -1 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Aurelien Jarno @ 2010-07-13 6:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Avi Kivity; +Cc: Juan Quintela, qemu-devel, kvm-devel Avi Kivity a écrit : > On 07/12/2010 05:57 PM, Juan Quintela wrote: >> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. >> >> > > 0.12.n+1 > I won't be at the KVM call, but I can work on that in the next days. Basically the stable tree already contains a lot of fixes and we can do a call for patches for this release. One week should be enough, so that we can have the release at the end of next week (a few technical days are needed in addition). -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurelien@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th @ 2010-07-13 6:57 ` Aurelien Jarno 0 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Aurelien Jarno @ 2010-07-13 6:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Avi Kivity; +Cc: qemu-devel, kvm-devel, Juan Quintela Avi Kivity a écrit : > On 07/12/2010 05:57 PM, Juan Quintela wrote: >> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. >> >> > > 0.12.n+1 > I won't be at the KVM call, but I can work on that in the next days. Basically the stable tree already contains a lot of fixes and we can do a call for patches for this release. One week should be enough, so that we can have the release at the end of next week (a few technical days are needed in addition). -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurelien@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th 2010-07-13 6:57 ` Aurelien Jarno @ 2010-07-13 7:40 ` Avi Kivity -1 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Avi Kivity @ 2010-07-13 7:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Aurelien Jarno; +Cc: Juan Quintela, qemu-devel, kvm-devel On 07/13/2010 09:57 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Avi Kivity a écrit : > >> On 07/12/2010 05:57 PM, Juan Quintela wrote: >> >>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. >>> >>> >>> >> 0.12.n+1 >> >> > I won't be at the KVM call, but I can work on that in the next days. > > Basically the stable tree already contains a lot of fixes and we can do > a call for patches for this release. One week should be enough, so that > we can have the release at the end of next week (a few technical days > are needed in addition). > Thanks. I'd like to see more frequent stable releases, at least if the stable branch contains fixes to user-reported bugs (or of course security or data integrity fixes). -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th @ 2010-07-13 7:40 ` Avi Kivity 0 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Avi Kivity @ 2010-07-13 7:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Aurelien Jarno; +Cc: qemu-devel, kvm-devel, Juan Quintela On 07/13/2010 09:57 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Avi Kivity a écrit : > >> On 07/12/2010 05:57 PM, Juan Quintela wrote: >> >>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. >>> >>> >>> >> 0.12.n+1 >> >> > I won't be at the KVM call, but I can work on that in the next days. > > Basically the stable tree already contains a lot of fixes and we can do > a call for patches for this release. One week should be enough, so that > we can have the release at the end of next week (a few technical days > are needed in addition). > Thanks. I'd like to see more frequent stable releases, at least if the stable branch contains fixes to user-reported bugs (or of course security or data integrity fixes). -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th 2010-07-13 7:40 ` Avi Kivity @ 2010-07-13 14:08 ` Luiz Capitulino -1 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Luiz Capitulino @ 2010-07-13 14:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Avi Kivity; +Cc: Aurelien Jarno, qemu-devel, kvm-devel, Juan Quintela On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 10:40:40 +0300 Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> wrote: > On 07/13/2010 09:57 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > Avi Kivity a écrit : > > > >> On 07/12/2010 05:57 PM, Juan Quintela wrote: > >> > >>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> 0.12.n+1 > >> > >> > > I won't be at the KVM call, but I can work on that in the next days. > > > > Basically the stable tree already contains a lot of fixes and we can do > > a call for patches for this release. One week should be enough, so that > > we can have the release at the end of next week (a few technical days > > are needed in addition). > > > > Thanks. > > I'd like to see more frequent stable releases, at least if the stable > branch contains fixes to user-reported bugs (or of course security or > data integrity fixes). I remember someone has stepped in to take that work, but I don't exactly remember who. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th @ 2010-07-13 14:08 ` Luiz Capitulino 0 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Luiz Capitulino @ 2010-07-13 14:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Avi Kivity; +Cc: Juan Quintela, qemu-devel, Aurelien Jarno, kvm-devel On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 10:40:40 +0300 Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> wrote: > On 07/13/2010 09:57 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > Avi Kivity a écrit : > > > >> On 07/12/2010 05:57 PM, Juan Quintela wrote: > >> > >>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> 0.12.n+1 > >> > >> > > I won't be at the KVM call, but I can work on that in the next days. > > > > Basically the stable tree already contains a lot of fixes and we can do > > a call for patches for this release. One week should be enough, so that > > we can have the release at the end of next week (a few technical days > > are needed in addition). > > > > Thanks. > > I'd like to see more frequent stable releases, at least if the stable > branch contains fixes to user-reported bugs (or of course security or > data integrity fixes). I remember someone has stepped in to take that work, but I don't exactly remember who. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th 2010-07-13 14:08 ` Luiz Capitulino @ 2010-07-13 15:03 ` Avi Kivity -1 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Avi Kivity @ 2010-07-13 15:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Luiz Capitulino; +Cc: Aurelien Jarno, qemu-devel, kvm-devel, Juan Quintela On 07/13/2010 05:08 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote: > >> I'd like to see more frequent stable releases, at least if the stable >> branch contains fixes to user-reported bugs (or of course security or >> data integrity fixes). >> > I remember someone has stepped in to take that work, but I don't exactly > remember who. > He doesn't either, presumably. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th @ 2010-07-13 15:03 ` Avi Kivity 0 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Avi Kivity @ 2010-07-13 15:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Luiz Capitulino; +Cc: Juan Quintela, qemu-devel, Aurelien Jarno, kvm-devel On 07/13/2010 05:08 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote: > >> I'd like to see more frequent stable releases, at least if the stable >> branch contains fixes to user-reported bugs (or of course security or >> data integrity fixes). >> > I remember someone has stepped in to take that work, but I don't exactly > remember who. > He doesn't either, presumably. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th 2010-07-13 7:40 ` Avi Kivity @ 2010-07-13 16:57 ` Anthony Liguori -1 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Anthony Liguori @ 2010-07-13 16:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Avi Kivity; +Cc: Aurelien Jarno, Juan Quintela, qemu-devel, kvm-devel On 07/13/2010 02:40 AM, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 07/13/2010 09:57 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: >> Avi Kivity a écrit : >>> On 07/12/2010 05:57 PM, Juan Quintela wrote: >>>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. >>>> >>>> >>> 0.12.n+1 >>> >> I won't be at the KVM call, but I can work on that in the next days. >> >> Basically the stable tree already contains a lot of fixes and we can do >> a call for patches for this release. One week should be enough, so that >> we can have the release at the end of next week (a few technical days >> are needed in addition). > > Thanks. > > I'd like to see more frequent stable releases, at least if the stable > branch contains fixes to user-reported bugs (or of course security or > data integrity fixes). Would you like to see more frequent stable releases or more frequent master releases? The later is a bit easier since it doesn't involve maintaining and testing two code bases. Regards, Anthony Liguori ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th @ 2010-07-13 16:57 ` Anthony Liguori 0 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Anthony Liguori @ 2010-07-13 16:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Avi Kivity; +Cc: kvm-devel, qemu-devel, Aurelien Jarno, Juan Quintela On 07/13/2010 02:40 AM, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 07/13/2010 09:57 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: >> Avi Kivity a écrit : >>> On 07/12/2010 05:57 PM, Juan Quintela wrote: >>>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. >>>> >>>> >>> 0.12.n+1 >>> >> I won't be at the KVM call, but I can work on that in the next days. >> >> Basically the stable tree already contains a lot of fixes and we can do >> a call for patches for this release. One week should be enough, so that >> we can have the release at the end of next week (a few technical days >> are needed in addition). > > Thanks. > > I'd like to see more frequent stable releases, at least if the stable > branch contains fixes to user-reported bugs (or of course security or > data integrity fixes). Would you like to see more frequent stable releases or more frequent master releases? The later is a bit easier since it doesn't involve maintaining and testing two code bases. Regards, Anthony Liguori ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th 2010-07-13 16:57 ` Anthony Liguori @ 2010-07-13 17:01 ` Avi Kivity -1 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Avi Kivity @ 2010-07-13 17:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Anthony Liguori; +Cc: Aurelien Jarno, Juan Quintela, qemu-devel, kvm-devel On 07/13/2010 07:57 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> I'd like to see more frequent stable releases, at least if the stable >> branch contains fixes to user-reported bugs (or of course security or >> data integrity fixes). > > > Would you like to see more frequent stable releases or more frequent > master releases? > Yes. But in this context I'm interested in stable releases. We have bugs reported, fixed, and the fix applied, yet the fixes are unreachable to users. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th @ 2010-07-13 17:01 ` Avi Kivity 0 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Avi Kivity @ 2010-07-13 17:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Anthony Liguori; +Cc: kvm-devel, qemu-devel, Aurelien Jarno, Juan Quintela On 07/13/2010 07:57 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> I'd like to see more frequent stable releases, at least if the stable >> branch contains fixes to user-reported bugs (or of course security or >> data integrity fixes). > > > Would you like to see more frequent stable releases or more frequent > master releases? > Yes. But in this context I'm interested in stable releases. We have bugs reported, fixed, and the fix applied, yet the fixes are unreachable to users. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th 2010-07-13 17:01 ` Avi Kivity @ 2010-07-13 17:19 ` Brian Jackson -1 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Brian Jackson @ 2010-07-13 17:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: qemu-devel Cc: Avi Kivity, Anthony Liguori, kvm-devel, Aurelien Jarno, Juan Quintela On Tuesday, July 13, 2010 12:01:22 pm Avi Kivity wrote: > On 07/13/2010 07:57 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: > >> I'd like to see more frequent stable releases, at least if the stable > >> branch contains fixes to user-reported bugs (or of course security or > >> data integrity fixes). > > > > Would you like to see more frequent stable releases or more frequent > > master releases? > > Yes. But in this context I'm interested in stable releases. We have > bugs reported, fixed, and the fix applied, yet the fixes are unreachable > to users. Especially so since qemu-kvm 0.12-stable hasn't been merged with qemu basically since 0.12.4 came out. I was trying to help one of the Gentoo maintainers find post 0.12.4 patches the other day and had to point them to the upstream qemu stable tree. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th @ 2010-07-13 17:19 ` Brian Jackson 0 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Brian Jackson @ 2010-07-13 17:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: qemu-devel; +Cc: Aurelien Jarno, Juan Quintela, Avi Kivity, kvm-devel On Tuesday, July 13, 2010 12:01:22 pm Avi Kivity wrote: > On 07/13/2010 07:57 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: > >> I'd like to see more frequent stable releases, at least if the stable > >> branch contains fixes to user-reported bugs (or of course security or > >> data integrity fixes). > > > > Would you like to see more frequent stable releases or more frequent > > master releases? > > Yes. But in this context I'm interested in stable releases. We have > bugs reported, fixed, and the fix applied, yet the fixes are unreachable > to users. Especially so since qemu-kvm 0.12-stable hasn't been merged with qemu basically since 0.12.4 came out. I was trying to help one of the Gentoo maintainers find post 0.12.4 patches the other day and had to point them to the upstream qemu stable tree. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th 2010-07-13 17:19 ` Brian Jackson @ 2010-07-13 17:48 ` Avi Kivity -1 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Avi Kivity @ 2010-07-13 17:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Brian Jackson Cc: qemu-devel, Anthony Liguori, kvm-devel, Aurelien Jarno, Juan Quintela On 07/13/2010 08:19 PM, Brian Jackson wrote: > >> Yes. But in this context I'm interested in stable releases. We have >> bugs reported, fixed, and the fix applied, yet the fixes are unreachable >> to users. >> > Especially so since qemu-kvm 0.12-stable hasn't been merged with qemu > basically since 0.12.4 came out. I was trying to help one of the Gentoo > maintainers find post 0.12.4 patches the other day and had to point them to > the upstream qemu stable tree. > An email should suffice to get things merged. -- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th @ 2010-07-13 17:48 ` Avi Kivity 0 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Avi Kivity @ 2010-07-13 17:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Brian Jackson; +Cc: Aurelien Jarno, Juan Quintela, qemu-devel, kvm-devel On 07/13/2010 08:19 PM, Brian Jackson wrote: > >> Yes. But in this context I'm interested in stable releases. We have >> bugs reported, fixed, and the fix applied, yet the fixes are unreachable >> to users. >> > Especially so since qemu-kvm 0.12-stable hasn't been merged with qemu > basically since 0.12.4 came out. I was trying to help one of the Gentoo > maintainers find post 0.12.4 patches the other day and had to point them to > the upstream qemu stable tree. > An email should suffice to get things merged. -- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th 2010-07-13 17:19 ` Brian Jackson @ 2010-07-15 18:43 ` Justin M. Forbes -1 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Justin M. Forbes @ 2010-07-15 18:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Brian Jackson Cc: qemu-devel, Avi Kivity, Anthony Liguori, kvm-devel, Aurelien Jarno, Juan Quintela On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 12:19:21PM -0500, Brian Jackson wrote: > On Tuesday, July 13, 2010 12:01:22 pm Avi Kivity wrote: > > On 07/13/2010 07:57 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: > > >> I'd like to see more frequent stable releases, at least if the stable > > >> branch contains fixes to user-reported bugs (or of course security or > > >> data integrity fixes). > > > > > > Would you like to see more frequent stable releases or more frequent > > > master releases? > > > > Yes. But in this context I'm interested in stable releases. We have > > bugs reported, fixed, and the fix applied, yet the fixes are unreachable > > to users. > > Especially so since qemu-kvm 0.12-stable hasn't been merged with qemu > basically since 0.12.4 came out. I was trying to help one of the Gentoo > maintainers find post 0.12.4 patches the other day and had to point them to > the upstream qemu stable tree. I have offered to take care of this, but so far I do not have commit access. Justin ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th @ 2010-07-15 18:43 ` Justin M. Forbes 0 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Justin M. Forbes @ 2010-07-15 18:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Brian Jackson Cc: kvm-devel, Juan Quintela, qemu-devel, Avi Kivity, Aurelien Jarno On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 12:19:21PM -0500, Brian Jackson wrote: > On Tuesday, July 13, 2010 12:01:22 pm Avi Kivity wrote: > > On 07/13/2010 07:57 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: > > >> I'd like to see more frequent stable releases, at least if the stable > > >> branch contains fixes to user-reported bugs (or of course security or > > >> data integrity fixes). > > > > > > Would you like to see more frequent stable releases or more frequent > > > master releases? > > > > Yes. But in this context I'm interested in stable releases. We have > > bugs reported, fixed, and the fix applied, yet the fixes are unreachable > > to users. > > Especially so since qemu-kvm 0.12-stable hasn't been merged with qemu > basically since 0.12.4 came out. I was trying to help one of the Gentoo > maintainers find post 0.12.4 patches the other day and had to point them to > the upstream qemu stable tree. I have offered to take care of this, but so far I do not have commit access. Justin ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th 2010-07-15 18:43 ` Justin M. Forbes @ 2010-07-15 18:51 ` Aurelien Jarno -1 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Aurelien Jarno @ 2010-07-15 18:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Justin M. Forbes Cc: Brian Jackson, kvm-devel, Juan Quintela, qemu-devel, Avi Kivity On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 01:43:28PM -0500, Justin M. Forbes wrote: > On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 12:19:21PM -0500, Brian Jackson wrote: > > On Tuesday, July 13, 2010 12:01:22 pm Avi Kivity wrote: > > > On 07/13/2010 07:57 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: > > > >> I'd like to see more frequent stable releases, at least if the stable > > > >> branch contains fixes to user-reported bugs (or of course security or > > > >> data integrity fixes). > > > > > > > > Would you like to see more frequent stable releases or more frequent > > > > master releases? > > > > > > Yes. But in this context I'm interested in stable releases. We have > > > bugs reported, fixed, and the fix applied, yet the fixes are unreachable > > > to users. > > > > Especially so since qemu-kvm 0.12-stable hasn't been merged with qemu > > basically since 0.12.4 came out. I was trying to help one of the Gentoo > > maintainers find post 0.12.4 patches the other day and had to point them to > > the upstream qemu stable tree. > > I have offered to take care of this, but so far I do not have commit > access. > You don't necessarily need commit access for that. Just create your own tree with backported patches, and then send a stable pull request to the mailing list. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurelien@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th @ 2010-07-15 18:51 ` Aurelien Jarno 0 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Aurelien Jarno @ 2010-07-15 18:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Justin M. Forbes Cc: Brian Jackson, Avi Kivity, qemu-devel, kvm-devel, Juan Quintela On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 01:43:28PM -0500, Justin M. Forbes wrote: > On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 12:19:21PM -0500, Brian Jackson wrote: > > On Tuesday, July 13, 2010 12:01:22 pm Avi Kivity wrote: > > > On 07/13/2010 07:57 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: > > > >> I'd like to see more frequent stable releases, at least if the stable > > > >> branch contains fixes to user-reported bugs (or of course security or > > > >> data integrity fixes). > > > > > > > > Would you like to see more frequent stable releases or more frequent > > > > master releases? > > > > > > Yes. But in this context I'm interested in stable releases. We have > > > bugs reported, fixed, and the fix applied, yet the fixes are unreachable > > > to users. > > > > Especially so since qemu-kvm 0.12-stable hasn't been merged with qemu > > basically since 0.12.4 came out. I was trying to help one of the Gentoo > > maintainers find post 0.12.4 patches the other day and had to point them to > > the upstream qemu stable tree. > > I have offered to take care of this, but so far I do not have commit > access. > You don't necessarily need commit access for that. Just create your own tree with backported patches, and then send a stable pull request to the mailing list. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurelien@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th 2010-07-15 18:51 ` Aurelien Jarno @ 2010-07-15 18:54 ` Anthony Liguori -1 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Anthony Liguori @ 2010-07-15 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Aurelien Jarno Cc: Justin M. Forbes, Brian Jackson, kvm-devel, Juan Quintela, qemu-devel, Avi Kivity On 07/15/2010 01:51 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 01:43:28PM -0500, Justin M. Forbes wrote: > >> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 12:19:21PM -0500, Brian Jackson wrote: >> >>> On Tuesday, July 13, 2010 12:01:22 pm Avi Kivity wrote: >>> >>>> On 07/13/2010 07:57 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: >>>> >>>>>> I'd like to see more frequent stable releases, at least if the stable >>>>>> branch contains fixes to user-reported bugs (or of course security or >>>>>> data integrity fixes). >>>>>> >>>>> Would you like to see more frequent stable releases or more frequent >>>>> master releases? >>>>> >>>> Yes. But in this context I'm interested in stable releases. We have >>>> bugs reported, fixed, and the fix applied, yet the fixes are unreachable >>>> to users. >>>> >>> Especially so since qemu-kvm 0.12-stable hasn't been merged with qemu >>> basically since 0.12.4 came out. I was trying to help one of the Gentoo >>> maintainers find post 0.12.4 patches the other day and had to point them to >>> the upstream qemu stable tree. >>> >> I have offered to take care of this, but so far I do not have commit >> access. >> >> > You don't necessarily need commit access for that. Just create your own > tree with backported patches, and then send a stable pull request to > the mailing list. > Precisely. In the case of stable, that means watching the mailing list and backporting patches as appropriate and periodically doing pull requests. Regards, Anthony Liguori ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th @ 2010-07-15 18:54 ` Anthony Liguori 0 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Anthony Liguori @ 2010-07-15 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Aurelien Jarno Cc: Brian Jackson, kvm-devel, Juan Quintela, Justin M. Forbes, qemu-devel, Avi Kivity On 07/15/2010 01:51 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 01:43:28PM -0500, Justin M. Forbes wrote: > >> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 12:19:21PM -0500, Brian Jackson wrote: >> >>> On Tuesday, July 13, 2010 12:01:22 pm Avi Kivity wrote: >>> >>>> On 07/13/2010 07:57 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: >>>> >>>>>> I'd like to see more frequent stable releases, at least if the stable >>>>>> branch contains fixes to user-reported bugs (or of course security or >>>>>> data integrity fixes). >>>>>> >>>>> Would you like to see more frequent stable releases or more frequent >>>>> master releases? >>>>> >>>> Yes. But in this context I'm interested in stable releases. We have >>>> bugs reported, fixed, and the fix applied, yet the fixes are unreachable >>>> to users. >>>> >>> Especially so since qemu-kvm 0.12-stable hasn't been merged with qemu >>> basically since 0.12.4 came out. I was trying to help one of the Gentoo >>> maintainers find post 0.12.4 patches the other day and had to point them to >>> the upstream qemu stable tree. >>> >> I have offered to take care of this, but so far I do not have commit >> access. >> >> > You don't necessarily need commit access for that. Just create your own > tree with backported patches, and then send a stable pull request to > the mailing list. > Precisely. In the case of stable, that means watching the mailing list and backporting patches as appropriate and periodically doing pull requests. Regards, Anthony Liguori ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th 2010-07-12 14:57 ` [Qemu-devel] " Juan Quintela @ 2010-07-13 6:31 ` Avi Kivity -1 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Avi Kivity @ 2010-07-13 6:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Juan Quintela; +Cc: qemu-devel, kvm-devel On 07/12/2010 05:57 PM, Juan Quintela wrote: > Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. > > kvm testsuite -- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th @ 2010-07-13 6:31 ` Avi Kivity 0 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Avi Kivity @ 2010-07-13 6:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Juan Quintela; +Cc: qemu-devel, kvm-devel On 07/12/2010 05:57 PM, Juan Quintela wrote: > Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. > > kvm testsuite -- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-07-16 22:13 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 39+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2010-07-12 14:57 KVM Call agenda for July 13th Juan Quintela 2010-07-12 14:57 ` [Qemu-devel] " Juan Quintela 2010-07-12 21:57 ` Chris Wright 2010-07-12 21:57 ` [Qemu-devel] " Chris Wright 2010-07-12 22:07 ` Anthony Liguori 2010-07-12 22:07 ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony Liguori 2010-07-12 22:08 ` Anthony Liguori 2010-07-12 22:08 ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony Liguori 2010-07-13 4:38 ` Avi Kivity 2010-07-13 4:38 ` [Qemu-devel] " Avi Kivity 2010-07-13 14:03 ` Anthony Liguori 2010-07-13 14:03 ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony Liguori 2010-07-16 22:13 ` Artyom Tarasenko 2010-07-13 4:37 ` Avi Kivity 2010-07-13 4:37 ` [Qemu-devel] " Avi Kivity 2010-07-13 6:57 ` Aurelien Jarno 2010-07-13 6:57 ` Aurelien Jarno 2010-07-13 7:40 ` Avi Kivity 2010-07-13 7:40 ` Avi Kivity 2010-07-13 14:08 ` Luiz Capitulino 2010-07-13 14:08 ` Luiz Capitulino 2010-07-13 15:03 ` Avi Kivity 2010-07-13 15:03 ` Avi Kivity 2010-07-13 16:57 ` Anthony Liguori 2010-07-13 16:57 ` Anthony Liguori 2010-07-13 17:01 ` Avi Kivity 2010-07-13 17:01 ` Avi Kivity 2010-07-13 17:19 ` Brian Jackson 2010-07-13 17:19 ` Brian Jackson 2010-07-13 17:48 ` Avi Kivity 2010-07-13 17:48 ` Avi Kivity 2010-07-15 18:43 ` Justin M. Forbes 2010-07-15 18:43 ` Justin M. Forbes 2010-07-15 18:51 ` Aurelien Jarno 2010-07-15 18:51 ` Aurelien Jarno 2010-07-15 18:54 ` Anthony Liguori 2010-07-15 18:54 ` Anthony Liguori 2010-07-13 6:31 ` Avi Kivity 2010-07-13 6:31 ` [Qemu-devel] " Avi Kivity
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.