* device(s) namespace
@ 2011-01-26 16:30 Oren Laadan
[not found] ` <4D404C0E.6040603-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Oren Laadan @ 2011-01-26 16:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Containers
Hi,
I vaguely recall some discussions/ideas about the possibility
of a devices namespace, its pros and cons, and alternative.
Related to that is also device viruatlization, and isolation
of devices in containers.
Any thoughts and or pointers to past/current discussions are
welcome :)
Thanks,
Oren.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: device(s) namespace
[not found] ` <4D404C0E.6040603-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org>
@ 2011-01-27 13:35 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2011-01-28 14:33 ` Serge E. Hallyn
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Serge E. Hallyn @ 2011-01-27 13:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oren Laadan; +Cc: Linux Containers
Quoting Oren Laadan (orenl-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org):
> Hi,
>
> I vaguely recall some discussions/ideas about the possibility
> of a devices namespace, its pros and cons, and alternative.
> Related to that is also device viruatlization, and isolation
> of devices in containers.
>
> Any thoughts and or pointers to past/current discussions are
> welcome :)
I'm hoping to get my archive disk out this weekend or monday
and search for these, if noone else finds them before that.
-serge
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: device(s) namespace
[not found] ` <4D404C0E.6040603-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org>
2011-01-27 13:35 ` Serge E. Hallyn
@ 2011-01-28 14:33 ` Serge E. Hallyn
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Serge E. Hallyn @ 2011-01-28 14:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oren Laadan; +Cc: Linux Containers, Eric W. Biederman
Quoting Oren Laadan (orenl-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org):
> Hi,
>
> I vaguely recall some discussions/ideas about the possibility
> of a devices namespace, its pros and cons, and alternative.
> Related to that is also device viruatlization, and isolation
> of devices in containers.
>
> Any thoughts and or pointers to past/current discussions are
> welcome :)
>
> Thanks,
What I find in my old containers folders when grepping for
'device namespace' is mainly vague references to devicens as
a more ideal solution to other patches being submitted (namely
the device cgroup, the sysfs directory tagging, and ptyns).
A link which was referenced in one of those emails:
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/containers/2008-April/010810.html
So while I'm pretty sure I have in the past seen discussions on what
the device namespace would look like, they must have been on irc or
in person.
-serge
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-01-28 14:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-01-26 16:30 device(s) namespace Oren Laadan
[not found] ` <4D404C0E.6040603-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org>
2011-01-27 13:35 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2011-01-28 14:33 ` Serge E. Hallyn
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.