* device(s) namespace @ 2011-01-26 16:30 Oren Laadan [not found] ` <4D404C0E.6040603-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Oren Laadan @ 2011-01-26 16:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Containers Hi, I vaguely recall some discussions/ideas about the possibility of a devices namespace, its pros and cons, and alternative. Related to that is also device viruatlization, and isolation of devices in containers. Any thoughts and or pointers to past/current discussions are welcome :) Thanks, Oren. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <4D404C0E.6040603-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: device(s) namespace [not found] ` <4D404C0E.6040603-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org> @ 2011-01-27 13:35 ` Serge E. Hallyn 2011-01-28 14:33 ` Serge E. Hallyn 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Serge E. Hallyn @ 2011-01-27 13:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Oren Laadan; +Cc: Linux Containers Quoting Oren Laadan (orenl-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org): > Hi, > > I vaguely recall some discussions/ideas about the possibility > of a devices namespace, its pros and cons, and alternative. > Related to that is also device viruatlization, and isolation > of devices in containers. > > Any thoughts and or pointers to past/current discussions are > welcome :) I'm hoping to get my archive disk out this weekend or monday and search for these, if noone else finds them before that. -serge ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: device(s) namespace [not found] ` <4D404C0E.6040603-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org> 2011-01-27 13:35 ` Serge E. Hallyn @ 2011-01-28 14:33 ` Serge E. Hallyn 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Serge E. Hallyn @ 2011-01-28 14:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Oren Laadan; +Cc: Linux Containers, Eric W. Biederman Quoting Oren Laadan (orenl-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org): > Hi, > > I vaguely recall some discussions/ideas about the possibility > of a devices namespace, its pros and cons, and alternative. > Related to that is also device viruatlization, and isolation > of devices in containers. > > Any thoughts and or pointers to past/current discussions are > welcome :) > > Thanks, What I find in my old containers folders when grepping for 'device namespace' is mainly vague references to devicens as a more ideal solution to other patches being submitted (namely the device cgroup, the sysfs directory tagging, and ptyns). A link which was referenced in one of those emails: https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/containers/2008-April/010810.html So while I'm pretty sure I have in the past seen discussions on what the device namespace would look like, they must have been on irc or in person. -serge ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-01-28 14:33 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2011-01-26 16:30 device(s) namespace Oren Laadan [not found] ` <4D404C0E.6040603-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org> 2011-01-27 13:35 ` Serge E. Hallyn 2011-01-28 14:33 ` Serge E. Hallyn
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.