All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: mgorman@suse.de
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, minchan.kim@gmail.com,
	colin.king@canonical.com, James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com,
	raghu.prabhu13@gmail.com, jack@suse.cz, chris.mason@oracle.com,
	cl@linux.com, penberg@kernel.org, riel@redhat.com,
	hannes@cmpxchg.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: vmscan: Correctly check if reclaimer should schedule during shrink_slab
Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 09:45:59 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DD316C7.60003@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110517161508.GN5279@suse.de>

(2011/05/18 1:15), Mel Gorman wrote:
> It has been reported on some laptops that kswapd is consuming large
> amounts of CPU and not being scheduled when SLUB is enabled during
> large amounts of file copying. It is expected that this is due to
> kswapd missing every cond_resched() point because;
>
> shrink_page_list() calls cond_resched() if inactive pages were isolated
>          which in turn may not happen if all_unreclaimable is set in
>          shrink_zones(). If for whatver reason, all_unreclaimable is
>          set on all zones, we can miss calling cond_resched().
>
> balance_pgdat() only calls cond_resched if the zones are not
>          balanced. For a high-order allocation that is balanced, it
>          checks order-0 again. During that window, order-0 might have
>          become unbalanced so it loops again for order-0 and returns
>          that it was reclaiming for order-0 to kswapd(). It can then
>          find that a caller has rewoken kswapd for a high-order and
>          re-enters balance_pgdat() without ever calling cond_resched().
>
> shrink_slab only calls cond_resched() if we are reclaiming slab
> 	pages. If there are a large number of direct reclaimers, the
> 	shrinker_rwsem can be contended and prevent kswapd calling
> 	cond_resched().
>
> This patch modifies the shrink_slab() case. If the semaphore is
> contended, the caller will still check cond_resched(). After each
> successful call into a shrinker, the check for cond_resched() is
> still necessary in case one shrinker call is particularly slow.
>
> This patch replaces
> mm-vmscan-if-kswapd-has-been-running-too-long-allow-it-to-sleep.patch
> in -mm.
>
> [mgorman@suse.de: Preserve call to cond_resched after each call into shrinker]
> From: Minchan Kim<minchan.kim@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman<mgorman@suse.de>

Looks good to me.
	Reviewed-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>



WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: mgorman@suse.de
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, minchan.kim@gmail.com,
	colin.king@canonical.com, James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com,
	raghu.prabhu13@gmail.com, jack@suse.cz, chris.mason@oracle.com,
	cl@linux.com, penberg@kernel.org, riel@redhat.com,
	hannes@cmpxchg.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: vmscan: Correctly check if reclaimer should schedule during shrink_slab
Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 09:45:59 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DD316C7.60003@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110517161508.GN5279@suse.de>

(2011/05/18 1:15), Mel Gorman wrote:
> It has been reported on some laptops that kswapd is consuming large
> amounts of CPU and not being scheduled when SLUB is enabled during
> large amounts of file copying. It is expected that this is due to
> kswapd missing every cond_resched() point because;
>
> shrink_page_list() calls cond_resched() if inactive pages were isolated
>          which in turn may not happen if all_unreclaimable is set in
>          shrink_zones(). If for whatver reason, all_unreclaimable is
>          set on all zones, we can miss calling cond_resched().
>
> balance_pgdat() only calls cond_resched if the zones are not
>          balanced. For a high-order allocation that is balanced, it
>          checks order-0 again. During that window, order-0 might have
>          become unbalanced so it loops again for order-0 and returns
>          that it was reclaiming for order-0 to kswapd(). It can then
>          find that a caller has rewoken kswapd for a high-order and
>          re-enters balance_pgdat() without ever calling cond_resched().
>
> shrink_slab only calls cond_resched() if we are reclaiming slab
> 	pages. If there are a large number of direct reclaimers, the
> 	shrinker_rwsem can be contended and prevent kswapd calling
> 	cond_resched().
>
> This patch modifies the shrink_slab() case. If the semaphore is
> contended, the caller will still check cond_resched(). After each
> successful call into a shrinker, the check for cond_resched() is
> still necessary in case one shrinker call is particularly slow.
>
> This patch replaces
> mm-vmscan-if-kswapd-has-been-running-too-long-allow-it-to-sleep.patch
> in -mm.
>
> [mgorman@suse.de: Preserve call to cond_resched after each call into shrinker]
> From: Minchan Kim<minchan.kim@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman<mgorman@suse.de>

Looks good to me.
	Reviewed-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-18  0:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 119+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-13 14:03 [PATCH 0/4] Reduce impact to overall system of SLUB using high-order allocations V2 Mel Gorman
2011-05-13 14:03 ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-13 14:03 ` [PATCH 1/4] mm: vmscan: Correct use of pgdat_balanced in sleeping_prematurely Mel Gorman
2011-05-13 14:03   ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-13 14:28   ` Johannes Weiner
2011-05-13 14:28     ` Johannes Weiner
2011-05-14 16:30   ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-14 16:30     ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-16 14:30   ` Rik van Riel
2011-05-16 14:30     ` Rik van Riel
2011-05-13 14:03 ` [PATCH 2/4] mm: slub: Do not wake kswapd for SLUBs speculative high-order allocations Mel Gorman
2011-05-13 14:03   ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-16 21:10   ` David Rientjes
2011-05-16 21:10     ` David Rientjes
2011-05-18  6:09     ` Pekka Enberg
2011-05-18  6:09       ` Pekka Enberg
2011-05-18 17:21       ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-18 17:21         ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-13 14:03 ` [PATCH 3/4] mm: slub: Do not take expensive steps " Mel Gorman
2011-05-13 14:03   ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-16 21:16   ` David Rientjes
2011-05-16 21:16     ` David Rientjes
2011-05-17  8:42     ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-17  8:42       ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-17 13:51       ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-17 13:51         ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-17 16:22         ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-17 16:22           ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-17 17:52           ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-17 17:52             ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-17 19:35             ` David Rientjes
2011-05-17 19:35               ` David Rientjes
2011-05-17 19:31       ` David Rientjes
2011-05-17 19:31         ` David Rientjes
2011-05-13 14:03 ` [PATCH 4/4] mm: vmscan: If kswapd has been running too long, allow it to sleep Mel Gorman
2011-05-13 14:03   ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-15 10:27   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-15 10:27     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-16  4:21     ` James Bottomley
2011-05-16  4:21       ` James Bottomley
2011-05-16  5:04       ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-16  5:04         ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-16  8:45         ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-16  8:45           ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-16  8:45           ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-16  8:58           ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-16  8:58             ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-16  8:58             ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-16 10:27             ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-16 10:27               ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-16 10:27               ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-16 23:50               ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-16 23:50                 ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-17  0:48                 ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-17  0:48                   ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-17  0:48                   ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-17 10:38                 ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-17 10:38                   ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-17 10:38                   ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-17 13:50                   ` Colin Ian King
2011-05-17 13:50                     ` Colin Ian King
2011-05-17 16:15                     ` [PATCH] mm: vmscan: Correctly check if reclaimer should schedule during shrink_slab Mel Gorman
2011-05-17 16:15                       ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-18  0:45                       ` KOSAKI Motohiro [this message]
2011-05-18  0:45                         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-19  0:03                       ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-19  0:03                         ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-19  0:03                         ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-19  0:09                       ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-19  0:09                         ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-19  0:09                         ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-19 11:36                         ` Colin Ian King
2011-05-19 11:36                           ` Colin Ian King
2011-05-20  0:06                           ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-20  0:06                             ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-20  0:06                             ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-18  4:19                     ` [PATCH 4/4] mm: vmscan: If kswapd has been running too long, allow it to sleep Minchan Kim
2011-05-18  4:19                       ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-18  7:39                       ` Colin Ian King
2011-05-18  7:39                         ` Colin Ian King
2011-05-18  4:09                   ` James Bottomley
2011-05-18  4:09                     ` James Bottomley
2011-05-18  1:05                 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-18  1:05                   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-18  5:44                   ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-18  5:44                     ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-18  5:44                     ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-18  6:05                     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-18  6:05                       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-18  9:58                     ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-18  9:58                       ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-18  9:58                       ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-18 22:55                       ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-18 22:55                         ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-18 23:54                         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-18 23:54                           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-18  0:26               ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-18  0:26                 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-18  9:57                 ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-18  9:57                   ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-16  8:45     ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-16  8:45       ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-16 14:30   ` Rik van Riel
2011-05-16 14:30     ` Rik van Riel
2011-05-13 15:19 ` [PATCH 0/4] Reduce impact to overall system of SLUB using high-order allocations V2 James Bottomley
2011-05-13 15:19   ` James Bottomley
2011-05-13 15:19   ` James Bottomley
2011-05-13 15:52   ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-13 15:52     ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-13 15:21 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-13 15:21   ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-13 15:43   ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-13 15:43     ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-14  8:34 ` Colin Ian King
2011-05-14  8:34   ` Colin Ian King
2011-05-16  8:37   ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-16  8:37     ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-16 11:24     ` Colin Ian King
2011-05-16 11:24       ` Colin Ian King

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DD316C7.60003@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=raghu.prabhu13@gmail.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.