All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Santosh <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux@arm.linux.org.uk, rnayak@ti.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/25] OMAP4: PM: Add WakeupGen module as OMAP gic_arch_extn
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 14:35:49 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E69D6ED.4080409@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1109091017300.2723@ionos>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3145 bytes --]

On Friday 09 September 2011 01:48 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Sep 2011, Santosh wrote:
>> On Friday 09 September 2011 12:49 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>>
>>> The flag says: MASK ON SUSPEND and it does not imply that you don't
>>> need a wake function. There might be cases where you want to setup
>>> stuff in that function in order to have the wakeup happen on that
>>> interrupt line despite of the mask on suspend.
>>>
>> I see your point.
>>
>>> We either need a separate flag or a global dummy set_wake function in
>>> the core to avoid empty copies all over the place.
>>>
>> A flag is probably better since you mentioned that on some arch, there
>> might be need to have actual set_wake() handler. Or if the global
>> dummy can be over-ridden by platform, that's fine too.
>
> Global dummy would mean:
>
> int irq_set_wake_dummy(...)
> {
> 	return 0;
> }
>
> And you just add it to your chip, but either way I don't care whether
> it's a dummy function or a flag.
>
Will below patch work for you then ?
Attaching the same in case mailer damages it.

Regards,
Santosh

 From d63d4347dc8fb144b19f4d4e7c0621397cccea94 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 13:59:35 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] irq: Add IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE flag to avoid need of 
dummy set_wake() handler.

Certain IRQCHIP's may not need to install the irq_set_wake() handler if
the IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND flag is set. But but if it's not implemented,
enable_irq_wake() will return an error.  That needs the IRQCHIP to install
an empty set_wake handler.

Add an 'IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE' flag so that IRQCHIP can inform the core
irq code that irq_set_wake() handler is not necessary.

Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
  include/linux/irq.h |    2 ++
  kernel/irq/manage.c |    3 +++
  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/irq.h b/include/linux/irq.h
index 5951730..4b0d842 100644
--- a/include/linux/irq.h
+++ b/include/linux/irq.h
@@ -336,12 +336,14 @@ struct irq_chip {
   * IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND:	Mask non wake irqs in the suspend path
   * IRQCHIP_ONOFFLINE_ENABLED:	Only call irq_on/off_line callbacks
   *				when irq enabled
+ * IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE:	Skip chip.irq_set_wake(), for this IRQCHIP
   */
  enum {
  	IRQCHIP_SET_TYPE_MASKED		= (1 <<  0),
  	IRQCHIP_EOI_IF_HANDLED		= (1 <<  1),
  	IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND		= (1 <<  2),
  	IRQCHIP_ONOFFLINE_ENABLED	= (1 <<  3),
+	IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE		= (1 <<  4),
  };

  /* This include will go away once we isolated irq_desc usage to core 
code */
diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c
index 9b956fa..7e1a3ed 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
@@ -467,6 +467,9 @@ static int set_irq_wake_real(unsigned int irq, 
unsigned int on)
  	struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
  	int ret = -ENXIO;

+	if (irq_desc_get_chip(desc)->flags &  IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE)
+		return 0;
+
  	if (desc->irq_data.chip->irq_set_wake)
  		ret = desc->irq_data.chip->irq_set_wake(&desc->irq_data, on);

-- 
1.7.4.1


[-- Attachment #2: 0001-irq-Add-IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE-flag-to-avoid-need-of-.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 2040 bytes --]

>From d63d4347dc8fb144b19f4d4e7c0621397cccea94 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 13:59:35 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] irq: Add IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE flag to avoid need of dummy set_wake() handler.

Certain IRQCHIP's may not need to install the irq_set_wake() handler if
the IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND flag is set. But but if it's not implemented,
enable_irq_wake() will return an error.  That needs the IRQCHIP to install
an empty set_wake handler.

Add an 'IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE' flag so that IRQCHIP can inform the core
irq code that irq_set_wake() handler is not necessary.

Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
 include/linux/irq.h |    2 ++
 kernel/irq/manage.c |    3 +++
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/irq.h b/include/linux/irq.h
index 5951730..4b0d842 100644
--- a/include/linux/irq.h
+++ b/include/linux/irq.h
@@ -336,12 +336,14 @@ struct irq_chip {
  * IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND:	Mask non wake irqs in the suspend path
  * IRQCHIP_ONOFFLINE_ENABLED:	Only call irq_on/off_line callbacks
  *				when irq enabled
+ * IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE:	Skip chip.irq_set_wake(), for this IRQCHIP
  */
 enum {
 	IRQCHIP_SET_TYPE_MASKED		= (1 <<  0),
 	IRQCHIP_EOI_IF_HANDLED		= (1 <<  1),
 	IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND		= (1 <<  2),
 	IRQCHIP_ONOFFLINE_ENABLED	= (1 <<  3),
+	IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE		= (1 <<  4),
 };
 
 /* This include will go away once we isolated irq_desc usage to core code */
diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c
index 9b956fa..7e1a3ed 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
@@ -467,6 +467,9 @@ static int set_irq_wake_real(unsigned int irq, unsigned int on)
 	struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
 	int ret = -ENXIO;
 
+	if (irq_desc_get_chip(desc)->flags &  IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE)
+		return 0;
+
 	if (desc->irq_data.chip->irq_set_wake)
 		ret = desc->irq_data.chip->irq_set_wake(&desc->irq_data, on);
 
-- 
1.7.4.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (Santosh)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 13/25] OMAP4: PM: Add WakeupGen module as OMAP gic_arch_extn
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 14:35:49 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E69D6ED.4080409@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1109091017300.2723@ionos>

On Friday 09 September 2011 01:48 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Sep 2011, Santosh wrote:
>> On Friday 09 September 2011 12:49 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>>
>>> The flag says: MASK ON SUSPEND and it does not imply that you don't
>>> need a wake function. There might be cases where you want to setup
>>> stuff in that function in order to have the wakeup happen on that
>>> interrupt line despite of the mask on suspend.
>>>
>> I see your point.
>>
>>> We either need a separate flag or a global dummy set_wake function in
>>> the core to avoid empty copies all over the place.
>>>
>> A flag is probably better since you mentioned that on some arch, there
>> might be need to have actual set_wake() handler. Or if the global
>> dummy can be over-ridden by platform, that's fine too.
>
> Global dummy would mean:
>
> int irq_set_wake_dummy(...)
> {
> 	return 0;
> }
>
> And you just add it to your chip, but either way I don't care whether
> it's a dummy function or a flag.
>
Will below patch work for you then ?
Attaching the same in case mailer damages it.

Regards,
Santosh

 From d63d4347dc8fb144b19f4d4e7c0621397cccea94 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 13:59:35 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] irq: Add IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE flag to avoid need of 
dummy set_wake() handler.

Certain IRQCHIP's may not need to install the irq_set_wake() handler if
the IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND flag is set. But but if it's not implemented,
enable_irq_wake() will return an error.  That needs the IRQCHIP to install
an empty set_wake handler.

Add an 'IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE' flag so that IRQCHIP can inform the core
irq code that irq_set_wake() handler is not necessary.

Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
  include/linux/irq.h |    2 ++
  kernel/irq/manage.c |    3 +++
  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/irq.h b/include/linux/irq.h
index 5951730..4b0d842 100644
--- a/include/linux/irq.h
+++ b/include/linux/irq.h
@@ -336,12 +336,14 @@ struct irq_chip {
   * IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND:	Mask non wake irqs in the suspend path
   * IRQCHIP_ONOFFLINE_ENABLED:	Only call irq_on/off_line callbacks
   *				when irq enabled
+ * IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE:	Skip chip.irq_set_wake(), for this IRQCHIP
   */
  enum {
  	IRQCHIP_SET_TYPE_MASKED		= (1 <<  0),
  	IRQCHIP_EOI_IF_HANDLED		= (1 <<  1),
  	IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND		= (1 <<  2),
  	IRQCHIP_ONOFFLINE_ENABLED	= (1 <<  3),
+	IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE		= (1 <<  4),
  };

  /* This include will go away once we isolated irq_desc usage to core 
code */
diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c
index 9b956fa..7e1a3ed 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
@@ -467,6 +467,9 @@ static int set_irq_wake_real(unsigned int irq, 
unsigned int on)
  	struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
  	int ret = -ENXIO;

+	if (irq_desc_get_chip(desc)->flags &  IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE)
+		return 0;
+
  	if (desc->irq_data.chip->irq_set_wake)
  		ret = desc->irq_data.chip->irq_set_wake(&desc->irq_data, on);

-- 
1.7.4.1

  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-09  9:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 238+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-04 13:54 [PATCH 00/25] OMAP4: PM: suspend, CPU-hotplug and CPUilde support Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54 ` [PATCH 01/25] ARM: mm: Add strongly ordered descriptor support Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-13 20:23   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-13 20:23     ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-14  5:36     ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2011-09-14  5:36       ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2011-09-04 13:54 ` [PATCH 02/25] OMAP4: Redefine mandatory barriers for OMAP to include interconnect barriers Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-13 20:27   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-13 20:27     ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-14  5:39     ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2011-09-14  5:39       ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2011-09-14 10:24     ` Santosh
2011-09-14 10:24       ` Santosh
2011-09-15 17:17       ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-15 17:17         ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-15 17:24         ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2011-09-15 17:24           ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2011-09-15 17:53           ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-15 17:53             ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-15 18:22             ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2011-09-15 18:22               ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2011-09-15 19:43               ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-15 19:43                 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-15 20:00                 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2011-09-15 20:00                   ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2011-09-16 12:01                   ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2011-09-16 12:01                     ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2011-09-04 13:54 ` [PATCH 03/25] OMAP4: PM: Use custom omap_do_wfi() for suspend and default idle Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54 ` [PATCH 04/25] OMAP4: Remove un-used do_wfi() macro Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54 ` [PATCH 05/25] OMAP4: Use WARN_ON() instead of BUG_ON() with graceful exit Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-05 10:11   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2011-09-05 10:11     ` Sergei Shtylyov
2011-09-05 10:42     ` Santosh
2011-09-05 10:42       ` Santosh
2011-09-05 10:47       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-09-05 10:47         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-09-05 10:51         ` Santosh
2011-09-05 10:51           ` Santosh
2011-09-08 18:51           ` Jean Pihet
2011-09-08 18:51             ` Jean Pihet
2011-09-04 13:54 ` [PATCH 06/25] OMAP4: Export omap4_get_base*() rather than global address pointers Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54 ` [PATCH 07/25] OMAP4: PM: Add SAR RAM support Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54 ` [PATCH 08/25] OMAP4: PM: Keep static dep between MPUSS-EMIF and MPUSS-L3 and DUCATI-L3 Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-08 18:06   ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-08 18:06     ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-09  4:21     ` Santosh
2011-09-09  4:21       ` Santosh
2011-09-04 13:54 ` [PATCH 09/25] OMAP4: PM: Avoid omap4_pm_init() on OMAP4430 ES1.0 Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54 ` [PATCH 10/25] OMAP4: PM: Initialise all the clockdomains to supported states Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54 ` [PATCH 11/25] OMAP: Add Secure HAL and monitor mode API infrastructure Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-08 18:58   ` Jean Pihet
2011-09-08 18:58     ` Jean Pihet
2011-09-09  4:22     ` Santosh
2011-09-09  4:22       ` Santosh
2011-09-04 13:54 ` [PATCH 12/25] OMAP: Add support to allocate the memory for secure RAM Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-08 19:19   ` Jean Pihet
2011-09-08 19:19     ` Jean Pihet
2011-09-09  9:43     ` Santosh
2011-09-09  9:43       ` Santosh
2011-09-09 12:54       ` Jean Pihet
2011-09-09 12:54         ` Jean Pihet
2011-09-09 14:09         ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2011-09-09 14:09           ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2011-09-04 13:54 ` [PATCH 13/25] OMAP4: PM: Add WakeupGen module as OMAP gic_arch_extn Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-08 18:27   ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-08 18:27     ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-09  4:29     ` Santosh
2011-09-09  4:29       ` Santosh
2011-09-09  7:19       ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-09-09  7:19         ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-09-09  8:07         ` Santosh
2011-09-09  8:07           ` Santosh
2011-09-09  8:18           ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-09-09  8:18             ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-09-09  9:05             ` Santosh [this message]
2011-09-09  9:05               ` Santosh
2011-09-12  7:56               ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-09-12  7:56                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-09-12  8:44                 ` Santosh
2011-09-12  8:44                   ` Santosh
2011-09-08 19:16   ` Jean Pihet
2011-09-08 19:16     ` Jean Pihet
2011-09-09  4:23     ` Santosh
2011-09-09  4:23       ` Santosh
2011-09-13 20:36   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-13 20:36     ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-14  5:34     ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2011-09-14  5:34       ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2011-09-14 15:21       ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-14 15:21         ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-14 16:49         ` Santosh
2011-09-14 16:49           ` Santosh
2011-09-14 17:08           ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-14 17:08             ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-14 17:13             ` Santosh
2011-09-14 17:13               ` Santosh
2011-09-14 17:18               ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-14 17:18                 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-14 17:21                 ` Santosh
2011-09-14 17:21                   ` Santosh
2011-09-14 17:22                 ` Santosh
2011-09-14 17:22                   ` Santosh
2011-09-14 19:04                   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-14 19:04                     ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-15  2:57                     ` Santosh
2011-09-15  2:57                       ` Santosh
2011-09-15  9:36                   ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-15  9:36                     ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-15 12:02                     ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2011-09-15 12:02                       ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2011-09-15 13:29                       ` Woodruff, Richard
2011-09-15 13:29                         ` Woodruff, Richard
2011-09-04 13:54 ` [PATCH 14/25] OMAP4: PM: Add CPUX OFF mode support Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-08 19:39   ` Jean Pihet
2011-09-08 19:39     ` Jean Pihet
2011-09-09  9:59     ` Santosh
2011-09-09  9:59       ` Santosh
2011-09-09  8:04   ` Shawn Guo
2011-09-09  8:04     ` Shawn Guo
2011-09-09  8:09     ` Santosh
2011-09-09  8:09       ` Santosh
2011-09-09 14:13       ` Shawn Guo
2011-09-09 14:13         ` Shawn Guo
2011-09-09 14:11         ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2011-09-09 14:11           ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2011-09-09 15:27           ` Shawn Guo
2011-09-09 15:27             ` Shawn Guo
2011-09-09 16:59             ` Santosh
2011-09-09 16:59               ` Santosh
2011-09-09 18:34               ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-09 18:34                 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-10  3:39                 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2011-09-10  3:39                   ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2011-09-09 23:34               ` Shawn Guo
2011-09-09 23:34                 ` Shawn Guo
2011-09-10  3:38                 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2011-09-10  3:38                   ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2011-09-10  4:54                   ` Shawn Guo
2011-09-10  4:54                     ` Shawn Guo
2011-09-10  5:51                     ` Santosh
2011-09-10  5:51                       ` Santosh
2011-09-12 21:06   ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-12 21:06     ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-13  5:39     ` Santosh
2011-09-13  5:39       ` Santosh
2011-09-13 17:33       ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-13 17:33         ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-14  5:26         ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2011-09-14  5:26           ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2011-09-04 13:54 ` [PATCH 15/25] OMAP4: Remove __INIT from omap_secondary_startup() to re-use it for hotplug Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54 ` [PATCH 16/25] OMAP4: PM: Program CPU1 to hit OFF when off-lined Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-12 21:12   ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-12 21:12     ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-13  5:35     ` Santosh
2011-09-13  5:35       ` Santosh
2011-09-04 13:54 ` [PATCH 17/25] OMAP4: PM: CPU1 wakeup workaround from Low power modes Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54 ` [PATCH 18/25] OMAP4: suspend: Add MPUSS power domain RETENTION support Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-15  0:27   ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-15  0:27     ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-15  3:19     ` Santosh
2011-09-15  3:19       ` Santosh
2011-09-04 13:54 ` [PATCH 19/25] OMAP4: PM: Add WakeupGen and secure GIC low power support Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54 ` [PATCH 20/25] OMAP4: PM: Add L2X0 cache lowpower support Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-05 14:01   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2011-09-05 14:01     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2011-09-05 14:13     ` Santosh
2011-09-05 14:13       ` Santosh
2011-09-16 17:23   ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-16 17:23     ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-18  8:46     ` Santosh
2011-09-18  8:46       ` Santosh
2011-09-04 13:54 ` [PATCH 21/25] OMAP4: PM: Add MPUSS power domain OSWR support Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-12 18:52   ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-12 18:52     ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-13  5:37     ` Santosh
2011-09-13  5:37       ` Santosh
2011-09-13  7:39       ` Jean Pihet
2011-09-13  7:39         ` Jean Pihet
2011-09-13  8:25         ` Santosh
2011-09-13  8:25           ` Santosh
2011-09-04 13:54 ` [PATCH 22/25] OMAP4: PM: Add power domain statistics support Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-05 10:08   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2011-09-05 10:08     ` Sergei Shtylyov
2011-09-05 10:43     ` Santosh
2011-09-05 10:43       ` Santosh
2011-09-04 13:54 ` [PATCH 23/25] OMAP4: PM: Add CPUidle support Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-16 17:45   ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-16 17:45     ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-18  8:47     ` Santosh
2011-09-18  8:47       ` Santosh
2011-09-04 13:54 ` [PATCH 24/25] OMAP4: cpuidle: Switch to gptimer from twd in deeper C-states Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-16 17:51   ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-16 17:51     ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-18  8:48     ` Santosh
2011-09-18  8:48       ` Santosh
2011-09-04 13:54 ` [PATCH 25/25] OMAP3: CPUidle: Make use of CPU PM notifiers Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-08 17:57   ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-08 17:57     ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-09  4:20     ` Santosh
2011-09-09  4:20       ` Santosh
2011-09-09  7:17     ` Santosh
2011-09-09  7:17       ` Santosh
2011-09-08 20:15 ` [PATCH 00/25] OMAP4: PM: suspend, CPU-hotplug and CPUilde support Jean Pihet
2011-09-08 20:15   ` Jean Pihet
2011-09-09  4:25   ` Santosh
2011-09-09  4:25     ` Santosh
2011-09-20 11:24 ` Vishwanath Sripathy
2011-09-20 11:24   ` Vishwanath Sripathy
2011-09-20 11:37   ` Santosh
2011-09-20 11:37     ` Santosh
2011-09-20 11:57 ` Santosh
2011-09-20 11:57   ` Santosh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E69D6ED.4080409@ti.com \
    --to=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
    --cc=khilman@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=rnayak@ti.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.