All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
To: "Lothar Waßmann" <LW@KARO-electronics.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [BUG] genirq: Race condition in ONESHOT IRQ handler disabling IRQ forever
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 11:42:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F2FAE93.5020205@metafoo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20271.35831.227679.177366@ipc1.ka-ro>

On 02/06/2012 09:14 AM, =?utf-8?Q?Lothar_Wa=C3=9Fmann?= wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I already sent this to <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> on Feb. 1, 2012
> but did not get any response there. So resending to a wider audience
> with improved subject line:
> 
> there is a race condition in the threaded IRQ handler code for oneshot
> interrupts that may lead to disabling an IRQ indefinitely. IRQs are
> masked before calling the hard-irq handler and are unmasked only after
> the soft-irq handler has been run. Thus if the hard-irq handler
> returns IRQ_HANDLED instead of IRQ_WAKE_THREAD, meaning the soft-irq
> will not be called, the interrupt will remain masked forever.
> 
> This can happen due to a short pulse on the interrupt line, that
> triggers the interrupt logic, but goes undetected by the hard-irq
> handler. The problem can be reproduced with the TSC2007 touch
> controller driver that uses ONESHOT interrupts.
> 
> The problem arises also with interrupt controllers that latch a level
> triggered IRQ until it is acknowledged (like the i.MX28 does).
> In this case the IRQ status bit will remain asserted after the
> soft-irq finishes and retrigger the interrupt while the interrupt line
> is already deasserted.
> 
> The following patch would solve the problem, but I'm not sure whether
> it's the Right Thing(TM) to do. Especially wrt. shared interrupts.
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/handle.c b/kernel/irq/handle.c
> index 470d08c..93beadb 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/handle.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/handle.c
> @@ -146,6 +146,11 @@ handle_irq_event_percpu(struct irq_desc *desc, struct irqaction *action)
>  			/* Fall through to add to randomness */
>  		case IRQ_HANDLED:
>  			random |= action->flags;
> +			/* unmask the IRQ that has been left masked
> +			 * due to race condition
> +			 */
> +			if (res == IRQ_HANDLED && (action->flags & IRQF_ONESHOT))
> +				unmask_irq(desc);
>  			break;
>  
>  		default:

I think a better fix is to check the return value of handle_irq_event in
handle_level_irq and if the IRQ_WAKE_THREADED bit is not set unmask the irq.

The same should probably also be done for handle_fasteoi_irq.


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: lars@metafoo.de (Lars-Peter Clausen)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [BUG] genirq: Race condition in ONESHOT IRQ handler disabling IRQ forever
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 11:42:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F2FAE93.5020205@metafoo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20271.35831.227679.177366@ipc1.ka-ro>

On 02/06/2012 09:14 AM, =?utf-8?Q?Lothar_Wa=C3=9Fmann?= wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I already sent this to <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> on Feb. 1, 2012
> but did not get any response there. So resending to a wider audience
> with improved subject line:
> 
> there is a race condition in the threaded IRQ handler code for oneshot
> interrupts that may lead to disabling an IRQ indefinitely. IRQs are
> masked before calling the hard-irq handler and are unmasked only after
> the soft-irq handler has been run. Thus if the hard-irq handler
> returns IRQ_HANDLED instead of IRQ_WAKE_THREAD, meaning the soft-irq
> will not be called, the interrupt will remain masked forever.
> 
> This can happen due to a short pulse on the interrupt line, that
> triggers the interrupt logic, but goes undetected by the hard-irq
> handler. The problem can be reproduced with the TSC2007 touch
> controller driver that uses ONESHOT interrupts.
> 
> The problem arises also with interrupt controllers that latch a level
> triggered IRQ until it is acknowledged (like the i.MX28 does).
> In this case the IRQ status bit will remain asserted after the
> soft-irq finishes and retrigger the interrupt while the interrupt line
> is already deasserted.
> 
> The following patch would solve the problem, but I'm not sure whether
> it's the Right Thing(TM) to do. Especially wrt. shared interrupts.
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/handle.c b/kernel/irq/handle.c
> index 470d08c..93beadb 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/handle.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/handle.c
> @@ -146,6 +146,11 @@ handle_irq_event_percpu(struct irq_desc *desc, struct irqaction *action)
>  			/* Fall through to add to randomness */
>  		case IRQ_HANDLED:
>  			random |= action->flags;
> +			/* unmask the IRQ that has been left masked
> +			 * due to race condition
> +			 */
> +			if (res == IRQ_HANDLED && (action->flags & IRQF_ONESHOT))
> +				unmask_irq(desc);
>  			break;
>  
>  		default:

I think a better fix is to check the return value of handle_irq_event in
handle_level_irq and if the IRQ_WAKE_THREADED bit is not set unmask the irq.

The same should probably also be done for handle_fasteoi_irq.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-02-06 10:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-06  8:14 [BUG] genirq: Race condition in ONESHOT IRQ handler disabling IRQ forever =?utf-8?Q?Lothar_Wa=C3=9Fmann?=
2012-02-06  8:14 ` =?utf-8?Q?Lothar_Wa=C3=9Fmann?=
2012-02-06 10:42 ` Lars-Peter Clausen [this message]
2012-02-06 10:42   ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2012-02-07  9:03 ` Yong Zhang
2012-02-07  9:03   ` Yong Zhang
2012-02-07 10:01   ` Lothar Waßmann
2012-02-07 10:01     ` Lothar Waßmann
2012-02-07 12:34     ` Yong Zhang
2012-02-07 12:34       ` Yong Zhang
2012-02-07 12:52       ` Lothar Waßmann
2012-02-07 12:52         ` Lothar Waßmann
2012-02-07 13:07         ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2012-02-07 13:07           ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2012-02-07 13:38           ` [PATCH] genirq: Fix race condition in ONESHOT irq handler Lothar Waßmann
2012-02-07 13:38             ` Lothar Waßmann
2012-02-07 17:03             ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-02-07 17:03               ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-02-08  6:05               ` Lothar Waßmann
2012-02-08  6:05                 ` Lothar Waßmann
2012-02-08 10:38                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-02-08 10:38                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-02-09  8:40                   ` Lothar Waßmann
2012-02-09  8:40                     ` Lothar Waßmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F2FAE93.5020205@metafoo.de \
    --to=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=LW@KARO-electronics.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.