From: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
To: <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] powerpc: define TUNE_PKGARCH for powerpc/powerpc-nf
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 10:38:38 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F7481FE.3020505@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABcZANnyVxQsJ6ntV=DTeOtPb3R=d8=JSbny8+iOAT8XV99+UQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 3/28/12 11:54 PM, Chris Larson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 9:47 PM, McClintock Matthew-B29882
> <B29882@freescale.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Chris Larson<clarson@kergoth.com> wrote:
>>>> If you can explain why the override isn't overriding the default
>>>> TUNE_PKGARCH (and it's intentional and not a bug), and we can consistently
>>>> modify all of the elements... I'm happy to accept the changes to all of the
>>>> tunings.
>>>
>>> See above. It's not an override. And plenty of files already specify
>>> TUNE_PKGARCH_tune-<tune>, so I don't see how it'd be inconsistent to
>>> do so for the defaults, personally.
>>
>> If no one else has complained so far it makes me believe they are not
>> missing any TUNE_PKGARCH_tune-<tune> then.
>
> I don't understand the point you're attempting to make here.
Just an FYI -- I've not forgotten about this.. I'm going to look into what is
currently implemented and figure out how to get it to be consistent.. things
have definitely changed since the initial implementation, and things are no
longer consistent.
Hopefully I'll have an update later today.
--Mark
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-29 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-27 19:51 [PATCH 1/3] external-csl: add mapping for powerpc-nf Christopher Larson
2012-03-27 19:51 ` [PATCH 2/3] powerpc e500: set -mfloat-gprs=double Christopher Larson
2012-04-07 5:40 ` Khem Raj
2012-04-07 16:12 ` Chris Larson
2012-03-27 19:51 ` [PATCH 3/3] powerpc: define TUNE_PKGARCH for powerpc/powerpc-nf Christopher Larson
2012-03-27 20:22 ` Mark Hatle
2012-03-27 21:05 ` Chris Larson
2012-03-27 21:50 ` Mark Hatle
2012-03-27 21:57 ` Christopher Larson
2012-03-27 22:13 ` Mark Hatle
2012-03-27 22:16 ` Chris Larson
2012-03-29 4:47 ` McClintock Matthew-B29882
2012-03-29 4:54 ` Chris Larson
2012-03-29 5:07 ` McClintock Matthew-B29882
2012-03-29 15:38 ` Mark Hatle [this message]
2012-03-29 15:54 ` Chris Larson
2012-03-29 15:58 ` McClintock Matthew-B29882
2012-03-29 16:40 ` Mark Hatle
2012-03-29 18:38 ` Chris Larson
2012-03-29 18:50 ` McClintock Matthew-B29882
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F7481FE.3020505@windriver.com \
--to=mark.hatle@windriver.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.