* xfs_check segfault / xfs_repair I/O error
@ 2012-04-15 13:15 Drew Wareham
2012-04-15 19:47 ` Stan Hoeppner
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Drew Wareham @ 2012-04-15 13:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xfs
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6991 bytes --]
Hello Everyone,
Hopefully this is the correct kind of information to send to this list.
I have an issue with a large XFS volume (17TB) that mounts, but is not
readable. I can view the folder structure on the volume but I can't access
any of the actual data. A disk failed in a RAID5 array and while it has
rebuilt now, it looks like it's caused serious data integrity issues.
Here is the CentOS release / Kernel version:
[root@svr608 ~]# uname -a
Linux svr608 2.6.18-308.1.1.el5 #1 SMP Wed Mar 7 04:16:51 EST 2012
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
[root@svr608 ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release
CentOS release 5.8 (Final)
[root@svr608 ~]# cat /tmp/yum.list | grep xfs | grep installed
kmod-xfs.x86_64 0.4-2
installed
xfsdump.x86_64 2.2.46-1.el5.centos
installed
xfsprogs.x86_64 2.9.4-1.el5.centos
installed
xorg-x11-xfs.x86_64 1:1.0.2-5.el5_6.1
installed
On startup, the OS thinks everything's fine with the drives/volume:
SCSI subsystem initialized
HP CISS Driver (v 3.6.28-RH2)
GSI 20 sharing vector 0x42 and IRQ 20
ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:04:00.0[A] -> GSI 32 (level, low) -> IRQ 66
cciss 0000:04:00.0: cciss: Trying to put board into performant mode
cciss 0000:04:00.0: Placing controller into performant mode
cciss/c0d0: p1 p2 p3 p4 < p5 >
usb 5-2: new low speed USB device using uhci_hcd and address 2
cciss/c0d1:
cciss 0000:04:00.0: blocks= 35162671280 block_size= 512
cciss 0000:04:00.0: blocks= 35162671280 block_size= 512
cciss/c0d2: unknown partition table
scsi0 : cciss
shpchp: Standard Hot Plug PCI Controller Driver version: 0.4
libata version 3.00 loaded.
ata_piix 0000:00:1f.2: version 2.12
ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:1f.2[B] -> GSI 19 (level, low) -> IRQ 58
ata_piix 0000:00:1f.2: MAP [ P0 P2 P1 P3 ]
PCI: Setting latency timer of device 0000:00:1f.2 to 64
scsi1 : ata_piix
scsi2 : ata_piix
ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 bmdma 0xff90 irq 14
ata2: SATA max UDMA/133 bmdma 0xff98 irq 15
usb 5-2: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
input: Rextron USB as /class/input/input0
input,hidraw0: USB HID v1.10 Keyboard [Rextron USB] on
usb-0000:00:1d.1-2
input: Rextron USB as /class/input/input1
input,hidraw0: USB HID v1.00 Mouse [Rextron USB] on usb-0000:00:1d.1-2
ata1: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
ata2: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:1f.5[B] -> GSI 19 (level, low) -> IRQ 58
ata_piix 0000:00:1f.5: MAP [ P0 -- P1 -- ]
PCI: Setting latency timer of device 0000:00:1f.5 to 64
scsi3 : ata_piix
scsi4 : ata_piix
ata3: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xcc00 ctl 0xc880 bmdma 0xc400 irq 58
ata4: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xc800 ctl 0xc480 bmdma 0xc408 irq 58
ata3: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
ata4: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
device-mapper: uevent: version 1.0.3
device-mapper: ioctl: 4.11.6-ioctl (2011-02-18) initialised:
dm-devel@redhat.com
device-mapper: dm-raid45: initialized v0.2594l
kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds
EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
SELinux: Disabled at runtime.
SELinux: Unregistering netfilter hooks
type=1404 audit(1334501635.200:2): selinux=0 auid=4294967295
ses=4294967295
... snip (network devices) ...
dell-wmi: No known WMI GUID found
md: Autodetecting RAID arrays.
md: autorun ...
md: ... autorun DONE.
device-mapper: multipath: version 1.0.6 loaded
loop: loaded (max 8 devices)
EXT3 FS on cciss/c0d0p5, internal journal
kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds
EXT3 FS on cciss/c0d0p3, internal journal
EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds
EXT3 FS on cciss/c0d0p1, internal journal
EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
SGI XFS with ACLs, security attributes, large block/inode numbers, no
debug enabled
SGI XFS Quota Management subsystem
XFS mounting filesystem cciss/c0d2
Ending clean XFS mount for filesystem: cciss/c0d2
Adding 4192956k swap on /dev/cciss/c0d0p2. Priority:-1 extents:1
across:4192956k
But even though the volume mounts, when trying to access data it just gives
a "Structure needs cleaning" error.
Running xfs_check and xfs_repair yield the following:
[root@svr608 ~]# xfs_check /dev/cciss/c0d2
bad agf magic # 0x58418706 in ag 0
bad agf version # 0x30002 in ag 0
/usr/sbin/xfs_check: line 28: 5259 Segmentation fault
xfs_db$DBOPTS -i -p xfs_check -c "check$OPTS" $1
[root@svr608 ~]# xfs_repair -n /dev/cciss/c0d2
Phase 1 - find and verify superblock...
superblock read failed, offset 0, size 524288, ag 0, rval -1
fatal error -- Input/output error
And they leave the following in dmesg:
xfs_db[5259]: segfault at 000000000555a134 rip 00000000004070c3 rsp
00007fff986bae50 error 4
cciss 0000:04:00.0: cciss: c ffff810037e00000 has CHECK CONDITION sense
key = 0x3
And finally if I try to ls or stat a directory, I get the following call
trace:
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff8835d8b8>] :xfs:xfs_da_do_buf+0x4ee/0x59c
[<ffffffff8835d9b9>] :xfs:xfs_da_read_buf+0x16/0x1b
[<ffffffff8835d9b9>] :xfs:xfs_da_read_buf+0x16/0x1b
[<ffffffff88362414>] :xfs:xfs_dir2_leaf_lookup_int+0x57/0x24f
[<ffffffff88362414>] :xfs:xfs_dir2_leaf_lookup_int+0x57/0x24f
[<ffffffff8004ad3e>] try_to_del_timer_sync+0x7f/0x88
[<ffffffff883628c5>] :xfs:xfs_dir2_leaf_lookup+0x1f/0xb6
[<ffffffff8835f50c>] :xfs:xfs_dir2_isleaf+0x19/0x4a
[<ffffffff8003f8b2>] memcpy_toiovec+0x36/0x66
[<ffffffff8835fc1a>] :xfs:xfs_dir_lookup+0xf9/0x140
[<ffffffff88384309>] :xfs:xfs_lookup+0x49/0xa8
[<ffffffff8805c27c>] :ext3:ext3_get_acl+0x63/0x310
[<ffffffff8838f772>] :xfs:xfs_vn_lookup+0x3d/0x7b
[<ffffffff8000d0b0>] do_lookup+0x126/0x227
[<ffffffff80009c59>] __link_path_walk+0x3aa/0xf39
[<ffffffff8000eb37>] link_path_walk+0x45/0xb8
[<ffffffff8000ce0a>] do_path_lookup+0x294/0x310
[<ffffffff80012969>] getname+0x15b/0x1c2
[<ffffffff80023a11>] __user_walk_fd+0x37/0x4c
[<ffffffff8002898c>] vfs_stat_fd+0x1b/0x4a
[<ffffffff80067235>] do_page_fault+0x4cc/0x842
[<ffffffff8023074b>] sys_connect+0x7e/0xae
[<ffffffff80023741>] sys_newstat+0x19/0x31
[<ffffffff8005d229>] tracesys+0x71/0xe0
[<ffffffff8005d28d>] tracesys+0xd5/0xe0
00000000: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
................
Filesystem cciss/c0d2: XFS internal error xfs_da_do_buf(2) at line 2112
of file fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.c. Caller 0xffffffff8835d9b9
hpacucli says the array is fine, but it looks like it's corrupted to me.
This is probably a lost cause, but if anyone has any ideas I'd love to hear
them.
Thanks,
Drew
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 8389 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 121 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: xfs_check segfault / xfs_repair I/O error
2012-04-15 13:15 xfs_check segfault / xfs_repair I/O error Drew Wareham
@ 2012-04-15 19:47 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-04-15 22:31 ` Dave Chinner
2012-04-20 15:06 ` Eric Sandeen
2 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Stan Hoeppner @ 2012-04-15 19:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Drew Wareham; +Cc: xfs
On 4/15/2012 8:15 AM, Drew Wareham wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> Hopefully this is the correct kind of information to send to this list.
>
> I have an issue with a large XFS volume (17TB) that mounts, but is not
> readable. I can view the folder structure on the volume but I can't access
> any of the actual data. A disk failed in a RAID5 array and while it has
> rebuilt now, it looks like it's caused serious data integrity issues.
>
> Here is the CentOS release / Kernel version:
> [root@svr608 ~]# uname -a
> Linux svr608 2.6.18-308.1.1.el5 #1 SMP Wed Mar 7 04:16:51 EST 2012
> x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> [root@svr608 ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release
> CentOS release 5.8 (Final)
> [root@svr608 ~]# cat /tmp/yum.list | grep xfs | grep installed
> kmod-xfs.x86_64 0.4-2
> installed
> xfsdump.x86_64 2.2.46-1.el5.centos
> installed
> xfsprogs.x86_64 2.9.4-1.el5.centos
> installed
> xorg-x11-xfs.x86_64 1:1.0.2-5.el5_6.1
> installed
>
> On startup, the OS thinks everything's fine with the drives/volume:
> SCSI subsystem initialized
> HP CISS Driver (v 3.6.28-RH2)
> GSI 20 sharing vector 0x42 and IRQ 20
> ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:04:00.0[A] -> GSI 32 (level, low) -> IRQ 66
> cciss 0000:04:00.0: cciss: Trying to put board into performant mode
> cciss 0000:04:00.0: Placing controller into performant mode
> cciss/c0d0: p1 p2 p3 p4 < p5 >
> usb 5-2: new low speed USB device using uhci_hcd and address 2
> cciss/c0d1:
> cciss 0000:04:00.0: blocks= 35162671280 block_size= 512
> cciss 0000:04:00.0: blocks= 35162671280 block_size= 512
> cciss/c0d2: unknown partition table
> scsi0 : cciss
> shpchp: Standard Hot Plug PCI Controller Driver version: 0.4
> libata version 3.00 loaded.
> ata_piix 0000:00:1f.2: version 2.12
> ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:1f.2[B] -> GSI 19 (level, low) -> IRQ 58
> ata_piix 0000:00:1f.2: MAP [ P0 P2 P1 P3 ]
> PCI: Setting latency timer of device 0000:00:1f.2 to 64
> scsi1 : ata_piix
> scsi2 : ata_piix
> ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 bmdma 0xff90 irq 14
> ata2: SATA max UDMA/133 bmdma 0xff98 irq 15
> usb 5-2: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
> input: Rextron USB as /class/input/input0
> input,hidraw0: USB HID v1.10 Keyboard [Rextron USB] on
> usb-0000:00:1d.1-2
> input: Rextron USB as /class/input/input1
> input,hidraw0: USB HID v1.00 Mouse [Rextron USB] on usb-0000:00:1d.1-2
> ata1: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
> ata2: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
> ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:1f.5[B] -> GSI 19 (level, low) -> IRQ 58
> ata_piix 0000:00:1f.5: MAP [ P0 -- P1 -- ]
> PCI: Setting latency timer of device 0000:00:1f.5 to 64
> scsi3 : ata_piix
> scsi4 : ata_piix
> ata3: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xcc00 ctl 0xc880 bmdma 0xc400 irq 58
> ata4: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xc800 ctl 0xc480 bmdma 0xc408 irq 58
> ata3: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
> ata4: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
> device-mapper: uevent: version 1.0.3
> device-mapper: ioctl: 4.11.6-ioctl (2011-02-18) initialised:
> dm-devel@redhat.com
> device-mapper: dm-raid45: initialized v0.2594l
> kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds
> EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
> SELinux: Disabled at runtime.
> SELinux: Unregistering netfilter hooks
> type=1404 audit(1334501635.200:2): selinux=0 auid=4294967295
> ses=4294967295
> ... snip (network devices) ...
> dell-wmi: No known WMI GUID found
> md: Autodetecting RAID arrays.
> md: autorun ...
> md: ... autorun DONE.
> device-mapper: multipath: version 1.0.6 loaded
> loop: loaded (max 8 devices)
> EXT3 FS on cciss/c0d0p5, internal journal
> kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds
> EXT3 FS on cciss/c0d0p3, internal journal
> EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
> kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds
> EXT3 FS on cciss/c0d0p1, internal journal
> EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
> SGI XFS with ACLs, security attributes, large block/inode numbers, no
> debug enabled
> SGI XFS Quota Management subsystem
> XFS mounting filesystem cciss/c0d2
> Ending clean XFS mount for filesystem: cciss/c0d2
> Adding 4192956k swap on /dev/cciss/c0d0p2. Priority:-1 extents:1
> across:4192956k
>
> But even though the volume mounts, when trying to access data it just gives
> a "Structure needs cleaning" error.
>
> Running xfs_check and xfs_repair yield the following:
> [root@svr608 ~]# xfs_check /dev/cciss/c0d2
> bad agf magic # 0x58418706 in ag 0
> bad agf version # 0x30002 in ag 0
> /usr/sbin/xfs_check: line 28: 5259 Segmentation fault
> xfs_db$DBOPTS -i -p xfs_check -c "check$OPTS" $1
> [root@svr608 ~]# xfs_repair -n /dev/cciss/c0d2
> Phase 1 - find and verify superblock...
> superblock read failed, offset 0, size 524288, ag 0, rval -1
>
> fatal error -- Input/output error
>
> And they leave the following in dmesg:
> xfs_db[5259]: segfault at 000000000555a134 rip 00000000004070c3 rsp
> 00007fff986bae50 error 4
> cciss 0000:04:00.0: cciss: c ffff810037e00000 has CHECK CONDITION sense
> key = 0x3
>
> And finally if I try to ls or stat a directory, I get the following call
> trace:
> Call Trace:
> [<ffffffff8835d8b8>] :xfs:xfs_da_do_buf+0x4ee/0x59c
> [<ffffffff8835d9b9>] :xfs:xfs_da_read_buf+0x16/0x1b
> [<ffffffff8835d9b9>] :xfs:xfs_da_read_buf+0x16/0x1b
> [<ffffffff88362414>] :xfs:xfs_dir2_leaf_lookup_int+0x57/0x24f
> [<ffffffff88362414>] :xfs:xfs_dir2_leaf_lookup_int+0x57/0x24f
> [<ffffffff8004ad3e>] try_to_del_timer_sync+0x7f/0x88
> [<ffffffff883628c5>] :xfs:xfs_dir2_leaf_lookup+0x1f/0xb6
> [<ffffffff8835f50c>] :xfs:xfs_dir2_isleaf+0x19/0x4a
> [<ffffffff8003f8b2>] memcpy_toiovec+0x36/0x66
> [<ffffffff8835fc1a>] :xfs:xfs_dir_lookup+0xf9/0x140
> [<ffffffff88384309>] :xfs:xfs_lookup+0x49/0xa8
> [<ffffffff8805c27c>] :ext3:ext3_get_acl+0x63/0x310
> [<ffffffff8838f772>] :xfs:xfs_vn_lookup+0x3d/0x7b
> [<ffffffff8000d0b0>] do_lookup+0x126/0x227
> [<ffffffff80009c59>] __link_path_walk+0x3aa/0xf39
> [<ffffffff8000eb37>] link_path_walk+0x45/0xb8
> [<ffffffff8000ce0a>] do_path_lookup+0x294/0x310
> [<ffffffff80012969>] getname+0x15b/0x1c2
> [<ffffffff80023a11>] __user_walk_fd+0x37/0x4c
> [<ffffffff8002898c>] vfs_stat_fd+0x1b/0x4a
> [<ffffffff80067235>] do_page_fault+0x4cc/0x842
> [<ffffffff8023074b>] sys_connect+0x7e/0xae
> [<ffffffff80023741>] sys_newstat+0x19/0x31
> [<ffffffff8005d229>] tracesys+0x71/0xe0
> [<ffffffff8005d28d>] tracesys+0xd5/0xe0
>
> 00000000: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> ................
> Filesystem cciss/c0d2: XFS internal error xfs_da_do_buf(2) at line 2112
> of file fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.c. Caller 0xffffffff8835d9b9
>
> hpacucli says the array is fine,
What does an array verify/consistency check say?
> but it looks like it's corrupted to me.
> This is probably a lost cause, but if anyone has any ideas I'd love to hear
> them.
May be. But I'd exhaust all recovery possibilities before throwing in
the towel. You need to identify the root cause of this failure before
wiping/recreating this RAID5 array and restoring from tape/D2D. You say
a single drive in a RAID5 array failed, then all hell broke loose after
reconstructing the array with a spare drive. Were any errors logged
during the rebuild, either in the controller's log or any Linux system
logs? If not, and the reconstruction corrupted the array, I'd say you
may have a controller firmware bug on your hands. Thus I'd update the
firmware to the latest before proceeding to recreate the array and restore.
Interestingly, this exact scenario was brought to my attention on
another list just yesterday relating to a firmware bug in the IBM
DS3000/4000/5000 SAN controllers. Also after a RAID5 reconstruction.
May 16, 2008 - version 07.15.07.00
- Fix 432525 - CR139339 Data corruption found on drive after
reconstruct from GHSP (Global Hot Spare)
Once systems go into production a very large percentage of operators
never upgrade the firmware on system components...until they have a
problem. Even if the problem isn't firmware related in this case, it'd
be a good idea to update all your firmware anyway, to prevent other
possible problems.
--
Stan
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: xfs_check segfault / xfs_repair I/O error
2012-04-15 13:15 xfs_check segfault / xfs_repair I/O error Drew Wareham
2012-04-15 19:47 ` Stan Hoeppner
@ 2012-04-15 22:31 ` Dave Chinner
2012-04-16 10:18 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-04-20 4:11 ` Drew Wareham
2012-04-20 15:06 ` Eric Sandeen
2 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Dave Chinner @ 2012-04-15 22:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Drew Wareham; +Cc: xfs
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 11:15:09PM +1000, Drew Wareham wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> Hopefully this is the correct kind of information to send to this list.
>
> I have an issue with a large XFS volume (17TB) that mounts, but is not
> readable. I can view the folder structure on the volume but I can't access
> any of the actual data. A disk failed in a RAID5 array and while it has
> rebuilt now, it looks like it's caused serious data integrity issues.
>
> Here is the CentOS release / Kernel version:
> [root@svr608 ~]# uname -a
> Linux svr608 2.6.18-308.1.1.el5 #1 SMP Wed Mar 7 04:16:51 EST 2012
> x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> [root@svr608 ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release
> CentOS release 5.8 (Final)
> [root@svr608 ~]# cat /tmp/yum.list | grep xfs | grep installed
> kmod-xfs.x86_64 0.4-2
> installed
> xfsdump.x86_64 2.2.46-1.el5.centos
> installed
> xfsprogs.x86_64 2.9.4-1.el5.centos
Try upgrading xfsprogs to the latest version first. this is rather
old, and the latest versions handle IO errors better...
> But even though the volume mounts, when trying to access data it just gives
> a "Structure needs cleaning" error.
>
> Running xfs_check and xfs_repair yield the following:
> [root@svr608 ~]# xfs_check /dev/cciss/c0d2
> bad agf magic # 0x58418706 in ag 0
Oh, that's bad. 2 bytes of the magic number are corrupt...
> bad agf version # 0x30002 in ag 0
And the version is completely toast.
> /usr/sbin/xfs_check: line 28: 5259 Segmentation fault
> xfs_db$DBOPTS -i -p xfs_check -c "check$OPTS" $1
> [root@svr608 ~]# xfs_repair -n /dev/cciss/c0d2
> Phase 1 - find and verify superblock...
> superblock read failed, offset 0, size 524288, ag 0, rval -1
>
> fatal error -- Input/output error
>
> And they leave the following in dmesg:
> xfs_db[5259]: segfault at 000000000555a134 rip 00000000004070c3 rsp
> 00007fff986bae50 error 4
> cciss 0000:04:00.0: cciss: c ffff810037e00000 has CHECK CONDITION sense
> key = 0x3
This is clearly a raid array error....
....
> ................
> Filesystem cciss/c0d2: XFS internal error xfs_da_do_buf(2) at line 2112
> of file fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.c. Caller 0xffffffff8835d9b9
>
> hpacucli says the array is fine, but it looks like it's corrupted to me.
It's badly corrupted. Try a newer version of check/repair, otherwise
you're in a disaster recovery situation...
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: xfs_check segfault / xfs_repair I/O error
2012-04-15 22:31 ` Dave Chinner
@ 2012-04-16 10:18 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-04-20 4:11 ` Drew Wareham
1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Stan Hoeppner @ 2012-04-16 10:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xfs
On 4/15/2012 5:31 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 11:15:09PM +1000, Drew Wareham wrote:
>> cciss 0000:04:00.0: cciss: c ffff810037e00000 has CHECK CONDITION sense
>> key = 0x3
>
> This is clearly a raid array error....
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722780
http://h30499.www3.hp.com/t5/ProLiant-Servers-ML-DL-SL/DL180-G5-showing-hard-drive-error-messages/td-p/4771517
http://h30499.www3.hp.com/t5/General/i-o-error-linux-DL380G5/td-p/4772829
Not sure if these are relevant Drew but I'm posting them just in case.
--
Stan
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: xfs_check segfault / xfs_repair I/O error
2012-04-15 22:31 ` Dave Chinner
2012-04-16 10:18 ` Stan Hoeppner
@ 2012-04-20 4:11 ` Drew Wareham
1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Drew Wareham @ 2012-04-20 4:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Chinner; +Cc: xfs
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3013 bytes --]
Hi Dave / Stan,
Thanks for taking the time to reply. Unfortunately none of the suggestions
were able to recover the data - I'm going to rebuild the array now, but as
RAID6 for the extra level of security.
Thanks again for all your help!
Cheers,
Drew
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 11:15:09PM +1000, Drew Wareham wrote:
> > Hello Everyone,
> >
> > Hopefully this is the correct kind of information to send to this list.
> >
> > I have an issue with a large XFS volume (17TB) that mounts, but is not
> > readable. I can view the folder structure on the volume but I can't
> access
> > any of the actual data. A disk failed in a RAID5 array and while it has
> > rebuilt now, it looks like it's caused serious data integrity issues.
> >
> > Here is the CentOS release / Kernel version:
> > [root@svr608 ~]# uname -a
> > Linux svr608 2.6.18-308.1.1.el5 #1 SMP Wed Mar 7 04:16:51 EST 2012
> > x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> > [root@svr608 ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release
> > CentOS release 5.8 (Final)
> > [root@svr608 ~]# cat /tmp/yum.list | grep xfs | grep installed
> > kmod-xfs.x86_64 0.4-2
> > installed
> > xfsdump.x86_64 2.2.46-1.el5.centos
> > installed
> > xfsprogs.x86_64 2.9.4-1.el5.centos
>
> Try upgrading xfsprogs to the latest version first. this is rather
> old, and the latest versions handle IO errors better...
>
> > But even though the volume mounts, when trying to access data it just
> gives
> > a "Structure needs cleaning" error.
> >
> > Running xfs_check and xfs_repair yield the following:
> > [root@svr608 ~]# xfs_check /dev/cciss/c0d2
> > bad agf magic # 0x58418706 in ag 0
>
> Oh, that's bad. 2 bytes of the magic number are corrupt...
>
> > bad agf version # 0x30002 in ag 0
>
> And the version is completely toast.
>
> > /usr/sbin/xfs_check: line 28: 5259 Segmentation fault
> > xfs_db$DBOPTS -i -p xfs_check -c "check$OPTS" $1
> > [root@svr608 ~]# xfs_repair -n /dev/cciss/c0d2
> > Phase 1 - find and verify superblock...
> > superblock read failed, offset 0, size 524288, ag 0, rval -1
> >
> > fatal error -- Input/output error
> >
> > And they leave the following in dmesg:
> > xfs_db[5259]: segfault at 000000000555a134 rip 00000000004070c3 rsp
> > 00007fff986bae50 error 4
> > cciss 0000:04:00.0: cciss: c ffff810037e00000 has CHECK CONDITION
> sense
> > key = 0x3
>
> This is clearly a raid array error....
>
> ....
>
> > ................
> > Filesystem cciss/c0d2: XFS internal error xfs_da_do_buf(2) at line
> 2112
> > of file fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.c. Caller 0xffffffff8835d9b9
> >
> > hpacucli says the array is fine, but it looks like it's corrupted to me.
>
> It's badly corrupted. Try a newer version of check/repair, otherwise
> you're in a disaster recovery situation...
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
> --
> Dave Chinner
> david@fromorbit.com
>
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 3992 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 121 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: xfs_check segfault / xfs_repair I/O error
2012-04-15 13:15 xfs_check segfault / xfs_repair I/O error Drew Wareham
2012-04-15 19:47 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-04-15 22:31 ` Dave Chinner
@ 2012-04-20 15:06 ` Eric Sandeen
2012-04-20 15:46 ` Drew Wareham
2 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sandeen @ 2012-04-20 15:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Drew Wareham; +Cc: xfs
On 4/15/12 8:15 AM, Drew Wareham wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> Hopefully this is the correct kind of information to send to this list.
>
> I have an issue with a large XFS volume (17TB) that mounts, but is not readable. I can view the folder structure on the volume but I can't access any of the actual data. A disk failed in a RAID5 array and while it has rebuilt now, it looks like it's caused serious data integrity issues.
>
> Here is the CentOS release / Kernel version:
> [root@svr608 ~]# uname -a
> Linux svr608 2.6.18-308.1.1.el5 #1 SMP Wed Mar 7 04:16:51 EST 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> [root@svr608 ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release
> CentOS release 5.8 (Final)
> [root@svr608 ~]# cat /tmp/yum.list | grep xfs | grep installed
> kmod-xfs.x86_64 0.4-2 installed
You reall, Really, REALLY, *REALLY* want to remove kmod-xfs.
RHEL5 has been shipping with supported xfs for what, 2 years now, and that old kmod-xfs
is an ancient, ancient piece of unmaintained, bitrotting code. Sadly it overrides
the kernel rpm's xfs.ko. I don't know if this is the root cause of your problem; probably
not, but eventually it will likely be the root cause of some other problem :)
-Eric
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: xfs_check segfault / xfs_repair I/O error
2012-04-20 15:06 ` Eric Sandeen
@ 2012-04-20 15:46 ` Drew Wareham
2012-04-20 17:01 ` Eric Sandeen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Drew Wareham @ 2012-04-20 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Sandeen; +Cc: xfs
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1593 bytes --]
Hey Eric,
Good point! We're running CentOS 5, so is the CentOS-Plus repo the way to
go? These servers are all setup from a fairly old base image hence using
kmod-xfs, definitely something I'll address.
Cheers
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net> wrote:
> On 4/15/12 8:15 AM, Drew Wareham wrote:
> > Hello Everyone,
> >
> > Hopefully this is the correct kind of information to send to this list.
> >
> > I have an issue with a large XFS volume (17TB) that mounts, but is not
> readable. I can view the folder structure on the volume but I can't access
> any of the actual data. A disk failed in a RAID5 array and while it has
> rebuilt now, it looks like it's caused serious data integrity issues.
> >
> > Here is the CentOS release / Kernel version:
> > [root@svr608 ~]# uname -a
> > Linux svr608 2.6.18-308.1.1.el5 #1 SMP Wed Mar 7 04:16:51 EST 2012
> x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> > [root@svr608 ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release
> > CentOS release 5.8 (Final)
> > [root@svr608 ~]# cat /tmp/yum.list | grep xfs | grep installed
> > kmod-xfs.x86_64 0.4-2
> installed
>
> You reall, Really, REALLY, *REALLY* want to remove kmod-xfs.
>
> RHEL5 has been shipping with supported xfs for what, 2 years now, and that
> old kmod-xfs
> is an ancient, ancient piece of unmaintained, bitrotting code. Sadly it
> overrides
> the kernel rpm's xfs.ko. I don't know if this is the root cause of your
> problem; probably
> not, but eventually it will likely be the root cause of some other problem
> :)
>
> -Eric
>
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 2109 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 121 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: xfs_check segfault / xfs_repair I/O error
2012-04-20 15:46 ` Drew Wareham
@ 2012-04-20 17:01 ` Eric Sandeen
2012-04-21 0:57 ` Drew Wareham
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sandeen @ 2012-04-20 17:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Drew Wareham; +Cc: xfs
On 4/20/12 10:46 AM, Drew Wareham wrote:
> Good point! We're running CentOS 5, so is the CentOS-Plus repo the way to go? These servers are all setup from a fairly old base image hence using kmod-xfs, definitely something I'll address.
as long as you're on x86_64, the stock kernel has the xfs.ko you want.
I'm not big on offering too much centos support, but i would rather not see people using reaaaly crufty xfs. :)
-Eric
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: xfs_check segfault / xfs_repair I/O error
2012-04-20 17:01 ` Eric Sandeen
@ 2012-04-21 0:57 ` Drew Wareham
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Drew Wareham @ 2012-04-21 0:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Sandeen; +Cc: xfs
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 635 bytes --]
Thanks Eric - It might be time for us to switch up to RHEL to be honest ;).
Thanks again everyone.
Drew
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 3:01 AM, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net> wrote:
> On 4/20/12 10:46 AM, Drew Wareham wrote:
> > Good point! We're running CentOS 5, so is the CentOS-Plus repo the way
> to go? These servers are all setup from a fairly old base image hence
> using kmod-xfs, definitely something I'll address.
>
> as long as you're on x86_64, the stock kernel has the xfs.ko you want.
>
> I'm not big on offering too much centos support, but i would rather not
> see people using reaaaly crufty xfs. :)
>
> -Eric
>
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1006 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 121 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-04-21 0:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-04-15 13:15 xfs_check segfault / xfs_repair I/O error Drew Wareham
2012-04-15 19:47 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-04-15 22:31 ` Dave Chinner
2012-04-16 10:18 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-04-20 4:11 ` Drew Wareham
2012-04-20 15:06 ` Eric Sandeen
2012-04-20 15:46 ` Drew Wareham
2012-04-20 17:01 ` Eric Sandeen
2012-04-21 0:57 ` Drew Wareham
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.