From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@st.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: viresh kumar <viresh.linux@gmail.com>,
"wim@iguana.be" <wim@iguana.be>,
spear-devel <spear-devel@list.st.com>,
"linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org" <linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Pawel Moll <Pawel.Moll@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] watchdog: mpcore: Add DT probing support for ARM mpcore watchdog
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:55:09 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F967F85.1030907@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F9582AF.6040501@arm.com>
On 4/23/2012 9:56 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> > Looking at your confidence, i am starting to feel, i am wrong here ;)
> Well, having written the code that ensures request_irq() fails when
> passed a PPI, I'd be very worried if the above started to be working...
And yes. I was wrong.
WARNING: at /home/vireshk/work/spear/kernel/linux-2.6/kernel/irq/manage.c:1368 request_threaded_irq+0x128/0x148()
Modules linked in:
Backtrace:
[<c000c200>] (dump_backtrace+0x0/0x10c) from [<c0249814>] (dump_stack+0x18/0x1c)
r6:00000558 r5:c005cb34 r4:00000000
[<c02497fc>] (dump_stack+0x0/0x1c) from [<c00157d4>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x54/0x6c)
[<c0015780>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x0/0x6c) from [<c0015810>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x24/0x28)
r8:0000001e r7:c01f69c4 r6:00000000 r5:c033b840 r4:ee21770c
[<c00157ec>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x0/0x28) from [<c005cb34>] (request_threaded_irq+0x128/0x148)
[<c005ca0c>] (request_threaded_irq+0x0/0x148) from [<c005e95c>] (devm_request_threaded_irq+0x5c/0x94)
[<c005e900>] (devm_request_threaded_irq+0x0/0x94) from [<c02460b8>] (mpcore_wdt_probe+0x88/0x2d4)
[<c0246030>] (mpcore_wdt_probe+0x0/0x2d4) from [<c0180548>] (platform_drv_probe+0x20/0x24)
r7:00000000 r6:ee101c08 r5:c03601e4 r4:c038abf4
--
viresh
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: viresh.kumar@st.com (Viresh Kumar)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH V2] watchdog: mpcore: Add DT probing support for ARM mpcore watchdog
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:55:09 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F967F85.1030907@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F9582AF.6040501@arm.com>
On 4/23/2012 9:56 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> > Looking at your confidence, i am starting to feel, i am wrong here ;)
> Well, having written the code that ensures request_irq() fails when
> passed a PPI, I'd be very worried if the above started to be working...
And yes. I was wrong.
WARNING: at /home/vireshk/work/spear/kernel/linux-2.6/kernel/irq/manage.c:1368 request_threaded_irq+0x128/0x148()
Modules linked in:
Backtrace:
[<c000c200>] (dump_backtrace+0x0/0x10c) from [<c0249814>] (dump_stack+0x18/0x1c)
r6:00000558 r5:c005cb34 r4:00000000
[<c02497fc>] (dump_stack+0x0/0x1c) from [<c00157d4>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x54/0x6c)
[<c0015780>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x0/0x6c) from [<c0015810>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x24/0x28)
r8:0000001e r7:c01f69c4 r6:00000000 r5:c033b840 r4:ee21770c
[<c00157ec>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x0/0x28) from [<c005cb34>] (request_threaded_irq+0x128/0x148)
[<c005ca0c>] (request_threaded_irq+0x0/0x148) from [<c005e95c>] (devm_request_threaded_irq+0x5c/0x94)
[<c005e900>] (devm_request_threaded_irq+0x0/0x94) from [<c02460b8>] (mpcore_wdt_probe+0x88/0x2d4)
[<c0246030>] (mpcore_wdt_probe+0x0/0x2d4) from [<c0180548>] (platform_drv_probe+0x20/0x24)
r7:00000000 r6:ee101c08 r5:c03601e4 r4:c038abf4
--
viresh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-24 10:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-20 14:42 [PATCH] watchdog: mpcore: Add DT bindings for ARM mpcore watchdog Viresh Kumar
2012-04-20 14:42 ` Viresh Kumar
2012-04-21 8:32 ` Pawel Moll
2012-04-21 8:32 ` Pawel Moll
2012-04-21 11:41 ` [PATCH V2] watchdog: mpcore: Add DT probing support " Viresh Kumar
2012-04-21 11:41 ` Viresh Kumar
2012-04-23 8:36 ` Marc Zyngier
2012-04-23 8:36 ` Marc Zyngier
2012-04-23 11:35 ` viresh kumar
2012-04-23 11:35 ` viresh kumar
2012-04-23 12:15 ` Marc Zyngier
2012-04-23 12:15 ` Marc Zyngier
2012-04-23 12:21 ` viresh kumar
2012-04-23 12:21 ` viresh kumar
2012-04-23 14:21 ` viresh kumar
2012-04-23 14:21 ` viresh kumar
2012-04-23 15:22 ` Marc Zyngier
2012-04-23 15:22 ` Marc Zyngier
2012-04-23 15:33 ` viresh kumar
2012-04-23 15:33 ` viresh kumar
2012-04-23 15:49 ` Marc Zyngier
2012-04-23 15:49 ` Marc Zyngier
2012-04-23 16:01 ` viresh kumar
2012-04-23 16:01 ` viresh kumar
2012-04-23 16:12 ` Marc Zyngier
2012-04-23 16:12 ` Marc Zyngier
2012-04-23 16:16 ` viresh kumar
2012-04-23 16:16 ` viresh kumar
2012-04-23 16:26 ` Marc Zyngier
2012-04-23 16:26 ` Marc Zyngier
2012-04-24 10:25 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2012-04-24 10:25 ` Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F967F85.1030907@st.com \
--to=viresh.kumar@st.com \
--cc=Pawel.Moll@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=spear-devel@list.st.com \
--cc=viresh.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=wim@iguana.be \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.