All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@ti.com>
To: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: tony@atomide.com, grant.likely@secretlab.ca, khilman@ti.com,
	paul@pwsan.com, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
	rnayak@ti.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] OMAP2+: Add SoC specific map_io functions
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 17:06:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FB11F63.2010108@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120504175942.5ceb8e91@skate>

Salut Thomas,

Sorry for the delay.

On 5/4/2012 5:59 PM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Hello Benoit,
>
> Le Fri, 23 Sep 2011 22:23:09 +0200,
> Benoit Cousson<b-cousson@ti.com>  a écrit :
>
>> Add SoC specific map_io function to be used by the generic DT
>> board file. This is an intermediate step before having some
>> generic DT aware map_io function.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Benoit Cousson<b-cousson@ti.com>
>> Cc: Tony Lindgren<tony@atomide.com>
>
> Do you know if some progress has been made on having a generic DT aware
> map_io function, or is the per-SoC ->map_io() function still the
> recommended way of handling SoC having different requirements of static
> mappings at boot time?

Mmm, Maybe I'm wrong, but I'm not sure people are really pushing to 
store that inside DT. But to be honest, I don't really know :-)

Tony might have some clue.

Regards,
Benoit
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: b-cousson@ti.com (Cousson, Benoit)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 01/11] OMAP2+: Add SoC specific map_io functions
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 17:06:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FB11F63.2010108@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120504175942.5ceb8e91@skate>

Salut Thomas,

Sorry for the delay.

On 5/4/2012 5:59 PM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Hello Benoit,
>
> Le Fri, 23 Sep 2011 22:23:09 +0200,
> Benoit Cousson<b-cousson@ti.com>  a ?crit :
>
>> Add SoC specific map_io function to be used by the generic DT
>> board file. This is an intermediate step before having some
>> generic DT aware map_io function.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Benoit Cousson<b-cousson@ti.com>
>> Cc: Tony Lindgren<tony@atomide.com>
>
> Do you know if some progress has been made on having a generic DT aware
> map_io function, or is the per-SoC ->map_io() function still the
> recommended way of handling SoC having different requirements of static
> mappings at boot time?

Mmm, Maybe I'm wrong, but I'm not sure people are really pushing to 
store that inside DT. But to be honest, I don't really know :-)

Tony might have some clue.

Regards,
Benoit

  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-14 15:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-23 20:23 [PATCH 00/11] OMAP: Add initial support for DT on OMAP3 & OMAP4 Benoit Cousson
2011-09-23 20:23 ` Benoit Cousson
2011-09-23 20:23 ` [PATCH 01/11] OMAP2+: Add SoC specific map_io functions Benoit Cousson
2011-09-23 20:23   ` Benoit Cousson
2011-09-23 23:00   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-23 23:00     ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-26 23:15     ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-26 23:15       ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-26 23:16       ` [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: Use SoC specifc map_io Tony Lindgren
2011-09-26 23:16         ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-26 23:18         ` [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: Remove custom init_irq for remaining boards Tony Lindgren
2011-09-26 23:18           ` Tony Lindgren
2012-05-04 15:59   ` [PATCH 01/11] OMAP2+: Add SoC specific map_io functions Thomas Petazzoni
2012-05-04 15:59     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-05-14 15:06     ` Cousson, Benoit [this message]
2012-05-14 15:06       ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-05-14 19:55       ` Nicolas Pitre
2012-05-14 19:55         ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-09-23 20:23 ` [PATCH 02/11] arm/dts: Add initial device tree support for OMAP4 SoC Benoit Cousson
2011-09-23 20:23   ` Benoit Cousson
2011-09-23 20:23 ` [PATCH 03/11] arm/dts: Add support for OMAP4 PandaBoard Benoit Cousson
2011-09-23 20:23   ` Benoit Cousson
2011-09-23 23:21   ` Grant Likely
2011-09-23 23:21     ` Grant Likely
2011-09-26 12:38     ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-26 12:38       ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-23 20:23 ` [PATCH 04/11] arm/dts: Add support for OMAP4 SDP board Benoit Cousson
2011-09-23 20:23   ` Benoit Cousson
2011-09-23 20:23 ` [PATCH 05/11] arm/dts: Add initial device tree support for OMAP3 SoC Benoit Cousson
2011-09-23 20:23   ` Benoit Cousson
2011-09-23 20:23 ` [PATCH 06/11] arm/dts: Add support for OMAP3 Beagle board Benoit Cousson
2011-09-23 20:23   ` Benoit Cousson
2011-09-23 20:23 ` [PATCH 07/11] OMAP2+: board-generic: Add DT support to generic board Benoit Cousson
2011-09-23 20:23   ` Benoit Cousson
2011-09-23 23:08   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-23 23:08     ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-26 12:35     ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-26 12:35       ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-26 21:37       ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-26 21:37         ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-26  6:32   ` Rajendra Nayak
2011-09-26  6:32     ` Rajendra Nayak
     [not found]     ` <4E801C62.5020700-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2011-09-26  9:00       ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-26  9:00         ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-23 20:23 ` [PATCH 08/11] OMAP2+: board-generic: Add i2c static init Benoit Cousson
2011-09-23 20:23   ` Benoit Cousson
2011-09-23 23:12   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-23 23:12     ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-23 23:47     ` Grant Likely
2011-09-23 23:47       ` Grant Likely
2011-09-26 16:45       ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-26 16:45         ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-23 20:23 ` [PATCH 09/11] OMAP2+: l3-noc: Add support for device-tree Benoit Cousson
2011-09-23 20:23   ` Benoit Cousson
2011-09-23 20:23 ` [PATCH 10/11] arm/dts: OMAP4: Add a main ocp entry bound to l3-noc driver Benoit Cousson
2011-09-23 20:23   ` Benoit Cousson
2011-09-23 22:58   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-23 22:58     ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-26 12:13     ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-26 12:13       ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-26 21:44       ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-26 21:44         ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-23 20:23 ` [PATCH 11/11] arm/dts: OMAP3+: Add mpu, dsp and iva nodes Benoit Cousson
2011-09-23 20:23   ` Benoit Cousson
2011-09-23 23:26   ` Grant Likely
2011-09-23 23:26     ` Grant Likely

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FB11F63.2010108@ti.com \
    --to=b-cousson@ti.com \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=khilman@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@pwsan.com \
    --cc=rnayak@ti.com \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.