* self-hosted image vs. build appliance @ 2012-06-20 16:23 Barros Pena, Belen 2012-06-20 16:44 ` Saul Wold 2012-06-20 22:16 ` Stewart, David C 0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Barros Pena, Belen @ 2012-06-20 16:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: yocto Does anybody know why are we calling it 'self-hosted-image' in Hob and 'build-appliance' in the Yocto Project website? Wouldn't it be easier if we used the same name everywhere? Which one should be used? Thanks! Belen --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Corporation (UK) Limited Registered No. 1134945 (England) Registered Office: Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ VAT No: 860 2173 47 This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: self-hosted image vs. build appliance 2012-06-20 16:23 self-hosted image vs. build appliance Barros Pena, Belen @ 2012-06-20 16:44 ` Saul Wold 2012-06-21 10:30 ` Barros Pena, Belen 2012-06-20 22:16 ` Stewart, David C 1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Saul Wold @ 2012-06-20 16:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Barros Pena, Belen; +Cc: yocto On 06/20/2012 09:23 AM, Barros Pena, Belen wrote: > Does anybody know why are we calling it 'self-hosted-image' in Hob and > 'build-appliance' in the Yocto Project website? Wouldn't it be easier if > we used the same name everywhere? Which one should be used? > They are slightly different. The self-hosted-image is the recipe name that generates the image. The build-appliance is the VMware OVF file and bits needed to use VMPlayer or VMWorkstation. The self-hosted-image is the underlying disk image used in the Build Appliance Sau! > Thanks! > > Belen > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Intel Corporation (UK) Limited > Registered No. 1134945 (England) > Registered Office: Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ > VAT No: 860 2173 47 > > This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for > the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution > by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended > recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. > > _______________________________________________ > yocto mailing list > yocto@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: self-hosted image vs. build appliance 2012-06-20 16:44 ` Saul Wold @ 2012-06-21 10:30 ` Barros Pena, Belen 2012-06-21 15:22 ` Saul Wold 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Barros Pena, Belen @ 2012-06-21 10:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Saul Wold; +Cc: yocto Hi Saul, Thanks for explaining. But I must say: to an outsider, the existing naming does not explain how these 2 things relate to each other. We are adding a description of the 'self-hosted-image' to Hob, including a link to the Build Appliance page in the Yocto Project website. But I am not sure it will be enough to fully explain the relationship between both. Is there any reason why the recipe and the ovf file need to have different names? Cheers Belen On 20/06/2012 17:44, "Saul Wold" <sgw@linux.intel.com> wrote: >On 06/20/2012 09:23 AM, Barros Pena, Belen wrote: >> Does anybody know why are we calling it 'self-hosted-image' in Hob and >> 'build-appliance' in the Yocto Project website? Wouldn't it be easier if >> we used the same name everywhere? Which one should be used? >> >They are slightly different. The self-hosted-image is the recipe name >that generates the image. The build-appliance is the VMware OVF file >and bits needed to use VMPlayer or VMWorkstation. The self-hosted-image >is the underlying disk image used in the Build Appliance > >Sau! > >> Thanks! >> >> Belen >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Intel Corporation (UK) Limited >> Registered No. 1134945 (England) >> Registered Office: Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ >> VAT No: 860 2173 47 >> >> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for >> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution >> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended >> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> yocto mailing list >> yocto@yoctoproject.org >> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Corporation (UK) Limited Registered No. 1134945 (England) Registered Office: Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ VAT No: 860 2173 47 This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: self-hosted image vs. build appliance 2012-06-21 10:30 ` Barros Pena, Belen @ 2012-06-21 15:22 ` Saul Wold 2012-06-22 8:44 ` Barros Pena, Belen 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Saul Wold @ 2012-06-21 15:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Barros Pena, Belen; +Cc: yocto On 06/21/2012 03:30 AM, Barros Pena, Belen wrote: > Hi Saul, > > Thanks for explaining. But I must say: to an outsider, the existing naming > does not explain how these 2 things relate to each other. > > We are adding a description of the 'self-hosted-image' to Hob, including a > link to the Build Appliance page in the Yocto Project website. But I am > not sure it will be enough to fully explain the relationship between both. > Is there any reason why the recipe and the ovf file need to have different > names? > How about build-appliance-image and building a Build Appliance ovf Sau! > Cheers > > Belen > > > > On 20/06/2012 17:44, "Saul Wold"<sgw@linux.intel.com> wrote: > >> On 06/20/2012 09:23 AM, Barros Pena, Belen wrote: >>> Does anybody know why are we calling it 'self-hosted-image' in Hob and >>> 'build-appliance' in the Yocto Project website? Wouldn't it be easier if >>> we used the same name everywhere? Which one should be used? >>> >> They are slightly different. The self-hosted-image is the recipe name >> that generates the image. The build-appliance is the VMware OVF file >> and bits needed to use VMPlayer or VMWorkstation. The self-hosted-image >> is the underlying disk image used in the Build Appliance >> >> Sau! >> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> Belen >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Intel Corporation (UK) Limited >>> Registered No. 1134945 (England) >>> Registered Office: Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ >>> VAT No: 860 2173 47 >>> >>> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for >>> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution >>> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended >>> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> yocto mailing list >>> yocto@yoctoproject.org >>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto >>> >>> > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: self-hosted image vs. build appliance 2012-06-21 15:22 ` Saul Wold @ 2012-06-22 8:44 ` Barros Pena, Belen 2012-06-22 13:44 ` Rifenbark, Scott M 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Barros Pena, Belen @ 2012-06-22 8:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Saul Wold; +Cc: yocto Dave Stewart has suggested to use Build Appliance everywhere unless someone comes up with something better. I think build-appliance-image is definitely better than self-hosted-image, so I'll ask that to be changed in Hob as part of bug 2636. About the description, this is what Scott has suggested: 'An image you can run using the Yocto Project Build Appliance. It boots from VMware Player or VMware Workstation. For more details, visit the Yocto Project Website.' 'visit the Yocto Project Website' would be a link to http://www.yoctoproject.org/documentation/build-appliance Any thoughts? Thanks! Belen On 21/06/2012 16:22, "Saul Wold" <sgw@linux.intel.com> wrote: >On 06/21/2012 03:30 AM, Barros Pena, Belen wrote: >> Hi Saul, >> >> Thanks for explaining. But I must say: to an outsider, the existing >>naming >> does not explain how these 2 things relate to each other. >> >> We are adding a description of the 'self-hosted-image' to Hob, >>including a >> link to the Build Appliance page in the Yocto Project website. But I am >> not sure it will be enough to fully explain the relationship between >>both. >> Is there any reason why the recipe and the ovf file need to have >>different >> names? >> >How about build-appliance-image and building a Build Appliance ovf > >Sau! > > >> Cheers >> >> Belen >> >> >> >> On 20/06/2012 17:44, "Saul Wold"<sgw@linux.intel.com> wrote: >> >>> On 06/20/2012 09:23 AM, Barros Pena, Belen wrote: >>>> Does anybody know why are we calling it 'self-hosted-image' in Hob and >>>> 'build-appliance' in the Yocto Project website? Wouldn't it be easier >>>>if >>>> we used the same name everywhere? Which one should be used? >>>> >>> They are slightly different. The self-hosted-image is the recipe name >>> that generates the image. The build-appliance is the VMware OVF file >>> and bits needed to use VMPlayer or VMWorkstation. The >>>self-hosted-image >>> is the underlying disk image used in the Build Appliance >>> >>> Sau! >>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> >>>> Belen >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> Intel Corporation (UK) Limited >>>> Registered No. 1134945 (England) >>>> Registered Office: Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ >>>> VAT No: 860 2173 47 >>>> >>>> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for >>>> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution >>>> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended >>>> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> yocto mailing list >>>> yocto@yoctoproject.org >>>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto >>>> >>>> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Corporation (UK) Limited Registered No. 1134945 (England) Registered Office: Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ VAT No: 860 2173 47 This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: self-hosted image vs. build appliance 2012-06-22 8:44 ` Barros Pena, Belen @ 2012-06-22 13:44 ` Rifenbark, Scott M 2012-06-25 9:38 ` Barros Pena, Belen 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Rifenbark, Scott M @ 2012-06-22 13:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Barros Pena, Belen, Saul Wold; +Cc: yocto The term "self-hosted image" will need to be expunged from the docs. This should be mentioned in the bug as well. Scott -----Original Message----- From: yocto-bounces@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-bounces@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Barros Pena, Belen Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 1:44 AM To: Saul Wold Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [yocto] self-hosted image vs. build appliance Dave Stewart has suggested to use Build Appliance everywhere unless someone comes up with something better. I think build-appliance-image is definitely better than self-hosted-image, so I'll ask that to be changed in Hob as part of bug 2636. About the description, this is what Scott has suggested: 'An image you can run using the Yocto Project Build Appliance. It boots from VMware Player or VMware Workstation. For more details, visit the Yocto Project Website.' 'visit the Yocto Project Website' would be a link to http://www.yoctoproject.org/documentation/build-appliance Any thoughts? Thanks! Belen On 21/06/2012 16:22, "Saul Wold" <sgw@linux.intel.com> wrote: >On 06/21/2012 03:30 AM, Barros Pena, Belen wrote: >> Hi Saul, >> >> Thanks for explaining. But I must say: to an outsider, the existing >>naming >> does not explain how these 2 things relate to each other. >> >> We are adding a description of the 'self-hosted-image' to Hob, >>including a >> link to the Build Appliance page in the Yocto Project website. But I am >> not sure it will be enough to fully explain the relationship between >>both. >> Is there any reason why the recipe and the ovf file need to have >>different >> names? >> >How about build-appliance-image and building a Build Appliance ovf > >Sau! > > >> Cheers >> >> Belen >> >> >> >> On 20/06/2012 17:44, "Saul Wold"<sgw@linux.intel.com> wrote: >> >>> On 06/20/2012 09:23 AM, Barros Pena, Belen wrote: >>>> Does anybody know why are we calling it 'self-hosted-image' in Hob and >>>> 'build-appliance' in the Yocto Project website? Wouldn't it be easier >>>>if >>>> we used the same name everywhere? Which one should be used? >>>> >>> They are slightly different. The self-hosted-image is the recipe name >>> that generates the image. The build-appliance is the VMware OVF file >>> and bits needed to use VMPlayer or VMWorkstation. The >>>self-hosted-image >>> is the underlying disk image used in the Build Appliance >>> >>> Sau! >>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> >>>> Belen >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> Intel Corporation (UK) Limited >>>> Registered No. 1134945 (England) >>>> Registered Office: Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ >>>> VAT No: 860 2173 47 >>>> >>>> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for >>>> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution >>>> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended >>>> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> yocto mailing list >>>> yocto@yoctoproject.org >>>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto >>>> >>>> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Corporation (UK) Limited Registered No. 1134945 (England) Registered Office: Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ VAT No: 860 2173 47 This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: self-hosted image vs. build appliance 2012-06-22 13:44 ` Rifenbark, Scott M @ 2012-06-25 9:38 ` Barros Pena, Belen 2012-06-25 9:47 ` Barros Pena, Belen 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Barros Pena, Belen @ 2012-06-25 9:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rifenbark, Scott M, Saul Wold; +Cc: yocto Hi Scott, I'll file a separate bug for the documentation. Cheers Belen On 22/06/2012 14:44, "Rifenbark, Scott M" <scott.m.rifenbark@intel.com> wrote: >The term "self-hosted image" will need to be expunged from the docs. >This should be mentioned in the bug as well. > >Scott > >-----Original Message----- >From: yocto-bounces@yoctoproject.org >[mailto:yocto-bounces@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Barros Pena, Belen >Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 1:44 AM >To: Saul Wold >Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org >Subject: Re: [yocto] self-hosted image vs. build appliance > >Dave Stewart has suggested to use Build Appliance everywhere unless >someone comes up with something better. I think build-appliance-image is >definitely better than self-hosted-image, so I'll ask that to be changed >in Hob as part of bug 2636. > >About the description, this is what Scott has suggested: > >'An image you can run using the Yocto Project Build Appliance. It boots >from VMware Player or VMware Workstation. For more details, visit the >Yocto Project Website.' > >'visit the Yocto Project Website' would be a link to >http://www.yoctoproject.org/documentation/build-appliance > > >Any thoughts? > >Thanks! > >Belen > >On 21/06/2012 16:22, "Saul Wold" <sgw@linux.intel.com> wrote: > >>On 06/21/2012 03:30 AM, Barros Pena, Belen wrote: >>> Hi Saul, >>> >>> Thanks for explaining. But I must say: to an outsider, the existing >>>naming >>> does not explain how these 2 things relate to each other. >>> >>> We are adding a description of the 'self-hosted-image' to Hob, >>>including a >>> link to the Build Appliance page in the Yocto Project website. But I am >>> not sure it will be enough to fully explain the relationship between >>>both. >>> Is there any reason why the recipe and the ovf file need to have >>>different >>> names? >>> >>How about build-appliance-image and building a Build Appliance ovf >> >>Sau! >> >> >>> Cheers >>> >>> Belen >>> >>> >>> >>> On 20/06/2012 17:44, "Saul Wold"<sgw@linux.intel.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 06/20/2012 09:23 AM, Barros Pena, Belen wrote: >>>>> Does anybody know why are we calling it 'self-hosted-image' in Hob >>>>>and >>>>> 'build-appliance' in the Yocto Project website? Wouldn't it be easier >>>>>if >>>>> we used the same name everywhere? Which one should be used? >>>>> >>>> They are slightly different. The self-hosted-image is the recipe name >>>> that generates the image. The build-appliance is the VMware OVF file >>>> and bits needed to use VMPlayer or VMWorkstation. The >>>>self-hosted-image >>>> is the underlying disk image used in the Build Appliance >>>> >>>> Sau! >>>> >>>>> Thanks! >>>>> >>>>> Belen >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> Intel Corporation (UK) Limited >>>>> Registered No. 1134945 (England) >>>>> Registered Office: Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ >>>>> VAT No: 860 2173 47 >>>>> >>>>> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for >>>>> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution >>>>> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended >>>>> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> yocto mailing list >>>>> yocto@yoctoproject.org >>>>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>> > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >Intel Corporation (UK) Limited >Registered No. 1134945 (England) >Registered Office: Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ >VAT No: 860 2173 47 > >This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for >the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution >by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended >recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. > >_______________________________________________ >yocto mailing list >yocto@yoctoproject.org >https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Corporation (UK) Limited Registered No. 1134945 (England) Registered Office: Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ VAT No: 860 2173 47 This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: self-hosted image vs. build appliance 2012-06-25 9:38 ` Barros Pena, Belen @ 2012-06-25 9:47 ` Barros Pena, Belen 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Barros Pena, Belen @ 2012-06-25 9:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Barros Pena, Belen, Rifenbark, Scott M, Saul Wold; +Cc: yocto Just filed that bug for the documentation: 2656 https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2656 Cheers Belen On 25/06/2012 10:38, "Barros Pena, Belen" <belen.barros.pena@intel.com> wrote: >Hi Scott, > >I'll file a separate bug for the documentation. > >Cheers > >Belen > >On 22/06/2012 14:44, "Rifenbark, Scott M" <scott.m.rifenbark@intel.com> >wrote: > >>The term "self-hosted image" will need to be expunged from the docs. >>This should be mentioned in the bug as well. >> >>Scott >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: yocto-bounces@yoctoproject.org >>[mailto:yocto-bounces@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Barros Pena, Belen >>Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 1:44 AM >>To: Saul Wold >>Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org >>Subject: Re: [yocto] self-hosted image vs. build appliance >> >>Dave Stewart has suggested to use Build Appliance everywhere unless >>someone comes up with something better. I think build-appliance-image is >>definitely better than self-hosted-image, so I'll ask that to be changed >>in Hob as part of bug 2636. >> >>About the description, this is what Scott has suggested: >> >>'An image you can run using the Yocto Project Build Appliance. It boots >>from VMware Player or VMware Workstation. For more details, visit the >>Yocto Project Website.' >> >>'visit the Yocto Project Website' would be a link to >>http://www.yoctoproject.org/documentation/build-appliance >> >> >>Any thoughts? >> >>Thanks! >> >>Belen >> >>On 21/06/2012 16:22, "Saul Wold" <sgw@linux.intel.com> wrote: >> >>>On 06/21/2012 03:30 AM, Barros Pena, Belen wrote: >>>> Hi Saul, >>>> >>>> Thanks for explaining. But I must say: to an outsider, the existing >>>>naming >>>> does not explain how these 2 things relate to each other. >>>> >>>> We are adding a description of the 'self-hosted-image' to Hob, >>>>including a >>>> link to the Build Appliance page in the Yocto Project website. But I >>>>am >>>> not sure it will be enough to fully explain the relationship between >>>>both. >>>> Is there any reason why the recipe and the ovf file need to have >>>>different >>>> names? >>>> >>>How about build-appliance-image and building a Build Appliance ovf >>> >>>Sau! >>> >>> >>>> Cheers >>>> >>>> Belen >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 20/06/2012 17:44, "Saul Wold"<sgw@linux.intel.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 06/20/2012 09:23 AM, Barros Pena, Belen wrote: >>>>>> Does anybody know why are we calling it 'self-hosted-image' in Hob >>>>>>and >>>>>> 'build-appliance' in the Yocto Project website? Wouldn't it be >>>>>>easier >>>>>>if >>>>>> we used the same name everywhere? Which one should be used? >>>>>> >>>>> They are slightly different. The self-hosted-image is the recipe >>>>>name >>>>> that generates the image. The build-appliance is the VMware OVF file >>>>> and bits needed to use VMPlayer or VMWorkstation. The >>>>>self-hosted-image >>>>> is the underlying disk image used in the Build Appliance >>>>> >>>>> Sau! >>>>> >>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>> >>>>>> Belen >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>--------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> Intel Corporation (UK) Limited >>>>>> Registered No. 1134945 (England) >>>>>> Registered Office: Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ >>>>>> VAT No: 860 2173 47 >>>>>> >>>>>> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material >>>>>>for >>>>>> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or >>>>>>distribution >>>>>> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended >>>>>> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> yocto mailing list >>>>>> yocto@yoctoproject.org >>>>>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >>--------------------------------------------------------------------- >>Intel Corporation (UK) Limited >>Registered No. 1134945 (England) >>Registered Office: Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ >>VAT No: 860 2173 47 >> >>This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for >>the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution >>by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended >>recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. >> >>_______________________________________________ >>yocto mailing list >>yocto@yoctoproject.org >>https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >Intel Corporation (UK) Limited >Registered No. 1134945 (England) >Registered Office: Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ >VAT No: 860 2173 47 > >This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for >the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution >by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended >recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. > >_______________________________________________ >yocto mailing list >yocto@yoctoproject.org >https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Corporation (UK) Limited Registered No. 1134945 (England) Registered Office: Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ VAT No: 860 2173 47 This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: self-hosted image vs. build appliance 2012-06-20 16:23 self-hosted image vs. build appliance Barros Pena, Belen 2012-06-20 16:44 ` Saul Wold @ 2012-06-20 22:16 ` Stewart, David C 2012-06-21 10:39 ` Barros Pena, Belen 1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Stewart, David C @ 2012-06-20 22:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Barros Pena, Belen, yocto >From: yocto-bounces@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto- >bounces@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Barros Pena, Belen >Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 9:24 AM > >Does anybody know why are we calling it 'self-hosted-image' in Hob and >'build-appliance' in the Yocto Project website? Wouldn't it be easier if >we used the same name everywhere? Which one should be used? Yes indeed, we should have consistent naming for this feature. The problem is, neither name is very good. "build-appliance" = an implication that the thing "just works" like an appliance should just work in your kitchen. Unfortunately, the name isn't very descriptive. "Self-hosted-image" = a description of how the thing is constructed (it's a Linux OS which was constructed by the Yocto Project itself, and it builds using the Yocto Project). So neither name is good, but build appliance is usually the one I use. If anyone has a better name I WOULD LOVE TO HAVE IT. Otherwise please file a bug to change the self-hosted-image name to build appliance. Dave ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: self-hosted image vs. build appliance 2012-06-20 22:16 ` Stewart, David C @ 2012-06-21 10:39 ` Barros Pena, Belen 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Barros Pena, Belen @ 2012-06-21 10:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stewart, David C, yocto Thanks, Dave. If no suggestions come in, I'll file the bug. Belen On 20/06/2012 23:16, "Stewart, David C" <david.c.stewart@intel.com> wrote: > >>From: yocto-bounces@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto- >>bounces@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Barros Pena, Belen >>Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 9:24 AM >> >>Does anybody know why are we calling it 'self-hosted-image' in Hob and >>'build-appliance' in the Yocto Project website? Wouldn't it be easier if >>we used the same name everywhere? Which one should be used? > >Yes indeed, we should have consistent naming for this feature. > >The problem is, neither name is very good. > >"build-appliance" = an implication that the thing "just works" like an >appliance should just work in your kitchen. Unfortunately, the name isn't >very descriptive. >"Self-hosted-image" = a description of how the thing is constructed (it's >a Linux OS which was constructed by the Yocto Project itself, and it >builds using the Yocto Project). > >So neither name is good, but build appliance is usually the one I use. > >If anyone has a better name I WOULD LOVE TO HAVE IT. Otherwise please >file a bug to change the self-hosted-image name to build appliance. > >Dave --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Corporation (UK) Limited Registered No. 1134945 (England) Registered Office: Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ VAT No: 860 2173 47 This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-06-25 9:49 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2012-06-20 16:23 self-hosted image vs. build appliance Barros Pena, Belen 2012-06-20 16:44 ` Saul Wold 2012-06-21 10:30 ` Barros Pena, Belen 2012-06-21 15:22 ` Saul Wold 2012-06-22 8:44 ` Barros Pena, Belen 2012-06-22 13:44 ` Rifenbark, Scott M 2012-06-25 9:38 ` Barros Pena, Belen 2012-06-25 9:47 ` Barros Pena, Belen 2012-06-20 22:16 ` Stewart, David C 2012-06-21 10:39 ` Barros Pena, Belen
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.