From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>,
libc-alpha@sourceware.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
"Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@redhat.com>,
Yuriy Kolerov <Yuriy.Kolerov@synopsys.com>
Subject: Re: [glibc PATCH] fcntl: put F_OFD_* constants under #ifdef __USE_FILE_OFFSET64
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 10:45:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4b4a2f9e-c6eb-c9f0-51bb-8f2ea5471f21@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ziobt8xj.fsf@linux-m68k.org>
On 08/17/2016 10:52 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> On Aug 17 2016, Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Why would the F_SETLK operation work with a struct flock64 in
>> _FILE_OFFSET_BITS == 64 mode? I think the kernel still expects a 32-bit
>> struct.
>
> With _F_O_B == 64, F_SETLK is actually F_SETLK64.
Indeed, I missed that. I think removing the file-private lock
definitions in 32 bit mode is the closest we can get to mirror this
behavior.
Florian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-18 8:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-17 14:47 [glibc PATCH] fcntl: put F_OFD_* constants under #ifdef __USE_FILE_OFFSET64 Jeff Layton
2016-08-17 15:44 ` Joseph Myers
2016-08-17 17:49 ` Jeff Layton
2016-08-17 17:56 ` Joseph Myers
2016-08-17 18:23 ` Jeff Layton
2016-08-17 16:13 ` Mike Frysinger
2016-08-17 17:34 ` Florian Weimer
2016-08-17 17:39 ` Jeff Layton
2016-08-17 18:02 ` Florian Weimer
2016-08-17 18:21 ` Jeff Layton
2016-08-17 18:51 ` Florian Weimer
2016-08-17 19:20 ` Jeff Layton
2016-08-18 8:44 ` Florian Weimer
2016-08-18 8:58 ` Andreas Schwab
2016-08-17 20:52 ` Andreas Schwab
2016-08-18 8:45 ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2016-08-17 18:43 ` Mike Frysinger
2016-08-17 19:15 ` Jeff Layton
2016-08-17 19:59 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2016-08-17 20:05 ` Jeff Layton
2016-08-17 20:37 ` Mike Frysinger
2016-08-17 20:57 ` Jeff Layton
2016-08-17 21:35 ` Mike Frysinger
2016-08-17 21:48 ` Jeff Layton
2016-08-18 9:00 ` Florian Weimer
2016-08-23 11:03 ` Cyril Hrubis
2016-08-23 11:36 ` Jeff Layton
2016-08-23 11:38 ` Cyril Hrubis
2016-08-23 21:10 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2016-11-14 13:45 ` Cyril Hrubis
2016-11-22 18:41 ` Florian Weimer
2016-08-18 8:57 ` Florian Weimer
2016-08-17 20:03 ` Mike Frysinger
2016-08-17 21:30 ` Cyril Hrubis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4b4a2f9e-c6eb-c9f0-51bb-8f2ea5471f21@redhat.com \
--to=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=Yuriy.Kolerov@synopsys.com \
--cc=carlos@redhat.com \
--cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
--cc=schwab@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.