All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
	Guodong Xu <guodong.xu@linaro.org>,
	Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
	Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@linaro.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] PM / ACPI / i2c: Deploy runtime PM centric path for system sleep
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 17:10:10 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4f22e64f-8a3c-9ce2-d12d-d3ff2c4108c9@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1503499329-28834-1-git-send-email-ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

On 08/23/2017 05:42 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> This series has been tested on an ARM64 Hikey board, which isn't having the
> i2c device attached to the ACPI PM domain. This means that the ACPI changes
> needs to be tested on some relevant Intel SoCs and it's greatly appreciated
> is someone could help out with this, so is of course review comments.
> 
I tested this set on both platforms using drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c and 
drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.c and didn't see any issues.

I guess tested-by is not needed yet as details are cooking in ACPI part 
of the set.

-- 
Jarkko

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com (Jarkko Nikula)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/9] PM / ACPI / i2c: Deploy runtime PM centric path for system sleep
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 17:10:10 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4f22e64f-8a3c-9ce2-d12d-d3ff2c4108c9@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1503499329-28834-1-git-send-email-ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

On 08/23/2017 05:42 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> This series has been tested on an ARM64 Hikey board, which isn't having the
> i2c device attached to the ACPI PM domain. This means that the ACPI changes
> needs to be tested on some relevant Intel SoCs and it's greatly appreciated
> is someone could help out with this, so is of course review comments.
> 
I tested this set on both platforms using drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c and 
drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.c and didn't see any issues.

I guess tested-by is not needed yet as details are cooking in ACPI part 
of the set.

-- 
Jarkko

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-08-25 14:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 94+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-23 14:42 [PATCH v2 0/9] PM / ACPI / i2c: Deploy runtime PM centric path for system sleep Ulf Hansson
2017-08-23 14:42 ` Ulf Hansson
2017-08-23 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] PM / ACPI: Restore acpi_subsys_complete() Ulf Hansson
2017-08-23 14:42   ` Ulf Hansson
2017-08-23 22:41   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-08-23 22:41     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-08-23 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] PM / Sleep: Remove pm_complete_with_resume_check() Ulf Hansson
2017-08-23 14:42   ` Ulf Hansson
2017-08-23 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] PM / ACPI: Split code validating need for runtime resume in ->prepare() Ulf Hansson
2017-08-23 14:42   ` Ulf Hansson
2017-08-23 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] PM / ACPI: Split acpi_lpss_suspend_late|resume_early() Ulf Hansson
2017-08-23 14:42   ` Ulf Hansson
2017-08-23 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] PM / ACPI: Provide option to disable direct_complete for ACPI devices Ulf Hansson
2017-08-23 14:42   ` Ulf Hansson
2017-08-23 23:39   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-08-23 23:39     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-08-24  0:13     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-08-24  0:13       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-08-24  0:20       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-08-24  0:20         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-08-24  1:03         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-08-24  1:03           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-08-24  9:15           ` Ulf Hansson
2017-08-24  9:15             ` Ulf Hansson
2017-08-24 16:35             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-08-24 16:35               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-08-24 21:50               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-08-24 21:50                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-08-25 13:42                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-08-25 13:42                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-08-28  1:30                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-08-28  1:30                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-08-28  8:31                     ` Ulf Hansson
2017-08-28  8:31                       ` Ulf Hansson
2017-08-28 12:39                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-08-28 12:39                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-08-28 12:54                         ` Ulf Hansson
2017-08-28 12:54                           ` Ulf Hansson
2017-08-28 13:40                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-08-28 13:40                             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-08-28 14:24                             ` Ulf Hansson
2017-08-28 14:24                               ` Ulf Hansson
2017-08-28 21:14                               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-08-28 21:14                                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-08-25  9:28               ` Ulf Hansson
2017-08-25  9:28                 ` Ulf Hansson
2017-08-25 12:23                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-08-25 12:23                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-08-24  8:19     ` Ulf Hansson
2017-08-24  8:19       ` Ulf Hansson
2017-08-24 14:57       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-08-24 14:57         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-08-25  9:04         ` Ulf Hansson
2017-08-25  9:04           ` Ulf Hansson
2017-08-23 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] PM / ACPI: Enable the runtime PM centric approach for system sleep Ulf Hansson
2017-08-23 14:42   ` Ulf Hansson
2017-08-23 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] PM / ACPI: Avoid runtime resuming device in acpi_subsys_suspend|freeze() Ulf Hansson
2017-08-23 14:42   ` Ulf Hansson
2017-08-23 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] i2c: designware: Don't resume device in the ->complete() callback Ulf Hansson
2017-08-23 14:42   ` Ulf Hansson
2017-08-23 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] i2c: designware: Deploy the runtime PM centric approach for system sleep Ulf Hansson
2017-08-23 14:42   ` Ulf Hansson
2017-08-25 14:10 ` Jarkko Nikula [this message]
2017-08-25 14:10   ` [PATCH v2 0/9] PM / ACPI / i2c: Deploy runtime PM centric path " Jarkko Nikula
2017-08-29  0:18 ` [PATCH 0/3] PM / ACPI / i2c: Runtime PM aware system sleep handling Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-08-29  0:18   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-08-29  0:20   ` [PATCH 1/3] PM / core: Add SAFE_SUSPEND driver flag Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-08-29  0:20     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-08-29 14:57     ` Ulf Hansson
2017-08-29 14:57       ` Ulf Hansson
2017-08-29 15:02       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-08-29 15:02         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-08-29  0:59   ` [PATCH 2/3] PM / ACPI: Use SAFE_SUSPEND in the generic ACPI PM domain Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-08-29  0:59     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-08-29  0:59   ` [PATCH 3/3] PM: i2c-designware-platdrv: System sleep handling rework Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-08-29  0:59     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-08-29 16:38     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-08-29 16:38       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-08-29 16:40       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-08-29 16:40         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-08-29 10:29   ` [PATCH 0/3] PM / ACPI / i2c: Runtime PM aware system sleep handling Johannes Stezenbach
2017-08-29 10:29     ` Johannes Stezenbach
2017-08-29 11:44     ` Ulf Hansson
2017-08-29 11:44       ` Ulf Hansson
2017-08-29 13:53       ` Johannes Stezenbach
2017-08-29 13:53         ` Johannes Stezenbach
2017-08-29 14:43       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-08-29 14:43         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-08-29 15:05         ` Ulf Hansson
2017-08-29 15:05           ` Ulf Hansson
2017-08-29 16:44           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-08-29 16:44             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-08-29 14:49     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-08-29 14:49       ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4f22e64f-8a3c-9ce2-d12d-d3ff2c4108c9@linux.intel.com \
    --to=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=guodong.xu@linaro.org \
    --cc=haojian.zhuang@linaro.org \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=jszhang@marvell.com \
    --cc=khilman@kernel.org \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    --cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.