All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	Andre Przywara <andre@andrep.de>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: kernel 3.7+ cpufreq regression on AMD system running as dom0
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 12:22:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50FD32FA.7010306@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130118200331.GF4062@pd.tnic>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2722 bytes --]

On 01/18/2013 08:03 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 02:00:15PM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> I did not explain myself well. The fix is OK - it just that the
>> hypervisor causes the quirk to not work correctly. Hmm, I wonder if
>> there BIOSes that do the same thing (cause the MSR to return 0). Per
>> you estimation of BIOS quality, it seems that this could happen.
>
> Yeah, I don't think there's a limit to the amount of SNAFU a BIOS can
> cause :-).
>

So for having the "check for sensible BIOS" in mainline I refreshed the patch 
(fixed the bit test, and actually tested it this time) and also added some 
hopefully sensible explanation to it (attached below).

Should I send it to acpi lists or would that have to go via an Andre?

-Stefan

 From 6e2fc8291c91339123a37162382d8b08b50867ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 16:17:00 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] ACPI: Check MSR valid bit before using P-state frequencies

To fix incorrect P-state frequencies which can happen on
some AMD systems f594065faf4f9067c2283a34619fc0714e79a98d
   "ACPI: Add fixups for AMD P-state figures"
introduced a quirk to obtain the correct values by reading
from AMD specific MSRs.

This did cause a regression when running a kernel using that
quirk under Xen which does (currently) not pass on the contents
of the HW but 0. And this seems to cause a failure to initialize
the ondemand governour (hard to say for sure as all P-states
appear to run at the same frequency).

While this should also be fixed in the hypervisor (to allow
a guest to read that MSR), this patch is intended to work
around the issue in the meantime. In discussion it turned out
that indeed real HW/BIOSes may choose to not set the valid bit
and thus mark the P-state as invalid. So this could be considered
a fix for broken BIOSes that also works around the issue on Xen.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.7..
---
  drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c | 3 +++
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
index 836bfe0..41f4bdac 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
@@ -340,6 +340,9 @@ static void amd_fixup_frequency(struct acpi_processor_px 
*px, int i)
  	if ((boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x10 && boot_cpu_data.x86_model < 10)
  	    || boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x11) {
  		rdmsr(MSR_AMD_PSTATE_DEF_BASE + index, lo, hi);
+		/* Bit 63 indicates whether contents are valid */
+		if (!(hi & 0x80000000))
+			return;
  		fid = lo & 0x3f;
  		did = (lo >> 6) & 7;
  		if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x10)
-- 
1.8.0



[-- Attachment #2: 0001-ACPI-Check-MSR-valid-bit-before-using-P-state-freque.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 1932 bytes --]

>From 6e2fc8291c91339123a37162382d8b08b50867ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 16:17:00 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] ACPI: Check MSR valid bit before using P-state frequencies

To fix incorrect P-state frequencies which can happen on
some AMD systems f594065faf4f9067c2283a34619fc0714e79a98d
  "ACPI: Add fixups for AMD P-state figures"
introduced a quirk to obtain the correct values by reading
from AMD specific MSRs.

This did cause a regression when running a kernel using that
quirk under Xen which does (currently) not pass on the contents
of the HW but 0. And this seems to cause a failure to initialize
the ondemand governour (hard to say for sure as all P-states
appear to run at the same frequency).

While this should also be fixed in the hypervisor (to allow
a guest to read that MSR), this patch is intended to work
around the issue in the meantime. In discussion it turned out
that indeed real HW/BIOSes may choose to not set the valid bit
and thus mark the P-state as invalid. So this could be considered
a fix for broken BIOSes that also works around the issue on Xen.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.7..
---
 drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
index 836bfe0..41f4bdac 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
@@ -340,6 +340,9 @@ static void amd_fixup_frequency(struct acpi_processor_px *px, int i)
 	if ((boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x10 && boot_cpu_data.x86_model < 10)
 	    || boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x11) {
 		rdmsr(MSR_AMD_PSTATE_DEF_BASE + index, lo, hi);
+		/* Bit 63 indicates whether contents are valid */
+		if (!(hi & 0x80000000))
+			return;
 		fid = lo & 0x3f;
 		did = (lo >> 6) & 7;
 		if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x10)
-- 
1.8.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-01-21 12:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-14 15:58 kernel 3.7+ cpufreq regression on AMD system running as dom0 Stefan Bader
2013-01-14 16:34 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-14 16:55   ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2013-01-14 17:08   ` Stefan Bader
2013-01-14 17:40     ` André Przywara
2013-01-14 17:40       ` André Przywara
2013-01-15 17:53   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-01-15 18:18     ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-18 19:00       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-01-18 19:38         ` [Xen-devel] " Boris Ostrovsky
2013-01-18 19:44           ` Andrew Cooper
2013-01-18 20:03         ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-18 22:00           ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-01-21 12:22           ` Stefan Bader [this message]
2013-01-21 12:42             ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-21 12:53               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-21 13:08                 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-21 13:11               ` Stefan Bader
2013-01-21 15:03               ` Stefan Bader
2013-01-21 15:31                 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-22 13:54                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-22  0:01         ` [Xen-devel] " Boris Ostrovsky
2013-01-16 10:26     ` Jan Beulich
2013-01-16 14:34       ` Stefan Bader
2013-01-16 14:34       ` [Xen-devel] " Stefan Bader
2013-01-16 10:26     ` Jan Beulich
2013-01-15 13:04 ` Matt Wilson
2013-01-15 17:59   ` [Xen-devel] " Matt Wilson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50FD32FA.7010306@canonical.com \
    --to=stefan.bader@canonical.com \
    --cc=andre@andrep.de \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjg@redhat.com \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.