All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@free.fr>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
	Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: Dove: Add the audio devices in DT
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 14:16:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <521DEA20.8020103@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130828135827.2307c89e@skate>

On 08/28/13 13:58, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 13:44:51 +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
>>>> Also, we'll need to distinguish between the different audio controllers
>>>> on a single SoC, i.e. i2s0 and i2s1. I suggest checking the (phys) reg
>>>> base passed.
>>>
>>> For what reason does the driver needs to know whether it's the instance
>>> 0 or instance 1 ? If it's needed for some specific reason, then there
>>> should probably be something like marvell,i2s-channel-id = <0> and
>>> marvell,i2s-channel-id = <1>.
>>
>> On Dove, audio1 has SPDIF out, audio0 hasn't. Russell also mentioned to
>> get rid of "i2s" and use "audio" instead. Most SoC's controllers are
>> i2s only but as soon as SPDIF comes into play, it is a different
>> interface protocol.
>>
>> I am fine with having a "marvell,channel-id" (no "i2s") to discriminate
>> the instances, although reg offset should be sufficient.
>
> Well, the reg offset is a possibility, but it's not really nice, and
> would have to be adapted to each and every SoC even if the reset of the
> audio IP is the same.
>
> Though, if the difference between the two units is the availability of
> SPDIF support, then we shouldn't encode the channel number, but instead
> the availability of SPDIF, i.e:
>
> 	audio0 {
> 		reg = <... ...>;
> 		compatible = "marvell,kirkwood-audio";
> 		marvell,has-spdif;

Agree, if you make it "marvell,has-spdif-in" and "marvell,has-spdif-out"
Dove has either i2s-only or i2s+spdifo, kirkwood has i2s+spdifo+spdifi
for the one audio controller available. Can't tell for Armada 370.

BTW, you might have followed some of the DT discussions with Mark
before; as he insists on having a separate sound card node, he might
argue that above property should be part of that node instead.

Last patch discussion [1] I followed on some spdif sound nodes, took the
patch up to v11 or so. Mainly, because the author updated it too
quickly, but looks like audio bindings are (still) worth a lot of
discussion.

[1] http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.alsa.devel/112004

Sebastian

> 	};
>
> 	audio1 {
> 		reg = <... ...>;
> 		compatible = "marvell,kirkwood-audio";
> 	};




WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com (Sebastian Hesselbarth)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: Dove: Add the audio devices in DT
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 14:16:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <521DEA20.8020103@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130828135827.2307c89e@skate>

On 08/28/13 13:58, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 13:44:51 +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
>>>> Also, we'll need to distinguish between the different audio controllers
>>>> on a single SoC, i.e. i2s0 and i2s1. I suggest checking the (phys) reg
>>>> base passed.
>>>
>>> For what reason does the driver needs to know whether it's the instance
>>> 0 or instance 1 ? If it's needed for some specific reason, then there
>>> should probably be something like marvell,i2s-channel-id = <0> and
>>> marvell,i2s-channel-id = <1>.
>>
>> On Dove, audio1 has SPDIF out, audio0 hasn't. Russell also mentioned to
>> get rid of "i2s" and use "audio" instead. Most SoC's controllers are
>> i2s only but as soon as SPDIF comes into play, it is a different
>> interface protocol.
>>
>> I am fine with having a "marvell,channel-id" (no "i2s") to discriminate
>> the instances, although reg offset should be sufficient.
>
> Well, the reg offset is a possibility, but it's not really nice, and
> would have to be adapted to each and every SoC even if the reset of the
> audio IP is the same.
>
> Though, if the difference between the two units is the availability of
> SPDIF support, then we shouldn't encode the channel number, but instead
> the availability of SPDIF, i.e:
>
> 	audio0 {
> 		reg = <... ...>;
> 		compatible = "marvell,kirkwood-audio";
> 		marvell,has-spdif;

Agree, if you make it "marvell,has-spdif-in" and "marvell,has-spdif-out"
Dove has either i2s-only or i2s+spdifo, kirkwood has i2s+spdifo+spdifi
for the one audio controller available. Can't tell for Armada 370.

BTW, you might have followed some of the DT discussions with Mark
before; as he insists on having a separate sound card node, he might
argue that above property should be part of that node instead.

Last patch discussion [1] I followed on some spdif sound nodes, took the
patch up to v11 or so. Mainly, because the author updated it too
quickly, but looks like audio bindings are (still) worth a lot of
discussion.

[1] http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.alsa.devel/112004

Sebastian

> 	};
>
> 	audio1 {
> 		reg = <... ...>;
> 		compatible = "marvell,kirkwood-audio";
> 	};

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-08-28 12:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-28  9:34 [PATCH 1/2] ARM: Dove: Add the audio devices in DT Jean-Francois Moine
2013-08-28  9:34 ` Jean-Francois Moine
2013-08-28 10:13 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-28 10:13   ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-28 10:13   ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-28 10:19   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-28 10:19     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-28 10:19     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-28 10:26     ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-28 10:26       ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-28 10:26       ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-28 11:15       ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-28 11:15         ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-28 11:44         ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-28 11:44           ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-28 11:58           ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-28 11:58             ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-28 12:13             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-28 12:13               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-28 12:29               ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-28 12:29                 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-28 12:42                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-28 12:42                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-28 12:51                   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-28 12:51                     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-28 13:58                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-28 13:58                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-28 12:16             ` Sebastian Hesselbarth [this message]
2013-08-28 12:16               ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-29 10:07               ` Jean-Francois Moine
2013-08-29 10:07                 ` Jean-Francois Moine
2013-08-29 10:13                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-29 10:13                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-29 11:01                   ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-29 11:01                     ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-30 15:08                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-30 15:08                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-29  9:46         ` Jean-Francois Moine
2013-08-29  9:46           ` Jean-Francois Moine
2013-08-29 16:12       ` Mark Brown
2013-08-29 16:12         ` Mark Brown
2013-08-29 16:33         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-29 16:33           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-29 17:12           ` Mark Brown
2013-08-29 17:12             ` Mark Brown
2013-08-29 18:02             ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-29 18:02               ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-29 18:20               ` Mark Brown
2013-08-29 18:20                 ` Mark Brown
2013-08-29 18:34                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-29 18:34                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-28 19:49 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-08-28 19:49   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-08-29  9:38   ` Jean-Francois Moine
2013-08-29  9:38     ` Jean-Francois Moine
2013-08-29 14:13     ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-08-29 14:13       ` Sergei Shtylyov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=521DEA20.8020103@gmail.com \
    --to=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gregory.clement@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=moinejf@free.fr \
    --cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
    --cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
    --cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.