All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rohit Vaswani <rvaswani@codeaurora.org>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Cc: David Brown <davidb@codeaurora.org>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
	Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Daniel Walker <dwalker@fifo99.com>,
	Bryan Huntsman <bryanh@codeaurora.org>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 1/2] ARM: msm: Add support for APQ8074 Dragonboard
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2013 10:48:22 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <522E09E6.8040300@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130906215051.GA29253@quad.lixom.net>

On 9/6/2013 2:50 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some comments below.
>
> On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 12:32:22PM -0700, Rohit Vaswani wrote:
>> This patch adds basic board support for APQ8074 Dragonboard
>> <snip>
>>   dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MSM) += msm8660-surf.dtb \
>> -	msm8960-cdp.dtb
>> +	msm8960-cdp.dtb \
>> +	apq8074-dragonboard.dtb
> Please add boards alphabetically.
Will do.
>
>>   dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MVEBU) += armada-370-db.dtb \
>>   	armada-370-mirabox.dtb \
>>   	armada-370-rd.dtb \
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/apq8074-dragonboard.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/apq8074-dragonboard.dts
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..5b7b6a0
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/apq8074-dragonboard.dts
> arch/arm/boot/dts/ is getting really crowded. It's been working best if the SoC
> family or vendor is used as a prefix to keep things a bit more organized. In
> that spirit, prefixing these with msm-<foo> makes sense. Can you please do so?

Sure. But the board is called an APQ8074 and we wanted to keep the 
naming consistent with that.
>> @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
>> +/include/ "msm8974.dtsi"
>> +
>> +/ {
>> +	model = "Qualcomm APQ8074 Dragonboard";
>> +	compatible = "qcom,apq8074-dragonboard", "qcom,apq8074";
>> +};
> Ok, I'm all for merging a early minimal dts file, but things like memory and
> a default bootargs tend to make sense.
>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/msm8974.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/msm8974.dtsi
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..f04b643
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/msm8974.dtsi
>> @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
>> +/dts-v1/;
>> +
>> +/include/ "skeleton.dtsi"
>> +
>> +/ {
>> +	model = "Qualcomm MSM8974";
>> +	compatible = "qcom,msm8974";
> the board uses "qcom,apq8074" and this overrides this. Which way is it?

So, MSM8974 is the base chip. The APQ8074 is a board based on it with 
the modem fused. So, apq8074 board compatible overrides the generic chip 
compatible.
>
>> +	interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
>> +
>> +	soc: soc { };
> For files that include this it's ok to use the &phandle syntax, but in this
> base dtsi, please use proper structure. In other words, move the contents of
> the soc node up above instead.

Will do.
>
>> +};
>> +
>> +&soc {
>> +	#address-cells = <1>;
>> +	#size-cells = <1>;
>> +	ranges;
>> +	compatible = "simple-bus";
>> +
>> +	intc: interrupt-controller@f9000000 {
>> +		compatible = "qcom,msm-qgic2";
>> +		interrupt-controller;
>> +		#interrupt-cells = <3>;
>> +		reg = <0xf9000000 0x1000>,
>> +		      <0xf9002000 0x1000>;
>> +	};
>> +
>> +	timer {
>> +		compatible = "arm,armv7-timer";
>> +		interrupts = <1 2 0xf08>,
>> +			     <1 3 0xf08>,
>> +			     <1 4 0xf08>,
>> +			     <1 1 0xf08>;
>> +		clock-frequency = <19200000>;
>> +	};
>> +};
> It'd make a lot of sense to include at least cpu nodes here as well, and
> ideally basics for the drivers you have already merged, such as uarts.

Those are scheduled next as separate patches with some additional changes.
>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-msm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-msm/Kconfig
>> index 905efc8..499e8fe 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-msm/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-msm/Kconfig
>> @@ -1,12 +1,12 @@
>>   if ARCH_MSM
>>   
>>   comment "Qualcomm MSM SoC Type"
>> -	depends on (ARCH_MSM8X60 || ARCH_MSM8960)
>> +	depends on ARCH_MSM_DT
>>   
>>   choice
>>   	prompt "Qualcomm MSM SoC Type"
>>   	default ARCH_MSM7X00A
>> -	depends on !(ARCH_MSM8X60 || ARCH_MSM8960)
>> +	depends on !ARCH_MSM_DT
> This has nothing to do with adding support for dragonboard. Please break
> out the cleanup separately.
>
> I'm not sure what the purpose of ARCH_MSM_DT is either, it just looks to
> complicate matter here?

ARCH_MSM_DT is just a combined config to denote the targets that have DT 
support instead of ORing the chip configs.
>> +config ARCH_MSM8974
>> +	bool "MSM8974"
>> +	select ARM_GIC
>> +	select CPU_V7
>> +	select HAVE_ARM_ARCH_TIMER
>> +	select HAVE_SMP
>> +	select MSM_SCM if SMP
>> +	select USE_OF
>> +
>> +config ARCH_MSM_DT
>> +	def_bool y
>> +	depends on (ARCH_MSM8X60 || ARCH_MSM8960 || ARCH_MSM8974)
>> +
>>   config MSM_HAS_DEBUG_UART_HS
>>   	bool
>>   
>> @@ -68,6 +81,7 @@ config MSM_SOC_REV_A
>>   
>>   config  ARCH_MSM_ARM11
>>   	bool
>> +
>>   config  ARCH_MSM_SCORPION
>>   	bool
>>   
>> @@ -75,6 +89,7 @@ config  MSM_VIC
>>   	bool
>>   
>>   menu "Qualcomm MSM Board Type"
>> +	depends on !ARCH_MSM_DT
>>   
>>   config MACH_HALIBUT
>>   	depends on ARCH_MSM
>> @@ -122,6 +137,7 @@ config MSM_SMD
>>   
>>   config MSM_GPIOMUX
>>   	bool
>> +	depends on !ARCH_MSM_DT
>>   	help
>>   	  Support for MSM V1 TLMM GPIOMUX architecture.
>
> All of the above should be in a separate patch and motivated.
>
>>   
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-msm/Makefile b/arch/arm/mach-msm/Makefile
>> index d257ff4..80e3b15 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-msm/Makefile
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-msm/Makefile
>> @@ -29,5 +29,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MSM7X30) += board-msm7x30.o devices-msm7x30.o
>>   obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QSD8X50) += board-qsd8x50.o devices-qsd8x50.o
>>   obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MSM8X60) += board-dt-8660.o
>>   obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MSM8960) += board-dt-8960.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MSM8974) += board-dt-8974.o
>>   obj-$(CONFIG_MSM_GPIOMUX) += gpiomux.o
>>   obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QSD8X50) += gpiomux-8x50.o
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-msm/board-dt-8974.c b/arch/arm/mach-msm/board-dt-8974.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..01ed8d0
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-msm/board-dt-8974.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
>> +/* Copyright (c) 2013, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 and
>> + * only version 2 as published by the Free Software Foundation.
>> + *
>> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
>> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
>> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
>> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
>> +#include <asm/mach/arch.h>
>> +
>> +static const char * const msm8974_dt_match[] __initconst = {
>> +	"qcom,msm8974",
>> +	"qcom,apq8074",
>> +	NULL
>> +};
>> +
>> +DT_MACHINE_START(MSM8974_DT, "Qualcomm MSM (Flattened Device Tree)")
>> +	.dt_compat = msm8974_dt_match,
>> +MACHINE_END
> This file should be shared across SoCs. You should avoid adding a new dt board
> file for every SoC like this.

Will club these changes with the ARCH_MSM_DT seperation and send that 
out as a precursor patch to 8074 support.
>
> -Olof


Thanks,
Rohit Vaswani

-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: rvaswani@codeaurora.org (Rohit Vaswani)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv3 1/2] ARM: msm: Add support for APQ8074 Dragonboard
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2013 10:48:22 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <522E09E6.8040300@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130906215051.GA29253@quad.lixom.net>

On 9/6/2013 2:50 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some comments below.
>
> On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 12:32:22PM -0700, Rohit Vaswani wrote:
>> This patch adds basic board support for APQ8074 Dragonboard
>> <snip>
>>   dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MSM) += msm8660-surf.dtb \
>> -	msm8960-cdp.dtb
>> +	msm8960-cdp.dtb \
>> +	apq8074-dragonboard.dtb
> Please add boards alphabetically.
Will do.
>
>>   dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MVEBU) += armada-370-db.dtb \
>>   	armada-370-mirabox.dtb \
>>   	armada-370-rd.dtb \
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/apq8074-dragonboard.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/apq8074-dragonboard.dts
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..5b7b6a0
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/apq8074-dragonboard.dts
> arch/arm/boot/dts/ is getting really crowded. It's been working best if the SoC
> family or vendor is used as a prefix to keep things a bit more organized. In
> that spirit, prefixing these with msm-<foo> makes sense. Can you please do so?

Sure. But the board is called an APQ8074 and we wanted to keep the 
naming consistent with that.
>> @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
>> +/include/ "msm8974.dtsi"
>> +
>> +/ {
>> +	model = "Qualcomm APQ8074 Dragonboard";
>> +	compatible = "qcom,apq8074-dragonboard", "qcom,apq8074";
>> +};
> Ok, I'm all for merging a early minimal dts file, but things like memory and
> a default bootargs tend to make sense.
>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/msm8974.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/msm8974.dtsi
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..f04b643
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/msm8974.dtsi
>> @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
>> +/dts-v1/;
>> +
>> +/include/ "skeleton.dtsi"
>> +
>> +/ {
>> +	model = "Qualcomm MSM8974";
>> +	compatible = "qcom,msm8974";
> the board uses "qcom,apq8074" and this overrides this. Which way is it?

So, MSM8974 is the base chip. The APQ8074 is a board based on it with 
the modem fused. So, apq8074 board compatible overrides the generic chip 
compatible.
>
>> +	interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
>> +
>> +	soc: soc { };
> For files that include this it's ok to use the &phandle syntax, but in this
> base dtsi, please use proper structure. In other words, move the contents of
> the soc node up above instead.

Will do.
>
>> +};
>> +
>> +&soc {
>> +	#address-cells = <1>;
>> +	#size-cells = <1>;
>> +	ranges;
>> +	compatible = "simple-bus";
>> +
>> +	intc: interrupt-controller at f9000000 {
>> +		compatible = "qcom,msm-qgic2";
>> +		interrupt-controller;
>> +		#interrupt-cells = <3>;
>> +		reg = <0xf9000000 0x1000>,
>> +		      <0xf9002000 0x1000>;
>> +	};
>> +
>> +	timer {
>> +		compatible = "arm,armv7-timer";
>> +		interrupts = <1 2 0xf08>,
>> +			     <1 3 0xf08>,
>> +			     <1 4 0xf08>,
>> +			     <1 1 0xf08>;
>> +		clock-frequency = <19200000>;
>> +	};
>> +};
> It'd make a lot of sense to include at least cpu nodes here as well, and
> ideally basics for the drivers you have already merged, such as uarts.

Those are scheduled next as separate patches with some additional changes.
>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-msm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-msm/Kconfig
>> index 905efc8..499e8fe 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-msm/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-msm/Kconfig
>> @@ -1,12 +1,12 @@
>>   if ARCH_MSM
>>   
>>   comment "Qualcomm MSM SoC Type"
>> -	depends on (ARCH_MSM8X60 || ARCH_MSM8960)
>> +	depends on ARCH_MSM_DT
>>   
>>   choice
>>   	prompt "Qualcomm MSM SoC Type"
>>   	default ARCH_MSM7X00A
>> -	depends on !(ARCH_MSM8X60 || ARCH_MSM8960)
>> +	depends on !ARCH_MSM_DT
> This has nothing to do with adding support for dragonboard. Please break
> out the cleanup separately.
>
> I'm not sure what the purpose of ARCH_MSM_DT is either, it just looks to
> complicate matter here?

ARCH_MSM_DT is just a combined config to denote the targets that have DT 
support instead of ORing the chip configs.
>> +config ARCH_MSM8974
>> +	bool "MSM8974"
>> +	select ARM_GIC
>> +	select CPU_V7
>> +	select HAVE_ARM_ARCH_TIMER
>> +	select HAVE_SMP
>> +	select MSM_SCM if SMP
>> +	select USE_OF
>> +
>> +config ARCH_MSM_DT
>> +	def_bool y
>> +	depends on (ARCH_MSM8X60 || ARCH_MSM8960 || ARCH_MSM8974)
>> +
>>   config MSM_HAS_DEBUG_UART_HS
>>   	bool
>>   
>> @@ -68,6 +81,7 @@ config MSM_SOC_REV_A
>>   
>>   config  ARCH_MSM_ARM11
>>   	bool
>> +
>>   config  ARCH_MSM_SCORPION
>>   	bool
>>   
>> @@ -75,6 +89,7 @@ config  MSM_VIC
>>   	bool
>>   
>>   menu "Qualcomm MSM Board Type"
>> +	depends on !ARCH_MSM_DT
>>   
>>   config MACH_HALIBUT
>>   	depends on ARCH_MSM
>> @@ -122,6 +137,7 @@ config MSM_SMD
>>   
>>   config MSM_GPIOMUX
>>   	bool
>> +	depends on !ARCH_MSM_DT
>>   	help
>>   	  Support for MSM V1 TLMM GPIOMUX architecture.
>
> All of the above should be in a separate patch and motivated.
>
>>   
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-msm/Makefile b/arch/arm/mach-msm/Makefile
>> index d257ff4..80e3b15 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-msm/Makefile
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-msm/Makefile
>> @@ -29,5 +29,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MSM7X30) += board-msm7x30.o devices-msm7x30.o
>>   obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QSD8X50) += board-qsd8x50.o devices-qsd8x50.o
>>   obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MSM8X60) += board-dt-8660.o
>>   obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MSM8960) += board-dt-8960.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MSM8974) += board-dt-8974.o
>>   obj-$(CONFIG_MSM_GPIOMUX) += gpiomux.o
>>   obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QSD8X50) += gpiomux-8x50.o
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-msm/board-dt-8974.c b/arch/arm/mach-msm/board-dt-8974.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..01ed8d0
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-msm/board-dt-8974.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
>> +/* Copyright (c) 2013, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 and
>> + * only version 2 as published by the Free Software Foundation.
>> + *
>> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
>> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
>> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
>> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
>> +#include <asm/mach/arch.h>
>> +
>> +static const char * const msm8974_dt_match[] __initconst = {
>> +	"qcom,msm8974",
>> +	"qcom,apq8074",
>> +	NULL
>> +};
>> +
>> +DT_MACHINE_START(MSM8974_DT, "Qualcomm MSM (Flattened Device Tree)")
>> +	.dt_compat = msm8974_dt_match,
>> +MACHINE_END
> This file should be shared across SoCs. You should avoid adding a new dt board
> file for every SoC like this.

Will club these changes with the ARCH_MSM_DT seperation and send that 
out as a precursor patch to 8074 support.
>
> -Olof


Thanks,
Rohit Vaswani

-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

  reply	other threads:[~2013-09-09 17:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-06 19:32 [PATCHv3 1/2] ARM: msm: Add support for APQ8074 Dragonboard Rohit Vaswani
2013-09-06 19:32 ` Rohit Vaswani
2013-09-06 19:32 ` [PATCHv3 2/2] defconfig: msm_defconfig: Enable CONFIG_ARCH_MSM8974 Rohit Vaswani
2013-09-06 19:32   ` Rohit Vaswani
2013-09-06 19:53 ` [PATCHv3 1/2] ARM: msm: Add support for APQ8074 Dragonboard Josh Cartwright
2013-09-06 19:53   ` Josh Cartwright
2013-09-06 20:31   ` [PATCH] ARM: msm: Remove irqs-*.h files for DT based targets Stephen Boyd
2013-09-06 20:31     ` Stephen Boyd
2013-09-06 20:50     ` Stephen Boyd
2013-09-06 20:50       ` Stephen Boyd
2013-09-06 20:55     ` Josh Cartwright
2013-09-06 20:55       ` Josh Cartwright
2013-09-06 21:50 ` [PATCHv3 1/2] ARM: msm: Add support for APQ8074 Dragonboard Olof Johansson
2013-09-06 21:50   ` Olof Johansson
2013-09-09 17:48   ` Rohit Vaswani [this message]
2013-09-09 17:48     ` Rohit Vaswani
2013-09-09 19:17     ` Kumar Gala
2013-09-09 19:17       ` Kumar Gala
2013-09-09 19:29       ` Stephen Warren
2013-09-09 19:29         ` Stephen Warren
2013-09-09 19:48         ` Kumar Gala
2013-09-09 19:48           ` Kumar Gala
2013-09-09 21:21           ` Stephen Warren
2013-09-09 21:21             ` Stephen Warren
2013-09-09 21:25             ` Kumar Gala
2013-09-09 21:25               ` Kumar Gala
2013-09-09 21:42               ` Rohit Vaswani
2013-09-09 21:42                 ` Rohit Vaswani
2013-09-09 22:04                 ` Kumar Gala
2013-09-09 22:04                   ` Kumar Gala
2013-09-09 22:30                   ` Rohit Vaswani
2013-09-09 22:30                     ` Rohit Vaswani

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=522E09E6.8040300@codeaurora.org \
    --to=rvaswani@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=bryanh@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=davidb@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dwalker@fifo99.com \
    --cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=olof@lixom.net \
    --cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
    --cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
    --cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.